Risk Perception under Uncertainty: A Behavioral Analysis of Safe-Haven Asset Return Responses
Abstract
The study aims to examine the return responses of safe-haven assets from a behavioural perspective rather than to measure quantity-based demand directly. It elaborates on perceived risk, loss aversion, and uncertainty avoidance as critical determining processes and traits. The data from January 2000 to October 2025 examine gold, the Swiss franc (USD/CHF), and the Japanese yen (USD/JPY) as safe-haven assets. The VIX, EPU, and GPR indices represent financial market, economic policy, and geopolitical uncertainty, respectively. Because the dependent variables are stationary return series, the empirical design is framed as a direction-dependent dynamic regression based on asymmetric partial-sum decomposition rather than as a cointegration or error-correction model. The evidence shows significant asymmetries in both cumulative and short-run return responses. Greater and more persistent responses occur amid rises in uncertainty than falls in uncertainty, which show much weaker and often insignificant responses. Investor reactions to higher and lower levels of uncertainty show a statistically significant difference for all the measures. The intensity and duration of these effects vary across different assets, indicating that gold and currency-based safe-haven assets have different behavioural roles for investors.
Keywords
References
- Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H. and Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: a parameter-free measurement. Management Science, 53(10), 1659–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711
- Addo, J.O., Cúg, J., Keelson, S.A., Amoah, J. and Petráková, Z. (2025). Behavioral risk management in investment strategies: analyzing investor psychology. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13020053
- Al-Thaqeb, S.A. and Algharabali, B.G. (2029). Economic policy uncertainty: a literature review. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 20, e00133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00133
- Albrecht, P. and Kočenda, E. (2024). Volatility connectedness on the central european forex markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 93, 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103179
- Almansour, B.Y., Elkrghli, S. and Almansour, A.Y. (2023). Behavioral finance factors and investment decisions: a mediating role of risk perception. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 2239032. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2239032
- Baker, S.R., Bloom, N. and Davis, S.J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
- Barberis, N., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00027-0
- Barberis, N., Shleifer, A. and Wurgler, J. (2005). Comovement. Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.04.003
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Finance
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Arif Saldanlı
0000-0001-9990-9510
Türkiye
Batuhan Medetoğlu
0000-0002-8400-1232
Türkiye
Fatih Günay
*
0000-0003-0892-514X
Türkiye
Publication Date
June 30, 2026
Submission Date
April 20, 2026
Acceptance Date
June 29, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 11 Number: 2