Age of suspicion, identification and intervention for rural Indian children with hearing loss

Year 2010, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 97 - 102, 17.01.2013

Nachiketa Rout Uday Singh

Abstract

Abstract. It is crucial to understand factors which delay the commencement of aural habilitation in children. Alleviating the factors will help reducing the delay to an extent in a developing country like India where universal newborn hearing screening programs is yet to begin at a national level. The present study aims to find age of suspicion, identification and intervention availed for children with hearing loss who approached hearing evaluation camps conducted in rural West Bengal. Data was obtained from evaluation of 209 children with moderately severe to profound degree of hearing impairment, present with a complaint of not being able to speak and hear. The family members, mostly mothers, suspected hearing loss in the child at a mean age of 1.5 years when the children did not respond to name-call, clap and vehicle horns. However the parents consulted any doctor primarily a specialist by an average age of 2.4 years. As many as 21% of the doctors during the first visit assured the parents not to worry as the child would learn language with age and only 33.4 % were referred for aural rehabilitation. The average age at which children were brought to an audiologist for the first time was 9.3 years yet 95% of parents did not perceive delay in the initiation of aural rehabilitation. Children with mild to moderate degree of hearing loss and with unilateral hearing loss who account for 40% of the childhood hearing loss do not attend even rural camps. Factors like child rearing practices, ignorance about the importance of intact hearing sensitivity and critical age for speech development along with lack of aural rehabilitation services contributed to the delay in identification and habilitation.

Key words: Rural India, hearing impairment, identification and intervention

Keywords

Rural India, hearing impairment, identification and intervention

References

• Kumar S, D’Mello J. Identifying children at-risk for speech and hearing disorders: A preliminary study from Hyderabad, India. Asia Pacific Disability Journal 2006; 17: 101-108.
• National Sample Survey Organization. Hearing Impairment. Cited in: Rehabilitation Council of India. Status of Disability in India- 2003. New Delhi: Authors 1991; 122.
• Mann SB, Sharma SC, Gupta AK, et al. Incidence of hearing impairment among rural and urban school going children: a survey. Indian J Pediatr 1998; 65: 141-145.
• Kumar S. Deafness and its prevention- Indian scenario. Indian J Pediatr 1997; 64: 801-809.
• Goswami SP, Samasthitha S, Kumar S. ISHA Directory 2010. Mysore. Indian Speech and Hearing Association.
• Census of India, 2001. Government of India Ministry of home affairs, office of registrar general and census commissioner, India. www.censusindia.gov.in. dated 15.06.10.
• Sjoblad S, Harrison M, Roush J, Mc William RA. Parents’ reactions and recommendations after diagnosis and hearing aid fitting. AM J Audiol 2001; 10: 24-31.
• Ansari SM. Screening programme for hearing impairment in newborns: A challenge during rehabilitation for all. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal 2004; 15: 83-89.
• Bansal M, Berry B, Deka C. Early identification of hearing impairment in children in India a hospital- based prevalence study. Childhood Disability Update 2003; 3: 6-9.
• Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DR, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Paediatrics 1998; 102: 1161-1171.
• Moeller MP. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics 2000; 106: E43.
• Kennedy CR, Mc Cann DC, Campbell MJ, et al. Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Eng J Med 2006; 354: 2131-2141.
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for audiologists providing informational and adjustment counseling to families of infants and young children with hearing loss birth to 5 years of age (guidelines), 2008; www.asha.org/policy on 20.07.09.
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention, 2007; www.asha.org/policy on 13.09.09.
• Rout N, Parveen S, Chattopadhyay D, Kishore MT. Risk factors of hearing impairment in Indian children: a retrospective case-file study. Int J Rehabil Res 2008; 31: 293- 296.
• Davis JM, Elfenbe J, Schum R, Bentler RA. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 53–62.
• Banarjee A, Selvakumaran H, Kumar S, Chaterjee I, Kumar A. A study of nature of hearing impairment of children enrolled as children with special needs in Sarva sikhsa abhayan in the state of Bihar. J Rehabil Council of India 2007; 3: 72-79.
• Layton K. A survey of the distribution of information regarding hearing loss to parents by hospital and paediatricians in the St. Louis area. Unpublished dissertation in Master of Science in speech and hearing. Washington university. Washington 2001.
• Majumdar P, Sah VP. A study of awareness
• level on critical period of speech–language and hearing among parents of children with hearing impairment. Foresight 2008; 3: 20-30.
• Russ SA, Poulakis Z, Barker M etal. Epidermology of hearing loss in Victoria Australlia. Int J Audiology 2003; 42: 385-390.
• Durieux- Smith A, Fitzpatrik E & Whittingham J. Universal newborn hearing screening: A question of evidence 2008; 47: 1-10.