EN
Before Asking “What Happens Next?”: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace
Abstract
The United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace has been closed in 2017 and its mission has been conveyed to the International Olympic Committee. The aim of this article is therefore to explore whether the principles of Olympic Education, based on Olympism and the Olympic Movement, are compatible with the objectives of Sport for Development and Peace. Qualitative research method was used in this research. And phenomenological research design was adapted as an instructive method for collecting and analyzing data. In-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 6 participants whom were selected through purposive sampling based on their expertise on the topics of the research question. The resulting data was compiled using descriptive analysis and classified using content analysis. According to 11 main themes and 2 sub-themes that have been deducted, it has been revealed that Olympic Education principles and Sport for Development and Peace objectives complement each other in terms of conceptual basis and practice. On the basis of the research findings, the following conclusions were drawn: The participants of the Sport for Development and Peace programmes need to take active roles in the process; the policy resolutions upon the research subjects need to be implemented fully and effectively; the stakeholders in the Olympic Education and Sport for Development and Peace processes need to be all in cooperation and coordination; the sustainability of the process needs to be maintained; the strategic partnership between the United Nations and the International Olympic Committee needs to be maintained on an equal footing.
Keywords
References
- Abreu, N. (2002). Olympic multiculturalism: proclaimed universal values versus cultural relativism. In Olympic Studies Current Intellectual Crossroads (pp. 201-254).
- Açıkgöz, S., Haudenhuyse, R., & Tınaz, C. (2021). Social innovation and challenges in youth-based sport practices: An analysis of state-led programs. In A. Tjønndal (Ed.), Social innovation in sport (pp.113-132). Palgrave McMillan.
- Appleton, C. (2011). 'Critical Friends', Feminism and Integrity: A reflection on the use of critical friends as a research tool to support researcher integrity and reflexivity in qualitative research studies. Women in Welfare Education, 10.
- Atalay, M. (2004). Uluslararası Olimpik Akademide (IOA) görev alan çeşitli ülke temsilcilerinin, dünyada Olimpizm düşüncesinin yaygınlaştırılmasına yönelik görüşlerinin analizi ve Türkiye için bir değerlendirme [Doctoral dissertation]. Marmara University (Türkiye).
- Barclay, C. (2019, August 23). Just for fun. AMUN. https://www.amun.org/sports-as-a-tool-for-peace/.
- Bardocz-Bencsik, M., & Doczi, T. (2019). Mapping sport for development and peace as Bourdieu’s field. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 81(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2019-0001.
- Beutler, I. (2008). Sport serving development and peace: Achieving the goals of the United Nations through sport. Sport in Society, 11(4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430802019227.
- Binder, D. L. (2012). Olympic values education: evolution of a pedagogy. Educational Review, 64(3), 275-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2012.676539.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Sports Activity Management
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
March 17, 2024
Publication Date
March 31, 2024
Submission Date
January 8, 2024
Acceptance Date
March 12, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2024 Volume: 6 Number: 1
APA
Otay, Y., & Yılmaz, S. (2024). Before Asking “What Happens Next?”: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace. Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education, 6(1), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.47778/ejsse.1416447
AMA
1.Otay Y, Yılmaz S. Before Asking “What Happens Next?”: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace. EJSSE. 2024;6(1):80-99. doi:10.47778/ejsse.1416447
Chicago
Otay, Yeliz, and Semih Yılmaz. 2024. “Before Asking ‘What Happens Next?’: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace”. Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education 6 (1): 80-99. https://doi.org/10.47778/ejsse.1416447.
EndNote
Otay Y, Yılmaz S (March 1, 2024) Before Asking “What Happens Next?”: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace. Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education 6 1 80–99.
IEEE
[1]Y. Otay and S. Yılmaz, “Before Asking ‘What Happens Next?’: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace”, EJSSE, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 80–99, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.47778/ejsse.1416447.
ISNAD
Otay, Yeliz - Yılmaz, Semih. “Before Asking ‘What Happens Next?’: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace”. Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education 6/1 (March 1, 2024): 80-99. https://doi.org/10.47778/ejsse.1416447.
JAMA
1.Otay Y, Yılmaz S. Before Asking “What Happens Next?”: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace. EJSSE. 2024;6:80–99.
MLA
Otay, Yeliz, and Semih Yılmaz. “Before Asking ‘What Happens Next?’: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace”. Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education, vol. 6, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 80-99, doi:10.47778/ejsse.1416447.
Vancouver
1.Yeliz Otay, Semih Yılmaz. Before Asking “What Happens Next?”: The Compatibility Between the Olympic Education Principles and The Objectives of Sport for Development and Peace. EJSSE. 2024 Mar. 1;6(1):80-99. doi:10.47778/ejsse.1416447