Abstract
The long-term viability of the European Union depends not only on well-defined goals, but also on
the financial means behind them. Integration can achieve greater success in areas that nation states would
otherwise not be able to do effectively enough on their own. Examples include sustainability and strengthening
international competitiveness. There are therefore some tasks that can be more successfully achieved at
Community level, but they would require adequate financial support. The EU itself has an annual budget, but
even more interesting is the so-called Multiannual Financial Framework, which sets out not only the financial
possibilities but also the prevailing economic strategic orientations. Some areas are given priority, while others
have to be diverted. Budgeting in this way is a continuous series of choices and dilemmas, which are not easy
decisions for the decision-maker. The present study aims to compare the structure of the two most recent
Multiannual Financial Frameworks and focuses on Hungary's share of each heading. The study will hopefully
make it clear that EU funding is a complex issue and that planning an appropriate budget is not as simple as one
might first think.
Keywords
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 14, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 27 |
