The Effect of Cooperative Learning: University Example

Year 2016, Volume: 16 Issue: 64, 0 - 0, 15.07.2016

Busra Tombak , Sertel Altun

Abstract

Problem Statement: Motivation is a significant component of success in education, and it is best achieved by constructivist learning methods, especially cooperative Learning (CL). CL is a popular method among primary and secondary schools, but it is rarely used in higher education due to the large numbers of students and time restrictions. The literature does not give much space to the use of CL and its motivational effects. This study aimed to fill this gap in the literature and practice. Purpose of the Study: This study sought to investigate the effects of CL on students’ motivation and student products at university level. Method: With an implementation of CL at a university, this study was performed with mixed-method techniques. Jigsaw and Team-GameTournament techniques were implemented in two sections of a selective course at a state university in Istanbul, Turkey to outline the motivational effects of CL on students between the ages of 18 and 25. To reach more satisfying results, a mixed methodology was used and pre- and postmotivation questionnaires were supported with document analysis of students’ products. Findings: The study showed that the university level is not a hazardous place to implement CL. On the contrary, it is a fruitful level to see positive motivational effects. Both the qualitative and quantitative data supported the positive effect of CL on students’ motivation and cooperative learning strategies. Conclusion and Recommendations: Based on the findings, it could be asserted that CL is effective on students’ motivation and cooperative learning strategies. Especially for students at faculties of education, the use of CL was rather generous in terms of their own learning. As their profession involves teaching how to learn, it is important that they know the specific path.Keywords: Cooperative Learning, motivation, teacher training, higher education. 

References

• Adu, E. O., & Galloway, G. (2015). The effects of cooperative learning on students’
• economics achievement and attitude towards economics. Journal of Economics,
• (1), 30-36.
• Ahmadpanah, M., Soheili, S., Jahangard, L., Bajoghli, H., Haghighi, M., HolsboerTrachsler,
• E., & Keikhavandi, S. (2014). Cooperative learning improves social
• skills and knowledge of science topics in pre-adolescent children in
• Iran. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(8), 1029-1037.
• Altun, S. & Erden, M. (2007). Ogrenmede motive edici stratejiler olceginin gecerlik ve
• guvenilirlik çalismasi. Edu7, 2(3), 1-16.
• Artut, P. D., & Tarim, K. (2007). The effectiveness of Jigsaw II on prospective
• elementary school teachers. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 129-
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and
• functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
• Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed). Boston,
• MA: Pearson.
• Bergman, M. M. (2011). The good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research
• and design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 271-275.
• Bunrasi, J. B. T. (2012). Algebra I achievement of eighth grade mexican american students
• using cooperative learning versus traditional instruction. Doctoral dissertation,
• Walden University.
• Buyukozturk, S. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabi: Istatistik, arastirma
• deseni SPSS uygulamalari ve yorum. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Cadima, J., Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., & Buyse, E. (2015). Child engagement in the
• transition to school: Contributions of self-regulation, teacher–child
• relationships and classroom climate. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32(1),
• -12.
• Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel arastirma surecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem
• Academy.
• Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic
• incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological
• Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008.
• Chan, K. W. (2014). Cooperative learning in a Hong Kong primary school:
• perceptions, problems and accommodation. Intercultural Education, 25(3), 216-
• Cherry, K. (2015,nd ). Theories of motivation in psychology. Retrieved March 19, 2015,
• from http://psychology.about.com/od/psychologytopics/tp/theories-ofmotivation.htm
• Chow, S. J., & Yong, B. C. S. (2013). Secondary School Students' Motivation and
• Achievement in Combined Science. Online Submission, 3(4), 213-228.
• Clark, N. M., Gong, M., & Kaciroti, N. (2014). A model of self-regulation for control
• of chronic disease. Health Education & Behavior, 41(5), 499-508.
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods
• research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
• Cubukcu, Z. (2012). The effect of hidden curriculum on character education process
• of primary school students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(2),
• -1534.
• Dandy, K., & Bendersky, K. (2014). Student and faculty beliefs about learning in
• higher education: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Teaching &
• Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 358-380.
• de Vries, S., van de Grift, W. J., & Jansen, E. P. (2014). How teachers’ beliefs about
• learning and teaching relate to their continuing professional development.
• Teachers and Teaching, 20(3), 338-357.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of
• Social Psychology, 1(1), 416-433.
• Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: The
• self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
• Retrieved November 21, 2011, from
• http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
• Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice a research paradigm for the mixed
• methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270-283.
• Deutsch, M. (1949). An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and
• competition upon group process. Human relations, 2(3), 199-231.
• Freiberger, V., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Competence beliefs and perceived
• ability evaluations: How do they contribute to intrinsic motivation and
• achievement?. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 518-522.
• Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2013).
• Longitudinal pathways from math intrinsic motivation and achievement to
• math course accomplishments and educational attainment. Journal of Research
• on Educational Effectiveness, 6(1), 68-92.
• Hancock, D. (2004). Cooperative learning and peer orientation effects on motivation
• and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 159-168.
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York: State
• University of New York Press.
• Hennessey, A., & Dionigi, R. A. (2013). Implementing cooperative learning in
• Australian primary schools: Generalist teachers' perspectives. Issues in
• Educational Research, 23(1), 52-68.
• Jobs, S. (2005). The only way to do great work is to love what you do. Retrieved from
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odEfLZ9HMZ8
• John, K. K., & Ng’eno, J. K. (2014). Effects of cooperative mastery learning approach
• on students’ motivation to learn chemistry by gender. Journal of Education and
• Practice, 5(8), 91-97.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in 21st century. Anales
• de Psicología, 30(3), 841-851.
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research
• paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
• Karacop, A., Doymus, K., Dogan, A., & Koc, Y. (2009). Ogrencilerin akademik
• basarilarina bilgisayar bnimasyonlari ve jigsaw tekniginin etkisi. Gazi Egitim
• Fakultesi Dergisi, 29(1), 211-235.
• Keramati, M. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement of
• physics course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29(2),
• -173.
• Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement,
• and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading
• and Writing, 28(2), 239-269.
• Koutselini, M. (2008). Teacher misconceptions and understanding of cooperative
• learning: An intervention study. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 43(2) 34-
• Kus, M., Filiz, E., & Altun, S. (2014). Teacher and student thoughts on effectiveness of
• cooperative learning in geography teaching. Educational Research and
• Reviews, 9(11), 312-319.
• Lee, W. & Reeve, J. (2012). Teachers' estimates of their students' motivation and
• engagement: Being in synch with students. Educational Psychology, 32(6), 727-
• Lei, S. A. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Evaluating benefits and
• drawbacks from college instructors' perspectives. Journal of Instructional
• Psychology, 37(2), 153.
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics II. Channels of group life; social
• planning and action research. Human relations, 1(2), 143-153.
• Martin, A. J. (2012). High school motivation and engagement: Gender and age
• effects. Online Submission, 1-7. Retrieved from
• http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532692.pdf
• Martin, A. J., Yu, K., & Hau, K. T. (2014). Motivation and engagement in the ‘Asian
• Century’: a comparison of Chinese students in Australia, Hong Kong, and
• Mainland China. Educational Psychology, 34(4), 417-439.
• Martin, M. R., & Pickett, M. T. (2013). The effects of differentiated instruction on
• motivation and engagement in fifth-grade gifted math and music students.
• Online Submission, Master of Arts Action Research Project, Saint Xavier
• University, 1-92. Retrieved from
• http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541341.pdf
• Maslow, A., & Herzeberg, A. (1954). Hierarchy of needs. AH Maslow. ea., Motivation
• and Personality. Harper, New York.
• Nakiboglu, C. (2001). Maddenin yapisi unitesinin isbirlikli ogrenme yontemi
• kullanilarak kimya ögretmen adaylarina ogretilmesinin ogrenci basarisina
• etkisi. Gazi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 21(3), 131-143.
• Nichols, J. D., & Hall, N. (1996). The effects of cooperative learning on student
• achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Contemporary
• Education, 21(1), 467-476.
• Nichols, J. D., & Miller, R. B. (1994). Cooperative learning and student
• motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(2), 167-178.
• Ning, H., & Hornby, G. (2014). The impact of cooperative learning on tertiary EFL
• learners’ motivation. Educational Review, 66(1), 108-124.
• Obenland, C. A., Munson, A. H., & Hutchinson, J. S. (2012). Silent students'
• participation in a large active learning science classroom. Journal of College
• Science Teaching, 42(2), 90-98.
• Orora, W., Keraro, F. N., & Wachanga, S. W. (2014). Using cooperative e-learning
• teaching strategy to enhance students’ creativity in secondary school biology:
• A study of selected schools in Nakuru County, Kenya. International Journal of
• Education and Practice, 2(6), 137-146.
• Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in
• mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational
• Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.
• Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional
• versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749-771.
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning
• components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational
• psychology, 82(1), 33.
• Ray, N. L. (1992). Motivation in education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
• Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED349298), 1-27.
• Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED349298.pdf
• Ray, P. S., Leeper, J., & Amini, M. O. (2014). Proceedings from ASEE-E ’14: Effects of
• cooperative learning as a teaching method for an introductory course in
• engineering statistics. Macon, GA: USA.
• Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (2009). The role
• of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative
• learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 1195-1206. Retrieved March 7,
• Rowell, L., & Hong, E. (2013). Academic motivation: Concepts, strategies, and
• counseling approaches. Professional School Counseling, 16(3), 158-171.
• Ruan, Y., Duan, X., & Du, X. Y. (2015). Tasks and learner motivation in learning
• Chinese as a foreign language. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(2), 170-
• Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
• intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American
• Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
• Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (1991). A Motivational Approach to self: Integration in
• personality. In Diensthier, R. A. (Ed.), Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288).
• Nebraska: The University of Nebraska Press.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic
• definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-
• Sahin, A. (2011). Effects of Jigsaw III technique on achievement in written
• expression. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(3), 427-435.
• Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2014, January). Cognition, affect, and self‐regulation.
• In Affect and cognition: 17th annual carnegie mellon symposium on cognition (pp.
• . Psychology Press.
• Seyler, D. L., Holton III, E. F., Bates, R. A., Burnett, M. F., & Carvalho, M. A. (1998).
• Factors affecting motivation to transfer training. International Journal of
• Training and Development, 2(1), 2-16.
• Simoneau, H., & Bergeron, J. (2003). Factors affecting motivation during the first six
• weeks of treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 28(7), 1219-1241.
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal
• effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school
• year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
• Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning: Student teams. What research says to the teacher.
• Washington: National Education Association.
• Tarhan, L., Ayyildiz, Y., Ogunc, A., & Sesen, B. A. (2013). A jigsaw cooperative
• learning application in elementary science and technology lessons: Physical
• and chemical changes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 184-
• Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., &
• Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school
• achievement over time: the unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary
• Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342-358.
• Temiz, T., & Topcu, M. S. (2013). Preservice teachers’ teacher efficacy beliefs and
• constructivist-based teaching practice. European Journal of Psychology of
• Education, 28(4), 1435-1452.
• Thompson, V. C. (1987). Methodologies to motivate students. Abstract. Retrieved from
• http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED296955
• Topping, K. J., Thurston, A., Tolmie, A., Christie, D., Murray, P., & Karagiannidou, E.
• (2011). Cooperative learning in science: Intervention in the secondary school.
• Research in Science & Technological Education, 29(1), 91-106.
• Tran, V. D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement
• and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131-
• Unrau, N. J., & Quirk, M. (2014). Reading motivation and reading engagement:
• clarifying commingled conceptions. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 260-284.
• Wadsworth, B. J. (1996). Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development:
• Foundations of constructivism . London: Longman Publishing.
• Wiggins, G. P. &, McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA:
• Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara:
• Seckin Publishing.
• Zhao, D. B., Dou, Z. Y., & Kong, Q. M. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning on
• college students' personality and mentality in their taking tennis as an
• optional course. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University (Social Sciences
• Edition), 5(1), 604-607.
• Zhou, H. (2012). Enhancing non-english majors’ EFL motivation through cooperative
• learning. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12(1), 1317-1323.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary
• Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.
• Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., & Hawley, L. R. (2014). Support, belonging,
• motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method
• study. Instructional Science, 42(5), 661-684.