Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection
Abstract
Keywords
References
- Christenson RH, Tucker JA, Allen E. Results of Dipstick Tests, Visual Inspection, Microscopic Examination of Urine Sediment, and Microbiological Cultures of Urine Compared for Simplifying Urinalysis Clin Chem 1985; 31: 448-50.
- Lammers RL, Gibson S, Kovacs D, Sears W, Strachan G. Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points. Ann Emerg Med November 2001; 38:505-12.
- Walter FG, Knopp RK. Urine sampling in ambulatory wom- en: midstream clean catch versus catheterization. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:166-72.
- Güner G. Tanısal Yeterlilik Testleri. In: Taga Y, Aslan D, Güner G, Kutay FZ, editors. Tıbbi Laboratuvarlarda Standardizasyon ve Kalite Yönetimi, Türk Biyokimya Derneği, 2002: 106-123.
- Whiting P, Westwood M, Watt I, Cooper J, Kleijnen J. Rapid tests and urine sampling techniques for the diag- nosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review. BMC Pediatrics 2005, 5:4.
- Wenk RE, Dutta D, Rudert K, et al. Sediment microscopy, nitriteuria and leukocyte esteraseuria as predictors of significant bacteriuria. J Clin Lab Automation 1982; 2: 117-21.
- Wilkins EGL, Ratcliffe JG, Roberts C. Leucocyte- esterasenitrite screening method for pyuria and bacteri- uria. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 1342-5.
- Smalley DL, Dittman AN. Use of leukocyte-esterase-ni- trate activity as predictive assays of significant bacteri- uria. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 1256-7.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Ramazan Memişoğulları
This is me
Hatice Yüksel
This is me
Hayriye Ak Yıldırım
This is me
Özlem Yavuz
This is me
Publication Date
June 1, 2010
Submission Date
April 27, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2010 Volume: 7 Number: 2