Pomza, İgnimbirit ve Perlitin Taş Mastik Asfaltta Kullanılabilirliği

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, pomza, ignimbrit (Ahlat taşı) ve perlitin taş mastik asfalt üretiminde agrega malzemesi olarak kullanılabilirliği araştırılmıştır. Bu agregalar, karayollarında kullanılmadan önce kaldırıma uygulanan standart testlere tabi tutulmuş asfalt örneklerinde filler malzeme olarak kullanılmıştır. Los Angeles aşınma oranı pomza için %73, Ahlat taşı için %78 ve perlit için %67 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu çalışmada 4 farklı tip taş mastik asfalt (TMA) yapılmıştır. Bazalt-TMA'da (BAZ-TMA); karışımda kaba agrega, ince agrega ve filler olarak bazalt kullanılmıştır. Pomza-TMA'da (POM-TMA); kaba agrega ve ince agrega olarak bazalt, filler olarak pomza kullanılmıştır. Ahlat taşı-TMA'da (AT-TMA); kaba agrega ve ince agrega olarak bazalt, filler olarak Ahlat taşı kullanılmıştır. Perlit-TMA'da (PER-TMA); kaba agrega ve ince agrega olarak bazalt, filler olarak perlit kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda BAZ-TMA stabilitesi ve akma değerleri 979 kg ve 2,88 mm olarak bulunmuştur. POM-TMA stabilitesi ve akma değerleri 940 kg ve 3,24 mm olarak bulunmuştur. AT-TMA stabilitesi ve akma değerleri 965 kg ve 3,20 mm olarak bulunmuştur. PER-TMA stabilitesi ve akma değerleri 937 kg ve 3,19 mm olarak bulunmuştur. Bu testler TMA'ın şartname referans limitlerini sağlamıştır. Test sonuçları, pomza, Ahlat taşı ve perlitin TMA karışımlarında ince veya kaba agrega olarak kullanılamayacağını göstermektedir. Test sonuçları, pomza, Ahlat taşı ve perlitin TMA karışımlarında sadece filler olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

• Asfalt kaplama,Taş mastik asfalt (TMA),Pomza,Perlit,İgnimbirit,Ahlat taşı

Usability of Pumice, Ignimbrite and Perlite in Stone Mastic Asphalt

Abstract

The usability of pumice, ignimbrite (Ahlat stone), and perlite powders as aggregate material in stone mastic asphalt production was investigated in this study. These aggregates were used as filler in asphalt samples that were subjected to standard tests applied to pavement before it can be used in highways. Los Angeles abrasion rate was found to be 73% for pumice, 78% for Ahlat stone and 67% for perlite. In this study, 4 different types of stone mastic asphalt (SMA) were made. In Basalt-SMA (BAS-SMA); basalt was used as coarse aggregate, fine aggregate and filler in the mixture. In Pumice-SMA (PUM-SMA); basalt was used as coarse aggregate and fine aggregate, and pumice was used as filler. In Ahlat Stone-SMA (AS-SMA); basalt was used as coarse aggregate and fine aggregate, and Ahlat stone was used as filler. In Perlite-SMA (PER-SMA); basalt was used as coarse aggregate and fine aggregate, and perlite was used as filler. As a result of the study, BAS-SMA stability and flow values were found to be 979 kg and 2.88 mm. PUM-SMA stability and flow values were found to be 940 kg and 3.24 mm. AS-SMA stability and flow values were found to be 965 kg and 3.20 mm. PER-SMA stability and flow values were found to be 937 kg and 3.19 mm. These tests provided reference values for the specifications of SMA. Test results show that pumice, Ahlat stone and perlite cannot be used as fine or coarse aggregates in SMA mixtures. The test results show that pumice, Ahlat stone and perlite can only be used as filler in SMA mixtures.

Keywords

• Asphalt pavement,Stone mastic Asphalt (SMA),Pumice,Perlit,Ignimbrite

References

1. Akilli, A. (2012). Investigation of basalt aggregate's mechanical properties for use in road pavements, Master Thesis, Suleyman Demirel University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Isparta.
2. Alp, B. (2018). The Use and Comparison of the Abrasion Asphalt Concrete and Stone Mastic Asphalt Technology in Bridge Applications, Master Thesis, Basaksehir University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul.
3. Arslan, F. (2014). Investigating on possible use of Cebeci Dolomite Limestone, Golcuk Sandstone and Karatepe basalt in stone mastic asphalt in Istanbul, Master Thesis, Yildiz Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul.
4. Azizi, S. (2007). Mechanical properties and thermal isolation of perlite added lightweight concretes. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul.
5. Bakis, A. (2016). Usability of Ahlat Stone in Rigid Pavement Construction. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science, 5(2): 164-171. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/264097
6. Bulgurcu, H. (2009). Cement and Gypsum-Binding Construction Materials with Expanded Perlite Investigation of Thermal and Mechanical Properties. 17th National Congress of Heat Science and Technical, Sivas, 59–64.
7. Cengiz, M. S., Cengiz, C. (2018). Numerical Analysis of Tunnel LED Lighting Maintenance Factor. IIUM Engineering Journal, vol. 19(2), pp. 154–163.
8. Cengiz, M. S. (2019). The Relationship Between Maintenance Factor and Lighting Level in Tunnel Lighting. Light & Engineering, vol. 27. 3, pp. 154–163.

9. Gencer, G., Eren, M., Yildirim S. et al. (2017). Numerical Approach to City Road Lighting Standards. Imeset Int. Conf. Mult. Sci. Eng. Tech., Bitlis, 233.
10. General Directorate of Highways. (2013). Highways Technical Specification. Publication no. 276, Ankara.
11. Gokce, H.S. Simsek, Durmus, O. G. et al. (2010). Effect of Alternative Expanded Perlite Using on Properties of Raw Perlite Aggregated Light-Weight Concrete. Polytechnic, 13(2): 159–163. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/385554
12. Kahveci, A.E., and Kadayifci, A. (2013). Investigation Structural Properties of Basalt Stone in Diyarbakir Region. Suleyman Demirel University, International Technologic Science, 5(3): 56–59. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/254759
13. Kazanci , N., and Gurbuz, A. (2014). Natural Stones Qualified as Geological Heritage in Turkey. Geological Bulletin of Turkey, 57(1): 19–44. https://www.jmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/a15a16e5a7ba3b3_ek.pdf
14. Kennhpohl, J.A. (1993). Stone Mastic Asphalt Trials in Ontario. Transportation Research Record, no. 1427.
15. Kofteci, S. (2018). Investigation on the usability of pumice as mineral fibre in stone mastic asphalt. Građevinar, 70(8): 695–701. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2310.2017
16. Kutluhan, S. (2008). Modeling of rutting in bituminous hot mixtures, Ph. D. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul.
17. Oguz, C., and Turker, F. (1997). The Relationship between Physical and Mechanical Properties in Pumice Concrete. 1th Isparta Pumice Symposium, Isparta.
18. Orhan, F. (2012). Bituminous Mixtures Laboratory Studies. Highways General Directorate, Research and Development Department, Pavement Development Branch Directorate, Ankara.
19. Ozkan, S. G., and Tuncer, G. (2001). Pumice Mining Overview. 4th Industrial Raw Materials Symposium, Izmir, 200–207.
20. Ozturk, M. (2012). Examining Physical and Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Concrete with Pumice and Perlite. Master Thesis, Namik Kemal University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Tekirdag.
21. Saglik, A., and Gungor, A.G. (2008). Flexible Pavements Design Guide. General Directorate of Highways Publications, Ankara.
22. Sengül, C.E. (2011). The effect of hydrated lime with the types of SBS and fiber additives on SMA mixtures performance, Ph. D. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trabzon.
23. Simsek, O., and Erdal, M. (2004). Investigation of Some Mechanical and Physical Properties of the Ahlat Stone (Ignimbrite). Gazi University Journal of Science, 17(4): 71–78. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/83230
24. Tasdemir,Y. (1998). Etude of Stone Mastic Asphalt Mixtures, Master Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul.
25. TS 1171. (2006). Flash Point Determination. TSE, Ankara.
26. TS EN 12597. (2014). Bitumen and Bituminous Binders-Terminology. TSE, Ankara.
27. TS EN 1097-2. (2015). Tests for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates, Part 2: Methods of Determination of abrasion. TSE, Ankara.
28. TS EN 1426. (2015). Bitumen and Bituminous Binders, Determination of penetration depth. TSE, Ankara.
29. TS EN 1097-6. (2015). Tests for the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates, Part 6: Determination of Specific Gravity and Water Absorption. TSE, Ankara.
30. TS EN 1427. (2015). Bitumen and Bituminous Binders, Softening Point Determination. TSE, Ankara.
31. Turkel, S., and Kadiroglu, B. (2007). Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Structural Lightweight Concrete Made with Pumice Aggregate. Pamukkale University, Journal of Engineering Sciences, 13(3): 353–359. http://dergipark.gov.tr/pajes/issue/20518/218472
32. Umar, F., and Yayla, N. (1988). Road Superstructure. Istanbul Technical University, Construction Faculty Printing House, Istanbul.
33. Yardim, M. S., and Arslan, F. (2013). Stone Mastic Asphalt Usage in Turkey and an Evaluation on Literature. 6th National Asphalt Symposium, Ankara, 61-72.
34. Yilmaz, S., Bayrak, G., Sen, S. et al. (2006). Structural characterization of basalt-based glass–ceramic coatings. Materials and design, 27(10): 1092–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.04.004