Determining the STEM Discipline Identities of Female Students

Abstract

Different meanings can be attributed to STEM education, which is the trend approach of recent years, by societies and individuals. In order to understand the STEM approach in the mind of the individual, it is necessary to learn the perspective of STEM education or STEM disciplines. It is necessary to determine the STEM identity of female individuals, especially because of the differences between men and women who prefer STEM professions or their perspectives on STEM disciplines. In this research, it is aimed to determine the identity of the disciplines of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in female individuals. Within the scope of this aim, 125 female students studying child development were reached. Data were collected online with a short-answer form. In this form, the reasons for being a scientist, technologist, engineer or mathematician were asked. As a result of the analysis of the data, it is understood that almost half of the participants stated that they wanted to be scientists and engineers, and nearly half of them stated that they could be technology experts. In addition, it was determined that very few of them believed that they could be mathematicians. When the reasons for these data are examined, it is understood that they determine their identities in these disciplines due to reasons such as love, interest, curiosity, research, intelligence, willingness, and using their imagination. Likewise, it is understood that they cannot choose these disciplines due to reasons such as fear, anxiety, competence and unwillingness.

Keywords

• STEM education
• STEM identity
• women

References

1. Boateng, F. K., & Sharman, S. (2017). Unfettering the ball and chain of gender discrimination: Gendered experiences of senior STEM women in Ghana. Cogent Education, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1418135
2. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007).Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.
3. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2015). Design and execution of mixed method researches (2nd Edition) (Trans. Ed.: Dede, Y., &Demir, S.B.,). Ankara: Anı publications
4. Delaney, J. M., & Devereux, P. J., (2021). High school rank in math and English and the gender gap in STEM. Labour Economics, 69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101969
5. Dönmez, İ. (2021). Impact of out-of-school STEM activities on STEM career choices of female students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 91, 173-204, https://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.91.9
6. Dönmez, İ., & Gülen, S. (2021). An evaluation of student outcomes in interdisciplinary stem activities: An example of using STEM rubrics. Başkent University Journal of Education, 8 (2), 377-391
7. Dönmez, İ., Gülen, S. & Ayaz, M. (2021).Impact of Argumentation-based STEM activities on ongoing STEM motivation. Journal for STEM Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00062-2
8. Farrell, L., & McHugh, L., (2020). Exploring the relationship between implicit and explicit gender-STEM bias and behavior among STEM students using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.12.008

9. Fisher, C. R., Thompson, C. D., & Brookes, R. H. (2020). Gender differences in the Australian undergraduate STEM student experience: a systematic review. Higher Education Research & Development 39(6), 1155-1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1721441
10. Gülen, S. & Yaman, S. (2019). The effect of integration of STEM disciplines into Toulmin's argumentation model on students’ academic achievement, reflective thinking, and psychomotor skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 216-230. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused10276a
11. Gülen, S. (2019).The effect of STEM education roles on the solution of daily life problems. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.19.11.6.2
12. Hagglund, A. E., & Leuze, K. (2020). Gender differences in STEM expectations across countries: how perceived labor market structures shape adolescents’ preferences. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(5), 634-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1755029
13. Hanson, S. L., & Krywult-Albanska, M. (2020).Gender and access to STEM education and occupations in a cross-national context with a focus on Poland. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 882-905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1737341
14. Heybach, J., & Pickup, A. (2017).Whose STEM? Disrupting the gender crisis within STEM. Educational Studies, 53, 614-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369085
15. Hughes, R.M., Nzekwe, B. & Molyneaux, K.J. (2013). The single sex debate for girls in science: a comparison between two informal science programs on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Research Science Education 43, 1979–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7
16. Küçük, S., & Şişman, B. (2020). Students’ attitudes towards robotics and STEM: Differences based on gender and robotics experience. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.23-24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100167
17. McKinnon, M. (2020).The absence of evidence of the effectiveness of Australian gender equity in STEM initiatives. Australian Journal of Social Issues, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.142
18. Modrek, A. S., Hass, R., Kwako, A., & Sandoval, W. A. (2021). Do adolescents want more autonomy? Testing gender differences in autonomy across STEM. Journal of Adolescence, 92, 237-246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.09.003.
19. Ro, H. K., Fernandez, F., Ramon, E. J. (2021).Gender Equity in STEM in Higher Education. Routledge
20. Sainz, M., & Müller, J. (2017). Gender and family influences on Spanish students’ aspirations and values in stem fields. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 188-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1405464
21. Sakellariou, C., & Fang, Z. (2021). Self-efficacy and interest in STEM subjects as predictors of the STEM gender gap in the US: The role of unobserved heterogeneity. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101821
22. Sattari, N., &Sandefur, R. L. (2018). Gender in academic STEM: A focus on men faculty. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(2), 158-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12249
23. Schmuck, C., (2017). Women in STEM Disciplines. Springer International Publishing https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41658-8
24. Shahbazian, R., (2021). Under the influence of our older brother and sister: The association between sibling gender configuration and STEM degrees. Social Science Research, 97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102558
25. Vleuten, M., Steinmetz, S., & Werfhorst, H. (2019). Gender norms and STEM: the importance of friends for stopping leakage from the STEM pipeline. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(6-7), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2019.1589525
26. Xu, Y. (2016). Focusing on Women in STEM: A longitudinal examination of gender-based earning gap of college graduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(4), 489-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2015.11777373
27. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.