Kalite Fonksiyonu Açısından Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin Geliştirilmesi: İmalat Endüstrisinde Uygulaması

Öz

Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi (TZY) şirketlere finansal karlılık, performans, müşteri sadakati ve iş ortağı kazançları açısından verimlilik açısından fayda sağlar. Tedarik zinciri yönetiminin kurumsal açıdan sağladığı fırsatlardan bir kısmı aşağıda belirtildiği gibidir. Bu fırsatlar şu şekilde sıralanabilir; firma satışlarını artırır, sektördeki sermaye harcamalarını azaltmaya yardımcı olur, tüketici siparişleri ile dağıtım arasındaki süreyi verimli kullanarak zamanı azaltır, talep değişikliklerine yanıt vermeyi iyileştirir ve arz istikrarını sağlar, artırır. Bu konuya bağlı olarak, Kalite Fonksiyonu Dağılımı (KFD) uygulaması bir işletmedeki Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi (TZY) sistemi ile birleştirilerek, bu araştırma kapsamında bu uygulama alanı, sektörü için gelişmiş bir çıktı düzenlemesi sağlamaktadır. Bu araştırma, KFD yönteminin TZY sistemi ile birlikte kullanmanın temellerini ve ayrıca KFD’nin süreklilik birleşenlerini ve TZY yaklaşımı olarak nasıl kullanılacağına yönelik birkaç örnek kesitleri içermektedir. Bu çalışma, KFD'nin bir tedarik zincirinde nasıl ve neden kullanılabileceğinin yanında bazı potansiyel uygulamaların nasıl ve niçin kullanılabileceğini incelemektedir. KFD tekniği, TZY uygulamaları için yardımcı araç olarak kullanılmaktadır. KFD ‘nin önemli bir unsuru olan "Müşterilerin Sesi"’nin (Voice of Customer) TZY’ne entegrasyonu, yüksek bir performans artışı ve üretkenliği sağlarken Bulanık KFD uygulaması, değerlendirme aşaması için yapısal açıdan stratejik analizi sağlar. TZY, stratejik açıdan kritiktir ve rekabet avantajı olarak işletme için önem arz eder. Bu çalışma kapsamında mobilya endüstrisinde yapılan uygulama, KFD ile geleneksel yaklaşımlardan tedarik zinciri yönetimin birlikte kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi sektöre üretim ve yönetim kapsamında faydalar sağlamıştır, sağlamaktadır. Uygulamanın temel amacı, bu bağlamda mobilya sektöründe tedarik zinciri yönetiminin sürecini ve işleyişini, KFD ve TZY yöntemlerini birlikte kullanarak sektöre yönelik TZY’ne yönelik iyileştirmeler sunmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Endüstri-Sanayi
• İmalat
• Kalite Fonksiyonu
• Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi

Development Supply Chain Management In Terms of Quality Function: An Application in the Manufacturing Industry

Abstract

In terms of financial efficiency, customer loyalty, and partner earnings, Supply Chain Management (SCM) efficiently benefits the company. The belows are some of the corporate opportunities of supply chain management. It increases sales, helps to reduce capital expenditures in the industry, reduces time by making efficient use of the time between consumer orders and distribution and Improves responsiveness to changes in demand, increasing supply stability. Due to this topic, by combining Quality Function Deploymnet (QFD) applications with a SCM system, this research will provide the researcher with an improved output arrangement. It covers the basics of using QFD in SCM systems as well as several examples of how to use QFD as a continuity reference and a supply chain management approach. This research looks at how and why QFD can be used in a supply chain, as well as some of the potential applications. QFD technique may help with SCM implementations. Customers' importance in a supply chain network cannot be overstated. The integration of "Customers Voice" into the applied structure ensures a high chance of performance and device productivity, while the Fuzzy QFD implementation promotes strategic analysis as a framework for evaluating. Supply chain management is critical from a strategic standpoint and is seen as a competitive advantage. In this study, in the furniture industry, switching from conventional approaches to supply chain management with QFD has a number of benefits. The application's main objective is to expose the process and operation of supply chain management in the furniture industry in this context.

Keywords

• Industry
• Manufacturing
• Quality Function
• Supply Chain Management

References

1. Akao, Y. (1990). Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Springer, Cambridge, MA.
2. Asadabadi, M. R. (2017). A customer based supplier selection process that combines quality function deployment, the analytic network process and a Markov chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(3), 1049–1062. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.006
3. Ayers, J.B.(2006) Handbook of Supply Chain Management, Auerbach Publications; 2nd edition (April 24, 2006), 640 p. Bastas, A. and Liyanage, K. (2018). Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 726–744. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.110
4. Blanchard, D. (2010). Supply Chain Management Best Practices, Second Edition, 303 p., ISBN 13:9780470531884.
5. Bottani, E., and Rizzi, A. (2006). Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 585–599. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.11.006
6. Bossert, J.L (1990). Quality Function Deployment: The Practitioner's Approach (Quality and Reliability Series, Volume 21), CRC Press, 125 p., ISBN 13: 9780824783785.
7. Bossert, J.L (1990). Quality Function Deployment: The Practitioner's Approach (Quality and Reliability Series, Volume 21), CRC Press, 125 p., ISBN 13: 9780824783785 p.7
8. Chan, L.-K. and Wu, M.-L. (2002). Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 463–497. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00178-9

9. Chopra S. and Meindl P. (2016). Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning and Operations, South-Western College/West-Pearson, 6 th Edition, 890 p., ISBN 13: 978-1-285-86968-1.
10. Cohen, S. and Roussel, J. (2004). Strategic Supply Chain Management, First Edition, McGraw-Hill, 339 p., ISBN 13: 9780071454490.
11. Dat, L. Q., Phuong, T. T., Kao, H.-P., Chou, S.-Y. and Nghia, P. V. (2015). A new integrated fuzzy QFD approach for market segments evaluation and selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(13), 3653–3665. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2014.11.051.
12. De Brito, M.P. and Van der Laan, E.A. (2010). Supply chain management and sustainability: procrastinating integration in mainstream research. Sustainability, 2, 859-870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2040859.
13. Duffy, G.L., Moran, J.W. and Riley, W. J. (2010). Quality Function Deployment and Lean-Six Sigma Applications in Public Health, First Edition, ASQ Quality Press, 218 p, ISBN 13: 978-0-87389-787-7.
14. Fazlollahtabar, H. (2018). Supply Chain Management Models: Forward, Reverse, Uncertain, and Intelligent Foundations with Case Studies, First edition, CRC Press, 401 p., ISBN 10: 1351336576.
15. Franceschini, F. (2001), Advanced Quality Function Deployment, First Edition, CRC Press, 209 p., ISBN 13: 9781574443219.
16. Garvin, D. A. (1987), Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality, Harvard Business Review, November/December, p. 101-109.
17. Gunasekaran, A. and Ngai, E. W. (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 269- 295. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.016 .
18. Gürpınar, K. (2007). Türk Mobilya Sektörünün Rekabet Gücü Üzerine bir Araştırma, Doktora Tezi, Afyonkarahisar Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
19. Hauser, J. and Clausing, D. (1988). The House of Quality, Harvard Business Review, 16(1), pp. 63-73.
20. Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Algesheime, R., and Tomczak, T. (2006). An empirical study of quality function deployment on company performance. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 23(4), 345–366. doi:10.1108/02656710610657576.
21. Heizer, J., Render, B. and Munson, C. (2016). Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (12th Edition), Pearson, 918 p., ISBN 13: 9780134130422.
22. Ivanov, D., Tsipoulanidis, A. and Schönberger, J. (2016). Global Supply Chain and Operations Management, chapter 1, Basics of Supply Chain and Operations Management, pp 1-14.
23. Jacobs, F.R. and Chase, R.B. (2018). Operations and Supply Chain Management, 15th edition, McGraw Hill, 785 p., ISBN 13: 978-1-259-66610-0..
24. Jagdev, H., Bradley, P. and Molloy, O. (1997). A QFD based performance measurement tool. Computers in Industry, 33(2-3), 357–366. doi:10.1016/s0166-3615(97)00041-9 .
25. Jayaram, J., Dixit, M. and Motwani, J. (2014). Supply chain management capability of small and medium sized family businesses in India: A multiple case study approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 472 485 .https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.016.
26. Kuo, T. C., Wub, H. H. and Shieh, J. I. (2009). Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7148–7156.
27. Lam, J. S. L. (2015). Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: A hybrid QFD–ANP approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 78, 70–81. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.003.
28. Lysons, K. (2016), Procurement & Supply Chain Management, Trans-Atlantic Publ. (Pearson), 9th, 692 p., ISBN 13: 9781292086118.
29. Madu, C. N., Kuei, C. H. and Madu, I. E. (2002). A hierarchic metric approach for integration of green issues in manufacturing: A paper recycling application. Journal of Environmental Management, 64, 261–272.
30. Maritan, D. (auth.) (2015), Practical Manual of Quality Function Deployment, Springer International Publishing, First Edition, 199 p., ISBN 13: 978-3-319-08521-0
31. Meindl, P. and Capital, K. (2013). Supply Chain Management, Strategy, Planning, And Operation, Fifth Edition, Pearson, 559 p.
32. Meredith, J.R. and Shafer, S. M. (2016), Operations and Supply Chain Management for MBAs, Wiley, 6th Edition, 374 p., ISBN 13: 978-1-119-23953-6.
33. Meredith, J.R. and Shafer, S.M. (2007). Operation Management for MBAs, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 416 p.
34. Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R.B., Giunipero, L.C. and Patterson, J.L. (2016). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 6th edition, 890 p., South-Western College/West, ISBN 13:978-1-285-86968-1
35. Osorio Gómez, J. C. and España, K. T. (2020). Operational Risk Management in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Using Ontologies and Fuzzy QFD. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1673–1679. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.233.
36. Osiro, L., Lima-Junior, F. R. and Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2018). A group decision model based on quality function deployment and hesitant fuzzy for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 964–978. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.197.
37. Ramezankhani, M. J., Ali Torabi, S. and Vahidi, F. (2018). Supply Chain Performance Measurement and Evaluation: A Mixed Sustainability and Resilience Approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.054.
38. Reefke, H. and Sundaram, D. (2017). Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management – identification and evaluation. Omega, 66, 195–211. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2016.02.003
39. Sakao, T. (2007). A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18), 4143–4162.
40. SearchErp, supply chain visibility (SCV), https://searcherp.techtarget.com/definition/supply-chain-visibility-SCV (Acess Time: 29.04.2021).
41. Sohn, S. Y. and Choi, I. S. (2001). Fuzzy QFD for supply chain management with reliability consideration. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 72(3), 327–334. doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(01)00022-9.
42. Supply Chain Management Articles, https://www.fish bowl inventory.com/supply-chain-management (Access Time: 23.04.2021).
43. Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, http://www.mikado consulting.com/egitim/15/surdurulebilir-tedarik-zinciri-yonetimi (Access Time: 12.04.2021).
44. Tanyaş, T.(2003). “Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi”, Lojistik Dergisi, 3(15), p. 32.
45. Tedarik Zinciri Görünürlüğü ve Müşteri Memnuniyeti, Tugay Gülerhttps://satinalmadergisi.com/tedarik-zinciri gorunurlugu-ve-musteri-memnuniyeti/amp/ (Access Time: 12.04.2021).
46. Tedarik Zinciri Sürdürülebilirliği Sürekli İyileştirme için Pratik Rehber,https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/docs/issues_doc%2Fsupply_chain%2FSupplyChainRep_TR.pdf
47. Temponi, C., Yen, J. and Tiao, W. (1999). House of quality: A fuzzy logic based requirement analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 117, 340–354.
48. Vanegas, L. V. and Labib, A. W. (2001). A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets. International Journal of Production Research, 39(1), 99–120. doi:10.1080/00207540010005079.
49. Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., and Zhong, Z. W. (2010). Towards a QFD-based expert system: A novel extension to fuzzy QFD methodology using rough set theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8888–8896. doi:10.1016/ j.eswa. 2010. 06.007
50. Wang, C.-H. (2015). Using quality function deployment to conduct vendor assessment and supplier recommendation for business-intelligence systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 84, 24–31. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2014.10.005
51. What Is Quality Function Deployment (Qfd)? https://asq.org/ quality-resources/qfd-quality-function-deployment (Access Date: 23.03.2021).
52. Yaşar, S. (2005). Panel Mobilya Üretim Planlama Uygulaması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 5–8.
53. Yılmaz, H. (2009). Optimization of the product design through Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Analaytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): A case study in a ceramic washbasin, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 91 p.