Examination of Teaching and Learning Processes of an Elective Applied Mathematics Course

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the teaching and learning processes of an Elective Applied Mathematics course according to the opinions of mathematics teachers and students. Data was collected through interviews and focus group interviews, and the content analysis method was performed to interpret data. Results revealed that the requirements of the curriculum and student-centered education approach were generally not fulfilled. Therefore, meeting student expectations was not at the desired level. However, some teachers expressed that enriching the course with mathematical modeling and engaging problems would affect students' attitudes towards mathematics, in line with the general idea of the course. In general, the lack of school resources and limited teaching staff was a problem that restrict the instruction. As a recommendation, Elective Applied Mathematics teachers and students should be informed about the aim of the course. Moreover, teachers should be experienced in mathematical modeling.

Keywords

• Elective applied maths course
• elective course
• mathematics education

References

1. Arseven, Z. (2013). A study on the adequacy of primary school maths teachers in the application of alternative assessment approaches included in the primary school maths curriculum of 2005. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Uludag University, Bursa.
2. Bal, P. (2008). The evaluation of new mathematic curriculum in term of teachersʼ perspectives Journal of Cukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 17(1), 53-68.
3. Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2012). An investigation of the purposes of the measurement and assessment practice of primary school teachers within the context of the new mathematics curriculum, Education and Science, 37(165).
4. Bloor, M. (Ed.). (2001). Focus groups in social research. Sage.
5. Board of Education [BoE] (2018). Middle and imam-hatip schools elective applied mathematics course curriculum for grades 5-8. Turkish Ministry of National Education.
6. Bozdogan, B., Bozdogan, A.E., & Sengul, U (2014). Examination of teacher views about implementation science course with regard to different variables. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education 10(3), 96-109.
7. Canli, G. (2012). The student-centered education and knowledge economy. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Bogazici University, Istanbul.
8. Cavus, R., & A. Oztuna Kaplan. (2013). Science teachers' opinions about the middle school 5th grade science applications lesson. [Conference presentation]. 22nd Educational Sciences Congress, 5-7 September, Eskisehir.

9. Cirakoglu, M., & Saracaloglu, A., S. (2009). The effect of the multiple intelligence theory applications on the academic achievement of students in primary school. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences,7 (2).
10. Coban, F. N., & Erdogan, A. (2013). Difficulties encountered by the teachers in fifth grade applications of mathematics course Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 4(3).
11. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142.
12. Coskun, U. (2016). Investigating the effect of elective science application course to the scientific literacy and scientific attitude of the students, and perseptions of teachers’ opinions about the lesson. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Selcuk University.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
14. Demirtas, Z., Arslan, S., Eskicumali, A., & Civan, E. (2015). Teachers’ evaluations about elective mathematic applications for 5th and 6th grade curriculum. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 4074-4082.
15. Education Research and Development Department. [ERDD] (2007). Student centered education application model. Turkish Ministry of National Education.
16. Education Research and Development Department. [ERDD] (2008). A survey of the evaluation of selection criteria for elective courses. Turkish Ministry of National Education.
17. Erdal, H. (2007). The investigation of measurement and evaluation parts in the new elementary school mathematics curriculum (case of Afyonkarahisar) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Afyon Kocatepe University.
18. Erdem, A. R., & Genc, G. (2014). The students who choose elective applications of mathematics lesson at 5th secondary school to course opinions. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education- JOQRE2(2), 9-26.
19. Esbahoglu, F. (2015). The problems and solutions encountered in the process of selection of elective courses in the fifth and sixth grades in secondary schools. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Istanbul Aydin University.
20. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.
21. Gelbal, S., & Kelecioglu, H. (2007). Teachersʼ proficiency perceptions about the measurement and evaluation techniques and the problems they confront. H. U. Journal of Education, 33(33).
22. Gunes, G. (2008). Reflection on new primary school mathematics curriculum on the teaching and learning environment. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Karadeniz Technical University.
23. Inam, A., & Unsal, H. (2017). Evaluation of the effect of teaching web-based applications of maths subject on 5th grade studentsʼ performance and motivation through students’ views. HAYEF: Journal of Education14(1), 203.
24. Kapucu, M. (2016b). The evaluation of science applications course curriculum according to the views of the teachers. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(1), 26-46, http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c1s2m.
25. Kapucu, M. S. (2016a). Evaluation of selective course of science application according to the views of middle school students (5th, 6th and 7th grades). Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 12(1), 17-40.
26. Kesan, C., Cosar, M. C., & Erkus, Y. (2016). Views of secondary school students about elective application of mathematics course. The Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES)7(14), 33-44.
27. Korkmaz, T. (2016). Effects of mathematical applications course on the students' mathematical literacy. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Eskisehir Osmangazi University.
28. Kristiansen, S., Sorensen, M., & Stidsen, T. R. (2011). Elective course planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 215 (2011) 713–720.
29. Lake, S. (1989). Exploratory and elective courses in the middle level school. Practitioner's monograph #8. ERIC.
30. Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Merenbloom, E. Y., & Kalina, B. A. (2012). Creative scheduling for diverse populations in middle and high school: maximizing opportunities for learning. Corwin Press.
32. Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
33. Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications.
34. Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2012) Elective courses curricular. http://tegm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_08/31022530_secmeliders.pdf
35. Official Gazette. 24.6.1973. Number: 14574. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/14574.pdf.
36. Ozut, A. (2014). Evaluation of primary school levels elective lessons evaluation criterias to teachers and school managers. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Firat University.
37. Saban, O. (2019). The investigation of the effects of the applications of mathematics course onmiddle school students' mathematical literacy and attitudes towards mathematics. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe University.
38. Seferoglu, S. S. (2007). Primary school computer curriculum: A critical evaluation and problems faced during implementation. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 29, 99-111.
39. Tanhan, F. (2013). An evaluation of elective course practices in the context of psychological counseling and guidance: student-centered education [Conference presentation]. Symposium on Elective Courses in the Discrete 12-Year Compulsory Education Model. Van.
40. Tas, B. S. (2004). The evalation of the curriculum of elective courses, at primary school 6th, 7th and 8th grades, direction of teachers and students’ opinions. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Cukurova University.
41. Toptas, V. (2011). Classroom teachersʼ perceptions about the use of alternative assessment and evaluation methods in mathematics courses. Education and Science, 36 (159), 205-219.
42. Turkish Qualifications Framework [TQF]. (2016). www.myk.gov.tr/TYC .
43. Ulgen, G. (1992). Elective courses on 6,7 and 8th grades Hacettepe University Journal of Education 8(8).
44. Uysal, B. (2015). Evaluation of the elective courses in the middle school according to the opinions of the students, teachers and school administration. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ankara University.
45. Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S, & Williams, J. M. B. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. (7th edition). Pearson
46. Yakar, A., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2016). The evaluation of secondary school 5th grade science applications curriculum implemented in 2013 according to metfessel-michael curriculum evaluation model (Mugla sample). Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 12(3), 769-796.
47. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2013). Qualitative research in social sciences. (9th edition). Seckin.
48. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods. (4th edition). Sage.