Investigation the Relationship between High School Students the Value Preferences and Attitudes towards Teaching Profession

Abstract

Values have a motivating structure that leads people to do a job. Values, in fact, represent people's goals and goals while revealing the gaze of life on the one hand. It is a job that is expected to have values such as social status, self-esteem, success, self-direction and others, besides knowledge of teaching profession, knowledge of field education and general culture. They must be aware of their cognitive, psychological and social characteristics in order to be aware of their values and, depending on them, shape their lives. For this reason, students should be aware of what values they have and should be encouraged to develop positive attitudes about the teaching profession by recognizing themselves. The aim of the research, they have the value of students studying in schools in Turkey constitute the discovery of the relationship between attitudes towards the teaching profession. The data of the study were collected using the Schwartz value preferences scale and profession of teaching attitude scale. Relational survey model was used in the study. As a result of the research, it was determined that male students' attitudes towards the teaching profession were higher than female students and it was determined that female students significantly differed in terms of success, hedonism, stimulation, self-direction, universality, benevolence and harmony dimensions from male students. It has also been determined that there is a negative, meaningful, and weak relationship between value preferences and attitudes towards teaching profession.  

Keywords

• Schwartz value,Teaching profession,High school students

References

1. Aktepe, V. ve Yel, S. (2009). The description of value judgments of primary school teachers: The case of Kırşehir. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 7(3), 607-622. Alavi, H.R., & Rahimipoor, T. (2010). Correlation of Manager’s Value Systems and Student’s Moral Development in High School and Pre University Centers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(4), 423-442. Bacanlı, H. & Dombaycı, M.A. (2012). Value dimensioning approach in value education, II. International Values and Education Symposium. İstanbul: DEM Press. Bolay, S. H. (2007). The Value of Love. International Values and Education Symposium, İstanbul: Dem Yayıncılık. Çetin, Ş. (2006). Establishment of the profession of teaching attitude scale (The study for validity and confidence). The Journal of Industrial Arts Education Faculty of Gazi University, 18. Dilmac, B., Deniz, M., Deniz, E.M. (2009). Investigation of Value Preference and Self-Understanding of University Students. Journal of Values Education, 7 (18), 9-24. Feather, N. T. (2002). Values and value dilemmas in relation to judgements concerning outcomes of an industrial conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 446– 459. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill. Gümüş, Ö.D. (2009). The relationships between culture, values, personality and political ideology: A cross-cultural comparison (Turkey-USA). Ankara: Ankara University, Institute of Social Science, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Güngör, E. (1998). Research on Values Psychology. İstanbul: Ötüken Press. Kuşdil, M.E. & Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Value Orientations of Turkish Teachers and Schwartz Value Theory. Journal of Turkish Psychology, 15(45), 59-76. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press. Sarıcı Bulut, S. (2012). Value tendencies of the students at the college of education of Gazi university. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 1(3), 216-238. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. M. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press. Tulunay Ateş, Ö. (2017). The effect of values of education practices in Turkey on students positive features to gain the desired. Journal of Values Education, 15 (34), 41-60. Yılmaz, E. (2009). Investigation of teachers' value preference in terms of some variables. Journal of Values Education, 7(17), 109-128.