The effect of face to face interaction on critical thinking skills in web supported case-based learning / Web destekli örnek olay yönteminde yüz yüze etkileşimin öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerilerine etkisi

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, web destekli örnek olay yönteminde yüz yüze etkileşimin öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerilerine etkisini incelemektir. Araştırmada tek gruplu tekrarlı ölçümler deseni kullanılmıştır Araştırmaya Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü’nde 2010-2011 Güz döneminde 2. Sınıfta okuyan ve Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri dersi alan 65 öğrenci katılmıştır. Uygulama toplam 7 hafta sürmüştür. Araştırma bulgularına göre, web destekli örnek olay yönteminde yüz yüze sınıf etkileşiminin ardından, öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerileri ortalama puanları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu görülmektedir ([F_(1–63)=187,091, p<,05]). Benzer araştırmaların farklı disiplin ve sınıf düzeyinde de ortaya çıkarılmasına yönelik çalışmaların yapılması alanyazına katkı açısından önem taşımaktadır.

Keywords

• Web desteği, örnek olay yöntemi, eleştirel düşünme, eleştirel düşünme dereceli puanlama anahtarı

-

Abstract

The aim of this research is to review the effect of Face to Face Interaction on Critical Thinking Skills in Web Supported Case-Based Learning. Single-group repeated measures design was used in the study. The samples of the study were sixty five students, taking the Principles and Methods of Teaching course in their second year, in the department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology in the Gazi Faculty of Education in Gazi University. The research study took a total of seven weeks. The analysis, done using OneWay ANOVA for Repeated Measures, showed that there was a meaningful difference on critical thinking scores following the environment that contains face to face interaction ([F(1–63)=187,091, p<,05]). It is important to repeat these experimental studies on different disciplines and grades in order to contribute to the literature.

Keywords

• Web supported, case-based learning, critical thinking, critical thinking rubric

References

1. Alvarez, C. M. (1991). Case-Based Instruction and Learning: An Interdisciplinary Project, Reading is Knowledge. Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., ve Logan, J. (Editörler). Thirteenth Year Book ve The Collage Reading Association
2. Andrews, L. (2002). Preparing general education pre-service teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 27–35.
3. Aybek, B. (2007). Eleştirel düşünmenin öğretiminde öğretmenin rolü. Üniversite ve Toplum, 7 (2).
4. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., ve Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3 - 4), 3693
5. Bonk, C. J. ve Dennen, V. (1999). Teaching on the Web: With a little help from my pedagogical friends. Journal of Computingin Higher Education, 11(1), 3–28. Bradshaw, A .C., Bishop, J. L., Gens, L. S., Miller, S. L ve Rogers, A.R. (2002). The relationship of the world wide web to thinking skills. Education Media International. 39(3 - 4).
6. Chance, P. (1986). Thinking in the classroom: A survey of programs. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
7. Choi, I. ve Lee, K. (2008). A case-based learning environment design for real-world classroom management problem solving, Techtrends, 52(3). 26-31.
8. Craig, D. Ul-Haq, Khan, S., Zimring, S., Keheo, C., Rick, C. ve Guzdial, M. (2000). Using an Unstructured Collaboration Tool to Support Peer Interaction in Large College Classes. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

9. Cüceloğlu, D. (1994). İyi Düşün Doğru Karar Ver. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
10. Demirel, Ö. (2003). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Program Geliştirme (Beşinci baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık
11. Diamentes, T. ve Ovington, J. (2003). Storytelling: Using A Case Method Approach in Administrator Preparation Programs, Education, 123(3), 465-471
12. Doğan, A. (2013). Üstbiliş ve üstbilişe dayalı öğretim. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 3, 6-20.
13. Drucker, P. F. (1999). 21.Yüzyıl için yönetim tartışmaları. (Çev. İ. Bahçıvangil), İstanbul: Epilson.
14. Facione, P. A. (1990). A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purpose of Educational Assessment and Instructions, The Delphi Report. East Lansing, National Center for Research on Teacher Training , EBSCOST ERIC Document No: ED315423.
15. Facione, P. A. ve Facione, N. C. (1994). Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric. California Academic Press.
16. Facione, P. A. (1998). Critical Thinking: What It Is and What It Counts, California:Academic Press.
17. Fisher, R. (1995). Teaching Children to Think UK, Stanley Thornes Ltd.Gagne, R. M. (1980). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education. 7(1).
19. Gürkaynak, İ., Üstel, F. Ve Gülgöz, S. (2008). Eleştirel Düşünme. Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. Sabancı Üniversitesi İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi.
20. Halpern, D. F. (1996). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Human Rights Resource Center Web Sitesi. “Method 2 Case Studies,” 2002. Web: Human Rights Resource Center Web sitesindeki http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/htm adresinden 2009 tarihinde alınmıştır.
22. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Jonassen, D. H. (2002). Integrating of Problem Solving into Instructional Design. In Instructional Design and Technology. Reiser R.A ve Dempsey J.V. (Ed.).
24. Karagöz, S. ve Çivi, C. (1997). Genel Öğretim Metotları (Genişletilmiş Yedinci Baskı) İstanbul: Öz Eğitim Yayınları.
25. Kaya, H. (1997). Üniversite ÖğrencilerindeEleştirel Akıl Yürütme Gücü. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
26. Khan, B. H. (1996). Web-based instruction (WBI). What is it and Why is it? İn Web-based instruction (Ed. B. H. Khan), Educational Technology Publications: Englewood Cliffs, Nj.
27. Kleinfeld, J. (1991). Preparing teachers for multicultural classrooms: A case study in rural alaska. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA, Chicago.
28. Koray, Ö., Köksal, M. S., Özdemir M., ve Presley, A. İ. (2007). The effect of creative and critical thinking based laboratory applications on academic achievement and science process skills. Elementary Education Online, 6 (3), 377-3
29. Kökdemir, D. (2000). Deniz Yıldızlarını Kurtarmaya Çalışanların Öyküsü. Eleştirel ve Yaratıcı Düşünme. XI. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi. 19-22 Eylül, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
30. Kreps, G. L. (1984). Using the Case Study Method in Organizational Communication Classes: Developing Students’ Insight, Knowledge and Creativity, EBSCOhost veritabanındaki http://weblink1.epnet.com adresinden 17.06.2010 tarihinde alınmıştır.
31. Lee, K. S. (2004). Effects of Individual Versus Online Collaborative Case Study Learning Strategies On Critical Thinking of Undergraduate Students (Doctoral Dissertation, Teksas University, 2004).
32. Lee, S. H., Lee, J., Liu, X., Bonk, C. J. ve Magjuka, R. J. (2009). A review of casebased learning practices in an online MBA program: A program-level case study. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (3), 178–190.
33. Levin, B. B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experince in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and teacher education. 10(2), 1-14
34. Levin, B. B. (1996). Learning from discussion: A comparison of computer-based versus face to face case discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, New York
35. Levin, B. B. (1997). The influence of context in case-based teaching: Personal dilemmas, moral issues, or real changes in teachers’ thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, Chicago
36. Moallem, M. (2003). An Interactive Online Course: A Collaborative Design Model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51 (4), 85-103.
37. Neo, M. (2003). Developing a collaborative learning environment using a web based design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 462-473.
38. Norris, S. P. ve Ennis, R.H. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. CA. Midwest Publications.
39. Owston, R. D. (1997). The world wide web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 26 (2), 27-33.
40. Paul, R. C. (1992). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. (2. Baskı). Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
41. Pellegrino, J. (1995). Technology in support of critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 9-10.
42. Rosanna, D. (2002). Nursing Students’ Experiences with and Strategic Approaches to Case-based Instruction: A Replication and Comparison Study Between Two Disciplines. Journal of Nursing Education, 41(4), 165-174.
43. Scriven, M. ve Paul, R. (1996). Defining critical thinking: A draft statement for the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking. Web: http://www.criticalthinking.org/University/univlibrary/library.nclk adresinden 12.05.2010 tarihinde alınmıştır.
44. Siegel, H. (1999). What (Good) are Thinking Dispositions. Educational Theory, 49 (2), 207-224.
45. Sinnott, J. D. (1989). A model for solution of ill-structured problems: Implications for everyday and abstract problem solving. In Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications. J. D. Sinnott (Ed.). New York: Praeger.
46. Swartz , R. J. ve Parks, S. (1994). Infusing Critical and Creative Thinking into content instuction. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press & Software.
47. Tok, E. Ve Sevinç, M. (2010). Düşünme becerileri eğitiminin eleştirel düşünme ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 67-82.
48. Tosun, K. (1992). İşletme Yönetimi Genel Esaslar (Altıncı Baskı). Ankara: Savaş Kitap ve Yayınevi
49. VanderStoep, S. ve Pintrich, P. (2003). Learning to learn. The skill and will of college success. Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice Hall.
50. Vanzoest, L. R. (1995). The impact of small group discussion on preservice teachers’observations and reflections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA. San Francisco.
51. Voss, J. F. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning in ill-structured domains. In Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods. C. Antaki (Ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
52. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
53. Williams, M. (2004). Exploring the effects of a multimedia case-based learning environment in pre-service science teacher education in Jamaica (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands).
54. Yeh, Y. (1997). Teacher Training for Critical Thinking Instruction Via a Computer Simulation (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Virginia).
55. Zhao, Y. (1998). Design for adoption: The development of a Web-based integrated learning environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 30(3), 307-328.