Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 1, 1 - 30, 05.07.2024

Evrim Yılmaz

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Arpini, E., Panez, A., Cumbers, A., ve Pearson, B. (2022) “New municipalism in South America? Developing theory from experiences in Argentina and Chile”, Urban Studies, 60, 11, 2290-2306.
  • Baccini, L. ve Leemann, L. (2021) “Do natural disasters help the environment? How voters respond and what that means”, Political Science Research and Methods, 9, 3, 468-484.
  • Batuman, B. (2010) “Toplumcu Bir Belediyecilik Modeli: ‘Yeni Belediyecilik Hareketi’ 1973-1977”, Mülkiye, 34, 266, 223-241.
  • Bayramoğlu, S. (2005) Yönetişim Zihniyeti, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Bayramoğlu, S. (2015) Toplumcu Belediye: Nam-ı Diğer Belediye Sosyalizmi, Ankara: Notabene Yayınları. Beresford, P. (2016) All our welfare: Towards participatory social policy, Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S. ve Flores, F. (2012) “Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities”, Government information quarterly, 29, 2, 123-132.
  • Bonsón, E., Royo, S. ve Ratkai, M. (2015) “Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe”, Government information quarterly, 32, 1, 52-62.
  • Bonsón, E. ve Bednárová, M. (2018) “The use of YouTube in western European municipalities”, Government information quarterly, 35, 2, 223-232.
  • Bonsón, E., Perea, D. ve Bednárová, M. (2019) “Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities”, Government information quarterly, 36, 3, 480-489.
  • Bontenbal, M. ve Lindert, P. V. (2011) “Municipal partnerships for local development in the Global South? Understanding connections and context from a translocal perspective”, International Development Planning Review, 33, 4, 445-461.
  • Bruns, A. (2019) “Big social data approaches in Internet studies: The case of Twitter”, Second international handbook of internet research, 65-81.
  • Cammack, P. (2004) “What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters”, New Political Economy, 9, 189-211.
  • Chaney, B., Muraskin, L. D., Cahalan, M. W. ve Goodwin, D. (1998) “Helping the progress of disadvantaged students in higher education: The federal student support services program”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 3, 197-215.
  • Chen, J., Liu, Y. ve Zou, M. (2017) “User emotion for modeling retweeting behaviors”, Neural Networks, 96, 11-21.
  • Cheng, X., Li, J., Zhao, W. X. ve Wen, J. R. (2024) “ChainLM: Empowering Large Language Models with Improved Chain-of-Thought Prompting”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14312.
  • Cumbers, A. ve Paul, F. (2020) “Adapting to the political moment and diverse terrain of Actually Existing Municipalisms”, Soundings, 74, 40-53.
  • Çelik, A. (2010) “Muhafazakâr sosyal politika yönelimi: hak yerine yardim-yükümlülük yerine hayırseverlik”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 63-81.
  • Demiralp, S. ve Balta, E. (2021) “Defeating populists: the case of 2019 Istanbul elections”, South European Society and Politics, 26, 1, 1-26.
  • Dorlach, T. (2015) “The prospects of egalitarian capitalism in the global South: Turkish social neoliberalism in comparative perspective”, Economy and Society, 44, 4, 519-544.
  • Edosomwan, S., Prakasan, S. K., Kouame, D., Watson, J. ve Seymour, T. (2011) “The history of social media and its impact on business”, Journal of Applied Management and entrepreneurship, 16, 3, 79-91.
  • Elmas, T., Overdorf, R., Özkalay, A. F. ve Aberer, K. (2021) “Ephemeral astroturfing attacks: The case of fake twitter trends”, In 2021 IEEE European symposium on security and privacy (EuroS&P), IEEE, 403-422.
  • Enli, G. (2017) “Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election”, European journal of communication, 32, 1, 50-61.
  • Ersoy, M. (1992) “Relations between central and local governments in Turkey: An historical perspective”, Public Administration and Development, 12, 4, 325-341.
  • Fischer, F. (2010) “Participatory governance”, Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, 24, 1-19. Hamamcı, C. (2016) “Toplumcu Belediyecilik”, Prof. Dr. Oğuz Onaran’a Armağan içinde, Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, 534, 161-171.
  • Harris, L. M. ve Işlar, M. (2014) “Neoliberalism, nature, and changing modalities of environmental governance in contemporary Turkey”, Global economic crisis and the politics of diversity, 52-78.
  • Helmond, A., Nieborg, D. ve Vlist, F. (2019) “Facebook’s evolution: development of a platform-as-infrastructure”, Internet Histories, 3, 123-146.
  • Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Basart, S., Zou, A., Mazeika, M., Song, D. ve Steinhardt, J. (2020) “Measuring massive multitask language understanding”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300.
  • Hofmann, S., Beverungen, D., Räckers, M. ve Becker, J. (2013) “What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook”, Government information quarterly, 30, 4, 387-396.
  • Gendron-Carrier, N., Gonzalez-Navarro, M., Polloni, S. ve Turner, M. A. (2022) “Subways and urban air pollution”, American economic journal: Applied economics, 14, 1, 164-196.
  • Goldfrank, B. ve Schrank, A. (2009) “Municipal neoliberalism and municipal socialism: urban political economy in Latin America”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 2, 443-462.
  • Guillamón, M. D., Bastida, F. ve Benito, B. (2011) “The determinants of local government's financial transparency”, Local government studies, 37, 4, 391-406.
  • Grodach, C. (2010) “Art spaces, public space, and the link to community development”, Community Development Journal, 45, 4, 474-493.
  • Ibrahim, A. M. (2022) “A mapping towards a unified municipal platform: An investigative case study from a Norwegian municipality”, Sustainable Futures, 4, 100063.
  • İkiz, O. O., Sobaci, M. Z., Yavuz, N. ve Karkin, N. (2014) “Political use of Twitter: The case of metropolitan mayor candidates in 2014 local elections in Turkey” In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, 41-50.
  • İkizer, İ. (2022) “Weakening the Strong Mayor: Partisan Division and Presidential Intervention in Istanbul”, State and Local Government Review, 54, 1, 32-51.
  • Kadirbeyoğlu, Z. ve Sümer, B. (2016) “The neoliberal transformation of local government in Turkey and the contracting out of municipal services: implications for public accountability”, In The Redeployment of State Power in the Southern Mediterranean, Routledge, 38-55.
  • Keleş, R. ve Duru, B. (2008) “Ankara’nın Ülke Kentleşmesindeki Etkilerine Tarihsel Bir Bakış”, Mülkiye, 32, 261, 27-44.
  • Kıray, M.B. (1999) “Değişen patronaj kalıpları: Yapısal değişme üzerine bir çalışma”, Toplu Eserleri 4: Toplumsal Yapı ve Toplumsal Değişme içinde, İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 272-302.
  • Kıray, M. (1972) “Gecekondu: Az Gelişmiş Ülkelerde Hızla Topraktan Kopma ve Kentle Bütünleşememe”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 27, 03, 561-573.
  • Kioupkiolis, A. (2021) “New municipalism as a counter-hegemonic project for radicalizing democracy”, Soft Power, 81-100.
  • Kurtuluş, H. (2006) “Kentsel dönüşüme modern kent mitinin çöküşü çerçevesinden bakmak”, Planlama Dergisi, 2, 36, 7-13.
  • Kušen, E. ve Strembeck, M. (2018) “Politics, sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections”, Online Social Networks and Media, 5, 37-50. Kutlu, D. (2018) Sosyal Yardım Alanlar, İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Kuyucu, T. (2018) “Politics of urban regeneration in Turkey: Possibilities and limits of municipal regeneration initiatives in a highly centralized country”, Urban Geography, 39, 8, 1152-1176.
  • Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. ve Moon, S. (2010) “What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?”, In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web , 591-600.
  • La Porte, T. M., Demchak, C. C. ve De Jong, M. (2002) “Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web: empirical findings and theoretical speculations”, Administration & Society, 34, 4, 411-446.
  • Leopold, E. ve McDonald, D. A. (2012) “Municipal socialism then and now: Some lessons for the Global South”, Third World Quarterly, 33, 10, 1837-1853.
  • Li, S., Liu, Y., Purevjav, A. O. ve Yang, L. (2019) “Does subway expansion improve air quality?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 96, 213-235.
  • Liu, L. ve Jensen, M. B. (2018) “Green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management: Practices of five forerunner cities”, Cities, 74, 126-133.
  • Lucertini, G. ve Di Giustino, G. (2021) “Urban and peri-urban agriculture as a tool for food security and climate change mitigation and adaptation: The case of mestre”, Sustainability, 13, 11, 5999.
  • Malzer, C. ve Baum, M. (2020) “A hybrid approach to hierarchical density-based cluster selection”, In 2020 IEEE international conference on multisensor fusion and integration for intelligent systems (MFI), IEEE, 223-228.
  • Marshall, T. C., Ferenczi, N., Lefringhausen, K., Hill, S. ve Deng, J. (2020) “Intellectual, narcissistic, or Machiavellian? How Twitter users differ from Facebook-only users, why they use Twitter, and what they tweet about”, Psychology of Popular Media, 9,1, 14-30.
  • Masiero, G. ve Santarossa, M. (2021) “Natural disasters and electoral outcomes”, European Journal of Political Economy, 67, 101983.
  • Mason, D. S. (2012) “Sports facilities and urban development: An introduction”, City, Culture and Society, 3, 3, 165-167.
  • McInnes, L., Healy, J. ve Melville, J. (2018) “Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426.
  • Menzel, S., Buchecker, M. ve Schulz, T. (2013) “Forming social capital—Does participatory planning foster trust in institutions?”, Journal of environmental management, 131, 351-362.
  • Olsson, E. G. A., Kerselaers, E., Søderkvist Kristensen, L., Primdahl, J., Rogge, E. ve Wästfelt, A. (2016) “Peri-urban food production and its relation to urban resilience”, Sustainability, 8, 12, 1340.
  • Opitz, I., Berges, R., Piorr, A. ve Krikser, T. (2016) “Contributing to food security in urban areas: differences between urban agriculture and peri-urban agriculture in the Global North”, Agriculture and Human Values, 33, 341-358.
  • Öktem, K. (2021) “Dilemmas of Subnational Democracy under Authoritarianism: Istanbul's Metropolitan Municipality”, Social Research: An International Quarterly, 88, 2, 501-537.
  • Öncü, A. (1988) “The politics of the urban land market in Turkey: 1950–1980”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12, 1, 38-64.
  • Özuğurlu, M. (2011) Küçük Köylülüğe Sermaye Kapanı, Ankara: Nota Bene Yayınları.
  • Pal, J. (2017) “Studying political communication on Twitter: the case for small data”, Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 18, 97-102.
  • Pratchett, L. (1999) “New technologies and the modernization of local government: an analysis of biases and constraints”, Public administration, 77, 4, 731-751.
  • Rauchfleisch, A. ve Kaiser, J. (2020) “The false positive problem of automatic bot detection in social science research”, PloS one, 15, 10, e0241045.
  • Reimers, N. ve Gurevych, I. (2019) “Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.
  • Roseland, M. (1997) “Dimensions of the eco-city”, Cities, 14, 4, 197-202.
  • Rotta, M. J. R., Sell, D., dos Santos Pacheco, R. C. ve Yigitcanlar, T. (2019) “Digital commons and citizen coproduction in smart cities: Assessment of Brazilian municipal e-government platforms”, Energies, 12, 14, 2813.
  • Sakai, A., Hagihara, Y., Asada, K. ve Shengping, Z. (2004) “Management of rainfall-related environmental risks in urban area”, Journal of Risk Research, 7, 7-8, 731-744.
  • Sant'Anna, A. A. (2018) “Not so natural: Unequal effects of public policies on the occurrence of disasters”, Ecological economics, 152, 273-281.
  • Sareen, S. ve Waagsaether, K. L. (2023) “New municipalism and the governance of urban transitions to sustainability”, Urban Studies, 60, 11, 2271-2289.
  • Schwabe, K., Nemati, M., Amin, R., Tran, Q. ve Jassby, D. (2020) “Unintended consequences of water conservation on the use of treated municipal wastewater”, Nature Sustainability, 3, 8, 628-635.
  • Shahmirzadi, O., Lugowski, A. ve Younge, K. (2019) “Text similarity in vector space models: a comparative study”, In 2019 18th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA), IEEE, 659-666.
  • Sobacı, M. Z. ve Karkin, N. (2013) “The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better public services?”, Government Information Quarterly, 30, 4, 417-425.
  • Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P. ve Chi, E. H. (2010) “Want to be retweeted? large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network”, In 2010 IEEE second international conference on social computing, IEEE, 177-184.
  • Statista (2024a) “Number of internet and social media users worlwide as of April 2023”, https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/
  • Statista (2024b) “Leading countries based on number of X (formerly Twitter) users as of January 2024”, https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-twitter-users-in-selected-countries/#statisticContainer
  • Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H. ve Strohmaier, M. (2018) “Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter”, Political Communication, 35, 1, 50-74.
  • Struk, M. ve Bakoš, E. (2021) “Long-term benefits of intermunicipal cooperation for small municipalities in waste management provision”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 4, 1449.
  • Şen, B. (2011) “Kentsel mekanda üçlü ittifak: sanayisizleştirme, soylulaştırma, yeni orta sınıf”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 1-21.
  • Tekeli, İ. (1977) “Belediyeler ve Kent Yönetiminin Sınıfsal Yapısı”, Mimarlık, 1, 32-35.
  • Tekeli, İ., Okyay, T. ve Gülöksüz, Y. (2020) Gecekondulu, Dolmuşlu, İşportalı Şehir, İstanbul: İdealkent Yayınları.
  • The World Bank (2024) “Poverty and Inequality”, https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/themes/poverty-and-inequality.html
  • Theocharis, Y. ve Jungherr, A. (2021) “Computational social science and the study of political communication”, Political Communication, 38, 1, 1-22.
  • Thompson, M. (2020) “What’s so new about New Municipalism?”, Progress in Human Geography, 45, 2, 317-342.
  • Ulutaş, Ç. Ü. (2017) “Türkiye refah rejiminin dönüşüm sürecinde sosyal yardım sistemi”, Emek Araştırma Dergisi, 8, 12, 27-48.
  • Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N. ve Polosukhin, I. (2017) “Attention is all you need”, In advances in neural information processing systems, 5998-6008.
  • Yang, Z., Guo, J., Cai, K., Tang, J., Li, J., Zhang, L. ve Su, Z. (2010) “Understanding retweeting behaviors in social networks”, In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, 1633-1636.
  • Wan, C., Shen, G. Q. ve Choi, S. (2021) “Underlying relationships between public urban green spaces and social cohesion: A systematic literature review”, City, Culture and Society, 24, 100383.
  • Warren, A. M., Sulaiman, A. ve Jaafar, N. I. (2014) “Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions”, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 2, 291-301.
  • Weber, H. I., Vogt, S., Eberz-Weber, L. M., Steinmetz, H., Wagner, S. A., Walther, F. ve Kabst, R. (2019) “Participatory budgeting: findings from Germany”, In Civic engagement and politics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, IGI Global, 1087-1107.
  • Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E. ve Zhou, D. (2022) “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models”, Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 24824-24837.
  • Yılmaz, E. (2013) Türkiye’de kırsal dönüşüm: Malatya’dan iki köy örneği (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Twitter ve Belediyeler: Ankara ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 1, 1 - 30, 05.07.2024

Evrim Yılmaz

Öz

Politikacılar siyasi gündemlerini aktarmak, kitlelerini mobilize etmek, verdikleri hizmetleri duyurmak veya takipçilerinden geri bildirim almak için popüler sosyal medya platformlarını kullanmaktadır. Bu araştırma, Ankara ve İstanbul Belediye Başkanları Mansur Yavaş ve Ekrem İmamoğlu’nun Twitter’daki (yeni adıyla X) paylaşımları çerçevesinde belediyecilik modellerini hangi temel konular ve ilkeler üzerine inşa ettiklerini tespit etmeyi hedeflemektedir. Araştırmada belediye başkanlarının Aralık 2021 ve Nisan 2023 tarihleri arasında paylaştıkları toplam 4657 tweet, konu modelleme yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca GPT4 kullanılarak konu başlıkları belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, iki belediye başkanının 17 konuda içerik ürettiğini ve 12 konunun doğrudan kent politikalarıyla ilgili olduğunu göstermiştir. Konular Türkiye’nin toplumcu belediyecilik deneyiminden miras kalan ilkeler ve yeni dinamikler çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiş ve 4 belediyecilik yaklaşımı çerçevesinde tartışılmıştır: dayanışmacı belediye, birlikçi-bütünlükçü ve demokratik belediye, proaktif belediye, üretici ve tüketimi düzenleyici belediye. Bu yaklaşımların ne derece başarıyla uygulandığı konusu araştırmaya ve tartışmaya açıktır. Platformun kullanıcılarının belirlenen yaklaşımlar hakkındaki tutumlarını belirlemek amacıyla ise 17 konu kapsamındaki tweet’lere verdikleri yanıt, retweet ve beğeni sayıları çerçevesinde etkileşim metrikleri oluşturulmuştur. Özellikle beğeni ve retweet trendleri, ekonomik kriz ve afetler karşısında kamuoyunda en fazla dayanışmacı belediye ile proaktif belediye yaklaşımlarının onaylandığını gösterirken, yanıt trendleri demokratik katılım ve sürdürülebilir kentsel gelişme konusundaki duyarlılık çerçevesinde birlikçi ve bütünlükçü belediye ile üretici ve tüketimi düzenleyici belediye yaklaşımının gündem olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekrem İmamoğlu Mansur Yavaş Twitter belediyecilik konu modelleme

Kaynakça

  • Arpini, E., Panez, A., Cumbers, A., ve Pearson, B. (2022) “New municipalism in South America? Developing theory from experiences in Argentina and Chile”, Urban Studies, 60, 11, 2290-2306.
  • Baccini, L. ve Leemann, L. (2021) “Do natural disasters help the environment? How voters respond and what that means”, Political Science Research and Methods, 9, 3, 468-484.
  • Batuman, B. (2010) “Toplumcu Bir Belediyecilik Modeli: ‘Yeni Belediyecilik Hareketi’ 1973-1977”, Mülkiye, 34, 266, 223-241.
  • Bayramoğlu, S. (2005) Yönetişim Zihniyeti, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Bayramoğlu, S. (2015) Toplumcu Belediye: Nam-ı Diğer Belediye Sosyalizmi, Ankara: Notabene Yayınları. Beresford, P. (2016) All our welfare: Towards participatory social policy, Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S. ve Flores, F. (2012) “Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities”, Government information quarterly, 29, 2, 123-132.
  • Bonsón, E., Royo, S. ve Ratkai, M. (2015) “Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe”, Government information quarterly, 32, 1, 52-62.
  • Bonsón, E. ve Bednárová, M. (2018) “The use of YouTube in western European municipalities”, Government information quarterly, 35, 2, 223-232.
  • Bonsón, E., Perea, D. ve Bednárová, M. (2019) “Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities”, Government information quarterly, 36, 3, 480-489.
  • Bontenbal, M. ve Lindert, P. V. (2011) “Municipal partnerships for local development in the Global South? Understanding connections and context from a translocal perspective”, International Development Planning Review, 33, 4, 445-461.
  • Bruns, A. (2019) “Big social data approaches in Internet studies: The case of Twitter”, Second international handbook of internet research, 65-81.
  • Cammack, P. (2004) “What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters”, New Political Economy, 9, 189-211.
  • Chaney, B., Muraskin, L. D., Cahalan, M. W. ve Goodwin, D. (1998) “Helping the progress of disadvantaged students in higher education: The federal student support services program”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 3, 197-215.
  • Chen, J., Liu, Y. ve Zou, M. (2017) “User emotion for modeling retweeting behaviors”, Neural Networks, 96, 11-21.
  • Cheng, X., Li, J., Zhao, W. X. ve Wen, J. R. (2024) “ChainLM: Empowering Large Language Models with Improved Chain-of-Thought Prompting”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14312.
  • Cumbers, A. ve Paul, F. (2020) “Adapting to the political moment and diverse terrain of Actually Existing Municipalisms”, Soundings, 74, 40-53.
  • Çelik, A. (2010) “Muhafazakâr sosyal politika yönelimi: hak yerine yardim-yükümlülük yerine hayırseverlik”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 63-81.
  • Demiralp, S. ve Balta, E. (2021) “Defeating populists: the case of 2019 Istanbul elections”, South European Society and Politics, 26, 1, 1-26.
  • Dorlach, T. (2015) “The prospects of egalitarian capitalism in the global South: Turkish social neoliberalism in comparative perspective”, Economy and Society, 44, 4, 519-544.
  • Edosomwan, S., Prakasan, S. K., Kouame, D., Watson, J. ve Seymour, T. (2011) “The history of social media and its impact on business”, Journal of Applied Management and entrepreneurship, 16, 3, 79-91.
  • Elmas, T., Overdorf, R., Özkalay, A. F. ve Aberer, K. (2021) “Ephemeral astroturfing attacks: The case of fake twitter trends”, In 2021 IEEE European symposium on security and privacy (EuroS&P), IEEE, 403-422.
  • Enli, G. (2017) “Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election”, European journal of communication, 32, 1, 50-61.
  • Ersoy, M. (1992) “Relations between central and local governments in Turkey: An historical perspective”, Public Administration and Development, 12, 4, 325-341.
  • Fischer, F. (2010) “Participatory governance”, Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, 24, 1-19. Hamamcı, C. (2016) “Toplumcu Belediyecilik”, Prof. Dr. Oğuz Onaran’a Armağan içinde, Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, 534, 161-171.
  • Harris, L. M. ve Işlar, M. (2014) “Neoliberalism, nature, and changing modalities of environmental governance in contemporary Turkey”, Global economic crisis and the politics of diversity, 52-78.
  • Helmond, A., Nieborg, D. ve Vlist, F. (2019) “Facebook’s evolution: development of a platform-as-infrastructure”, Internet Histories, 3, 123-146.
  • Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Basart, S., Zou, A., Mazeika, M., Song, D. ve Steinhardt, J. (2020) “Measuring massive multitask language understanding”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300.
  • Hofmann, S., Beverungen, D., Räckers, M. ve Becker, J. (2013) “What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook”, Government information quarterly, 30, 4, 387-396.
  • Gendron-Carrier, N., Gonzalez-Navarro, M., Polloni, S. ve Turner, M. A. (2022) “Subways and urban air pollution”, American economic journal: Applied economics, 14, 1, 164-196.
  • Goldfrank, B. ve Schrank, A. (2009) “Municipal neoliberalism and municipal socialism: urban political economy in Latin America”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 2, 443-462.
  • Guillamón, M. D., Bastida, F. ve Benito, B. (2011) “The determinants of local government's financial transparency”, Local government studies, 37, 4, 391-406.
  • Grodach, C. (2010) “Art spaces, public space, and the link to community development”, Community Development Journal, 45, 4, 474-493.
  • Ibrahim, A. M. (2022) “A mapping towards a unified municipal platform: An investigative case study from a Norwegian municipality”, Sustainable Futures, 4, 100063.
  • İkiz, O. O., Sobaci, M. Z., Yavuz, N. ve Karkin, N. (2014) “Political use of Twitter: The case of metropolitan mayor candidates in 2014 local elections in Turkey” In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, 41-50.
  • İkizer, İ. (2022) “Weakening the Strong Mayor: Partisan Division and Presidential Intervention in Istanbul”, State and Local Government Review, 54, 1, 32-51.
  • Kadirbeyoğlu, Z. ve Sümer, B. (2016) “The neoliberal transformation of local government in Turkey and the contracting out of municipal services: implications for public accountability”, In The Redeployment of State Power in the Southern Mediterranean, Routledge, 38-55.
  • Keleş, R. ve Duru, B. (2008) “Ankara’nın Ülke Kentleşmesindeki Etkilerine Tarihsel Bir Bakış”, Mülkiye, 32, 261, 27-44.
  • Kıray, M.B. (1999) “Değişen patronaj kalıpları: Yapısal değişme üzerine bir çalışma”, Toplu Eserleri 4: Toplumsal Yapı ve Toplumsal Değişme içinde, İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 272-302.
  • Kıray, M. (1972) “Gecekondu: Az Gelişmiş Ülkelerde Hızla Topraktan Kopma ve Kentle Bütünleşememe”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 27, 03, 561-573.
  • Kioupkiolis, A. (2021) “New municipalism as a counter-hegemonic project for radicalizing democracy”, Soft Power, 81-100.
  • Kurtuluş, H. (2006) “Kentsel dönüşüme modern kent mitinin çöküşü çerçevesinden bakmak”, Planlama Dergisi, 2, 36, 7-13.
  • Kušen, E. ve Strembeck, M. (2018) “Politics, sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections”, Online Social Networks and Media, 5, 37-50. Kutlu, D. (2018) Sosyal Yardım Alanlar, İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Kuyucu, T. (2018) “Politics of urban regeneration in Turkey: Possibilities and limits of municipal regeneration initiatives in a highly centralized country”, Urban Geography, 39, 8, 1152-1176.
  • Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. ve Moon, S. (2010) “What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?”, In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web , 591-600.
  • La Porte, T. M., Demchak, C. C. ve De Jong, M. (2002) “Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web: empirical findings and theoretical speculations”, Administration & Society, 34, 4, 411-446.
  • Leopold, E. ve McDonald, D. A. (2012) “Municipal socialism then and now: Some lessons for the Global South”, Third World Quarterly, 33, 10, 1837-1853.
  • Li, S., Liu, Y., Purevjav, A. O. ve Yang, L. (2019) “Does subway expansion improve air quality?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 96, 213-235.
  • Liu, L. ve Jensen, M. B. (2018) “Green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management: Practices of five forerunner cities”, Cities, 74, 126-133.
  • Lucertini, G. ve Di Giustino, G. (2021) “Urban and peri-urban agriculture as a tool for food security and climate change mitigation and adaptation: The case of mestre”, Sustainability, 13, 11, 5999.
  • Malzer, C. ve Baum, M. (2020) “A hybrid approach to hierarchical density-based cluster selection”, In 2020 IEEE international conference on multisensor fusion and integration for intelligent systems (MFI), IEEE, 223-228.
  • Marshall, T. C., Ferenczi, N., Lefringhausen, K., Hill, S. ve Deng, J. (2020) “Intellectual, narcissistic, or Machiavellian? How Twitter users differ from Facebook-only users, why they use Twitter, and what they tweet about”, Psychology of Popular Media, 9,1, 14-30.
  • Masiero, G. ve Santarossa, M. (2021) “Natural disasters and electoral outcomes”, European Journal of Political Economy, 67, 101983.
  • Mason, D. S. (2012) “Sports facilities and urban development: An introduction”, City, Culture and Society, 3, 3, 165-167.
  • McInnes, L., Healy, J. ve Melville, J. (2018) “Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426.
  • Menzel, S., Buchecker, M. ve Schulz, T. (2013) “Forming social capital—Does participatory planning foster trust in institutions?”, Journal of environmental management, 131, 351-362.
  • Olsson, E. G. A., Kerselaers, E., Søderkvist Kristensen, L., Primdahl, J., Rogge, E. ve Wästfelt, A. (2016) “Peri-urban food production and its relation to urban resilience”, Sustainability, 8, 12, 1340.
  • Opitz, I., Berges, R., Piorr, A. ve Krikser, T. (2016) “Contributing to food security in urban areas: differences between urban agriculture and peri-urban agriculture in the Global North”, Agriculture and Human Values, 33, 341-358.
  • Öktem, K. (2021) “Dilemmas of Subnational Democracy under Authoritarianism: Istanbul's Metropolitan Municipality”, Social Research: An International Quarterly, 88, 2, 501-537.
  • Öncü, A. (1988) “The politics of the urban land market in Turkey: 1950–1980”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12, 1, 38-64.
  • Özuğurlu, M. (2011) Küçük Köylülüğe Sermaye Kapanı, Ankara: Nota Bene Yayınları.
  • Pal, J. (2017) “Studying political communication on Twitter: the case for small data”, Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 18, 97-102.
  • Pratchett, L. (1999) “New technologies and the modernization of local government: an analysis of biases and constraints”, Public administration, 77, 4, 731-751.
  • Rauchfleisch, A. ve Kaiser, J. (2020) “The false positive problem of automatic bot detection in social science research”, PloS one, 15, 10, e0241045.
  • Reimers, N. ve Gurevych, I. (2019) “Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.
  • Roseland, M. (1997) “Dimensions of the eco-city”, Cities, 14, 4, 197-202.
  • Rotta, M. J. R., Sell, D., dos Santos Pacheco, R. C. ve Yigitcanlar, T. (2019) “Digital commons and citizen coproduction in smart cities: Assessment of Brazilian municipal e-government platforms”, Energies, 12, 14, 2813.
  • Sakai, A., Hagihara, Y., Asada, K. ve Shengping, Z. (2004) “Management of rainfall-related environmental risks in urban area”, Journal of Risk Research, 7, 7-8, 731-744.
  • Sant'Anna, A. A. (2018) “Not so natural: Unequal effects of public policies on the occurrence of disasters”, Ecological economics, 152, 273-281.
  • Sareen, S. ve Waagsaether, K. L. (2023) “New municipalism and the governance of urban transitions to sustainability”, Urban Studies, 60, 11, 2271-2289.
  • Schwabe, K., Nemati, M., Amin, R., Tran, Q. ve Jassby, D. (2020) “Unintended consequences of water conservation on the use of treated municipal wastewater”, Nature Sustainability, 3, 8, 628-635.
  • Shahmirzadi, O., Lugowski, A. ve Younge, K. (2019) “Text similarity in vector space models: a comparative study”, In 2019 18th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA), IEEE, 659-666.
  • Sobacı, M. Z. ve Karkin, N. (2013) “The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better public services?”, Government Information Quarterly, 30, 4, 417-425.
  • Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P. ve Chi, E. H. (2010) “Want to be retweeted? large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network”, In 2010 IEEE second international conference on social computing, IEEE, 177-184.
  • Statista (2024a) “Number of internet and social media users worlwide as of April 2023”, https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/
  • Statista (2024b) “Leading countries based on number of X (formerly Twitter) users as of January 2024”, https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-twitter-users-in-selected-countries/#statisticContainer
  • Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H. ve Strohmaier, M. (2018) “Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter”, Political Communication, 35, 1, 50-74.
  • Struk, M. ve Bakoš, E. (2021) “Long-term benefits of intermunicipal cooperation for small municipalities in waste management provision”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 4, 1449.
  • Şen, B. (2011) “Kentsel mekanda üçlü ittifak: sanayisizleştirme, soylulaştırma, yeni orta sınıf”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 1-21.
  • Tekeli, İ. (1977) “Belediyeler ve Kent Yönetiminin Sınıfsal Yapısı”, Mimarlık, 1, 32-35.
  • Tekeli, İ., Okyay, T. ve Gülöksüz, Y. (2020) Gecekondulu, Dolmuşlu, İşportalı Şehir, İstanbul: İdealkent Yayınları.
  • The World Bank (2024) “Poverty and Inequality”, https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/themes/poverty-and-inequality.html
  • Theocharis, Y. ve Jungherr, A. (2021) “Computational social science and the study of political communication”, Political Communication, 38, 1, 1-22.
  • Thompson, M. (2020) “What’s so new about New Municipalism?”, Progress in Human Geography, 45, 2, 317-342.
  • Ulutaş, Ç. Ü. (2017) “Türkiye refah rejiminin dönüşüm sürecinde sosyal yardım sistemi”, Emek Araştırma Dergisi, 8, 12, 27-48.
  • Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N. ve Polosukhin, I. (2017) “Attention is all you need”, In advances in neural information processing systems, 5998-6008.
  • Yang, Z., Guo, J., Cai, K., Tang, J., Li, J., Zhang, L. ve Su, Z. (2010) “Understanding retweeting behaviors in social networks”, In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, 1633-1636.
  • Wan, C., Shen, G. Q. ve Choi, S. (2021) “Underlying relationships between public urban green spaces and social cohesion: A systematic literature review”, City, Culture and Society, 24, 100383.
  • Warren, A. M., Sulaiman, A. ve Jaafar, N. I. (2014) “Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions”, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 2, 291-301.
  • Weber, H. I., Vogt, S., Eberz-Weber, L. M., Steinmetz, H., Wagner, S. A., Walther, F. ve Kabst, R. (2019) “Participatory budgeting: findings from Germany”, In Civic engagement and politics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, IGI Global, 1087-1107.
  • Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E. ve Zhou, D. (2022) “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models”, Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 24824-24837.
  • Yılmaz, E. (2013) Türkiye’de kırsal dönüşüm: Malatya’dan iki köy örneği (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Toplam 91 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İletişim Teknolojisi ve Dijital Medya Çalışmaları, Siyasal İletişim
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Evrim Yılmaz 0000-0001-5057-4350

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 5 Temmuz 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 5 Temmuz 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2024
Kabul Tarihi 1 Temmuz 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yılmaz, E. (2024). Twitter ve Belediyeler: Ankara ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları. Emek Araştırma Dergisi(1), 1-30.
AMA Yılmaz E. Twitter ve Belediyeler: Ankara ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları. Emek Araştırma Dergisi. Temmuz 2024;(1):1-30.
Chicago Yılmaz, Evrim. “Twitter Ve Belediyeler: Ankara Ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları”. Emek Araştırma Dergisi, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2024): 1-30.
EndNote Yılmaz E (01 Temmuz 2024) Twitter ve Belediyeler: Ankara ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları. Emek Araştırma Dergisi 1 1–30.
IEEE E. Yılmaz, “Twitter ve Belediyeler: Ankara ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları”, Emek Araştırma Dergisi, sy. 1, ss. 1–30, Temmuz 2024.
ISNAD Yılmaz, Evrim. “Twitter Ve Belediyeler: Ankara Ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları”. Emek Araştırma Dergisi 1 (Temmuz 2024), 1-30.
JAMA Yılmaz E. Twitter ve Belediyeler: Ankara ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları. Emek Araştırma Dergisi. 2024;:1–30.
MLA Yılmaz, Evrim. “Twitter Ve Belediyeler: Ankara Ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları”. Emek Araştırma Dergisi, sy. 1, 2024, ss. 1-30.
Vancouver Yılmaz E. Twitter ve Belediyeler: Ankara ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Belediyecilik Yaklaşımları. Emek Araştırma Dergisi. 2024(1):1-30.
 Kapak Resmi İndir