BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 174 - 178, 01.06.2010
https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Christenson RH, Tucker JA, Allen E. Results of Dipstick Tests, Visual Inspection, Microscopic Examination of Urine Sediment, and Microbiological Cultures of Urine Compared for Simplifying Urinalysis Clin Chem 1985; 31: 448-50.
  • Lammers RL, Gibson S, Kovacs D, Sears W, Strachan G. Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points. Ann Emerg Med November 2001; 38:505-12.
  • Walter FG, Knopp RK. Urine sampling in ambulatory wom- en: midstream clean catch versus catheterization. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:166-72.
  • Güner G. Tanısal Yeterlilik Testleri. In: Taga Y, Aslan D, Güner G, Kutay FZ, editors. Tıbbi Laboratuvarlarda Standardizasyon ve Kalite Yönetimi, Türk Biyokimya Derneği, 2002: 106-123.
  • Whiting P, Westwood M, Watt I, Cooper J, Kleijnen J. Rapid tests and urine sampling techniques for the diag- nosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review. BMC Pediatrics 2005, 5:4.
  • Wenk RE, Dutta D, Rudert K, et al. Sediment microscopy, nitriteuria and leukocyte esteraseuria as predictors of significant bacteriuria. J Clin Lab Automation 1982; 2: 117-21.
  • Wilkins EGL, Ratcliffe JG, Roberts C. Leucocyte- esterasenitrite screening method for pyuria and bacteri- uria. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 1342-5.
  • Smalley DL, Dittman AN. Use of leukocyte-esterase-ni- trate activity as predictive assays of significant bacteri- uria. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 1256-7.
  • Maskell R. Urinary tract infection in clinical and labora- tory practice. London: Edward Arnold, 1988.
  • Bradley N, Watkins S. Survey of equipment in general practice. Br Med J 1989; 299: 435-8.
  • Ditchburn RK, Ditchburn JS. A study of microscopical and chemical tests for the rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infections in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1990; 40: 406-8.

Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 174 - 178, 01.06.2010
https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU

Öz

-

Kaynakça

  • Christenson RH, Tucker JA, Allen E. Results of Dipstick Tests, Visual Inspection, Microscopic Examination of Urine Sediment, and Microbiological Cultures of Urine Compared for Simplifying Urinalysis Clin Chem 1985; 31: 448-50.
  • Lammers RL, Gibson S, Kovacs D, Sears W, Strachan G. Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points. Ann Emerg Med November 2001; 38:505-12.
  • Walter FG, Knopp RK. Urine sampling in ambulatory wom- en: midstream clean catch versus catheterization. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:166-72.
  • Güner G. Tanısal Yeterlilik Testleri. In: Taga Y, Aslan D, Güner G, Kutay FZ, editors. Tıbbi Laboratuvarlarda Standardizasyon ve Kalite Yönetimi, Türk Biyokimya Derneği, 2002: 106-123.
  • Whiting P, Westwood M, Watt I, Cooper J, Kleijnen J. Rapid tests and urine sampling techniques for the diag- nosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review. BMC Pediatrics 2005, 5:4.
  • Wenk RE, Dutta D, Rudert K, et al. Sediment microscopy, nitriteuria and leukocyte esteraseuria as predictors of significant bacteriuria. J Clin Lab Automation 1982; 2: 117-21.
  • Wilkins EGL, Ratcliffe JG, Roberts C. Leucocyte- esterasenitrite screening method for pyuria and bacteri- uria. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 1342-5.
  • Smalley DL, Dittman AN. Use of leukocyte-esterase-ni- trate activity as predictive assays of significant bacteri- uria. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 1256-7.
  • Maskell R. Urinary tract infection in clinical and labora- tory practice. London: Edward Arnold, 1988.
  • Bradley N, Watkins S. Survey of equipment in general practice. Br Med J 1989; 299: 435-8.
  • Ditchburn RK, Ditchburn JS. A study of microscopical and chemical tests for the rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infections in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1990; 40: 406-8.
Toplam 11 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Yazarlar

Ramazan Memişoğulları Bu kişi benim

Hatice Yüksel Bu kişi benim

Hayriye Ak Yıldırım Bu kişi benim

Özlem Yavuz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2010
IZ https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Memişoğulları, R., Yüksel, H., Yıldırım, H. A., & Yavuz, Ö. (2010). Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection. European Journal of General Medicine, 7(2), 174-178. https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU
AMA 1.Memişoğulları R, Yüksel H, Yıldırım H A, Yavuz Ö. Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection. European Journal of General Medicine. 2010;7(2):174-178. https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU
Chicago Memişoğulları, Ramazan, Hatice Yüksel, Hayriye Ak Yıldırım, ve Özlem Yavuz. 2010. “Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection”. European Journal of General Medicine 7 (2): 174-78. https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU.
EndNote Memişoğulları R, Yüksel H, Yıldırım H A, Yavuz Ö (01 Haziran 2010) Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection. European Journal of General Medicine 7 2 174–178.
IEEE [1]R. Memişoğulları, H. Yüksel, H. A. Yıldırım, ve Ö. Yavuz, “Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection”, European Journal of General Medicine, c. 7, sy 2, ss. 174–178, Haz. 2010, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU
ISNAD Memişoğulları, Ramazan - Yüksel, Hatice - Yıldırım, Hayriye Ak - Yavuz, Özlem. “Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection”. European Journal of General Medicine 7/2 (01 Haziran 2010): 174-178. https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU.
JAMA 1.Memişoğulları R, Yüksel H, Yıldırım H A, Yavuz Ö. Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection. European Journal of General Medicine. 2010;7:174–178.
MLA Memişoğulları, Ramazan, vd. “Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection”. European Journal of General Medicine, c. 7, sy 2, Haziran 2010, ss. 174-8, https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU.
Vancouver 1.Ramazan Memişoğulları, Hatice Yüksel, Hayriye Ak Yıldırım, Özlem Yavuz. Performance characteristics of dipstick and microscopic urinalysis for diagnosis of urinary tract infection. European Journal of General Medicine [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2010;7(2):174-8. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA47WN22WU