Understanding HIV epidemic in India: analyses of the HIV program data

Year 2011, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 99 - 106, 21.01.2013

Ruchi Sogarwal Damodar Bachani S. Venkatesh

Abstract

Abstract. We describe the current status of the human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) epidemic among adults in India. Analyses of data relating to HIV positive persons aged 15 to 49 years as reported to the national HIV/AIDS Reporting System from the major states provide trends in HIV prevalence based on sentinel surveillance from 2004 through 2008. Analyses reveal that the number of HIV positive pregnant women had increased from 8991 in 2005 to 20027 in 2008. Five states (Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Gujarat) contributed 17097 (85%) of 20027 positive pregnant women identified in the same year. Seropositvity among general clients and pregnant women has declined from 11.55% to 5.33% and 0.77% to 0.43% from year 2005 to 2008, respectively.  Five states of the southern and western region account for more than three-fourths of the volume of HIV infected persons. Government of India’s policy of categorizing districts and states based on prevalence and other program data appears justified. Study reveals success of NACP III in combating the HIV epidemic which is reflection of comprehensive evidence based planning which gives judicious focus on prevention but at the same time does not ignore care and treatment.

Key words: HIV/AIDS, epidemiology, sero-positivity, prevalence, India

Keywords

HIV/AIDS, epidemiology, sero-positivity, prevalence, India

References

• National AIDS Control Organization: HIV Sentinel Surveillance and HIV Estimation in India. A Technical Brief 2007. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
• HIV Fact sheets, HIV Sentinel Surveillance Data in India, National AIDS Control Organization, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2003-2006.
• Cohen J. HIV/AIDS. India slashes estimate of HIV-infected people. Science 2007; 317: 179-181.
• International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro: National Family Health Survey-3, 2005-06: India Mumbai: IIPS; 2006.
• Newmann S, Sarin P, Kumarasamy N, et al. Marriage, monogamy and HIV: a profile of HIV- infected women in south India. Int J STD AIDS 2000; 11: 250-253.
• Project Implementation Plan for National AIDS Control Programme Phase-III, 2007 Government of India, New Delhi.
• Dandona L, Lakshmi V, Kumar GA, Dandona R. Is the HIV burden in India being overestimated? BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 308.
• Kumar R, Jha P, Arora P, et al. Trends in HIV-1 in young adults in south India from 2000 to 2004: a prevalence study. Lancet 2006; 367: 1164-1172.
• Rodrigues JJ, Mehendale SM, Shepherd ME, et al. Risk factors for HIV infection in people attending clinics for sexually transmitted diseases in India. BMJ 1995; 311: 283-286.
• Computerized Information Management System (CMIS) of National AIDS Control Organization; December 2008.
• Bachani D, Sogarwal R, Rao KS. A Population Based Survey on HIV Prevalence in Nagaland, India. SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases and HIV/AIDS 2009; 6: 1-11.
• UNAIDS (2009). HIV-related Stigma and Discrimination: A Summary of Recent Literature. Geneva, UNAIDS, August, 2009. http://data.unaids.org/pub/Report/2009/20091130_ stigmasummary_en.pdf
• Claeson M, Alexander A. Tackling HIV in India: evidence-based priority setting and programming. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27: 1091-1102.
• Rao JV, Ganguly NK, Mehendale SM, Bollinger RC. India's response to the HIV epidemic. Lancet 2004; 364: 1296-1297.