Değerlendirici Rolüyle İngilizce Öğretmenleri: Dilde Ölçme Değerlendirmeyle İlgili Görüşleri ve İhtiyaçlari

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 373 - 390, 31.01.2019

Elçin Ölmezer-öztürk Belgin Aydın

Abstract

Nitel bir araştırma desenine sahip bu çalışma, İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğreten öğretmenlerin dilde ölçme değerlendirme bilgileri üzerine görüşlerini araştırmayı ve bu alandaki ihtiyaçlarını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmaya amaca dayalı örneklemle belirlenmiş ve Türkiye’de yükseköğretim bağlamında çalışan 11 İngilizce öğretmeni katılmıştır. Veriler, katılımcıların Türkiye’deki öğretmenlerin dilde ölçme değerlendirme bilgilerini araştıran daha geniş ölçekli bir araştırmanın bulguları ile ilgili değerlendirmelerini ve dilde ölçme değerlendirme alanındaki ihtiyaçlarını soran yedi açık-uçlu soru yardımıyla toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler içeriğin kodlama ve temalandırılması yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, dil öğretmenlerinin dilde ölçme değerlendirme bilgilerinin eksikliğinin temel sebebinin hizmet-öncesi ve hizmet-içi eğitimlerin yetersizliği olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Çalışmaya katılan öğretmenler, dilde ölçme değerlendirmenin uygulamasına hakim kişiler tarafından verilen ve kendilerini her bir beceriyi ölçmede geliştirebilecek uygulamaya yönelik eğitimleri tercih ettiklerini belirtmişlerdir. Çalışma, bulguların ışığında, dilde ölçme değerlendirme eğitimlerine yönelik hizmet öncesi ve hizmet içi eğitim programlarına bazı öneriler sunmaktadır.

Keywords

Dilde ölçme değerlendirme, İngilizce öğretmenleri, dil öğretmenlerinin dilde ölçme değerlendirme ihtiyaçları

Voices Of EFL Teachers as Assessors: Their Opinions and Needs Regarding Language Assessment

Abstract

Employing a qualitative research design, this study aims to investigate the opinions of EFL teachers regarding their language assessment knowledge and identify their general and skill-based needs in this domain. The participants included 11 EFL teachers who were determined through purposeful sampling and working at different universities in Turkish higher education setting. The data collection process included the participants’ responses to seven open-ended questions that focused on their evaluations regarding the findings of a larger study investigating the language assessment knowledge of EFL teachers in Turkey and asked their needs in language testing and assessment. The data were analysed based on the qualitative content analysis by code-labelling and identifying the emerging themes. The findings indicated the insufficiency of trainings in both pre-service and in-service teacher education as the major reason of the low level in language assessment knowledge of EFL teachers. The teachers preferred hands-on trainings given by testing practitioners, and designed to improve them in assessing each skill separately. In the light of these findings, the study offers several suggestions for pre-service and in-service teacher education programs on language testing and assessment.

Keywords

Language assessment knowledge, EFL teachers, language assessment needs of language teachers

References

• Aydın, B., Kızıltan, N., Öztürk, G., İpek, Ö. F., Yükselir, C., & Beceren, S. (2017). Optional English preparatory programs after HEC 2016 regulation: Opinions of administrators on the current situation and problems. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 1 (2), 1-11.
• Backlund, P., Brown, K., Gurry, J., & Jandt, F. (1980). Evaluating speaking and listening skill assessment instruments: Which one is best for you? Language Arts, 57 (6), 621-627.
• Beverly, B.A., Tsushima, R., & Wang, S. (2014). Investigating Language Assessment Literacy: Collaboration between assessment specialists and Canadian university admissions officers. CercleS, 4 (1), 137-157.
• Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.
• Buck. G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In d. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Macmillan.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education.
• Falsgraf, C. (2005, April). Why a national assessment summit? New visions in action. National Assessment Summit. Meeting conducted in Alexanderia, Va. Retrieved from: http://www. nflrc.iastate.edu /nva/word documents/ assessment_2005/ pdf /nsap_introduction.pdf
• Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2012). Assessing listening. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff. (Eds.). The Cambridge guide to second language assessment. (pp. 225-233). Cambridge University Press, USA.
• Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9 (2), 113-132.
• Hasselgreen, A., Carlsen, C., Helness, H. (2004). European survey of language and assessment needs. Part one: General finding. Retrieved April 22, 2018, from www.ealta eu.org/documents/resources/survey-report-pt1.pdf.
• Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2015). English language testing and evaluation (ELTE) training in Turkey: expectations and needs of pre-service English language teachers. ELT Research Journal, 4 (2), 111-128.
• Herrera, L. & Macias, D. (2015). A call for language assessment literacy in the education and development of teachers of English as a foreign language. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J., 17 (2), 302-312.
• Hubley, N. N. (2012). Assessing reading. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff. (Eds.). The Cambridge guide to second language assessment. (pp. 211-217). Cambridge University Press, USA.
• Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25 (3), 385-402.
• Jannati, S. (2015). ELT teachers’ language assessment literacy: Perceptions and practices. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 6 (2), 26-37.
• Jeong, H. (2013). Defining assessment literacy: Is it different for language testers and non-language testers?. Language Testing, 30 (3), 345-362.
• Köksal, D. (2004). Assessing teachers’ testing skills in ELT and enhancing their professional development through distance learning on the net. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 5 (1), 1- 11.
• Lam, R. (2015). Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 32 (2), 169-197.
• Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrance Erlbaum.
• Malone, M. E. (2013). The essentials of assessment literacy: Contrasts between testers and users. Language Testing, 30 (3), 329-344.
• Marzano, R. J. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Mede, E., & Atay, D. (2017). English Language Teachers’ assessment literacy: The Turkish context. Dil Dergisi, 168 (1), 1-5.
• Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the assessment literacy inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490355.
• Nunan, D., & Miller, L. (1995). New ways in teaching listening. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
• O’Loughlin, K. (2013). Developing the assessment literacy of university proficiency test users. Language Testing, 30 (3), 363-380.
• Ölmezer-Öztürk, E. (2018). Developing and validating language assessment knowledge scale (LAKS) and exploring the assessment knowledge of EFL teachers. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Anadolu University, Turkey.
• Öz, H. (2014). Turkish teachers’ practices of assessment for learning in the English as a foreign language classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5 (4), 775-785.
• Öz, S., & Atay, D. (2017). Turkish EFL teachers’ in-class language assessment literacy: perceptions and practices. ELT Reseacrh Journal, 6 (1), 25-44.
• Popham, J. W. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48, 4-11.
• Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational researcher, 29 (7), 4-14.
• Stanford, P., & Reeves, S. (2005). Assessment that drives instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37 (4), 18-22.
• Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77 (3), 238-245.
• Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18 (1), 23-27.
• Tsagari, D. & Vogt, K. (2017). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers around Europe: Research, challenges and future prospects. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6 (1), 41-64.
• Wu, J. R. W. (2014). Investigating Taiwanese teachers’ language testing and assessment needs. English Teaching and Learning, 38 (1), 1-27.
• Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers’ self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16 (4), 323-342.