Potential of Geospatial Technologies in Mechanized Timber Harvesting Planning
Abstract
Mechanized timber harvesting involves various activities including road planning, and selection of harvesting systems and machineries. The emergence of geospatial technology (GSPT) i.e., geographical information system (GIS) and remote sensing in the recent decades, has been considered as the best tools to facilitate timber harvesting planning in plantation forests. GSPT provide accurate stand information enabling better decision-making and optimizing forest operations. This study was conducted at Sao hill Forest Plantation (SHFP) in Tanzania, with the objective of determining relative efficiency (RE) between geospatial approach (GSPA) and conventional approach (CA) on planning mechanized timber harvesting. 120 grapple skidders (GS) in 30 sample plots within different elevation terrain ranges were studied with time study observations in both approaches. Productivity and costs under the two approaches were estimated and modelled using generalized linear model (GLM) approach. To obtain large scale estimates of productivity and costs, Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation approach was used. The results showed that, GSPA demonstrated higher productivity and lower unit skidding costs (i.e., 71.1 m3/hr and 2.121 USD/m3) compared to CA (i.e., 67.5 m3/hr and 2.914 USD/m3) respectively. Skidding distance and slope (p-value < 0.05) were significant predictors of the GS performance in both approaches. The pseudo R2 ranging from 58.1% to 64.3% under CA, and from 62.9% to 60.8% under GSPA. Likewise, relative root mean square error (RMSEr) for the models under CA ranged from 49.3% to 50.4% and 33.4% to 35.2% under GSPA. Generally, the results showed that, models under GSPA have better fits and accuracy, compared to CA. Furthermore, the GSPA provided a raster representation of productivity and costs over the entire study area. Moreover, computed RE values (i.e., 1.18 and 6.17) indicated that parameter estimates for the GS productivity and costs were more precise in geospatial models (GSPM) compared to conventional models (CM). These findings highlight the potential of GSPT for an efficient large scale timber harvesting planning, by considering terrain constraints.
Keywords
Convectional, Geospatial, Grapple skidder, Productivity, Costs, Relative efficiency
Project Number
NONE
References
- Agüera-Vega, F., Agüera-Puntas, M., Martínez-Carricondo, P., Mancini, F., Carvajal, F. 2020. Effects of point cloud density, interpolation method and grid size on derived Digital Terrain Model accuracy at micro topography level Effects of point cloud density, interpolation method and grid topography level. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(21):8281-8299.https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161. 2020.1771788
- Banaś, J., Utnik-Banaś, K., Zięba, S., Janeczko, K. 2021. Assessing the technical efficiency of timber production during the transition from a production-oriented management model to a multifunctional one: A case from Poland 1990–2019. Forests, 12(9):1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091287
- Bettinger, P., Sessions, J., Boston, K. 2009. A review of the status and use of validation procedures for heuristics used in forest planning. International Journal of Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-ResourceSciences, 1(1):13.
- Borz, S. A., Ignea, G., Popa, B., Iordache, E., Spârchez, G. 2015. Estimating time consumption and productivity of roundwood skidding in group shelterwood system – a case study in a broadleaved mixed stand located in reduced accessibility conditions. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 36(1):137-146.
- Bredström, D., Jönsson, P., Rönnqvist, M. 2010. Annual planning of harvesting resources in the forest industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, 17(2):155–177.
- Çalişkan, E., Karahalil, U. 2017. Evaluation of Forest Road network and determining timber extraction system using GIS: A case study ˇ planning unit in Anbardag Planning Unit. Šumarski List, 383(001):163–171.
- Conrad, J.L., Bolding, M. C., Aust, W.M., Smith, R.L., Horcher, A. 2013. Harvesting productivity and costs when utilizing energywood from pine plantations of the southern Coastal Plain USA. Biomass and Bioenergy, 52:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biombioe.2013.02.038
- Conway, S. 1986. Logging Practice, Principles of Timber Harvesting System. Miller Freeman, USA. 416 pp.
- Đuka, A., Porsinsky, T., Vusic, D. 2015. DTM models to enhance planning of timber harvesting. Glasnik Sumarskog Fakulteta, suppl., 35-44. https://doi.org/ 10.2298/gsf15s1035d
- James, G., Witten, D., Tibshirani, R., Hastie, T. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R (Springer. (ed.). Springer.
