EXAMINATION OF EXPERIENCED CHEMISTRY TEACHERS' PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE TOWARDS 9th GRADE CHEMISTRY CURRICULUM

Year 2016, Volume: 4 , 429 - 432, 01.09.2016

Ayşe Zeynep Şen Canan Nakiboğlu

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the experienced chemistry
teachers’ (ECTs') pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) about what extent ECTs'
using of 9^th grade chemistry curriculum, taking into consideration
the objectives, goals and acquisitions. The study was designed as a case study,
a kind of qualitative research design, and it was performed with 3 ECTs during
the spring semester of 2014-2015 education year. The data were collected by
observations, interviews and lesson plans. The data were analyzed through
constant comparative method and enumerative approach.  It was found that the teachers’ PCK related
to the 9^th grade chemistry curriculum was not sufficient generally.
The teachers did not stick to the curriculum exactly. Instead, they thought
that, it was enough to follow the course book, even they could intervene the
curriculum if it was necessary according to them. At the same time, it was
determined that the teachers were not able to fulfill the aims, goals and
acquisitions in the curriculum strictly.

Keywords

Pedagogical content knowledge, curriculum knowledge, 9th grade chemistry curriculum, experienced chemistry teachers, physical and chemical changes

References

• Aydın, S. (2012). Examination of Chemistry Teachers’ Topic-Specific Nature of Pedagogıcal Content Knowledge In Electrochemıstry And Radıoactıvıty. Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage publications, London. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical Content Knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation, Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272. Gacanoğlu, Ş. ve Nakiboğlu, C. (2015). 2013 Yılı Kimya Dersi Öğretim Programının Uygulama Öncesinde Ve Sonrasında Kimya Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. IV. Ulusal Kimya Eğitimi Kongresi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi, Balıkesir. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press. Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe'. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1321-1342. Lankford, D. (2010). Examining the pedagogical content knowledge and practice of experienced secondary biology teachers for teaching diffusion and osmosis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, MO, USA. Krathwol, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practıce, 41(4), 212-218. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Park, S. and Oliver J. S. (2008). Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261- 284. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications (Third Edition). Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Teddie, C. and Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling A Typology with Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1 (1), 77-100. [URL-1]: Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/quality-framework/core-resources/curriculum/ Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.