Insights on motor-manual tree felling in Germany, recent developments to ensure efficient operations in singletree selection harvest

Year 2021, , 39 - 44, 30.06.2021

Stephan Hoffmann , Dirk Jaeger

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.953226

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Despite an intensive mechanization trend in German forest operations since the early 1990s, many sites restrict the efficient implementation of fully mechanized harvesting systems. Trafficability and singletree selection harvest-based silviculture, focusing on high stem volume broadleaves, such as European beech, are the main limitations. Thus, motor-manual operations are still prevalent but need to be adapted to stay efficient and improve safety in a changing work environment. Recent developments of new felling techniques and aiding tools and advances in training and work organization improved occupational health and safety. Also, these achievements help to avoid log devaluation due to felling damages. The general digitalization trend did not ignore motor-manual operations either. Smartphone applications can already contribute to more efficient bucking, operation planning and fleet management. Yet, motor-manual operations will remain cost-intensive, and expose worker directly to occupational hazards. Therefore, operations should take as much advantage of mechanized systems as possible for feasible and applicable silvicultural objectives.

Keywords

Occupational health and safety, forest worker, felling equipment, digitalization

References

• Axelsson, S.-Å., 1998. The Mechanization of Logging Operations in Sweden and its Effect on Occupational Safety and Health. International Journal of Forest Engineering 9(2):25–31. DOI: 10.1080/08435243.1998.10702715
• Berendt, F., Fortin, M., Jaeger, D., Schweier, J., 2017. How Climate Change Will Affect Forest Composition and Forest Operations in Baden-Württemberg—A GIS-Based Case Study Approach. Forests 8(8):298. DOI: 10.3390/f8080298
• BMBF (Ed.), 2005. Berufsbildungsgesetz. BBiG, revised 7/17/2017. Edited by Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bbig_2005/BBiG.pdf (Accessed: 19 November 2019)
• BMEL (Ed.), 2017. Waldbericht der Bundesregierung 2017. Edited by Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. Bonn.
• BMEL (Ed.), 2019. Forstwirtschaft in Deutschland. Edited by Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. https://www.forstwirtschaft-in-deutschland.de/forstwirtschaft/forstwirtschaft-in-deutschland/ (Accessed: 16 November 2019).
• DGUV (Ed.), 2014. Sichere Waldarbeiten. Edited by Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfall Versicherung (DGUV Informationen, 214-046). Berlin
• Eber, J., 2019. Motorsäge und App. Forst und Technik (7):20–23.
• EFESC (Ed.), 2017. EFESC Handbook. Edited by European Forestry and Environmental Skills Council, KWF Groß-Umstadt/Germany. https://efesc.org/wp-content/uploads/12_EFESC_Handbook_Nov_2017-1.pdf (Accessed: 19 November 2019).
• Erber, G., Stelzer, S., Stampfer, K., 2021. Evaluation of a novel mobile device app for value-maximized bucking by chainsaw. International Journal of Forest Engineering (online first). DOI:10.1080/14942119.2021.1927362
• European Parliament and Council, 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/425 of the European Parliament and of the Council on personal protective equipment. EU/2016/425. Official Journal of the European Union (L81/51). FAO (Ed.), 1980. Chainsaws in Tropical Forests. Edited by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 96 p.
• Forstwirtschaft in Deutschland (Ed.), 2019. Der Forstwirt: Ausbildung und Arbeit. https://www.forstwirtschaft-in-deutschland.de/forstwirtschaft/arbeitgeber-forstwirtschaft/forstwirt-in/ (Accessed: 19 November 2019). FOVEA, 2019. Digitale Holzvermessung. https://www.fovea.eu/ (Accessed: 21 November 2019).
• FSC (Ed.), 2018. Deutscher FSC-Standard 3-0. 2nd ed. Edited by Forest Stewardship Council Deutschland. Freiburg. https://www.fsc-deutschland.de/preview.fsc-waldstandard-3-0.a-1207.pdf (Accessed: 17 November 2019).
• Haim, G., 2009. Von der Fällmaschine zur modernen Motorsäge. Wald und Holz 83(9):51–54.
• Hartfiel, J., 2003. Arbeitsschutzausrüstung gestern und heute. Eine Entwicklungsgeschichte. Wald und Holz 84(8):64–67.
• Hartmann, H., 2007. Funktionelle Bekleidung hält Einzug in den Forstbetrieben. Bündnerwald 60(2):16–19.
• Höllerl, H., 2014. Kurbeln statt klopfen. Forst und Technik (12):14–18.
• Höllerl, H., 2017a. Einspritzsäge. Forst und Technik (11):70.
• Höllerl, H., 2017b. KuNo kabellos. Forst und Technik (11):69.
• Husqvarna, 2019. Husqvarna Fleet Services. https://www.husqvarna.com/de/rasen-garten/profi/fleetservices/ (Accessed: 19 November 2019).
• John Deere, 2019. TimberMatic™ Maps TimberManager™. Edited by Deere & Company. https://www.deere.co.uk/assets/publications/index.html?id=bd2a8bf9#1 (Accessed: 21 November 2019).
• Kieser, W., 2009. Fällen mit Seilwinde leicht gemacht! Forst und Technik (5): 2–5.
• Labelle, E.R., Bergen, M., Windisch, J., 2017. The effect of quality bucking and automatic bucking on harvesting productivity and product recovery in a pine-dominated stand. European Journal of Forest Research. 136(4):639–652. DOI:10.1007/s10342-017-1061-4
• Marchi, E., Chung, W., Visser, R., Abbas, D., Nordfjell, T., Mederski, P.S., McEwan, A., Brink, M., Laschi, A., 2018. Sustainable Forest Operations (SFO): A new paradigm in a changing world and climate. The Science of the total Environment 634:1385–1397. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.084
• Müller, F., Jaeger, D., Hanewinkel, M., 2019. Digitization in wood supply – A review on how Industry 4.0 will change the forest value chain. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 162:206–218. DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.002
• Nds. Landesforsten, 2014. Fällheber Terminator. Im Praxistest bewährt. Forst und Technik (7):6.
• Ruppert, D., 2000. Einsatz von hydraulischen Fällhilfen. Forsttechnische Informationen (5+7):49–50.
• Schmidt-Baum, T., 2008. Konzepte für Rettungsketten in Waldarbeitssystemen. 1st Edition, Cuvillier, Göttingen. 282 p.
• Schraitle, M., 2018. Geolokalisation der Erntebäume in naturverjüngungsreichen Beständen mit LogBuch. Hochschule für Forstwirtschaft, B.Sc. Thesis, Rottenburg.
• Sotirov, M., Blum, M., Storch, S., Selter, A., Schraml, U. 2017. Do forest policy actors learn through forward-thinking? Conflict and cooperation relating to the past, present and futures of sustainable forest management in Germany. Forest Policy and Economics 85:256–268. DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.11.011
• STIHL, 2018. Annual Report 2018. Tradition and Transformation. Edited by STIHL Holding AG & Co. KG. Waiblingen. https://ar2018.stihl.com/downloads/STIHL_AnnualReport2018_EN_Web.pdf (Accessed: 19 November 2019).
• STIHL, 2019. STIHL Smart Connector. Produkte intelligent vernetzen. Edited by STIHL Holding AG & Co. KG. https://www.stihl.de/STIHL-Produkte/Smarte-L%C3%B6sungen/287476-93994/Produkte-intelligent-vernetzen.aspx (Accessed: 16 November 2019).
• SVLFG (Ed.), 2017. Waldarbeit. Aktuelles zu Sicherheit und Gesundheitsschutz. Edited by Sozialversicherung für Landwirtschaft, Forsten und Gartenbau, Kassel. 87 p.
• Thöny, P., 2007. The History of the Chainsaw. https://www.waldwissen.net/lernen/forstgeschichte/wsl_geschichte_motorsaege/index_EN (Accessed: 21 November 2019).
• Tschannen, W. 2013. Ferdi Nussbaumer und sein „Raup-Trac“. Der 1-Maschinen-Forstunternehmer. Wald und Holz (8):51–53.
• Volmer, J. 2018. Fach-Seminar in Neheim führt bewährte Praxis und neue Ideen zusammen. Forsttechnische Informationen 70(6):5–6.
• Wiese, P. 2019. Akkugeräte im Forst. Forst und Technik (9):20–25.