Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education

Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high-quality research findings, specialist knowledge, and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. 

Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) topics are;

- Physical education,

- Sport Education,

- Sport Technologies Education,

- Leadership in Sport Education,

- Sport Management Education,

- Recreation Education,

- Education management and sport,

- Special education and sport,

- Life-long education and sport,

- Fine arts education and sport,

- Curriculum and sport,

and also other topics about education fields.

AUTHOR GUIDELINES

1. All researches to be published in the journal are written in English and Turkish ( For Turkish papers, Extended Abstract is Mandatory ( Max. 750 words))

2.  It is necessary for researchers to take the plagiarism reports (10% similarity limit). If a researcher does not submit the plagiarism report to the editors, the report will be taken by the editorial board using the plagiarism program before being sent to the study referees.

3. At least two referees’ opinions will be taken before the study is published. Studies accepted by the referees and approved by the editor in accordance with the scientific content and form are published in the journal.

4. The study to be published in the journal should not have been published in any publications before, or should not have been sent to any magazines to be published at the same time. This is completely the author’s responsibility.

5. Primarily, researches should be uploaded to the system via the http://dergipark.gov.tr/jssr website by researchers. The studies uploaded to the system are taken to preliminary consideration by the editorial board. After the approval of the editorial board, the studies are transmitted to the referees on the electronic media and the studies are published in accordance with the decisions (acceptance/rejection) of the referees and the editors.

6. All studies must be written in Times New Roman font and justified alignment.

7. The title of the study must be written in 14-point and 1 line space in the form of CAPITAL LETTERS.

8. The Abstract heading of the study must be written in large font, bold and 12-point. Abstract text must be in 9-point and 1 line space and not exceed 300 words.

9. Author name / names must be written below the heading of the study in bold, italic,   12-point and left aligned in order and academic title must not be used. Authors' institutions must be written in order and left aligned below their names.

10. The keywords of the study must be written in 9-point fonts, italic, starting with capital letters, maximum 5 words as shown in the example template on the right side of the summary text.

11. E-mail and telephone contacts (preferably) of the responsible writer of the study must be given as a footnote with 9-point at the bottom of the summary.

12. The text of the study must be written in 12-point and 1,15 space lines.

13. Tables, graphics, shapes etc. must be in 10-point (9-11 point) and must be prepared according to the APA 6 style.

14. Study: It must be organized in the form of INTRODUCTION, METHOD (Research Model, Study Group / Population and Sample, Data Collection Tools, Data Collection, Analysis of Data), FINDINGS, DISCUSSION, RESULTS, SUGGESTIONS and REFERENCES and title of each chapter must be 12- point, in bold and capital letter.

15. The study must be in A4 page format, text length should not exceed 25 pages including figures, graphics, and tables.

16. All margins of the page must be 2.5 cm.

17. The page numbers must be 11-point in Times New Roman font below the page and in the middle (The page number must not appear on the first page).   

18. The list of resources is sorted alphabetically by the first letter of the first author's surname for each study.

19. While giving an intertextual reference, more than one study must be given in alphabetical order. In the display of two or more studies in the same parenthesis, the semicolon is placed between the studies. (Hutchins & Rowe, 2009: 120-125; Yıldız and Güzel, 2015: 12-25; Yıldız, 2016).

Giving refernces: References must be written 10-point in APA style and 1 line spacing.

**  It must be shown as "et al." with 5 and more authors in references and intertextual reference.

 1. If taken from a journal:

Temel, C. (2016). A study of global citizenship levels of Turkish university students according to different variables (youth camp leaders sample). Educational Research and Reviews 11 (17), 1689-1695.

Temel, C., & Güllü, M. (2016). Draw a physical education lesson. education and science,  41(183), 351-361.

Temel, C., Mirzeoğlu, N., & Mirzeoğlu, D. (2013). An investigation of physical education teachers’ work alienation level according to some variables. International Journal of Academic Research, 5 (4), 502-508.

Yousefi, Z., Abedi, M., Baghban, I., Eatemadi, O. & Abedi, A. (2011). Personal and situational variables, and career concerns: Predicting career adaptability in young adults. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(01), 263-271.

 2. If taken from a book:

Single author

 Wodtke, C., & Govella, A. (2009). Information architecture: Blueprints for the web (2nd ed.). Berkely, CA: New Riders.

Two authors

Dyson, B., and Casey, A. (2016). Cooperative learning in physical education and physical activity. New York: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group. p. 162-167.

3. If taken from a book with editors:

Schiessl, P., & Lay, S. (2005). Influence of concrete composition. In H. Böhni (Ed.), Corrosion in reinforced concrete structures (pp. 91-134). Cambridge, England: Woodhead. 

 4. If anonymous:

Anonymous. (2000). Sports Statistics, Prime Ministry State Institute of Statistics, Ankara: Publication No:180.

 5. If taken from the internet:

All 33 Chile miners freed in flawless rescue. (2010, October 13). Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39625809/ns/world_news-americas/

6. If taken from E-Books:

The reference list entry for an e-book includes the author, date, title, and source (URL or DOI). For a chapter in an e-book, include the chapter title and page numbers (if available).

Whole e-book:

Author, A. (date). Title of book. Retrieved from http://xxxxxxxxx

Author, A. (date). Title of book. doi:xxxxxxxxxxxx

Chapter in an e-book:

Author, A. (date). Title of chapter. In E. Editor (Ed.), Title of book (pp. xx–xx). Retrieved from http://xxxxxxxxx

Author, A. (date). Title of chapter. In E. Editor (Ed.), Title of book (pp. xx–xx). doi:xxxxxxxxxx

7. If taken from Dissertation / Thesis:

Sabbagh, S. A. (2009). Investigating oral presentation skills and non-verbal communication techniques in UAE classrooms: A thesis in teaching English to speakers of other languages (master’s thesis). American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

If the reference used in the English version of the study is in a different language from English, the language must be shown in square brackets [In Turkish].  In English version of the study, English records of Turkish references must be written if available. If it is a study with an English title and abstract,  [In English Abstract] in square brackets must be written followed by its English record.

 8. When the same author has more than one study with the same year, it is sorted in small letters like "a, b, c" in accordance with the references.

  (Temel, 2018a)  (Temel, 2018b)  (Temel, 2018c)

9. Additions or extractions can not be made to the studies decided to be published.

10. The studies are published based on the date of arrival. However, this sequence may not be applied for some priority studies in terms of not losing its update. In this case, the editorial board has the entire authority for decision-making.

11. Studies which are not appropriate to the stated rules will not be evaluated.

12. The acceptance or rejection of the study may vary depending on the length of the review of the scientific advisory board.

* Please CLICK for the Example Template in accordance with the above publishing and detailed writing rules.

Ethical Principles and Publishing Policy
Publication Ethics

Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) aims to produce, improve, and share knowledge objectively via scientific methods by examining the current improvements related to Sport Sciences with a holistic and inclusive approach.
Scientific works are studies which are concluded as a result of scientific methods and which provide with the application of scientific methods and objectivity. In the process of production of these works, all the components of the publication process; namely, publisher, editor, author, reviewers, and readers must follow the ethical principles. In this scope, Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) must also follow the ethical principles of the all components of the publication process in the light of the guides and policies published in the open access by the Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE (e.g. COPE “Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors”; ICMJE Recommendations, CSE White Paper on Publication Ethics, WAME resources, WMA policies, and ORI; WMA Helsinki Declaration).
In case manipulated, falsified and fabricated data is determined in the scientific studies which are sent and/or accepted by the journal, the institution(s) for which the author(s) works for will be informed and the study will be rejected. Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) has the right to ask for the documents related to the analysis results from the authors according to the feedback given by the editorial board and/or reviewers.


Research Ethics (ETHICAL CONSENT FORM)
In the scope of the protection of human and animal rights, the Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) adopts the exact convenience principle of national and international ethical rules and principles. In the articles evaluated in Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE), Research Ethics Committee Approval is needed for the following items:
• Researches conducted in qualitative or quantitative approaches which require data collection from the participants using survey, interview, focus group study, observation, and/or experiment techniques,
• Using humans or animals (including material/data) with experimental or other scientific aims,
• Clinical researches on humans,
• Researches on animals,
• Retrospective studies in accordance with the law on the protection of personal data.


Ethical Responsibilities of the Publisher
Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) is a personal journal having been publishing in the field of Sport Sciences with the management of publication board or editorial board since 2019. The journal publishers adopt the principle of free publishing without profit-making purposes in the light of publishing scientific studies with ethical principles.
• The publisher who is one of the stakeholders of the scientific study must act in the light of ethical principles.
• The publisher is responsible for using the communication ability without considering personal benefits and for leading the audience correctly.
• The publisher protects all the property rights and copyrights of the articles published in their journal; and assumes the task of archiving each product.
• Individuals must not abstain from contacting the publisher in case they come across an unethical situation.


Ethical Tasks and Responsibilities of the Editors
• Rejecting articles which are incompatible with the aim and scope of the journal.
• Considering the original value of the articles, their contribution to the field, the reliability and validity of the research method, the clarity of expression and the aim and scope of the journal.
• Evaluating the articles in the pre-assessment phase as long as there are no serious problems about the submitted articles; considering the suggestions of the Reviewers, not changing the decisions made by previous editor(s) as long as there are no serious problems, providing with constructive criticism.
• Applying double-blind peer review method and evaluation process policies adopted by the journal, keep the identity information of the reviewers confidential, providing with objective and timely evaluation for each article.
• In order to provide with independent peer evaluation,
• In order to achieve peer evaluation independently, reviewers independent from the institutions of the authors are appointed.
• Sending articles for evaluation to the editors and reviewers considering their field of expertise and supporting objective and independent evaluation process.
• Acting in a balanced objective and fair way while the reviewers and editors do their duty without letting any discriminations against gender, religion or political belief or the ethnic or geographical roots of the authors.
• Evaluating the articles according to their content and favoring no authors in that sense.
• Taking necessary precautions and evaluating the presented declarations if any; in order to prevent possible conflicts of interest. In case there is a conflict of interest, Journal suspends the evaluation process of the article until the ambiguity is resolved; in this sense, Journal has the right to demand Research Ethics Committee Approval, Interviewer Consent Forms, and required documents.
• Evaluating sponsored articles or articles on special subjects in the same way with other articles.
• Applying required procedures by adhering to the policies and procedures of the journal in case there is a complaint about the ethical violation. Giving a chance to the authors in order to answer the complaint, and not avoiding applying required sanctions no matter to whom the article belongs to.
• Taking articles with negative conclusions into account.
• Acting responsibly and sensitively about publishing contents such as notice of correction, explanation, apology, and disclaimer.

Ethical Responsibilities of the Reviewers
A double-blind peer review is applied in the process of article evaluation in the Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) in which author(s) do not know reviewers and vice versa; Reviewers do not contact with authors directly; correction requests are forwarded to author(s) by the editors on the journal management system through article evaluation forms and notes on the original text.
Reviewers who are to evaluate articles submitted to the Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) must carry the following ethical responsibilities:
• Reviewers must objectively evaluate only the content of the article in a timely manner and must accept articles only about their fields of expertise in order to contribute to the decision-making process of the Editor.
• Reviewers must carry out the evaluation objectively and in strict confidence. As per this principle, they must remove the articles that they have evaluated and must use them after they are published. Nationality, gender, religion, political belief and commercial purposes must not be included in the evaluation process and must not ruin the objectivity.
• When reviewers conclude that there is a conflict of interest – common interest, they must inform the editor and reject evaluating the article.
• Reviewers must conclude evaluation in accordance with the academic etiquette with constructive and kind use of language, and must avoid libelous and hostile personal comments.
• Reviewers must evaluate the article which they accept to evaluate in the given time.
• Reviewers must reject evaluating articles that resemble to their own article in the writing process or in the evaluation process.
• Reviewers must protect the confidentiality of the information provided by the editor and author; as per confidentiality policy, they must remove the article after evaluation; if any, they must inform the editor about situations against bling judgment policy and reject the offer of evaluation.
• They must be aware of the potential conflicts of interest (financial, institutional, collaborative or author-related or the relations among authors); and if necessary, they must warn the editor.
• They must continue to protect the confidentiality of the study and the evaluation process.
• In case there is a situation which can affect their original comments and feedbacks, they must inform the journal.
• They must try to reply to the demands coming from the journal about revision and re-evaluation.


Ethical Responsibilities of the Authors
The following are the scientific research ethical responsibilities of author(s) who submitted the article to Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE):
• Author(s) must not submit their articles to the Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) at if the article was published in another journal or was submitted to another journal.
• Author(s) must send original articles to the Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE).
• Author(s) must refer to the sources that they use during the production of the article appropriately in the light of ethical principles.
• The individuals who does not contribute to the article must not be included in the article as author(s); changing the author order of the article or adding new authors or excluding an author must not be offered after submitting the article. During submission, the names of the authors must be uploaded to the system by the correspondent author. The Journal Editor Committee do not make any changes on the system.
• Author(s) must inform the editor about the individuals with conflict of interest or common interests for the article that has been submitted.
• In case information about the article or raw data is requested from the authors during the evaluation process, the requested information must be provided by the author(s) to the editor.
• Author(s) must provide documents related to the rights to use data, the approvals related to the research-analyses or the consents of the participant who forms the study groups. Information concerning voluntary participation consent form must be provided in the method part.
• Author(s) must contact the editors and edit or retrieve their content within five days when they realize that there is a problem with their article in the process of evaluation or in the preview process or published in the journal’s electronic environment.
• Author(s) must provide information regarding ethics committee approval of their articles which require quantitative or qualitative data collection such as experiment, survey, scale, interview, observation, focus group study with the name of the ethics committee name, decision date and issue in the first and last pages and in the method part. They must also submit an ethics committee approval document to the system.
• Author(s) must provide evidence (obtaining permission for the use of documents such as scales, surveys and photographs developed by others) that show they pay strict attention to the ethical principles in the process of data collection in the article. In the articles, it must be pointed out that copyright regulations were applied for the research and publication ethics and literary and artistic works. If the research is on humans and animals, it must be pointed out that the research was conducted in accordance with the international declarations, guides etc. (Helsinki Declaration).
• No ethics committee approval is required for the review articles. However, authors must show that there is no requirement for ethics committee requirements in the first, the last and the method part for the articles without ethics committee requirements.


Plagiarism Policy
Plagiarism is a common and serious ethical problem which affects scientific studies without considering if it is deliberate or not. Consequently, it is unethical and unacceptable as well as it is a crime to publish articles which have similarities with other sources and do not include references for it.
Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) takes various precautions to prevent any kind of plagiarism. Similarity Report Programs are used in order to determine the coinciding and similar text examples of the articles (after the acceptance of the articles). Articles with a similarity score of 10% and more are rejected even though they are accepted in the first place. Moreover, the publication board can act in accordance with COPE rules when encountered by plagiarism, reference manipulation and data fraud claims and suspicions.


Conflict of Interest Policy and Copyright Regulation
• Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) is responsible for taking precautions in order to prevent potential conflicts of interest and for assessing the given declarations. Consequently, the journal thinks that potential conflicts of interest harms the scientific publication ethics. The journal defines all the responsibilities for all shareholders in order to determine and prevent conflicts of interest. In case of a potential conflict of interest, the Journal suspends the evaluation process of an article until the unclarity is eliminated. In this context, the Journal has the right to request Ethics Committee Approval, Interviewer Voluntary Consent Form and other documents to be submitted from the author that submits the article.
• Author(s) has the copyright of their own articles and the first-time publication right belongs to the Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE); as per Creative Commons Attribution principles, the article can be shared referring to the author and journal.
• Author(s) must submit the article with the signed version of Copyright and Conflict of Interest Form (all the authors of an article must sign it) when they apply for article publication to Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE).


Publication Fee
Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE) do not demand any charges for publication or publication cost from the author or the authors in any phase such as the submission, evaluation publication phases. Furthermore, no article processing charges are requested from the authors for their submitted articles. The journal is free-of-charge and 100% nonprofit in order to support publication in the field of Sport Sciences. Moreover, the journal provides with DOI number from the moment the article is accepted and provides free access to the full text of the article.


Preview
The articles which are submitted to the Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE), accepted after the evaluation process and completed the process after the acceptance are presented with preview along with their DOI (Digital Object Identifier) numbers on the electronic environment in order to distribute the scientific information in an up-to-date manner. The articles which are published in the preview are published in an issue and voice with a page number approved by the editorial board and they are removed from the preview afterward. The articles in preview may not be the last version which will be published in the intended issue. Small changes may occur in the last version of the studies.

Reporting Situations Against Ethical Principles to the Journal Editor Board
In the Eurasian Journal of Sport Sciences and Education (EJSSE), editors, reviewers, authors must report the situations against Ethical Principles about the behaviors or the articles which are in the evaluation process, in preview or published using ejsse.editor@gmail.com.

Policy Grounds

YÖK Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi (Boar of Higher Education Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directions)
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Budapest Open Access Initiative
Creative Commons