Dünden Bugüne Radikal Perineal Prostatektomi: Açık, Perineoskopik, Robotik

Year 2020, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 45 - 52, 30.01.2020

Yusuf İlker Çömez , Doğukan Sökmen Volkan Tuğcu

Abstract

Amaç: Radikal perineal prostatektomi ameliyatının başlangıcından günümüze modern cerrahi ekipmanlar ile değişimine gözden geçirmeyi amaçladık.

Metod: Radikal Perineal Prostatektomi için cerrahi teknikler ile ilgili özgün makaleler Pubmed ile taranarak, yeni cerrahi platformlar eşliğinde tekniğin gelişimi de gözden geçirildi.

Sonuçlar: Lokalize prostat kanserindeki cerrahi tedavilerin en eskilerinden olan RPP ameliyatı, retropubik yöntemin tercih edilmesiyle popülerliğini yitirmiştir. Robotik cerrahinin perineal prostatektomi için kullanılmaya başlaması ile tekrar bu yönteme ilginin arttığı gözlenmiştir.

Karar: Özellikle robotik cerrahinin gelişmesi ile radikal perineal prostatektomi ameliyatına kaybolan ilgi tekrar artmaya başlamıştır. Lokalize prostat kanserinde perineal yaklaşımın yaygınlaşabilmesi ve ilerlemesi için randomize kontrollü çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Keywords

Perineal prostatektomi, prostat kanseri, robotik, lokalize

Perineal Prostatectomy: From Past to Today: Open, Perineoscopic, Robotic

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to review radical perineal prostatectomy from past to the latest developments with new surgical platforms in terms of surgical technique.

Method: A Pubmed research was done for surgical techniques of Radical Perineal Prostatectomy and the evolution with new surgical platforms.

Results: Radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) was the first technique defined for localised prostate cancer (Pca) but was replaced by Retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) within years. RPP technique has gaining attention by using Robotic platforms in this era.

Conclusion: Radical perineal prostatectomy surgery has an increase in popularity via development of robotic surgery. Randomised controlled trials are needed to become widespread and go ahead.

Keywords

Perineal Prostatectomy, prostat cancer, robotic, localised

References

• 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424 

• 2. Wallis CJD, Saskir R, Choo R et al (2016) Surgery versus radio- therapy for clinically-localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 70(1):21–30
• 3. Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E et al (2018) Clinically localized prostate cancer : AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: risk stratification, shared decision-making, and care options. J Urol 199(3):684–690 

• 4. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71(4): 618–629 

• 5. Young HH (1945) The cure of cancer of the prostate by radical perineal prostatectomy (prostate-seminal vesiculectomy): history, literature and statistics of Young’s operation. J Urol 53:188–256 

• 6. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JD (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473 

• 7. Gouley JWS (1885) Some points in the surgery of the hypertrophied prostate. Trans Meet Am Surg Assoc 3:163–192 

• 8. Billroth T. Carcinoma der prostate. Chir Erfahrungen, Zurich 1860-67. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir 1869; Bd X, S:548
• 9. Young HH (1940) A surgeon’s autobiography. Harcourt, Brace and Co, New York, pp 104–134
• 10. Young HH (1905) Conservative perineal prostatectomy: the results of two years experience and report of seventy-five cases. Ann Surg 41(4):549–557
• 11. Reiner WB, Walsh PC (1987) An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini’s plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy: the apical dissection. J Urol 138(3):543–550
• 12. Saito S, Murakami G (2003) Radical perineal prostatectomy: a novel approach for lymphadenectomy from perineal incision. J Urol 170:1298–1300
• 13. Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al (2000) Remote laparo- scopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol 10:520–523
• 14. Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408–410
• 15. Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C et al (2012) Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologist in the United States. J Urol 187:2087–2092
• 16. Albayrak S, Horuz R, Göktaş C, Cangüven Ö, Çetinel C. Radical perineal prostatectomy: our experiences on 40 cases. Turk J Urol 2007;33:398-404.
• 17. Resnick MI (2003) Radical perineal prostatectomy. BJU 92(6):522–523
• 18. Janoff DM, Parra RO (2005) Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 173:1863–1870
• 19. Kaouk JH, Akca O, Zargar H, Caputo P, Ramirez D, Andrade H, Albayrak S, Laydner H, Angermeir K (2016) Descriptive technique and initial results for robotic radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology 94:129–138
• 20. Kaouk JH, Akca O, Zargar H, Caputo P, Ramirez D, Andrade H, Albayrak S, Laydner H, Angermeir K (2016) Descriptive technique and initial results for robotic radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology 94:129–138
• 21. Akca O, Zargar H, Kaouk JH (2015) Robotic surgery revives radical perineal prostatectomy. Eur Urol 68(2):340–341
• 22. Tugku, Akca O, Simsek A et al (2017) Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: first experience of 15 cases. Turk J Urol 43(4):476–483
• 23. Tugcu V, Akca O, Simsek A et al (2019) Robot-assisted perineal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis. Turk J Urol. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.9825
• 24. Gillitzer R, Thuroff JW (2002) Relatavie advantages and disad- vantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retro- pubic prostatectomy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43(2):167–190
• 25. Sullivan LD, Weir MJ, Kinahan JF, Taylor DL (2000) A com- parison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 85(1):95–100
• 26. Gillitzer R, Thomas C, Wiesner C, Jones J et al (2010) Single Center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 76(2):417–422 

• 27. Matsubara A, Yoneta T, Nakamoto T et al (2007) Inguinal Hernia after radical perineal prostatectomy: comparison with the retropu- bic approach. Urology 70(6):1152–1156 

• 28. Haab F, Boocon-Gibod L, Delmas V, Toublanc M (1994) Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer. Br J Urol 74:626–629 

• 29. Zippe CD, Rackley RR (1996) Non-nerve sparing radical prosta- tectomy in the elderly patient: perineal vs retropubic approach. J Urol 155(Suppl):284 

• 30. Leung AC, Melman A. Radical perineal prostatectomy: a more optimal treatment approach than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients? Rev Urol 2005;7:48-52.
• 31. Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE et al (2009) Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology 73:316–322
• 32. Song W, Park JH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, et al. Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes and Complications According to Surgical Approach to Radical Prostatectomy: Special Focus on the Perineal Approach. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017;15:e645-52.
• 33. Ku JY, Ha HK. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopicradi- cal prostatectomy for a single experienced surgeon: comparison with simultaneous laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Mens Health 2015;33:30-
• 34. Lassen PM, Kearse WS (1995) Rectal injuries during radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology 45:266–269 

• 35. Bishoff JT, Motley G, Optenberg SA et al (1998) Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population. J Urol 160(2):454–458 

• 36. Eden CG. Minimal access radical prostatectomy: how is it shaping up? BJU Int 2008;101:791-2.
• 37. Tugcu V., Simsek A., Yigitbasi I., Yenice M.G.,Sahin S.,Tasci A.I. (2018) Robotic perineal prostatectomywith high prostate volume, Archivio Italiano Di Urologia e Andrologia, 90(1), 65. doi:10.4081/aiua.2018.1.65
• 38. Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH et al (2009) Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 55:1251–1265 

• 39. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM et al (2001) Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin Tables) for new millennium. Urology 58:843–848 

• 40. Keller H, Lehmann J, Beier J (2007) Radical perineal prostatec- tomy and simultaneous extended pelvic lymph node dissection via the same incision. Eur Urol 52:384–388 

• 41. Tuğcu V, Akça O, Şimşek A, Yiğitbaşı İ, Yenice MG, Şahin S, et al. Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy and robotic pelvic lymph node dissection via a perineal approach: The Tugcu Bakirkoy Technique. Turk J Urol 2018; 44(2): 114-8.