Belirsizlik Altında Risk Algısı: Güvenli Liman Varlık Getirisi Tepkilerine İlişkin Davranışsal Bir Analiz

Öz

Artan belirsizlik dönemlerinde, yatırımcı risk algısı önemli ölçüde değişmektedir. Çalışma, güvenli liman varlıklarına ilişkin miktar temelli talebi doğrudan ölçmekten ziyade, güvenli liman varlık getirisi tepkilerini davranışsal bir perspektiften incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Algılanan risk, kayıptan kaçınma ve belirsizlikten kaçınma kritik belirleyici süreç ve özellikler olarak ele alınmaktadır. Ocak 2000-Ekim 2025 dönemi verilerinde güvenli liman varlıkları olarak altın, İsviçre frangı (USD/CHF) ve Japon yeni (USD/JPY) incelenmektedir. VIX, EPU ve GPR endeksleri sırasıyla finansal piyasa, ekonomik politika ve jeopolitik belirsizliği temsil etmektedir. Bağımlı değişkenler durağan getiri serileri olduğundan, ampirik tasarım eşbütünleşme veya hata düzeltme modeli olarak değil, asimetrik kısmi toplam ayrıştırmasına dayalı yön-bağımlı dinamik regresyon çerçevesi olarak yeniden yapılandırılmıştır. Bulgular, hem kümülatif hem de kısa dönemli getiri tepkilerinde anlamlı asimetriler olduğunu göstermektedir. Belirsizlikteki artışlar, belirsizlikteki düşüşlere kıyasla daha güçlü ve daha kalıcı iken; düşüşlere verilen tepkiler daha zayıf ve çoğu durumda istatistiksel olarak anlamsızdır. Tüm ölçümlerde belirsizliğin artması ve azalmasına verilen yatırımcı tepkileri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık göstermektedir. Etkilerin yoğunluğu ve süresi farklı varlıklar arasında değişmekte, bu da altın ve döviz bazlı güvenli liman varlıklarının yatırımcılar için farklı davranışsal rollere sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Risk Algısı
• Belirsizlikten Kaçınma
• Kayıptan Kaçınma
• Duygu Sezgisi
• Yatırımcı Psikolojisi
• Güvenli Liman Varlıkları
• Davranışsal Finans
• Asimetrik Tepkiler

Etik Beyan

Etik kurul izni ve/veya yasal/özel izin alınmasına gerek olmayan bu çalışmada araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulmuştur.

Risk Perception under Uncertainty: A Behavioral Analysis of Safe-Haven Asset Return Responses

Öz

In times of increased unpredictability, investors' perception of risk changes significantly. The study aims to examine the return responses of safe-haven assets from a behavioural perspective rather than to measure quantity-based demand directly. It elaborates on perceived risk, loss aversion, and uncertainty avoidance as critical determining processes and traits. The data from January 2000 to October 2025 examine gold, the Swiss franc (USD/CHF), and the Japanese yen (USD/JPY) as safe-haven assets. The VIX, EPU, and GPR indices represent financial market, economic policy, and geopolitical uncertainty respectively. Because the dependent variables are stationary return series, the empirical design is framed as a direction-dependent dynamic regression based on asymmetric partial-sum decomposition rather than as a cointegration or error-correction model. The evidence shows significant asymmetries in both cumulative and short-run return responses. Greater and more persistent responses occur amid rises in uncertainty than falls in uncertainty, which show much weaker and often insignificant responses. Investor reactions to higher and lower levels of uncertainty show a statistically significant difference for all the measures. The intensity and duration of these effects vary across different assets, indicating that gold and currency-based safe-haven assets have different behavioural roles for investors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Risk Perception
• Ambiguity Aversion
• Loss Aversion
• Affect Heuristic
• Investor Psychology
• Safe-Haven Assets
• Behavioral Finance
• Asymmetric Responses

Etik Beyan

This study which does not require ethics committee approval and/or legal/specific permission complies with the research and publication ethics.

Kaynakça

1. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H. and Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: a parameter-free measurement. Management Science, 53(10), 1659–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711
2. Addo, J.O., Cúg, J., Keelson, S.A., Amoah, J. and Petráková, Z. (2025). Behavioral risk management in investment strategies: analyzing investor psychology. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13020053
3. Al-Thaqeb, S.A. and Algharabali, B.G. (2029). Economic policy uncertainty: a literature review. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 20, e00133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00133
4. Albrecht, P. and Kočenda, E. (2024). Volatility connectedness on the central european forex markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 93, 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103179
5. Almansour, B.Y., Elkrghli, S. and Almansour, A.Y. (2023). Behavioral finance factors and investment decisions: a mediating role of risk perception. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 2239032. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2239032
6. Baker, S.R., Bloom, N. and Davis, S.J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
7. Barberis, N., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00027-0
8. Barberis, N., Shleifer, A. and Wurgler, J. (2005). Comovement. Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.04.003

9. Baur, D. G., Beckmann, J., & Czudaj, R. L. (2020). The relative valuation of gold. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24(6), 1346-1391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100518000895
10. Baur, D. G., Dimpfl, T., & Pena, J. (2025). A safe haven ındex. Finance Research Letters, 107922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107922
11. Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R., & Wohar, M. E. (2018). Measuring the Response of Gold Prices to Uncertainty: An Analysis beyond the Mean. Economic Modelling, 75, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.010
12. Bouri, E., Gupta, R., Lahiani, A. and Shahbaz, M. (2018). Testing for asymmetric nonlinear short-and long-run relationships between bitcoin, aggregate commodity and gold prices. Resources Policy, 57, 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.03.008
13. Caldara, D. and Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
14. Cascaldi-Garcia, D., Sarisoy, C., Londono, J.M., Sun, B., Datta, D.D., Ferreira, T., Grishchenko, O., Jahan-Parvar, M.R., Loria, F. and Ma, S. (2023). What is certain about uncertainty?, Journal of Economic Literature, 61(2), 624–654. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20211645
15. Cheema, M.A., Faff, R. and Szulczyk, K.R. (2022). The 2008 global financial crisis and COVID-19 pandemic: how safe are the safe haven assets? International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102316
16. Ellsberg, D. (1961). The crude analysis of strategy choices. The American Economic Review, 51(2), 472–478. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1914513
17. Enke, B. and Graeber, T. (2023). Cognitive uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 138(4), 2021–2067. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjad025
18. Fama, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
19. Frydman, C. and Camerer, C. F. (2016). The psychology and neuroscience of financial decision making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.003
20. Gennaioli, N. and Shleifer, A. (2018). A crisis of beliefs: Investor psychology and financial fragility. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
21. Giot, P. (2005). Relationships between implied volatility indexes and stock index returns. Journal of Portfolio Management, 31(3), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2005.500363
22. Hasan, M.B., Hassan, M.K., Rashid, M.M. and Alhenawi, Y. (2021). Are safe haven assets really safe during the 2008 global financial crisis and COVID-19 pandemic? Global Finance Journal, 50, 100668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100668
23. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006
24. Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit, New York: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Kobiyh, M. and El Amri, A. (2023). Inefficiency of financial markets and paths to the development of a modern financial theory. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.7(2).95-100.2023
26. Kopyl, K.A. and Lee, J.B.-T. (2016). How safe are the safe haven assets? Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 30(4), 453–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-016-0277-5
27. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
28. Lee, J. and Strazicich, M.C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange Multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815961
29. Leippold, M. and Matthys, F. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and the yield curve. Review of Finance, 26(4), 751–797. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac031
30. Li, H., Bouri, E., Gupta, R. and Fang, L. (2023). Return volatility, correlation, and hedging of green and brown stocks: ıs there a role for climate risk factors? Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137594
31. Liang, C., Lee, P.K., Zhu, M., Yeung, A.C., Cheng, T.E. and Zhou, H. (2024). The bright side of being uncertain: the impact of economic policy uncertainty on corporate innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(11), 1886–1913. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2023-0386
32. Maghyereh, A. and Abdoh, H. (2022). Can news-based economic sentiment predict bubbles in precious metal markets? Financial Innovation, 8, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00341-w
33. Mahdi, I.B.S. and Abbes, M.B. (2018). Behavioral explanation for risk taking in Islamic and conventional banks. Research in International Business and Finance, 45, 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.111
34. Mousavi, S. and Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1671–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.013
35. Nasir, M.A. (2020). Forecasting inflation under uncertainty: The forgotten dog and the frisbee. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120172
36. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
37. Polat, O. (2024). Interlinkages across US sectoral returns: Time-varying interconnectedness and hedging effectiveness. Financial Innovation, 10(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00581-4
38. Pástor, Ľ. and Veronesi, P. (2013). Political uncertainty and risk premia. Journal of financial Economics, 110(3), 520–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.007
39. Ranaldo, A., & Söderlind, P. (2010). Safe haven currencies. Review of Finance, 14(3), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfq007
40. Saltik, O., Jalil, F. and Degirmen, S. (2024). Viral decisions: unmasking the impact of COVID-19 info and behavioral quirks on investment choices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03011-7
41. Seok, S., Cho, H. and Ryu, D. (2024). Dual effects of investor sentiment and uncertainty in financial markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 95, 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.04.006
42. Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S. and García-Muiña, F.E. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: a new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl 2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00277-7
43. Shaikh, I. and Padhi, P. (2015). The implied volatility ındex: ıs ‘ınvestor fear gauge’or ‘forward-looking’? Borsa Istanbul Review, 15(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2014.10.001
44. Shin, Y., Yu, B. and Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. in festschrift in honor of peter schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications; Springer, pp. 281–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
45. Slovic, P. (1997). Public perception of risk. Journal of Environmental Health, 59(9), 22–25. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A19543559/HRCA?u=anon~357eb818&sid=googleScholar&xid=fa8f6dbe
46. Sokol-Hessner, P. and Rutledge, R.B. (2019). The psychological and neural basis of loss aversion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418806510
47. Van Dolder, D. and Vandenbroucke, J. (2024). Behavioral risk profiling: measuring loss aversion of individual investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 168, 107293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107293
48. Walters, D.J. and Fernbach, P.M. (2021). Investor memory of past performance is positively biased and predicts overconfidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(36), e2026680118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026680118
49. Wei, M. (2025). Exploring the role of behavioral finance in ınvestment decisions during economic uncertainty. (SSRN Paper No. 5234966). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5234966
50. Zhang, H., Demirer, R., Huang, J., Huang, W., & Suleman, M. T. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and gold return dynamics: evidence from high-frequency data. Resources Policy, 72, 102078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102078
51. Zivot, E. and Andrews, D.W.K. (1992). Further evidence on the Great Crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509904