SELF-REGULATION AND INTERACTIVITY TYPES AS THE PREDICTORS OF LEARNER SATISFACTION WITH FLIPPED COURSES: EVIDENCE FROM A VOCATIONAL COLLEGE

Abstract

Learner satisfaction, which implies learners’ positive perceptions of their learning experiences in a particular learning environment, is assumed to be a critical indicator of academic achievement as well as the effectiveness of a method. Flipped courses, receiving a growing interest among contemporary instructional designs, appear to be a promising pedagogical model that entails high learner satisfaction through a variety of features. One is related to learners’ self-management of their own learning processes throughout the courses. The other feature is about the way learners interact with their instructors, peers and the content. A lack of appropriate educational technology would lead to limited interactivity and self-regulation, which might in turn decrease learners’ satisfaction with the courses. In this study, we assessed the values of self-regulation and interactivity features (the interactivity among learners, between learners and the instructor, and between learners and the course content) as the factors impacting learners’ satisfaction with the flipped courses. The participants (n=243) were from a two-year vocational college and took the courses Computer Use, Operating Systems, and Computer Programming in a flipped way in the 2015–2016 academic year. The data were collected via an online questionnaire and analyzed through linear regression analyses. The general results of the study revealed that self-regulation, interactivity between learners and the course content and among learners were found to be the significant predictors of learner satisfaction with the flipped courses. On the other hand, the interactivity between learners and the instructor did not appear to effect learners’ satisfaction with the flipped courses, which could imply the changing role of instructors in contemporary learning environments. Accordingly, the flipped courses seem to eliminate the traditional role of instructors (being at the center of all interactions) and bring the self-regulation along with the interactivity among learners and with the course content to the front.

Keywords

• Flipped course,interactivity,self-regulation,satisfaction

References

1. Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore, & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Artino, A.R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students' satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 191–202. Artino, A.R. (2008). Promoting academic motivation and self-regulation: Practical guidelines for online instructors. TechTrends, 52(3), 37–45. Jain, P. J. (2011). Interactions among online learners: A quantitative interdisciplinrary study. Education, 131(3), 538–544. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. Juwah, C. (Ed.). (2006). Interactions in online learning: Implications for theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Koseke, G. F., & Koseke, R. D. (1991). Student burnout as a mediator of the stress–outcome relationship. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 415–431. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50. Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interactions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. New York, NY:Wadsworth. Pike, G. R. (1993). The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An alternative view. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 23-40. Puzziferro,M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89.