Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yeni Bir Kitlesel Özelleştirme Platformu: Hyperledger Composer Kullanım Örneği

Year 2021, Issue: 31, 199 - 204, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1009610

Abstract

Günümüzde müşteri taleplerinin artan önemi ve bu taleplere cevap veren firmaların çoğalmasıyla birlikte kitlesel kişiselleştirme uygulamalarının kullanılması kaçınılmaz hale gelmiştir. Firmaların müşteri taleplerine cevap vermesine ve bu talepler doğrultusunda ürünler üretilmesine rağmen yeterince etkileşimli platform bulunmamaktadır. Ürün talebinin alınmasından üretim sürecine kadar olan süreçte gerekli olan aktörler ve malzemeler ile yeterli bağlantılar sağlanamamaktadır. Müşteri-üretici entegrasyonunun sağlanamadığı ve taleplerin karşılanmadığı modellerde ürünler yeterince özelleştirilemez. Önerilen bu yöntemde, üretim sürecindeki aktörleri bir araya getirecek ve etkileşimi sağlayacak bir platform önerilmektedir. Platform kurulurken güvenilir ve izlenebilir özellikleriyle dikkat çeken blockchain teknolojisi kullanılılmıştır. Hyperledger Composer, iş ağları için kullanılan bir blok zincir olup izin verilen ağ türünü ifade eder. Bu teknoloji ile aktörlerin birlikte işlem yapabileceği işbirlikçi, izlenebilir ve güvenilir bir platform önerilmiştir. Kişisel isteklerin arttığı sektörlerden biri olan mobilya sektörü örnek olarak verilmiştir.

References

  • ALTAY TOPCU, Betül, and Sevgi SUMERLİ SARIGÜL. 2020. “Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Blok Zinciri Teknolojisi: Finans Sektörü, Dış Ticaret ve Vergisel Düzenlemeler Üzerine Genel Bir Değerlendirme.” European Journal of Science and Technology (April): 27–39.
  • DİKİLİTAŞ, Yılmaz, Kazım Onur TOKA, and Ahmet SAYAR. 2021. “Current Research Areas in Blockchain.” European Journal of Science and Technology (26): 488–92.
  • Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås. 2016. “Services Trade Restrictiveness Index: The Trade Effect of Regulatory Differences.” OECD Trade Policy Papers, N° 28 (189). http://www.oecd.org/tad/services-trade/STRI Policy Brief_ENG.pdf.
  • Ho, G. T.S. et al. 2021. “A Blockchain-Based System to Enhance Aircraft Parts Traceability and Trackability for Inventory Management.” Expert Systems with Applications 179(April).
  • Homburg, Christian, Martin Schwemmle, and Christina Kuehnl. 2015. “New Product Design: Concept, Measurement, and Consequences.” Journal of Marketing 79(3): 41–56.
  • Huffman, Cynthia, and Barbara E. Kahn. 1998. “Variety for Sale: Mass Customization or Mass Confusion?” Journal of Retailing 74(4): 491–513.
  • Inayatullah, and Rakesh Narain. 2017. “Counteracting the Barriers to Adoption of Mass Customization Practices in Indian SMEs: A Case of Furniture Industry.” 2017 International Conference on Advances in Mechanical, Industrial, Automation and Management Systems, AMIAMS 2017 - Proceedings: 48–52.
  • Kristensson, Per, and Peter R. Magnusson. 2010. “Tuning Users’ Innovativeness during Ideation.” Creativity and Innovation Management 19(2): 147–59.
  • Kumar, Mahender, and Satish Chand. 2021. “MedHypChain: A Patient-Centered Interoperability Hyperledger-Based Medical Healthcare System: Regulation in COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications 179(January): 102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2021.102975.
  • Leng, Jiewu et al. 2020. “Blockchain-Empowered Sustainable Manufacturing and Product Lifecycle Management in Industry 4.0: A Survey.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 132(December 2019): 110112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110112. Mills, Peter K., Richard B. Chase, and Newton Margulies. 1984. “Motivating the Client/Employee System as a Service Production Strategy.” Journal of Library Administration 5(1): 97–112.
  • Neely, Andy. 2008. “Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of Manufacturing.” Operations Management Research 1(2): 103–18.
  • Pallant, Jessica L., Sean Sands, and Ingo Oswald Karpen. 2020. “The 4Cs of Mass Customization in Service Industries: A Customer Lens.” Journal of Services Marketing 34(4): 499–511.
  • Purohit, Soumya et al. 2021. “HonestChain: Consortium Blockchain for Protected Data Sharing in Health Information Systems.” Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications.
  • Qi, Yinan, Zhigang Mao, Min Zhang, and Hangfei Guo. 2020. “Manufacturing Practices and Servitization: The Role of Mass Customization and Product Innovation Capabilities.” International Journal of Production Economics 228(February): 107747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107747.
  • Surjandari, Isti, Harman Yusuf, Enrico Laoh, and Rayi Maulida. 2021. “Designing a Permissioned Blockchain Network for the Halal Industry Using Hyperledger Fabric with Multiple Channels and the Raft Consensus Mechanism.” Journal of Big Data 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00405-7.
  • “Typical Hyperledger Composer Solution Architecture.” https://hyperledger.github.io/composer/v0.19/introduction/solution-architecture.
  • Ulrich, Pamela V., Lenda Jo Anderson-Connell, and Weifang Wu. 2003. “Consumer Co-Design of Apparel for Mass Customization.” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 7(4): 398–412.
  • Zhang, Min, Hangfei Guo, and Xiande Zhao. 2017. “Effects of Social Capital on Operational Performance: Impacts of Servitisation.” International Journal of Production Research 55(15): 4304–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1246764.
  • Zhu, Xiaobao, Jing Shi, Samuel Huang, and Bin Zhang. 2020. “Consensus-Oriented Cloud Manufacturing Based on Blockchain Technology: An Exploratory Study.” Pervasive and Mobile Computing 62: 101113. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.pmcj.2020.101113.

A New Mass Customization Platform: Hyperledger Composer Use Case

Year 2021, Issue: 31, 199 - 204, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1009610

Abstract

Today, the use of mass customization applications has become inevitable with the increasing importance of customer demands and the proliferation of companies that respond to these demands. Although companies respond to customer demands and products are produced in line with these requests, there are not enough interactive platforms. Adequate connections with the actors and materials required in the process from the receipt of the product request to the production period cannot be provided. In models where customer-manufacturer integration cannot be achieved and demands are not met, the products cannot be sufficiently customized. In this proposed method, a platform is proposed that will bring together the actors in the production process and provide interaction. While establishing the platform, blockchain technology, which attracts attention with its reliable and traceable features, was used. Hyperledger Composer is a blockchain used for business networks and refers to the permissioned network type. With this technology, a collaborative, traceable and reliable platform where actors can transact together has been proposed. The furniture sector, which is one of the sectors where personal requests are increasing, is given as an example.

References

  • ALTAY TOPCU, Betül, and Sevgi SUMERLİ SARIGÜL. 2020. “Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Blok Zinciri Teknolojisi: Finans Sektörü, Dış Ticaret ve Vergisel Düzenlemeler Üzerine Genel Bir Değerlendirme.” European Journal of Science and Technology (April): 27–39.
  • DİKİLİTAŞ, Yılmaz, Kazım Onur TOKA, and Ahmet SAYAR. 2021. “Current Research Areas in Blockchain.” European Journal of Science and Technology (26): 488–92.
  • Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås. 2016. “Services Trade Restrictiveness Index: The Trade Effect of Regulatory Differences.” OECD Trade Policy Papers, N° 28 (189). http://www.oecd.org/tad/services-trade/STRI Policy Brief_ENG.pdf.
  • Ho, G. T.S. et al. 2021. “A Blockchain-Based System to Enhance Aircraft Parts Traceability and Trackability for Inventory Management.” Expert Systems with Applications 179(April).
  • Homburg, Christian, Martin Schwemmle, and Christina Kuehnl. 2015. “New Product Design: Concept, Measurement, and Consequences.” Journal of Marketing 79(3): 41–56.
  • Huffman, Cynthia, and Barbara E. Kahn. 1998. “Variety for Sale: Mass Customization or Mass Confusion?” Journal of Retailing 74(4): 491–513.
  • Inayatullah, and Rakesh Narain. 2017. “Counteracting the Barriers to Adoption of Mass Customization Practices in Indian SMEs: A Case of Furniture Industry.” 2017 International Conference on Advances in Mechanical, Industrial, Automation and Management Systems, AMIAMS 2017 - Proceedings: 48–52.
  • Kristensson, Per, and Peter R. Magnusson. 2010. “Tuning Users’ Innovativeness during Ideation.” Creativity and Innovation Management 19(2): 147–59.
  • Kumar, Mahender, and Satish Chand. 2021. “MedHypChain: A Patient-Centered Interoperability Hyperledger-Based Medical Healthcare System: Regulation in COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications 179(January): 102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2021.102975.
  • Leng, Jiewu et al. 2020. “Blockchain-Empowered Sustainable Manufacturing and Product Lifecycle Management in Industry 4.0: A Survey.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 132(December 2019): 110112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110112. Mills, Peter K., Richard B. Chase, and Newton Margulies. 1984. “Motivating the Client/Employee System as a Service Production Strategy.” Journal of Library Administration 5(1): 97–112.
  • Neely, Andy. 2008. “Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of Manufacturing.” Operations Management Research 1(2): 103–18.
  • Pallant, Jessica L., Sean Sands, and Ingo Oswald Karpen. 2020. “The 4Cs of Mass Customization in Service Industries: A Customer Lens.” Journal of Services Marketing 34(4): 499–511.
  • Purohit, Soumya et al. 2021. “HonestChain: Consortium Blockchain for Protected Data Sharing in Health Information Systems.” Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications.
  • Qi, Yinan, Zhigang Mao, Min Zhang, and Hangfei Guo. 2020. “Manufacturing Practices and Servitization: The Role of Mass Customization and Product Innovation Capabilities.” International Journal of Production Economics 228(February): 107747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107747.
  • Surjandari, Isti, Harman Yusuf, Enrico Laoh, and Rayi Maulida. 2021. “Designing a Permissioned Blockchain Network for the Halal Industry Using Hyperledger Fabric with Multiple Channels and the Raft Consensus Mechanism.” Journal of Big Data 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00405-7.
  • “Typical Hyperledger Composer Solution Architecture.” https://hyperledger.github.io/composer/v0.19/introduction/solution-architecture.
  • Ulrich, Pamela V., Lenda Jo Anderson-Connell, and Weifang Wu. 2003. “Consumer Co-Design of Apparel for Mass Customization.” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 7(4): 398–412.
  • Zhang, Min, Hangfei Guo, and Xiande Zhao. 2017. “Effects of Social Capital on Operational Performance: Impacts of Servitisation.” International Journal of Production Research 55(15): 4304–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1246764.
  • Zhu, Xiaobao, Jing Shi, Samuel Huang, and Bin Zhang. 2020. “Consensus-Oriented Cloud Manufacturing Based on Blockchain Technology: An Exploratory Study.” Pervasive and Mobile Computing 62: 101113. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.pmcj.2020.101113.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Nursena Bayğın 0000-0003-4457-5503

Mehmet Karaköse 0000-0002-3276-3788

Publication Date December 31, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 31

Cite

APA Bayğın, N., & Karaköse, M. (2021). A New Mass Customization Platform: Hyperledger Composer Use Case. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi(31), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1009610