Research Article

A Hybrid Benders Decomposition Algorithm and New Models for the Distributed Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem

Number: 23 April 30, 2021
TR EN

A Hybrid Benders Decomposition Algorithm and New Models for the Distributed Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem

Abstract

The distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem (DPFSP) is a generalization of the regular flowshop scheduling problem where several factories are accessible for processing the jobs. In this paper, two new mathematical models are developed by deriving inspiration from the formulations developed for the multiple-traveling salesman problem (mTSP), and six different pure Benders decomposition algorithms are developed based on different mathematical model formulations. In addition, a hybrid Benders decomposition algorithm is developed through the best performed mathematical. Nine newly developed exact methods are compared in detail with each other, the best mathematical models given by Naderi and Ruiz (2010) and an automatic Benders decomposition algorithm by using the 84 problem instances available in the literature. The consequences of the experiment performed for the comparison of all existing and new exact algorithms have revealed that the proposed hybrid Benders decomposition algorithm has outperformed considerably when compared to the other methods. In this paper, 4 new best solutions are identified for the DPFSP.

Keywords

References

  1. Naderi, B., Ruiz, R.: The distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem, Comput. Oper. Res. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.06.019
  2. Johnson, S.M.: Optimal two- and three-stage production schedules with setup times included, Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly (1954). https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800010110
  3. Framinan, J.M., Leisten, R., Ruiz, R.: Manufacturing Scheduling Systems: An Integrated View on Models, Methods and Tools. Springer, New York (2014)
  4. McKay, K.N.,Pinedo, M., Webster, S.: Practice-focused research issues for scheduling systems, Prod. Oper. Manage. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2002.tb00494.x
  5. Pinedo, M.: Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms and Systems. Springer, New York (2016)
  6. Fernandez-Viagas, V., Ruiz, E., Framinan, J.M.: A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: state-of-the-art and computational evaluation, Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.055
  7. Framinan, J.M., Gupta, J.N.D., Leisten, R.: A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective, J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601784
  8. Gupta, J.N.D., Stafford Jr, E. F.: Flowshop scheduling research after five decades, Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.001

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 30, 2021

Submission Date

October 21, 2020

Acceptance Date

February 24, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Number: 23

APA
İşgüder, H., & Hamzadayı, A. (2021). A Hybrid Benders Decomposition Algorithm and New Models for the Distributed Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 23, 126-148. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.814129