Research Article

Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle

Number: 14 December 31, 2018
EN TR

Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle

Abstract

The motor / generator instrument, which is the one of the key important components of hybrid electric vehicles, influence vehicle efficiency and emission scale with its types and features. For that reason, the electric motor (electric machine-EM) selection and identification are playing a crucial role. In this simulation study, effects of two different motors, Induction and Permanent Magnet (IM and PM) to emission and performance were compared for two driving cycles (FTP75 and NEDC) on a serial configuration hybrid electric vehicle which modeled with AVL Cruise. The general purpose of the work is, selecting electric motors that they have same output powers although the rotational speeds are different; and modeled for the same vehicle and identifing the effects of different driving cycles on the vehicles were compared. HEVs performance and emission results illustrated and electric machines performances and efficiency maps are graphically charted. Overall performance and emission outputs for two different driving cycles are discussed detailed. Also, a general concluded summary table that related the performance and emission outputs of different machines usage is presented. As a result, according to these modeling and test results, PM motor is more efficient than IM motor on overall simulation results, especially decreases the emission values at high speeds. 

Keywords

References

  1. “Global Automotive Executive Survey”, (2017). KPMG’s 18th Consecutive, 2017.
  2. Varga, B., “Energy management of electric and hybrid vehicles dependent on powertrain configuration,” Open Engineering, 2(2), 253-263, 2012.
  3. Arata, M., Kurihara, Y., Misu, D., & Matsubara, M., “EV and HEV motor development in TOSHIBA,” IEE Journal of Industry Applications, 4(3), 152-157, 2015.
  4. Minav,T.,”Basics of power electronics and electric motors for hybrid and electric vehicles,” Course Notes, Aalto University, 2012.
  5. Arora, A. S., Singh G. ., “Review of design and performance of permament magnet synchronous motor,” Proceedings of TheIRES 6th International Conference, Melbourne, Australia. ISBN: 978-93-85465-75-8, 2015.
  6. Zhu, Z. Q., Chu, W. Q., & Guan, Y. ., “Quantitative comparison of electromagnetic performance of electrical machines for HEVs/EVs,” CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 1(1), 37-47, 2017.
  7. Guzzella, L., Sciarretta, A., “Vehicle propulsion systems: introduction to modeling and optimization,”.Third edition, Springer – Verlag, Berlin publisher. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-35913-2, 2007.
  8. Hasan, S. M. (2008). “Hybrid electric vehicle powertrain: on-line parameter estimation of an induction motor drive and torque control of a PM BLDC starter-generator,” Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron, 2008.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2018

Submission Date

December 9, 2018

Acceptance Date

December 27, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Number: 14

APA
Arat, H. T. (2018). Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 14, 378-387. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.494127
AMA
1.Arat HT. Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. EJOSAT. 2018;(14):378-387. doi:10.31590/ejosat.494127
Chicago
Arat, Hüseyin Turan. 2018. “Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) Effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle”. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, nos. 14: 378-87. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.494127.
EndNote
Arat HT (December 1, 2018) Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 14 378–387.
IEEE
[1]H. T. Arat, “Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle”, EJOSAT, no. 14, pp. 378–387, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.31590/ejosat.494127.
ISNAD
Arat, Hüseyin Turan. “Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) Effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle”. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. 14 (December 1, 2018): 378-387. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.494127.
JAMA
1.Arat HT. Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. EJOSAT. 2018;:378–387.
MLA
Arat, Hüseyin Turan. “Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) Effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle”. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, no. 14, Dec. 2018, pp. 378-87, doi:10.31590/ejosat.494127.
Vancouver
1.Hüseyin Turan Arat. Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. EJOSAT. 2018 Dec. 1;(14):378-87. doi:10.31590/ejosat.494127

Cited By