PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE UNDERGRADUATE CLINICAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MEASURE UCEEM IN IRANIAN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY STUDENTS

Abstract

Background: Students’ perceptions of the educational environment are an important construct in assessing and enhancing the quality of medical training programs. Reliable and valid measurement, however, can be problematic especially as instruments developed and tested in one culture are translated for use in another. Materials and method: This study sought to explore the psychometric properties of the undergraduate Clinical Educational Environment Measure (UCEEM) for use in Iranian nursing and midwifery students. We translated the instrument into Persian and ensured its content validity by back translation and expert review prior to administering it to 215 nursing and midwifery Students Tehran Medical Sciences branch Islamic Azad University.

Results: One hundred and ninety seven questionnaires were analyzed. The factor analysis yielded four factors: F1: Opportunists to learn in and through work and Quality of supervision (8 items), F2Preparedness for student entry (8 items), and F3: Workplace interaction patterns and student inclusion Supervision (7 items), F4: Equal treatment (2) items. All correlations were r>0.3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients indicated that the relationships between subscales conformed to the theoretical model. Coefficients for subscales ranged between 0.27 and 0.75. All correlations were significant (p<0.005). The equal treatment subscale had a lower correlation with the other subscales (range 0.27–0.36).Relationships between the other three subscales varied between 0.53 and 0.75 and the reliabilities (Cranach’s α) of the items  was 0.93.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the UCEEM appears to be a reliable and potentially valid instrument for use in Iranian nursing and midwifery schools and may find favor in evaluating the educational environments of nursing and midwifery programs nationwid

Keywords

• Environment,undergraduate,evaluation,psychometrics

References

1. Billett S. 2002. Workplace pedagogic practices: Co-participation and learning. Br J Educ Studies 50(4):457–481.
2. Billett S, editor. 2010. Learning through practice. Models, traditions.
3. Boor K, Scheele F, Van Der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Teunissen P, Sijtsma K.2007. Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the clinical learning environment. Med Educ 41: 92-90 Chan DSK.2003. Validation of clinical learning inventory. West J Nurs Res 25:519 -532 Clapham M, Wall D, Batchelor A.2007. Educational environment in intensive care medicine-use of postgraduate hospital educational environment measure (PHEEM). Med Teach 29: e184-e91 Daelman HEM, Hoogenboom RJI, Donker AJM, Scherpbier AJJA, Stehouwer CDA, Vleuten CPM: Effectiveness of clinical rotations as a learning environment for achieving competencesMed Teach 2004, 26:305-312 Durning SJ, Artino AR. Situativity theory: a perspective on how participants and the environment can interact: AMEE Guide no. 52. Med Teach 2011; 33: 188_99. Guile D, Griffiths T. 2001. Learning through work experience. J Educ Work 14(1):113–131. Pololi L, Price J: Validation and use of an instrument to measure the learning environment as perceived by medical stude Teach Learn Med 2000, 12(4):201-207. Roff S, McAleer S, Skinner A. Development and validation of an instrument to measure the postgraduate clinical learning and teaching educational environment for hospital-based junior doctors in the UK. Med Teach 2005; 27: 326_31. Soemantri D, Herrera C, Riquelme A. Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: a systematic review. Med Teach 2010; 32: 947_52. SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc. Strand p.Development and psychometric evaluation ofthe Undergraduate Clinical EducationEnvironment Measure (UCEEM).Medical Teacher 2013; 35: 1014–1026 ..