Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Effects of Frugal Innovation on Supply Chains

Year 2021, Issue: 21, 261 - 267, 31.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.819652

Abstract

Concepts related to sustainability issues have gained great intention with the rise of sustainability problems. Solving these problems necessitates radical changes in our daily practices, business models, consumption behavior etc., and open a number of research venues. In this study, it is aimed to understand how supply chains and supply chain management approaches are affected by the integration of frugal innovation approaches into supply chains. With this aim, a bibliometric study based on publications indexed in Web of Science and Scopus is conducted. Main concepts and relationship among these concepts are demonstrated. The results show that frugal innovation is mostly associated with sustainability, closed-loop supply chains, green products, and circular economy. The design concept seems to be neglected in the literature. As frugal innovations are realized with very limited and easily available resources, designers need to be more creative than their colleagues that have more access to required resources. Thus, in future it may be expected to see more studies directed to design processes associated with supply chains.

References

  • Altamirano, M. A., & Beers, C. P. V. Van. (2017). Frugal Innovations in Technological and Institutional Infrastructure : Impact of Mobile Phone Technology on Productivity , Public Service Provision and Inclusiveness. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0115-2
  • Basu, R., Banerjee, P., & Sweeny, E. (2013). Frugal Innovation: Core Competencies to Address Global Sustainability. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, 1(2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.13185/jm2013.01204
  • Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211231344
  • Center for Frugal Innovation. (2020). Partners. Tarihinde 02 Haziran 2020, adresinden erişildi https://cfi.global-innovation.net/?page_id=37
  • Colledani, M., Silipo, L., Yemane, A., Lanza, G., Bürgin, J., Hochdörffer, J., … Belkadi, F. (2016). Technology-based Product-services for Supporting Frugal Innovation. Procedia CIRP, 47, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.093
  • Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228(July), 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303
  • Fulconis, F., Pache, G., & Reynaud, E. (2019). Frugal supply chains: a managerial and societal perspective. Society and Business Review, 14(3), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-06-2018-0059
  • Gaur, L., & Sahdev, S. L. (2015). Frugal innovation in India: The case of Tata Nano. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(7), 17411–17420.
  • Gupta, A. K. (2006). From sink to source: The Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(3), 49–66.
  • Handfield, R. (2020). What is supply chain management (SCM)? https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012370517-4/50004-6
  • Hood, B. (2016). Make Recycled Goods Covetable. Nature, 531(7595), 438–440.
  • Ivanov, D. (2020). Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspec- tives. Lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6
  • Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Unlocking effective multi-tier supply chain management for sustainability through quantitative modeling: Lessons learned and discoveries to be made. International Journal of Production Economics, 217(August 2018), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.029
  • Knizkov, S., & Arlinghaus, J. C. (2019). Is co-creation always sustainable? Empirical exploration of co-creation patterns, practices, and outcomes in bottom of the pyramid markets. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216017
  • Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management in Indian agriculture. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9788175968462.008
  • Malodia, S., Gupta, S., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2019). Reverse innovation: a conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00703-4
  • Muduli, K., Govindan, K., Barve, A., Kannan, D., & Geng, Y. (2013). Role of behavioural factors in green supply chain management implementation in Indian mining industries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 76, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.03.006
  • No Tata Nano production since Jan; only 1 unit sold in last 9 months | Business Standard News. (2019). Business Standard, (December 2018). Tarihinde adresinden erişildi https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/no-nano-production-since-jan-only-1-unit-sold-in-last-6-months-119070201018_1.html
  • Rao, B. C. (2013). How disruptive is frugal? Technology in Society, 35(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.003
  • Rocca, F. C. (2016). Supply Chain Management for Frugal Innovation Products. Tecnico Lisboa.
  • Rodríguez, L. A., & Cunha, C. (2017). Effects of dynamic capabilities on frugal innovation: A conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain application. 24th International Conference on Production Research, ICPR 2017, (Icpr), 388–393.
  • Ryder, B. (2010). First break all the rules. The Economist, 395(8678), 1–11.
  • Santos, L. L., Borini, F. M., & Oliveira Júnior, M. de M. (2020). In search of the frugal innovation strategy. Review of International Business and Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-10-2019-0142
  • Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing. Management Science, 50(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186
  • Sharma, A., & Iyer, G. R. (2012). Resource-constrained product development: Implications for green marketing and green supply chains. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.007
  • Shibin, K. T., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Luo, Z., Papadopoulos, T., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Frugal innovation for supply chain sustainability in SMEs: multi-method research design. Production Planning and Control, 29(11), 908–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1493139
  • Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/531435a Tan, K. C. (2001). A framework of supply chain management literature. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00020-4
  • Tshidimba, D., Lateur, F., & Sneyers, N. (2015). FRUGAL PRODUCTS: Western companies need to act “FRUGAL” to successfully sell FRUGAL products in emerging markets.
  • Zeschky, M. B., Winterhalter, S., & Gassmann, O. (2014). From Cost to Frugal And Reverse Innovation: Mapping the Field and Implications for Global Competitiveness. Research- Technology Management, 57(4), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5704235
  • Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308x5404007

Tedarik Zincirlerinde Tutumlu İnovasyonun Etkileri

Year 2021, Issue: 21, 261 - 267, 31.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.819652

Abstract

Sürdürülebilirlik problemlerimizin artması ile birlikte sürdürülebilirlik konularına ilişkin kavramlar da büyük ilgi çekmeye başlamıştır. Bu problemlerin çözümü günlük rutinlerimiz, iş modellerimiz, tüketim davranışımız gibi birçok alanda radikal değişiklikler yapmayı gerektirir ve bir dizi araştırma alanının açar. Bu çalışmada, tutumlu inovasyon yaklaşımlarının tedarik zincirlerine eklenmesi ile birlikte tedarik zincirlerinin ve tedarik zinciri yönetimi yaklaşımlarının nasıl etkilendiğinin anlaşılması hedeflenmiştir. Bu hedef doğrultusunda Web of Science ve Scopus vertabanlarında taranan yayınlara dayalı bibliometrik bir çalışma yapılmıştır. Temel kavramlar ve bu kavramlar arasındaki ilişki ortaya konulmuştur. Sonuçlar tutumlu inovasyonun genellikle sürdürülebilirlik, kapalı çevrim tedarik zincirleri, yeşil ürünler ve döngüsel ekonomi ile ilişkilendirildiğini göstermektedir. Tasarım kavramı yazında ihmal edilmiş olarak görünmektedir. Tutumlu inovasyonlar çok kısıtlı ve kolayca erişilebilir kaynaklarla gerçekleştirildiğinden tasarımcıları da gerekli kaynaklara daha fazla erişimi olan meslektaşlarından daha yaratıcı olmak durumundadırlar. Bu nedenle, ileride tedarik zinciri ile ilişkilendirilmiş tasarım süreçlerine dair daha fazla çalışmanın görülmesi beklenebilir.

References

  • Altamirano, M. A., & Beers, C. P. V. Van. (2017). Frugal Innovations in Technological and Institutional Infrastructure : Impact of Mobile Phone Technology on Productivity , Public Service Provision and Inclusiveness. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0115-2
  • Basu, R., Banerjee, P., & Sweeny, E. (2013). Frugal Innovation: Core Competencies to Address Global Sustainability. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, 1(2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.13185/jm2013.01204
  • Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211231344
  • Center for Frugal Innovation. (2020). Partners. Tarihinde 02 Haziran 2020, adresinden erişildi https://cfi.global-innovation.net/?page_id=37
  • Colledani, M., Silipo, L., Yemane, A., Lanza, G., Bürgin, J., Hochdörffer, J., … Belkadi, F. (2016). Technology-based Product-services for Supporting Frugal Innovation. Procedia CIRP, 47, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.093
  • Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228(July), 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303
  • Fulconis, F., Pache, G., & Reynaud, E. (2019). Frugal supply chains: a managerial and societal perspective. Society and Business Review, 14(3), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-06-2018-0059
  • Gaur, L., & Sahdev, S. L. (2015). Frugal innovation in India: The case of Tata Nano. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(7), 17411–17420.
  • Gupta, A. K. (2006). From sink to source: The Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(3), 49–66.
  • Handfield, R. (2020). What is supply chain management (SCM)? https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012370517-4/50004-6
  • Hood, B. (2016). Make Recycled Goods Covetable. Nature, 531(7595), 438–440.
  • Ivanov, D. (2020). Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspec- tives. Lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6
  • Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Unlocking effective multi-tier supply chain management for sustainability through quantitative modeling: Lessons learned and discoveries to be made. International Journal of Production Economics, 217(August 2018), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.029
  • Knizkov, S., & Arlinghaus, J. C. (2019). Is co-creation always sustainable? Empirical exploration of co-creation patterns, practices, and outcomes in bottom of the pyramid markets. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216017
  • Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management in Indian agriculture. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9788175968462.008
  • Malodia, S., Gupta, S., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2019). Reverse innovation: a conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00703-4
  • Muduli, K., Govindan, K., Barve, A., Kannan, D., & Geng, Y. (2013). Role of behavioural factors in green supply chain management implementation in Indian mining industries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 76, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.03.006
  • No Tata Nano production since Jan; only 1 unit sold in last 9 months | Business Standard News. (2019). Business Standard, (December 2018). Tarihinde adresinden erişildi https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/no-nano-production-since-jan-only-1-unit-sold-in-last-6-months-119070201018_1.html
  • Rao, B. C. (2013). How disruptive is frugal? Technology in Society, 35(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.003
  • Rocca, F. C. (2016). Supply Chain Management for Frugal Innovation Products. Tecnico Lisboa.
  • Rodríguez, L. A., & Cunha, C. (2017). Effects of dynamic capabilities on frugal innovation: A conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain application. 24th International Conference on Production Research, ICPR 2017, (Icpr), 388–393.
  • Ryder, B. (2010). First break all the rules. The Economist, 395(8678), 1–11.
  • Santos, L. L., Borini, F. M., & Oliveira Júnior, M. de M. (2020). In search of the frugal innovation strategy. Review of International Business and Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-10-2019-0142
  • Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing. Management Science, 50(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186
  • Sharma, A., & Iyer, G. R. (2012). Resource-constrained product development: Implications for green marketing and green supply chains. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.007
  • Shibin, K. T., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Luo, Z., Papadopoulos, T., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Frugal innovation for supply chain sustainability in SMEs: multi-method research design. Production Planning and Control, 29(11), 908–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1493139
  • Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/531435a Tan, K. C. (2001). A framework of supply chain management literature. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00020-4
  • Tshidimba, D., Lateur, F., & Sneyers, N. (2015). FRUGAL PRODUCTS: Western companies need to act “FRUGAL” to successfully sell FRUGAL products in emerging markets.
  • Zeschky, M. B., Winterhalter, S., & Gassmann, O. (2014). From Cost to Frugal And Reverse Innovation: Mapping the Field and Implications for Global Competitiveness. Research- Technology Management, 57(4), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5704235
  • Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308x5404007
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Dilek Özdemir Güngör 0000-0003-1661-3226

Publication Date January 31, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 21

Cite

APA Özdemir Güngör, D. (2021). Tedarik Zincirlerinde Tutumlu İnovasyonun Etkileri. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi(21), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.819652