Year 2020, Volume 9 , Issue 1, Pages 90 - 107 2020-08-06

Turkish Tertiary Level Voluntary Intensive English Program Students’ Perceptions of Autonomy and Autonomous Activities in EFL Classes


Language learner autonomy is an important concept that can change the English as a Foreign Language (EFL henceforth) world as giving learners control and responsibility for their language learning process. This study takes place in the EFL environment in a voluntary intensive English program at a state university in Turkey. In this program, there is an ongoing problem of drop-outs and failures each year, so the study was conducted to see if this phenomenon can be explained via autonomy. An explanatory sequential mixed-method study design was used. Autonomy Perception Scale was used to gather quantitative data, which was analyzed by means of IBM SPSS 22.0, and structured interview forms were utilized to collect qualitative data whose content was analyzed. Findings demonstrated that these students were not efficiently autonomous, there was no significant difference between genders, and many activities were conducted by adequately autonomous learners to promote learner autonomy levels in this program. Results were discussed and future implications were made.
autonomy, language learner autonomy, autonomous activities, English preparation program
  • Al-Busaidi, S. S., & Al-Maamari, F. S. (2014). Exploring university teachers' understanding of learner autonomy. Theory & practice in language studies, 4(10). doi:10.4304/tpls.4.10.2051-2060
  • Barrett, K. C., Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., & Gloeckner, G. W. (2011). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation, Fourth Edition. Routledge.
  • Baume, D. (1992). Developing learner autonomy, SEDA Paper 84. Staff and Educational Development Association: Birmingham UK.
  • Benson, P. 2001. Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
  • Benson, P. (2016). Language learner autonomy: exploring teachers’ perspectives on theory and practices. Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts, 114-133.
  • Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. ELT Journal, 12(7), 1-45. Ceylan, N. O. (2015). Fostering learner autonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.491
  • Chan, V. (2000). Fostering learner autonomy in an ESL classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 18(1), 75-86.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th Edition. California: Sage Publications.
  • Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 24(4), 24-34.
  • Demirtaş, İ. (2010). Üniversite İngilizce hazırlık eğitiminde özerk öğrenme becerileri. Unpublished MA thesis. Ankara Üniversitesi. Ankara.
  • Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation a literature review. System, 23(2), 165-174.
  • Dickinson, L. (1996, November). Culture, autonomy and common-sense. In Proceedings of the International Conference AUTONOMY 2000: The development of learning independence in language learning (pp. 41-54).
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Spain: OUP.
  • Han, L. (2014). Teacher's role in developing learner autonomy: A literature review. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 21. doi:10.5430/ijelt.v1n2p21
  • Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching, 3rd edition. Harlow: Longman.
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press.
  • Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2016). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703-723.
  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy, 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.
  • Little, D. (2000). Learner autonomy and human interdependence: some theoretical and practical consequences of a social-interactive view of cognition, learning and language. Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions, 15-23.
  • Little, D. (2003). Learner autonomy and public examinations. Learner autonomy in foreign language classrooms: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment, 223-236.
  • Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29. DOI: 10.2167/illt040.0
  • Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435.
  • Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
  • Macaro, E. (1997). Target language, collaborative learning and autonomy (Vol. 5). Multilingual matters.
  • Murray, G. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy: Stretching our boundaries. Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning, 247-262.
  • Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. Autonomy and independence in language learning, 192203.
  • Paiva, V. L. M. O. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in second language acquisition from the perspective of complex adaptive systems. Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning, 57-72.
  • Palfreyman, D. (2003). Introduction: Culture and learner autonomy. In Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 1-19). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pawlak, M. (2017). The role of autonomy in learning and teaching foreign language grammar. In Autonomy in Second Language Learning: Managing the Resources (pp. 3-19). Cham: Springer,.
  • Raya, M. J., & Lamb, T. (2008). Pedagogy for autonomy in modern languages education: theory, practice, and teacher education. Dublin: Authentik.
  • Ryan, R. M. (1991). The nature of the self in autonomy and relatedness. In The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 208-238). New York: Springer.
  • Smith, R. C. (2003). Postscript: Implications for language education. In Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 254-260). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Smith, R., Kuchah, K., & Lamb, M. (2018). Learner autonomy in developing countries. In Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 7-27). London: Palgrave Pivot.
  • Tanyeli, N., & Kuter, S. (2013). Examining learner autonomy in foreign language learning and instruction. Egitim arastirmalari-Eurasian journal of educational research, 53/A, 19-36.
  • Ünal, S., Çeliköz, N., & Sari, I. (2017). EFL proficiency in language learning and learner autonomy perceptions of Turkish learners. Journal of education and practice, 8(11), 117-122. Retrieved from
  • Üstünlüoğlu, E. (2009). Autonomy in language learning: Do students take responsibility for their learning?. Journal of theory & practice in education (JTPE), 5(2).
  • Wang, M. C., & Peverly, S. T. (1986). The self-instructive process in classroom learning contexts. Contemporary educational psychology, 11(4), 370-404.
  • Wang, P. (2011). Constructivism and learner autonomy in foreign language teaching and learning: To what extent does theory inform practice. Theory and practice in language studies, 1(3), 273-277.
Primary Language en
Subjects Language and Linguistics, Education, Scientific Disciplines, Education and Educational Research
Journal Section Research Article

Orcid: 0000-0002-7746-6269
Author: Ayça KILIÇ GÖNEN (Primary Author)
Country: Turkey


Application Date : February 10, 2020
Acceptance Date : June 25, 2020
Publication Date : August 6, 2020

APA Kılıç Gönen, A . (2020). Turkish Tertiary Level Voluntary Intensive English Program Students’ Perceptions of Autonomy and Autonomous Activities in EFL Classes . ELT Research Journal , 9 (1) , 90-107 . Retrieved from