Research Article

Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats

Volume: 19 Number: 1 April 1, 2022
  • Vehbi Guneş
  • Ali Cesur Onmaz
  • İhsan Keleş
  • Mehmet Çıtıl
  • Gencay Ekıncı
  • Emre Tüfekçı *
TR EN

Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats

Abstract

This study was aimed to determine the possible differences between two different oscillometric devices measured blood pressure. Additionally, it was carried out to determine the range levels of blood pressure measured in healthy cats admitted to a small animal clinic. In different breeds, healthy 50 cats, the median age was 8.75 months, and ranged between 3 to 36 months) were included in this study. Blood pressure values and pulse measurements of the cats were measured using the wall mounted (WMD) and mobile (MD) BP monitors. BP measurements were taken from the right front leg, arteria radialis on the mid of the antebrachium and tail root over the arteria coccygea medialis on the median line. Mean SBP measurements taken from right forelimb (135.90±16.34 mmHg) and tail (145.32±21.20 mmHg) by WMD were statistically different (P=0.020). Mean DBP (mmHg), MAP (mmHg) and Pulse (bpm) measurements were not different on different sites by each device (P>0.05). Mean SBP, DBP, MAP and pulse values of the right front forelimb using the mobile device were 136.10±16.37 mmHg, 83.74±17.0, 101.62±16.13 mmHg and 167 (134-227) bpm respectively. As a result, oscillometric blood pressure mobile devices and wall-mounted devices are compatible and can be used interchangeably in measuring the blood pressure in healthy cats. It is recommended to use the right forelimb for measuring blood pressure in cats. The reference ranges derived from in this study can be used by veterinary clinicians or technicians.

Keywords

References

  1. Ash AR, Harvey AM, Tasker S. Primary hyperaldosteronism in the cat: A series of 13 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2005; 7(3): 173-82.
  2. Bijsmans ES, Jepson RE, Chang YM, Syme HM, Elliott J. Changes in systolic blood pressure over time in healthy cats and cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2015; 29(3): 855-61.
  3. Binns SH, Sisson DD, Buoscio DA, Schaeffer DJ. Doppler ultrasonographic, oscillometrics phygmomanometric and photoplethysmographic techniques for noninvasive blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats. J Vet Intern Med 1995; 9(6): 405-14.
  4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8(2): 135-60.
  5. Bodey AR, Sansom J. Epidemiological study of blood pressure in domestic cats. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39(12): 567-73.
  6. Branson KR, Wagner-Mann CC, Mann FA. Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor on anaesthetised cats and the effect of cuff placement and fur on accuracy. Vet Surg 1997; 26(4): 347-53.
  7. Brown S, Atkins C, Bagley R, Carr A, Cowgill L, Davidson M, Egner B, Elliott J, Henik R, Labato M, Littman M, Polzin D, Ross L, Snyder P, Stepien R. Guidelines for the identification, evaluation and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21(3): 542-58.
  8. Brown SA, Henik RA. Diagnosis and treatment of systemic hypertension. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998; 28(6): 1481-94.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 1, 2022

Submission Date

October 27, 2021

Acceptance Date

January 25, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 19 Number: 1

APA
Guneş, V., Onmaz, A. C., Keleş, İ., Çıtıl, M., Ekıncı, G., & Tüfekçı, E. (2022). Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.1085242
AMA
1.Guneş V, Onmaz AC, Keleş İ, Çıtıl M, Ekıncı G, Tüfekçı E. Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;19(1):30-36. doi:10.32707/ercivet.1085242
Chicago
Guneş, Vehbi, Ali Cesur Onmaz, İhsan Keleş, Mehmet Çıtıl, Gencay Ekıncı, and Emre Tüfekçı. 2022. “Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 19 (1): 30-36. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.1085242.
EndNote
Guneş V, Onmaz AC, Keleş İ, Çıtıl M, Ekıncı G, Tüfekçı E (April 1, 2022) Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 19 1 30–36.
IEEE
[1]V. Guneş, A. C. Onmaz, İ. Keleş, M. Çıtıl, G. Ekıncı, and E. Tüfekçı, “Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 30–36, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.32707/ercivet.1085242.
ISNAD
Guneş, Vehbi - Onmaz, Ali Cesur - Keleş, İhsan - Çıtıl, Mehmet - Ekıncı, Gencay - Tüfekçı, Emre. “Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 19/1 (April 1, 2022): 30-36. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.1085242.
JAMA
1.Guneş V, Onmaz AC, Keleş İ, Çıtıl M, Ekıncı G, Tüfekçı E. Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;19:30–36.
MLA
Guneş, Vehbi, et al. “Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, Apr. 2022, pp. 30-36, doi:10.32707/ercivet.1085242.
Vancouver
1.Vehbi Guneş, Ali Cesur Onmaz, İhsan Keleş, Mehmet Çıtıl, Gencay Ekıncı, Emre Tüfekçı. Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022 Apr. 1;19(1):30-6. doi:10.32707/ercivet.1085242

Cited By