EFL STUDENTS’ REFLECTIONS ON EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK

Abstract

Written corrective feedback given by the teacher on students’ essays plays a significant role in the development of language and writing skills of second language (L2) learners. Whether explicit (direct) feedback or implicit (indirect) feedback should be given to students’ errors in essays, and which of these is more beneficial to learners has been a concern of L2 writing researchers for some time. However, the issue of learners’ preferences on the types of written corrective feedback has been overlooked. This paper aims to investigate Turkish speaking English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ ideas about explicit and implicit written corrective feedback. The authors attempt to answer the following questions:

 

1-       What are Turkish secondary school students’ attitudes towards writing in English as a foreign language?

2-       What are their preferences in relation to two different types of written corrective feedback (explicit and implicit)?

 

In order to shed light on the students’ opinions and preferences in terms of written corrective feedback, a study was conducted at a Turkish state secondary school in Istanbul. Seventy (70) seventh-grade female students, whose ages were around 12, participated in this study.  Half of the students received explicit feedback on their essays, while the other half received implicit feedback. Students’ opinions were collected via a questionnaire comprised of nine Likert-type items and one open-ended question during the fall semester of 2016-2017 academic year. The closed items were analyzed by conducting descriptive statistics, while qualitative data analysis was used for the answers to the open-ended item. Results reveal that students in both groups preferred one type of written corrective feedback more than the other type. Various factors that might play a role in this result as well as suggestions for EFL teachers will be discussed.

Keywords

• L2 writing,EFL learners,explicit feedback,implicit feedback

References

1. Atmaca, Ç. (2016). Contrasting perceptions of students and teachers: written corrective feedback. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 166-182. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,14(3), 191-205. Erel, S. & Bulut, D. (2007). Error treatment in L2 writing: a comparative study of direct and indirect coded feedback in Turkish EFL context. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(1), 397-415. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296. Hosseini, S. B. (2015).Written corrective feedback and the correct use of definite/indefinite articles. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(4), 98-112. Kahraman, A., &Yalvaç, F. (2015). EFL Turkish university students’ preferences about teacher feedback and its importance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 73-80. Kalra, R., &Tangkiensirisin, S. (2016). Thai students’ perceptions on the direct vs. indirect written corrective feedback: A Thai University Context. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(3), 161-176. Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), 1-16. Rotim, I. (2015). Learners’ Attitudes towards Error Correction in EFL writing (Doctoral dissertation, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences.).