Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bir Tekstil Fabrikasının Karbon Ayak İzinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2021, , 146 - 150, 31.12.2021

Yusuf Başoğul , Taha Tuna Göksu , Mehmet Fırat Baran

https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1006302

Abstract

Artan sera gazlarının çevreye etkisinin araştırılmasında en önemli faktör ve parametrelerden biri karbon ayak izidir. Dünya genelinde kişi bazlı indirilmeye veya azaltılmaya çalışılan bu parametre için fabrikalar ve özellikle de tekstil fabrikaları büyük önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Adıyaman ilinde faaliyet gösteren bir tekstil fabrikasının karbon ayak izi değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır. Verileri toplama ve değerlendirme tekniklerinin başında gelen ve çalışmaya uygunluğu da gözlemlenen Tier-1 metodu karbon ayak izi değerlendirmesinde kullanılmıştır. Tekstil fabrikasının servis aracı/dizel tüketimi, doğal gaz tüketimi, elektrik tüketimi, atık su bazlı faktörleri sırasıyla 5,475 lt/yıl-dizel, 55,200 m3, 456,000 kWh/yıl, 4,900 m3 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Belirtilen veriler tekstil fabrikasının 300 gün için çalıştığı farz edilip reel verilerle hesaplanmıştır. Tier-1 metoduna uygun olarak yapılan hesaplamalar sonucunda tekstil fabrikasının karbon ayak izi 297,343 ton CO2/yıl olarak hesaplanmıştır. Burada en önemli etkiyi elektrik tüketimi gösterirken en az etkiyi ise atık su göstermiştir. Türkiye’deki tekstil fabrikalarının karbon ayak izi değerlendirmesine önemli bir ışık tutan bu çalışma tekstil fabrikalarının karbon ayak izinin sera gazlarındaki önemli derecede olan etkisini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Karbon Ayak İzi Tekstil Fabrikası Tier-1 Sera Gazı

References

  • Akhtar, S., Baig, S. F., Saif, S., Mahmood, A., & Ahmad, S. R. (2017). Five Year Carbon Footprint of a Textile Industry: A Podium to incorporate Sustainability. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 16(1), 8.
  • Athalye, A. (n.d.). Carbon Footprint in Textile Processing. 12.
  • Başoğul, Y., & Göksu, T. T. (2021). Carbon Foot Print Evaluation of an Industrial Enterprise Producing Flour: A Case study of Adıyaman Province. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.52520/masjaps.40
  • Baran M.F, Gökdoğan, O., Eren,Ö. & Bayhan,Y. (2019). Determination of Ecological and Carbon Footprints of Adıyaman Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Staffs, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (15), 280-288
  • Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Giacchetta, G., & Marchetti, B. (2011). A carbon footprint analysis in the textile supply chain. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2010.502582
  • Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., & Tanabe, K. (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.
  • Gülhan, H., Özgün, H., Erşahi̇n, M. E., Dereli̇, R. K., & Öztürk, İ. (2018). İstanbul’daki Biyolojik Atıksu Arıtma Tesislerinin Sera Gazı Emisyonunun Modelleme Metodu ile Tahmini. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(1), 59–67.
  • Huang, B., Zhao, J., Geng, Y., Tian, Y., & Jiang, P. (2017). Energy-related GHG emissions of the textile industry in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 119, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.013
  • Jain, M. (2017). Ecological approach to reduce carbon footprint of textile industry. 11.
  • JRC, EC. (2007). Carbon Footprint: What it is and how to measure it. European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment European Commission, Joint~….
  • Muthu, S. S., Li, Y., Hu, J. Y., & Ze, L. (2012). Carbon footprint reduction in the textile process chain: Recycling of textile materials. Fibers and Polymers, 13(8), 1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-1065-0
  • Payet, J. (2021). Assessment of Carbon Footprint for the Textile Sector in France. 22.
  • Rathore, D., & Singh, R. (2019). Carbon and Ecological Footprint of Textile Industry: Application of R3 Strategy to Mitigate the Environmental Effects of Textile Processing Waste. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT AND ENVIRONMENT, 5(02), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.18811/ijpen.v5i02.11
  • Turhan, E., & Tolunay, D. (2017). Türkiye Ve İstanbul’da Kentsel Katı Atık Kaynaklı Sera Gazı Salımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Vıı. Ulusal Hava Kirliliği Ve Kontrolü Sempozyumu, S:115-128
  • Wang, C., Wang, L., Liu, X., Du, C., Ding, D., Jia, J., Yan, Y., & Wu, G. (2015). Carbon footprint of textile throughout its life cycle: A case study of Chinese cotton shirts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.127
  • Yan, Y., Wang, C., Ding, D., Zhang, Y., Wu, G., Wang, L., Liu, X., Du, C., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, C. (2016). Industrial carbon footprint of several typical Chinese textile fabrics. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(3), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2015.09.002
  • Zamani, B., Svanström, M., Peters, G., & Rydberg, T. (2015). A Carbon Footprint of Textile Recycling: A Case Study in Sweden: Carbon Footprint of Textile Recycling. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(4), 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12208

A Case Study on the Assessment of Carbon Footprint of a Textile Factory

Year 2021, , 146 - 150, 31.12.2021

Yusuf Başoğul , Taha Tuna Göksu , Mehmet Fırat Baran

https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1006302

Abstract

The crucial factor in the future of increasing greenhouse gases is the carbon footprint. It is of great importance for these factories around the world. In this study, the carbon footprint of a textile factory operating in Adıyaman province was evaluated. Tier-1, which is one of the primary data collection and techniques, was used in the footprint evaluation. The service vehicle/diesel consumption, natural gas consumption, electricity consumption, wastewater of the textile factory were calculated as 5,475 lt/year-diesel, 55,200 m3, 456,000 kWh/year, 4,900 m3, respectively. The carbon footprint of the textile factory was calculated as 297,343 tons CO2/year in the programming made by the Tier-1 method. Here, the most important effect is electricity consumption, while the least effect is caused by wastewater. This study, which sheds important light on the carbon footprint assessment of textile factories in Turkey, shows a large amount of greenhouse gases at the feet of textile factories.

Keywords

Carbon Footprint Electricity Consumption Tier 1 Carbon Footprint, Electricity Consumption, Tier 1

References

  • Akhtar, S., Baig, S. F., Saif, S., Mahmood, A., & Ahmad, S. R. (2017). Five Year Carbon Footprint of a Textile Industry: A Podium to incorporate Sustainability. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 16(1), 8.
  • Athalye, A. (n.d.). Carbon Footprint in Textile Processing. 12.
  • Başoğul, Y., & Göksu, T. T. (2021). Carbon Foot Print Evaluation of an Industrial Enterprise Producing Flour: A Case study of Adıyaman Province. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.52520/masjaps.40
  • Baran M.F, Gökdoğan, O., Eren,Ö. & Bayhan,Y. (2019). Determination of Ecological and Carbon Footprints of Adıyaman Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Staffs, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (15), 280-288
  • Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Giacchetta, G., & Marchetti, B. (2011). A carbon footprint analysis in the textile supply chain. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2010.502582
  • Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., & Tanabe, K. (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.
  • Gülhan, H., Özgün, H., Erşahi̇n, M. E., Dereli̇, R. K., & Öztürk, İ. (2018). İstanbul’daki Biyolojik Atıksu Arıtma Tesislerinin Sera Gazı Emisyonunun Modelleme Metodu ile Tahmini. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(1), 59–67.
  • Huang, B., Zhao, J., Geng, Y., Tian, Y., & Jiang, P. (2017). Energy-related GHG emissions of the textile industry in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 119, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.013
  • Jain, M. (2017). Ecological approach to reduce carbon footprint of textile industry. 11.
  • JRC, EC. (2007). Carbon Footprint: What it is and how to measure it. European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment European Commission, Joint~….
  • Muthu, S. S., Li, Y., Hu, J. Y., & Ze, L. (2012). Carbon footprint reduction in the textile process chain: Recycling of textile materials. Fibers and Polymers, 13(8), 1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-1065-0
  • Payet, J. (2021). Assessment of Carbon Footprint for the Textile Sector in France. 22.
  • Rathore, D., & Singh, R. (2019). Carbon and Ecological Footprint of Textile Industry: Application of R3 Strategy to Mitigate the Environmental Effects of Textile Processing Waste. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT AND ENVIRONMENT, 5(02), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.18811/ijpen.v5i02.11
  • Turhan, E., & Tolunay, D. (2017). Türkiye Ve İstanbul’da Kentsel Katı Atık Kaynaklı Sera Gazı Salımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Vıı. Ulusal Hava Kirliliği Ve Kontrolü Sempozyumu, S:115-128
  • Wang, C., Wang, L., Liu, X., Du, C., Ding, D., Jia, J., Yan, Y., & Wu, G. (2015). Carbon footprint of textile throughout its life cycle: A case study of Chinese cotton shirts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.127
  • Yan, Y., Wang, C., Ding, D., Zhang, Y., Wu, G., Wang, L., Liu, X., Du, C., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, C. (2016). Industrial carbon footprint of several typical Chinese textile fabrics. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(3), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2015.09.002
  • Zamani, B., Svanström, M., Peters, G., & Rydberg, T. (2015). A Carbon Footprint of Textile Recycling: A Case Study in Sweden: Carbon Footprint of Textile Recycling. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(4), 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12208
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Yusuf Başoğul 0000-0002-9668-6654

Taha Tuna Göksu 0000-0003-2028-3362

Mehmet Fırat Baran 0000-0002-7657-1227

Publication Date December 31, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Başoğul, Y., Göksu, T. T., & Baran, M. F. (2021). Bir Tekstil Fabrikasının Karbon Ayak İzinin Değerlendirilmesi. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi(31), 146-150. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1006302