Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Abstract
The motor / generator instrument, which is the one of the key important components of hybrid electric vehicles, influence vehicle efficiency and emission scale with its types and features. For that reason, the electric motor (electric machine-EM) selection and identification are playing a crucial role. In this simulation study, effects of two different motors, Induction and Permanent Magnet (IM and PM) to emission and performance were compared for two driving cycles (FTP75 and NEDC) on a serial configuration hybrid electric vehicle which modeled with AVL Cruise. The general purpose of the work is, selecting electric motors that they have same output powers although the rotational speeds are different; and modeled for the same vehicle and identifing the effects of different driving cycles on the vehicles were compared. HEVs performance and emission results illustrated and electric machines performances and efficiency maps are graphically charted. Overall performance and emission outputs for two different driving cycles are discussed detailed. Also, a general concluded summary table that related the performance and emission outputs of different machines usage is presented. As a result, according to these modeling and test results, PM motor is more efficient than IM motor on overall simulation results, especially decreases the emission values at high speeds.
Keywords
References
- “Global Automotive Executive Survey”, (2017). KPMG’s 18th Consecutive, 2017.
- Varga, B., “Energy management of electric and hybrid vehicles dependent on powertrain configuration,” Open Engineering, 2(2), 253-263, 2012.
- Arata, M., Kurihara, Y., Misu, D., & Matsubara, M., “EV and HEV motor development in TOSHIBA,” IEE Journal of Industry Applications, 4(3), 152-157, 2015.
- Minav,T.,”Basics of power electronics and electric motors for hybrid and electric vehicles,” Course Notes, Aalto University, 2012.
- Arora, A. S., Singh G. ., “Review of design and performance of permament magnet synchronous motor,” Proceedings of TheIRES 6th International Conference, Melbourne, Australia. ISBN: 978-93-85465-75-8, 2015.
- Zhu, Z. Q., Chu, W. Q., & Guan, Y. ., “Quantitative comparison of electromagnetic performance of electrical machines for HEVs/EVs,” CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 1(1), 37-47, 2017.
- Guzzella, L., Sciarretta, A., “Vehicle propulsion systems: introduction to modeling and optimization,”.Third edition, Springer – Verlag, Berlin publisher. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-35913-2, 2007.
- Hasan, S. M. (2008). “Hybrid electric vehicle powertrain: on-line parameter estimation of an induction motor drive and torque control of a PM BLDC starter-generator,” Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron, 2008.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Engineering
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
December 31, 2018
Submission Date
December 9, 2018
Acceptance Date
December 27, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 2018 Number: 14
Cited By
Comparative Study of Electric Machines for Stirling Generator Application
Advanced Engineering Forum
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.43.73Nonlinear Dynamics Induced by Coil Heat in the PMDC Motor and Control
Chaos Theory and Applications
https://doi.org/10.51537/chaos.1462132A Review of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Configurations: Advances and Challenges
Kerbala Journal for Engineering Sciences
https://doi.org/10.63463/kjes1155