A case study in Istanbul: Exploring the deliberation in English as a foreign language teaching units at state schools

Year 2012, Volume: 1 Issue: 4, 230 - 239, 23.10.2013

Dilara Demirbulak

Abstract

 

The aim of this study is to identify and understand the deliberation process carried out at school level. The assumption is that a sound deliberation for pre-exploration of the potential of the curriculum material in terms of not only the content that led to their development but also how and why the content was selected, arranged and transformed for educational purposes is essential in providing equal educational opportunity to citizens. The study was carried out at 27 state schools with 81 English language teachers.  The results of the findings indicated that variation in deliberation is due to affective factors at schools.

Keywords

deliberation, curriculum potential, teachers` approach to curriculum

References

• Akyüz, Y. (2007). Türk eğitim tarihi. Ankara:Pegem Akademi Yayınları. Ball, D. L. and D. K. Cohen (1996). "Reform by the book: What is — or might be — the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?" Educational Researcher 25(9): 6-8, 14.
• Ben-Peretz, M. (1990) The concept of curriculum potential. Curriculum Theory Network, 5 (2), 151--159.
• Brown, H. D. (2001) Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents).
• Carson, T. R. (2009) Internationalizing curriculum: Globalization and the worldliness of curriculum studies. Curriculum Inquiry, 39 (1), 145--158.
• Chval, K., Reys, R., Reys, B., Tarr, J., and Chavez, O. (2006) Pressures to improve student performance: A context that both urges and impedes school-based research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37 (3), 158--166.
• Demirel, Ö. (2008). Yabancı dil öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Deng, Z. (2009) Revisiting the curriculum potential. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Practical: The Practical: An East--West Curriculum Dialog (Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
• Fer, S. (2005) 1923 yılından günümüze Cumhuriyet dönemi ilköğretim programları üzerine bir inceleme. Cumhuriyet Dönemi Eğitim Politikaları Sempozyumu. İstanbul. Downloaded at 21.10. 2008 from http://sevalfer.com/files/Bildiri_CumhuriyetDonemiProg.pdf
• Fortna, B. J. (2002). Imperial Classroom: Islam, the State, and Education in the Late Ottoman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fullan, M. (2008) Curriculum implementation and sustainability. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, and J. I. Phillion (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction: Managing Curriculum (113--122). USA:Sage Publications.
• Fullan, M. and Pomfret, A. (1977) Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47 (2), 335--397.
• Gillham, Bill (2000). Case study research methods. London: Continuum. Heaton, J. (2004) Reworking Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
• İhsanoğlu, E. (2004). The Madrasas of the Otoman Empire. UK: Foundation for Science Technology and Civilization.
• McDonough, J. & Shaw, C. (1998). Materials and methods in ELT: a teacher’s guide applied languagestudies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
• Means, B. (2008) Technology’s role in curriculum and instruction. In F.
• M.Connelly, M. F. He, and J. I. Phillion (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction: Managing Curriculum. (123--143) USA:Sage Publications.
• Null, W. (2011). Curriculum:from theory to practice. USA:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Incompany.
• Oliva, P. F. (1997) Developing the Curriculum. USA: Longman. Özkan, S. H.(2010). Osmanlı Devletinde Yabancı Dil Eğitimi. Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 5(3)
• Saydam, Y. (2006). Language use in the Ottoman Empire and its problems (1299-1923). Johannesburg, South Africa: University of Johannesburg, Unpublished Thesis.
• Shawer, S. F. (2009). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculumdevelopers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education.
• Schwab, J. (1973) The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81 (4), 501--522.
• Snyder, J., Bolin, F., and Zumwalt, K. (1992) Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (ed), Handbook of Research on Curriculum: A Project of the American Educational Research Association (402--435) . New York: MacMillian.
• Sönmez, S. (2013). Primary education system in Ottoman Empire. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 5;163
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction of Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heineman T.C.Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Eğitimi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı. (2004). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin başarılarının belirlenmesi. İngilizce bilgisayar okuryazarlığı raporu. Ankara:MEB. Thornton, S. J. (2001). Educating the educators: Rethinking subject matter and methods. Theory and Practice, 40(1), 72-78.
• Varış, F. (1976). Eğitimde program geliştirme: teoriler - teknikler. Ankara: Alkım Kitapçılık Yayıncılık
• Xu, Y. (2009) School-based teacher development through a school-university collaborative Project: A case study of a recent initiative in China. Curriculum Studies, 41 (1), 49-- 66.