PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Cite

Practical Suggestions on Gifted Education in Turkey

Year 2012, Volume 1, Issue 2, 72 - 84, 01.10.2012

Abstract

The article discusses the changes that can be brought in the education of the gifted in today’s Turkey. In the article, there are suggestions that would not contradict – or would minimally contradict - with the other changes currently made in the educational system, that would not require fundamental changes in the current educational system, and that would not necessitate vast resources. Examples of policies and practices in gifted education in the U.S. are also provided. First, it is explained that the gifted education services do not need to originate from an elitist approach. Then, the suggestions are made separately for the preschool/elementary, middle, and high school levels. After elaborating on teacher preparation for gifted education, the work needed to strengthen the measurement infrastructure for the identification of the gifted is discussed. Finally, the factors that would determine the effectiveness of the suggestions made are listed

References

  • Assouline, S.G., Colangelo, N., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Lipscomb, J., ve Forstadt, L. (2009). Iowa Acceleration Scale manual: A guide for whole-grade acceleration
  • K-8 (3rd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S.G., ve Gross, M.U.M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IA: The Connie
  • Belin ve Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. Davidson Institute for Talent Development. (2004). Educational options for gifted learners. Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Declaration of Independence. (1776). (Erişim http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Gallagher, J.J. (1997). Least restrictive environment and gifted students. Peabody
  • Journal of Education, 72(3ve4), 153-165. Hjelle, L.A. ve Ziegler, D.J. (1981). Personality theories: Basic assumptions, research, and applications (2nded.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.§ 1400 (2004).
  • Maker, C.J. (1982). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publications.
  • National Association for Gifted Children ve Center for Gifted Education, College of William and Mary. (2007). Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low- income promising learners. http://www.nagc.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/Overlooked%20Gems%20(pass word%20protected%20-%20gifted).pdf (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Ohio Department of Education. (2012). Postsecondary enrollment options program for Ohio high school students. http://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/School-Choice/Private-Schools
  • (1)/Forms-and-Program-Information-for-Nonpublic-School/PSEOP_Fact- Sheet.pdf.aspx (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Ohio Department of Education. (n.d.). Chart of approved assessment and gifted education. http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Other-Resources/Gifted- Education/Gifted-Screening-and-Identification/Chart-of-Approved-Assessment- and-Gifted-Education (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Ozturk, M.A. ve Debelak, C. (2008a). Affective benefits from academic competitions for middle school gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 31(2), 48-53.
  • Ozturk, M.A. ve Debelak, C. (2008b). Academic competitions as tools for differentiation in middle school. Gifted Child Today, 31(3), 47-53.
  • Rakow, S. (2005). Educating gifted students in middle school: A practical guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Renzulli Learning. (n.d.). Renzulli Learning. Retrieved November 10, 2012 from http://www.renzullilearning.com
  • Rogers, C.R. (1980). A way of being. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Savaşır, I. ve Şahin, N. (1995). Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zekâ Ölçeği (WISC – R) el kitabı. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler

Year 2012, Volume 1, Issue 2, 72 - 84, 01.10.2012

Abstract

Makalede, günümüz Türkiye’sinde çok hızlı gerçekleşen kapsamlı eğitim reformu sürecinde üstün zekâlı eğitimi konusunda getirilebilecek yenilikler ele alınmaktadır. Eğitim alanında yapılan diğer değişikliklere ters düşmeyen veya en az ters düşen, sistemde köklü değişiklikler gerektirmeyen ve az kaynakla gerçekleştirilebilecek uygulama önerilerine yer verilmektedir. Öneriler açıklanırken bu konuda Türkiye’ye model olabilecek ülkelerden biri olan ABD’deki uygulamalardan da söz edilmektedir. Önce, üstün zekâlı eğitim hizmetlerinin elitist bir yaklaşımın ürünü olmak zorunda olmadığı açıklanmaktadır. Sonra, eğitim sisteminde yapılabilecek değişiklikler, okulöncesi/ilkokul, ortaokul ve lise düzeyleri için ayrı ayrı ele alınmaktadır. Üstün zekâlı eğitimi için öğretmen yetiştirmenin zamanlama ve içerik açısından nasıl düzenlenebileceği konusuna değinildikten sonra üstün zekâlı tanısı için gereken ölçme değerlendirme altyapısı irdelenmiştir. Son olarak, makalede bulunulan önerilerin ne ölçüde verimli olacağını belirleyecek faktörler sıralanmıştır

References

  • Assouline, S.G., Colangelo, N., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Lipscomb, J., ve Forstadt, L. (2009). Iowa Acceleration Scale manual: A guide for whole-grade acceleration
  • K-8 (3rd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S.G., ve Gross, M.U.M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IA: The Connie
  • Belin ve Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. Davidson Institute for Talent Development. (2004). Educational options for gifted learners. Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Declaration of Independence. (1776). (Erişim http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Gallagher, J.J. (1997). Least restrictive environment and gifted students. Peabody
  • Journal of Education, 72(3ve4), 153-165. Hjelle, L.A. ve Ziegler, D.J. (1981). Personality theories: Basic assumptions, research, and applications (2nded.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.§ 1400 (2004).
  • Maker, C.J. (1982). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publications.
  • National Association for Gifted Children ve Center for Gifted Education, College of William and Mary. (2007). Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low- income promising learners. http://www.nagc.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/Overlooked%20Gems%20(pass word%20protected%20-%20gifted).pdf (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Ohio Department of Education. (2012). Postsecondary enrollment options program for Ohio high school students. http://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/School-Choice/Private-Schools
  • (1)/Forms-and-Program-Information-for-Nonpublic-School/PSEOP_Fact- Sheet.pdf.aspx (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Ohio Department of Education. (n.d.). Chart of approved assessment and gifted education. http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Other-Resources/Gifted- Education/Gifted-Screening-and-Identification/Chart-of-Approved-Assessment- and-Gifted-Education (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 10 Kasım)
  • Ozturk, M.A. ve Debelak, C. (2008a). Affective benefits from academic competitions for middle school gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 31(2), 48-53.
  • Ozturk, M.A. ve Debelak, C. (2008b). Academic competitions as tools for differentiation in middle school. Gifted Child Today, 31(3), 47-53.
  • Rakow, S. (2005). Educating gifted students in middle school: A practical guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Renzulli Learning. (n.d.). Renzulli Learning. Retrieved November 10, 2012 from http://www.renzullilearning.com
  • Rogers, C.R. (1980). A way of being. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Savaşır, I. ve Şahin, N. (1995). Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zekâ Ölçeği (WISC – R) el kitabı. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mehmet Ali ÖZTÜRK This is me
Bahçeşehir üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, İstanbul

Publication Date October 1, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012, Volume 1, Issue 2

Cite

Bibtex @ { epa611610, journal = {Eğitimde Politika Analizi}, address = {eartvinli@gmail.com}, publisher = {Eskişehir Osmangazi University}, year = {2012}, volume = {1}, number = {2}, pages = {72 - 84}, title = {Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler}, key = {cite}, author = {Öztürk, Mehmet Ali} }
APA Öztürk, M. A. (2012). Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler . Eğitimde Politika Analizi , 1 (2) , 72-84 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/epa/issue/48308/611610
MLA Öztürk, M. A. "Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler" . Eğitimde Politika Analizi 1 (2012 ): 72-84 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/epa/issue/48308/611610>
Chicago Öztürk, M. A. "Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler". Eğitimde Politika Analizi 1 (2012 ): 72-84
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Practical Suggestions on Gifted Education in Turkey AU - Mehmet AliÖztürk Y1 - 2012 PY - 2012 N1 - DO - T2 - Eğitimde Politika Analizi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 72 EP - 84 VL - 1 IS - 2 SN - - M3 - UR - Y2 - 2023 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal of Educational Policy Analysis Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler %A Mehmet Ali Öztürk %T Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler %D 2012 %J Eğitimde Politika Analizi %P - %V 1 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD Öztürk, Mehmet Ali . "Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler". Eğitimde Politika Analizi 1 / 2 (October 2012): 72-84 .
AMA Öztürk M. A. Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler. Eğitimde Politika Analizi. 2012; 1(2): 72-84.
Vancouver Öztürk M. A. Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler. Eğitimde Politika Analizi. 2012; 1(2): 72-84.
IEEE M. A. Öztürk , "Türkiye’de Üstün Zekâlı Eğitimiyle İlgili Pratik Öneriler", Eğitimde Politika Analizi, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 72-84, Oct. 2012