FPGA Tabanlı Uzaktan Erişilebilir Laboratuvar Tasarımları

Abstract

Bilgisayar ağları teknolojisinin gelişmesi ile uzaktan erişilen ve kontrol edilebilen uygulamalar artmaktadır. Özellikle bağlantı hızlarının yükselmesi ve daha güvenli ağların yaygınlaşması sayesinde uzaktan erişilebilen cihazlar sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Bu sayede kullanılan cihazları yönetmek ve onlara anlık müdahale etmek önemli bir hale gelmiştir. Uzaktan erişilebilen laboratuvarlar sayesinde kullanıcılar internetin olması şartıyla laboratuvardaki cihazlarla bağlantı kurabilmektedirler. Kurulan bağlantı sayesinde komut ve parametreler göndererek deneyler yapmakta ve sonuçlara eş zamanlı ulaşabilmektedirler. Kullanıcılar evlerinden veya farklı bir ortamdan internet sayesinde FPGA ile ilgili uygulamalarını uzaktan erişerek yapabilmekte ve sonuçlarını canlı bir şekilde gözlemlemektedirler. Bu çalışmada, FPGA tabanlı uzaktan anlık bir şekilde erişilebilen laboratuvarlar üzerinde bir literatür araştırması yapılmıştır.

Keywords

• E-laboratuvar
• bulut bilişim
• sunucu
• uzaktan eğitim

FPGA-based remote accessible Laboratory Designs

Abstract

Applications that can be accessed and controlled remotely are increasing due to the development of computer network technology. Thanks to the increase in connection speeds and the spread of safer networks, remote access devices are frequently used. That’s why, it becomes important to manage the used devices and to intervene in them instantly. Because of the laboratories that can be accessed remotely, users can connect with the devices in the laboratory provided that internet is available. Thanks to the established connection, they can conduct experiments by sending commands and parameters and reach the results simultaneously. Users can remotely access their FPGA applications from their homes or from a different environment via the internet and observe the results live. In this study, a literature search was conducted on FPGA-based laboratories that can be accessed remotely.

Keywords

• E-laboratory
• cloud computing
• server
• distance education

References

1. [1] A. KAÇAN and İ. GELEN, “Türkiye’deki Uzaktan Eğitim Programlarına Bir Bakış,” Int. J. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Apr. 2020, Accessed: Dec. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uebt/issue/53891/713456.
2. [2] E. Sibirskaya, E. Popkova, L. Oveshnikova, and I. Tarasova, “Remote education vs traditional education based on effectiveness at the micro level and its connection to the level of development of macro-economic systems,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 533–543, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-08-2018-0248.
3. [3] A. Sarıkaş and A. Yayla, “UZAKTAN ERİŞİMLİ MİKRODENETLEYİCİ LABORATUVARI,” J. Res. Educ. Teach., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 283–296, 2017, Accessed: Dec. 02, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.jret.org@Herhakkısaklıdır.Dergideyayımlananyazılarıntümsorumluluğuyazarlarınaaittir.
4. [4] S. W. Tho and Y. Y. Yeung, “An implementation of remote laboratory for secondary science education,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 629–640, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12273.
5. [5] A. Rupani and G. Sujediya, “A Review of FPGA implementation of Internet of Things FPGA Implementation of Image proessing Filters View project A Review of FPGA implementation of Internet of Things,” Artic. Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng., vol. 3297, no. 9, 2016, doi: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2016.0409098.
6. [6] G. Sharma, K., Raju, G., & Varma, “A Review of FPGA Implementation of Internet of Things,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2257–2263, 2016, Accessed: Dec. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijser.org.
7. [7] C. Viegas et al., “Impact of a remote lab on teaching practices and student learning,” Comput. Educ., vol. 126, pp. 201–216, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.012.
8. [8] V. Fotopoulos, A. Fanariotis, and A. N. Skodras, “Remote FPGA Laboratory Course Development based on an Open Multimodal Laboratory Facility,” 2015, doi: 10.1145/2801948.2801950.

9. [9] M. P. Petrvalsky, O. Petura, and M. D. Drutarovsky, “Remote Fpga Laboratory For Testing Vhdl Implementations Of Digital Fir Filters,” Acta Electrotech. Inform., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 3–8, 2015, doi: 10.15546/aeei-2015-0009.
10. [10] H. Wan, X. Gao, and Q. Liu, “Hybrid teaching mode for laboratory-based remote education of computer structure course,” in 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2016, vol. 2016-Novem, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757582.
11. [11] Y. Zhang et al., “Remote FPGA lab platform for computer system curriculum,” in Proceedings of the ACM Turing 50th Celebration Conference - China on - ACM TUR-C ’17, 2017, vol. Part F1277, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1145/3063955.3063958.
12. [12] E. Irmak and A. Calpbinici, “E-Laboratuvarlar İçin Yeni Bir Tasarım: Eş Zamanlı Erişilebilen Deneysel Uygulama Platformu,” Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Derg., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 363–375, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.17341/gazimmfd.322159.
13. [13] A. A. Syed, R. Asif, S. Hina, and Z. Fatima, “Cloud Based Remote FPGA Lab Platform: An Application of Internet of Things,” Mehran Univ. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 535–544, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.22581/muet1982.1804.08.
14. [14] K. Zhang, Y. Chang, M. Chen, Y. Bao, and Z. Xu, “Computer Organization and Design Course with FPGA Cloud,” in Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Feb. 2019, pp. 927–933, doi: 10.1145/3287324.3287475.
15. [15] M. Winzker and A. Schwandt, “Open Education Teaching Unit for Low-Power Design and FPGA Image Processing,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2019, vol. 2019-Octob, pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028694.
16. [16] H. Wan, K. Liu, J. Lin, and X. Gao, “A Web-based Remote FPGA Laboratory for Computer Organization Course,” in Proceedings of the 2019 on Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI, May 2019, pp. 243–248, doi: 10.1145/3299874.3317999.
17. [17] C. Aramburu Mayoz et al., “FPGA Remote Laboratory: Experience in UPNA and UNIFESP,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1231 AISC, 2021, pp. 112–127.