BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2015, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 51 - 67, 01.02.2015

Abstract

This study aimed at examining computer programming students’ attitudes towards programming and their programming self-efficacy as well as the relationship between them. The study was conducted in a university located in the north of Turkey in the spring semester of the 2013-2014 academic year. The research sample consisted of 325 students studying in three different Computer Programming programs of the Department of Computer Technologies affiliated to a vocational school of the above-mentioned university. The Attitude Scale toward Computer Programming (AStCP) and the Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Inventory (CPSEI) were used for data collection. The descriptive survey model was employed in the study. The data obtained in the study were analyzed via the Mann Whitney U-test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Spearman Brown rho correlation coefficient. The research results indicated that the students generally had positive attitudes towards computer programming, and they had a medium-level programming self-efficacy. The attitudes of the students towards programming varied statistically significantly by gender, grade, and education type. Similarly, programming self-efficacy varied statistically by the aforementioned three variables. Finally, a positive medium relationship was found between the students’ attitudes towards programming and their self-efficacy

References

  • Akkoyunlu, B. & Kurbanoglu, S. (2004). A study on teachers’ information literacy self-efficacy beliefs. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 11- 20.
  • Altun, A. & Mazman, S.G. (2012). Programlamaya ilişkin öz yeterlilik algısı ölçeğinin Türkçe formumun geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 3(2), 297- 308.
  • Anastasiadou, S. D. & Karakos, A.S. (2011). The beliefs of electrical and computer engineering students’ regarding computer programming. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(1), 37-51.
  • Aşkar, P. & Davenport, D. (2009). An investigation of factors related to self- efficacy for java programming among engineering students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1).
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Başer, M. (2013). Developing attitude scale toward computer programming. International Journal of Social Science, 6(6), 199-215.
  • Başer, M. & Geban, Ö. (2007). Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Research in science & technological education, 25(1), 115–133.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Chang, S. L., Shieh, R. S., Liu, E. Z. F. ve Yu, P. T. (2012). Factors influencing women’s attitudes towards computers in a computer literacy training program. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 177-187.
  • Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
  • Çakıroğlu, E. & Işıksal, M. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs toward mathematics. Education and Science, 34(151), 132-139.
  • Demirtaş, H., Cömert, M., & Özer, N. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes towards profession. Education and Science, 36(159), 96- 111.
  • Ekici, G. (2008). The effects of the classroom management lesson on preservice teachers’ teacher sense of self-efficacy. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 98-110.
  • Hançer, A. H., Uludağ, N., & Yılmaz, A. (2007). The evaluation of the attitudes of science teacher candidates towards chemistry lesson. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 100-109.
  • Hawi, N. (2010). Causal attributions of success and failure made by undergraduate studentsin an introductory-level computer programming course. Computers & Education, 54(2010), 1127-1136.
  • Hongwarittorrn, N. & Krairit, D. (2010). Effects of program visualization (jeliot3) on students' performance and attitudes towards java programming. In The spring 8th International conference on Computing, Communication and Control Technologies, 6-9 April, Orlando, Florida USA.
  • Horzum, M. B. & Çakır, Ö. (2009). The validity and reliability studyof the turkish version of the online technologies self-efficacy scale. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(3), 1343-1356.
  • Hwang, G., Wu, P. & Chen, C. (2012). An online game approach for improving students’ learning performance in web-based problem-solving activities. Computers & Education, 59, 1246-1256.
  • Jegede, P. O. (2009). Predictors of java programming self efficacy among engineeringstudents in a Nigerian university. International Journal of Computer Science andInformation Security, 4(1&2).
  • Karsten, R. & Roth, M. R. (1998). The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductorycomputer literacy courses. Journal of Research on Technology Education, 31(1), 14-24.
  • Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). The impact of critical thinking and logical-mathematical intelligence on algorithmic design skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 173-193.
  • Korkmaz, Ö. & Altun, H. (2013). Engineering and ceit student’s attitude towards learning computer programming. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 1169-1185.
  • Kutluca, T. & Ekici, G. (2010). Examining teacher candidates’ attitudes and self- efficacy perceptions towards the computer assisted education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 177-188.
  • Lau, W. W. F. & Yuen, A. H. K. (2009). Exploring the effects of gender and learning styles on computer programming performance: implications for programming pedagogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 696-712.
  • Milne, I. ve Rowe, G. (2002). Difficulties in learning and teaching programming- views of students and tutors. Education and Information Technologies, 7(1), 55-66.
  • Pehlivan, Z. (2010). Analysis of physical self-perceptions of physical education teacher candidates and their attitudes toward teaching profession. Education and Science, 35(156), 126-141.
  • Pereira, H. B. D. B., Zebende, G. F. & Moret, M. A. (2010). Learning computer programming: Implementing a fractal in a Turing Machine. Computers & Education, 55(2), 767-776.
  • Pillay, N. & Jugoo, V. R. (2005). An investigation into student characteristics affecting novice programming performance. SIGCSE Bulletin 37(4), 107- 110.
  • Ramalingam, V. & Wiedenbeck, S. (1998). Development and validation of scores on a computer programming self-efficacy scale and group analysis of novice programmer self-efficacy. Journal of Educational ComputingResearch, 19(4), 367-381.
  • Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N.(2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 137-172.
  • Stoilescu, D. & Egodawatte, G. (2010). Gender differences in the use of computers, programming, and peer interactions in computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education, 20(4), 283-300.
  • Van De Gaer, E., Grisay, A., Schulz, W. & Gebhardt, E. (2012). The reference group effect an explanation of the paradoxical relationship between academic achievement and self-confidence across countries. Journal Of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(8), 1205-1228.
  • Yenilmez, K. (2008). Open primary education school students’ opinions about mathematics television programmes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(4), 176-189.

A study for determining computer programming students’ attitudes towards programming and their programming self-efficacy / Bilgisayar programcılığı öğrencilerinin programlamaya karşı tutum ve programlama öz-yeterliklerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir çalı

Year 2015, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 51 - 67, 01.02.2015

Abstract

This study aimed at examining computer programming students’ attitudes towards programming and their programming self-efficacy as well as the relationship between them. The study was conducted in a university located in the north of Turkey in the spring semester of the 2013-2014 academic year. The research sample consisted of 325 students studying in three different Computer Programming programs of the Department of Computer Technologies affiliated to a vocational school of the above-mentioned university. The Attitude Scale toward Computer Programming (AStCP) and the Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Inventory (CPSEI) were used for data collection. The descriptive survey model was employed in the study. The data obtained in the study were analyzed via the Mann Whitney U-test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the  Spearman Brown rho correlation coefficient. The research results indicated that the students generally had positive attitudes towards computer programming, and they had a medium-level programming self-efficacy. The attitudes of the students towards programming varied statistically significantly by gender, grade, and education type. Similarly, programming self-efficacy varied statistically by the aforementioned three variables. Finally, a positive medium relationship was found between the students’ attitudes towards programming and their self-efficacy.

References

  • Akkoyunlu, B. & Kurbanoglu, S. (2004). A study on teachers’ information literacy self-efficacy beliefs. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 11- 20.
  • Altun, A. & Mazman, S.G. (2012). Programlamaya ilişkin öz yeterlilik algısı ölçeğinin Türkçe formumun geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 3(2), 297- 308.
  • Anastasiadou, S. D. & Karakos, A.S. (2011). The beliefs of electrical and computer engineering students’ regarding computer programming. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(1), 37-51.
  • Aşkar, P. & Davenport, D. (2009). An investigation of factors related to self- efficacy for java programming among engineering students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1).
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Başer, M. (2013). Developing attitude scale toward computer programming. International Journal of Social Science, 6(6), 199-215.
  • Başer, M. & Geban, Ö. (2007). Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Research in science & technological education, 25(1), 115–133.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Chang, S. L., Shieh, R. S., Liu, E. Z. F. ve Yu, P. T. (2012). Factors influencing women’s attitudes towards computers in a computer literacy training program. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 177-187.
  • Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
  • Çakıroğlu, E. & Işıksal, M. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs toward mathematics. Education and Science, 34(151), 132-139.
  • Demirtaş, H., Cömert, M., & Özer, N. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes towards profession. Education and Science, 36(159), 96- 111.
  • Ekici, G. (2008). The effects of the classroom management lesson on preservice teachers’ teacher sense of self-efficacy. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 98-110.
  • Hançer, A. H., Uludağ, N., & Yılmaz, A. (2007). The evaluation of the attitudes of science teacher candidates towards chemistry lesson. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 100-109.
  • Hawi, N. (2010). Causal attributions of success and failure made by undergraduate studentsin an introductory-level computer programming course. Computers & Education, 54(2010), 1127-1136.
  • Hongwarittorrn, N. & Krairit, D. (2010). Effects of program visualization (jeliot3) on students' performance and attitudes towards java programming. In The spring 8th International conference on Computing, Communication and Control Technologies, 6-9 April, Orlando, Florida USA.
  • Horzum, M. B. & Çakır, Ö. (2009). The validity and reliability studyof the turkish version of the online technologies self-efficacy scale. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(3), 1343-1356.
  • Hwang, G., Wu, P. & Chen, C. (2012). An online game approach for improving students’ learning performance in web-based problem-solving activities. Computers & Education, 59, 1246-1256.
  • Jegede, P. O. (2009). Predictors of java programming self efficacy among engineeringstudents in a Nigerian university. International Journal of Computer Science andInformation Security, 4(1&2).
  • Karsten, R. & Roth, M. R. (1998). The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductorycomputer literacy courses. Journal of Research on Technology Education, 31(1), 14-24.
  • Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). The impact of critical thinking and logical-mathematical intelligence on algorithmic design skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 173-193.
  • Korkmaz, Ö. & Altun, H. (2013). Engineering and ceit student’s attitude towards learning computer programming. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 1169-1185.
  • Kutluca, T. & Ekici, G. (2010). Examining teacher candidates’ attitudes and self- efficacy perceptions towards the computer assisted education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 177-188.
  • Lau, W. W. F. & Yuen, A. H. K. (2009). Exploring the effects of gender and learning styles on computer programming performance: implications for programming pedagogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 696-712.
  • Milne, I. ve Rowe, G. (2002). Difficulties in learning and teaching programming- views of students and tutors. Education and Information Technologies, 7(1), 55-66.
  • Pehlivan, Z. (2010). Analysis of physical self-perceptions of physical education teacher candidates and their attitudes toward teaching profession. Education and Science, 35(156), 126-141.
  • Pereira, H. B. D. B., Zebende, G. F. & Moret, M. A. (2010). Learning computer programming: Implementing a fractal in a Turing Machine. Computers & Education, 55(2), 767-776.
  • Pillay, N. & Jugoo, V. R. (2005). An investigation into student characteristics affecting novice programming performance. SIGCSE Bulletin 37(4), 107- 110.
  • Ramalingam, V. & Wiedenbeck, S. (1998). Development and validation of scores on a computer programming self-efficacy scale and group analysis of novice programmer self-efficacy. Journal of Educational ComputingResearch, 19(4), 367-381.
  • Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N.(2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 137-172.
  • Stoilescu, D. & Egodawatte, G. (2010). Gender differences in the use of computers, programming, and peer interactions in computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education, 20(4), 283-300.
  • Van De Gaer, E., Grisay, A., Schulz, W. & Gebhardt, E. (2012). The reference group effect an explanation of the paradoxical relationship between academic achievement and self-confidence across countries. Journal Of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(8), 1205-1228.
  • Yenilmez, K. (2008). Open primary education school students’ opinions about mathematics television programmes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(4), 176-189.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Özcan Özyurt

Hacer Özyurt

Publication Date February 1, 2015
Submission Date December 14, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 11 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özyurt, Ö., & Özyurt, H. (2015). A study for determining computer programming students’ attitudes towards programming and their programming self-efficacy / Bilgisayar programcılığı öğrencilerinin programlamaya karşı tutum ve programlama öz-yeterliklerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir çalı. Eğitimde Kuram Ve Uygulama, 11(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.53204