BibTex RIS Cite

A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey

Year 2015, Volume: 10 Issue: 1 - Volume 10, Issue 1, 2015, 59 - 70, 19.05.2016

Sümer Aktan

Abstract

Curriculum is generally defined based on the philosophical perspectives of the individuals. One of the definitions of curriculum states that curriculum is a field of academic study and research, having an intrinsic research systematic, theory, and tradition. From this perspective, this study is designed as three main chapters. The first chapter consists of the development process of curriculum as a field of academic study. In the second chapter, the period between 1918 and 1938 in the USA, during which curriculum studies have been institutionalized, was described and then the development process of the curriculum history as a field in curriculum studies was analyzed. In the final chapter of the study, the significance of the studies developed around the education history in Turkey within the context of the curriculum history and the relations between the education history and the curriculum history were analyzed

Keywords

Curriculum studies the curriculum history research on the curriculum history the education history

References

  • Bailyn, B. (1960). Education in the forming of American society: Needs and oppotunities for study. Virginia: Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi / The Ottoman Archive of Prime Ministery [BOA]. Mf. Mkt. 1331/1118. 30; Mf. Mkt. 1313 / 283.19; Mf. Mkt. 1325 / 997.52.
  • Behar-Horenstein, S. L. (2000). Can the modern view of curriculum be refined by postmodern criticism? In J. Glanz & L.S. Behar-Horenstein (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Bellack, A. A. (1969). History of curriculum thought and practice. Review of Educational Research, 39 (3), pp. 283-292.
  • Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Bobbitt, J. F. (1924). How to make a curriculum.Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company
  • Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  • Compayré, G. (1886). The history of pedagogy. (W. H. Payne, Trans.). Boston: D. C. Heath & Company.
  • Compayré, G. (1907). Herbert and education by instruction. (M. A. Findlay, Trans.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell & Co. Publishers.
  • Cremin, L. A. (1964). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Cubberley, P. E. (1947). Public education in the United States: A study and interpretation of American educational history. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • DeGarmo, C. (1895). Herbert and the Herbertians. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Dunkel, B. H. (1969). Herbertianism comes to America: Part II. History of Education Quarterly, 9(3). pp. 376-390.
  • Ergin, O. (1977). Türk maarif tarihi. İstanbul: Eser Matbaası.
  • Ertürk, S. (1972). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Meteksan.
  • Fortna, B. C. (2005). Mekteb-i Hümayun: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun son döneminde İslam, devlet ve eğitim. (P. Siral, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Giroux, H., Penna, A., & Pinar, W. (1981). Curriculum and instruction: Alternatives in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • Goodlad, J. I. (1985). Curriculum as a field of study. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education. Pergamon: Oxford. pp. 1141-1144.
  • Gökmenoğlu, T. & Eret, E. (2010). Eğitim programları ve öğretim anabilim dalı araştırma görevlilerinin bakış açısıyla Türkiye’de program geliştirme. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 667-681. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  • Herbart, J. F. (1896). The science of education: Its general principles deduced from its aim and the aesthetic revelation of the world. (Henry M. & Emmie Felkin, Trans.). Boston: D.C. Heath and Co Publishers.
  • Herbart, J. F. (1913). Outlines an educational doctrine. (A. F. Lange, Trans.). New York: The McMillan Company.
  • Jackson, P. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialist. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (3-40). New York: McMillan Publishing Company.
  • Kliebard, H. (1975). Bureaucracy and curriculum theory. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies: The reconceptualization (Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists) (51-69). Troy, NY: Educator’s International Press.
  • Kliebard, H. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
  • Kliebard, H. (1992). Constructing a history of the American curriculum. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 157-184). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
  • Koçer, H. A. (1991). Türkiye’de modern eğitimin doğuşu ve gelişimi. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Kridel, C. & Bullough Jr., Robert V. (2002). Conceptions and misperceptions of the Eight-Year Study. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(1), pp.63–82.
  • Kridel, C. & Bullough Jr., Robert V. (2007). Stories of the eight-year study: Reexamining secondary education in America. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, M. W., Slattery, P. & Taubman, M. P. (1996). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Seguel, M. L. (1966). The curriculum field: It’s formative years. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Somel, S. A. (2010). Osmanlı’da eğitimin modernleşmesi: İslamlaşma, otokrasi ve disiplin (1839-1908). (O. Yener, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. (1975). Curriculum development: Theory into practice. New York: McMillan.
  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The scientific principles of management. New York: Harpers Brother Publishers.
  • Varış, F. (1971). Eğitimde program geliştirme: Teori ve teknikler. Ankara: Sevinç Matbaası.
  • Watras, J. (2002). The eight-year study: From evaluative research to a demonstration project, 1930–1940. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(21). Retrieved [17.09.2014] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n21/.

Year 2015, Volume: 10 Issue: 1 - Volume 10, Issue 1, 2015, 59 - 70, 19.05.2016

Sümer Aktan

Abstract

References

  • Bailyn, B. (1960). Education in the forming of American society: Needs and oppotunities for study. Virginia: Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi / The Ottoman Archive of Prime Ministery [BOA]. Mf. Mkt. 1331/1118. 30; Mf. Mkt. 1313 / 283.19; Mf. Mkt. 1325 / 997.52.
  • Behar-Horenstein, S. L. (2000). Can the modern view of curriculum be refined by postmodern criticism? In J. Glanz & L.S. Behar-Horenstein (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Bellack, A. A. (1969). History of curriculum thought and practice. Review of Educational Research, 39 (3), pp. 283-292.
  • Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Bobbitt, J. F. (1924). How to make a curriculum.Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company
  • Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  • Compayré, G. (1886). The history of pedagogy. (W. H. Payne, Trans.). Boston: D. C. Heath & Company.
  • Compayré, G. (1907). Herbert and education by instruction. (M. A. Findlay, Trans.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell & Co. Publishers.
  • Cremin, L. A. (1964). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Cubberley, P. E. (1947). Public education in the United States: A study and interpretation of American educational history. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • DeGarmo, C. (1895). Herbert and the Herbertians. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Dunkel, B. H. (1969). Herbertianism comes to America: Part II. History of Education Quarterly, 9(3). pp. 376-390.
  • Ergin, O. (1977). Türk maarif tarihi. İstanbul: Eser Matbaası.
  • Ertürk, S. (1972). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Meteksan.
  • Fortna, B. C. (2005). Mekteb-i Hümayun: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun son döneminde İslam, devlet ve eğitim. (P. Siral, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Giroux, H., Penna, A., & Pinar, W. (1981). Curriculum and instruction: Alternatives in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • Goodlad, J. I. (1985). Curriculum as a field of study. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education. Pergamon: Oxford. pp. 1141-1144.
  • Gökmenoğlu, T. & Eret, E. (2010). Eğitim programları ve öğretim anabilim dalı araştırma görevlilerinin bakış açısıyla Türkiye’de program geliştirme. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 667-681. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  • Herbart, J. F. (1896). The science of education: Its general principles deduced from its aim and the aesthetic revelation of the world. (Henry M. & Emmie Felkin, Trans.). Boston: D.C. Heath and Co Publishers.
  • Herbart, J. F. (1913). Outlines an educational doctrine. (A. F. Lange, Trans.). New York: The McMillan Company.
  • Jackson, P. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialist. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (3-40). New York: McMillan Publishing Company.
  • Kliebard, H. (1975). Bureaucracy and curriculum theory. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies: The reconceptualization (Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists) (51-69). Troy, NY: Educator’s International Press.
  • Kliebard, H. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
  • Kliebard, H. (1992). Constructing a history of the American curriculum. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 157-184). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
  • Koçer, H. A. (1991). Türkiye’de modern eğitimin doğuşu ve gelişimi. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Kridel, C. & Bullough Jr., Robert V. (2002). Conceptions and misperceptions of the Eight-Year Study. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(1), pp.63–82.
  • Kridel, C. & Bullough Jr., Robert V. (2007). Stories of the eight-year study: Reexamining secondary education in America. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, M. W., Slattery, P. & Taubman, M. P. (1996). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Seguel, M. L. (1966). The curriculum field: It’s formative years. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Somel, S. A. (2010). Osmanlı’da eğitimin modernleşmesi: İslamlaşma, otokrasi ve disiplin (1839-1908). (O. Yener, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. (1975). Curriculum development: Theory into practice. New York: McMillan.
  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The scientific principles of management. New York: Harpers Brother Publishers.
  • Varış, F. (1971). Eğitimde program geliştirme: Teori ve teknikler. Ankara: Sevinç Matbaası.
  • Watras, J. (2002). The eight-year study: From evaluative research to a demonstration project, 1930–1940. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(21). Retrieved [17.09.2014] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n21/.

Year 2015, Volume: 10 Issue: 1 - Volume 10, Issue 1, 2015, 59 - 70, 19.05.2016

Sümer Aktan

Abstract

References

  • Bailyn, B. (1960). Education in the forming of American society: Needs and oppotunities for study. Virginia: Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi / The Ottoman Archive of Prime Ministery [BOA]. Mf. Mkt. 1331/1118. 30; Mf. Mkt. 1313 / 283.19; Mf. Mkt. 1325 / 997.52.
  • Behar-Horenstein, S. L. (2000). Can the modern view of curriculum be refined by postmodern criticism? In J. Glanz & L.S. Behar-Horenstein (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Bellack, A. A. (1969). History of curriculum thought and practice. Review of Educational Research, 39 (3), pp. 283-292.
  • Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Bobbitt, J. F. (1924). How to make a curriculum.Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company
  • Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  • Compayré, G. (1886). The history of pedagogy. (W. H. Payne, Trans.). Boston: D. C. Heath & Company.
  • Compayré, G. (1907). Herbert and education by instruction. (M. A. Findlay, Trans.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell & Co. Publishers.
  • Cremin, L. A. (1964). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Cubberley, P. E. (1947). Public education in the United States: A study and interpretation of American educational history. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • DeGarmo, C. (1895). Herbert and the Herbertians. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Dunkel, B. H. (1969). Herbertianism comes to America: Part II. History of Education Quarterly, 9(3). pp. 376-390.
  • Ergin, O. (1977). Türk maarif tarihi. İstanbul: Eser Matbaası.
  • Ertürk, S. (1972). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Meteksan.
  • Fortna, B. C. (2005). Mekteb-i Hümayun: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun son döneminde İslam, devlet ve eğitim. (P. Siral, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Giroux, H., Penna, A., & Pinar, W. (1981). Curriculum and instruction: Alternatives in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • Goodlad, J. I. (1985). Curriculum as a field of study. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education. Pergamon: Oxford. pp. 1141-1144.
  • Gökmenoğlu, T. & Eret, E. (2010). Eğitim programları ve öğretim anabilim dalı araştırma görevlilerinin bakış açısıyla Türkiye’de program geliştirme. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 667-681. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  • Herbart, J. F. (1896). The science of education: Its general principles deduced from its aim and the aesthetic revelation of the world. (Henry M. & Emmie Felkin, Trans.). Boston: D.C. Heath and Co Publishers.
  • Herbart, J. F. (1913). Outlines an educational doctrine. (A. F. Lange, Trans.). New York: The McMillan Company.
  • Jackson, P. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialist. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (3-40). New York: McMillan Publishing Company.
  • Kliebard, H. (1975). Bureaucracy and curriculum theory. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies: The reconceptualization (Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists) (51-69). Troy, NY: Educator’s International Press.
  • Kliebard, H. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
  • Kliebard, H. (1992). Constructing a history of the American curriculum. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 157-184). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
  • Koçer, H. A. (1991). Türkiye’de modern eğitimin doğuşu ve gelişimi. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Kridel, C. & Bullough Jr., Robert V. (2002). Conceptions and misperceptions of the Eight-Year Study. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(1), pp.63–82.
  • Kridel, C. & Bullough Jr., Robert V. (2007). Stories of the eight-year study: Reexamining secondary education in America. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, M. W., Slattery, P. & Taubman, M. P. (1996). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Seguel, M. L. (1966). The curriculum field: It’s formative years. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Somel, S. A. (2010). Osmanlı’da eğitimin modernleşmesi: İslamlaşma, otokrasi ve disiplin (1839-1908). (O. Yener, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. (1975). Curriculum development: Theory into practice. New York: McMillan.
  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The scientific principles of management. New York: Harpers Brother Publishers.
  • Varış, F. (1971). Eğitimde program geliştirme: Teori ve teknikler. Ankara: Sevinç Matbaası.
  • Watras, J. (2002). The eight-year study: From evaluative research to a demonstration project, 1930–1940. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(21). Retrieved [17.09.2014] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n21/.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA22NG93VB
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Sümer Aktan This is me

Publication Date May 19, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 10 Issue: 1 - Volume 10, Issue 1, 2015

Cite

APA Aktan, S. (2016). A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, 10(1), 59-70.
AMA Aktan S. A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research. May 2016;10(1):59-70.
Chicago Aktan, Sümer. “A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 10, no. 1 (May 2016): 59-70.
EndNote Aktan S (May 1, 2016) A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 10 1 59–70.
IEEE S. Aktan, “A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey”, Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2016.
ISNAD Aktan, Sümer. “A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 10/1 (May 2016), 59-70.
JAMA Aktan S. A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research. 2016;10:59–70.
MLA Aktan, Sümer. “A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, vol. 10, no. 1, 2016, pp. 59-70.
Vancouver Aktan S. A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research. 2016;10(1):59-70.