Cognitive Levels and Misconceptions of Grade 11 Lebanese Students in Probability

Abstract

The concept of probability is fundamental to students especially at the secondary school level. Learning probability is always linked to logic and reasoning. This paper aims at unveiling the cognitive levels in probability and exploring the probability misconceptions of a sample of 41 grade 11 Lebanese students at the end of their academic year during which they encountered probability as a subject in school for the first time. The approach to data collection is quantitative and qualitative. The 25 item questionnaire in Paul and Hlanganipai (2014) was used to determine the students’ cognitive levels in probability based on SOLO taxonomy and using the rubrics used in Watson and Collis (1994). The questionnaire is divided into 5 categories: probability terms and definitions, theoretical probability, Venn diagrams, union and intersection and dependent and independent events. After that 10 students were randomly selected from the sample and interviewed to explore two probability misconceptions: representativeness and equiprobability bias. Results showed that grade 11 students attained level 3 in two of the categories and were able to reach level 2 in two other categories while they remained at level 1 in the fifth categories. As for the students’ misconceptions, representativeness misconception was rarely found while equiprobability bias was more prevalent.

Keywords

• Mathematics,Probability,Secondary level,Misconceptions,Solo taxonomy

References

1. Andrew, L. (2009). Experimental probability in elementary school. . Teaching Statistics, 31 (2), 34–36. Anyway, D. & Bennett, E. (2004). Common Misperceptions in Probability among Students in an Elementary Statistics Class. Paper Presented at the ARTIST Round Table Conference on Assessment in Statistics. Lawrence University, United States. August 1-4. Anggara, B., Patriana, N. and Juandi,D. ( 2018). Learning difficulties of senior high school students based on probability understanding levels. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 1013, conference 1 Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. 1989. Towards a model of school‐based curriculum development and assessment: Using the SOLO Taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33: 149–161. Center for Educational Research and Development (CERD). (1997). Curriculum of Mathematics. Lebanon: Ministry of National Education, Youth and Sports. Babbie, Earl R. The Practice of Social Research. 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010; Muijs, Daniel. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications, 2010. Fischbein, E. (1991). Factors affecting probabilistic judgements in children and adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 523- 549. Fischbein, E., Nello, M.S. and Marino, M.S. (1991). Factors affecting probabilistic judgements in children and adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 528. Fischbein. E., Pampu, I., & Manzat, I. (1970). Comparison of ratios and the chance concept in children. Child Development, 41 (2), 377–389. Garfield, J. (2002). The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education , 67. Goldberg, S. (1966). Probability judgements by preschool children: Task conditions and preformance. . Child Development, 37 (1), 157–167. Green, D. R. (1982). Probability concepts in 11-16 year old pupils (2nd edition ed.). Loughborough.: Centre for Advancement of Mathematical Education in Technology, University of Technology . Jones, G. (1974). The performance of first, second and third grade children on five concepts of probability and effects of grade. Indiana University: Unpublished Doctoral dissertation,Bloomington, IN. Li, J., & Pereira-Mendoza, L. (2002). Misconceptions in probability. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Cape Town, South Africa. [CD-ROM] Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. Lai, A. & Shahrill, M. (2014). Identifying Students' Specific Misconceptions in Learning Probability. International Journal of Probability and Statistics. 3. 10.5923/j.ijps.20140302.01. Morse J.M., Field P.A. (1996) An overview of qualitative methods. In: Nursing Research. Springer, Boston, MA Paul, M. and Hlanganipai, N. (2014). The nature of misconceptions and cognitive obstacles faced by secondary school mathematics students in understanding probability: A case study of selected Polokwane Secondary Schools Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5 8 446 Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1951). La genèse de l’idée de hasard chez l’enfant [ The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Child].. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Polaki, M. V. (2002). Using Instruction to Identify Key Features of Basotho ElementarStudents’ Growth in Probabilistic Thinking. . Mathematical Thinking and Learning, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0404 01, 4, 285-314. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM. Schum, D. 1994 The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. John Wiley & Sons, NY; 2001 Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL (paperback ed). Watson, J., & Collis, K. (1994). Multimodal functioning in understanding chance and data concepts. In J.P. da Ponte & J.F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: 4,369-376. Lisbon, Portugal.