Diagnostic Imaging of Retina in Dogs

Abstract

A significant number of ocular structures can be examined either directly or indirectly. With a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, it is possible to quickly and accurately diagnose most ocular diseases. The retina is connected directly to the anterior part of the brain via the optic nerve. The prediction of diseases affecting the retina is very important for the evaluation of visual impairment in terms of early onset of treatment and prognosis. Owing to sophisticated imaging technologies, a great advancement has been taken for the demonstration, presentation and sharing of patient pathologies. In this review, it is presented to facilitate the detection of diseases by collecting information about the diagnostic imaging of the retina in dogs.

Keywords

• Dog
• ophthalmoscopy
• retina
• retina imaging

Köpeklerde Retinanın Tanısal Görüntülenmesi

Abstract

Oküler yapıların önemli bir bölümü doğrudan da dolaylı yoldan muayene edilebilir. Kapsamlı bir oftalmik muayene yapılarak göz hastalıklarının birçoğuna hızlı ve hatasız teşhis koymak mümkün olabilmektedir. Retina, optik sinir vasıtası ile direk beynin ön bölümüne bağlanır. Görme bozukluklarının değerlendirilmesi için retinayı etkileyen hastalıkların önceden belirlenmesi sağaltıma erken başlama ve prognoz açısından oldukça önemlidir. Gelişmiş görüntüleme teknolojileri sayesinde, hastaların patolojilerinin gösterilmesinde, sunulmasında ve paylaşılmasında büyük yol alınmıştır. Bu “derleme” köpeklerde retinanın tanısal görüntülenmesi ile ilgili bilgileri toplayarak hastalıkların tespitini kolaylaştırmak amacıyla sunulmuştur.

Keywords

• Köpek
• oftalmoskopi
• retina
• retinanın görüntülenmesi

References

1. Afrashi F. Optik koherens tomografi (OKT): teknik, endikasyonlar ve değerlendirme (analiz). Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol-Special Topics 2015; 8(2): 12-7.
2. Balicka A, Trbolová A, Vrbovská T. Electroretinography (A review). Folia Vet 2016; 60(1): 53-8.
3. Balland O, Russo A, Isard PF, Mathieson I, Semeraro F, Dulaurent T. Assessment of a smartphone-based camera for fundus imaging in animals. Vet Ophthalmol 2017; 20(1): 89-94.
4. Batıoğlu F. Optik koherens tomografi temel prensipler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol-Special Topics 2010; 3(1): 1-11.
5. Bauer BS, Grahn BH, Sandmeyer LS. Diagnostic ophthalmology. Can Vet J 2016; 57: 789-90.
6. Bendschneider D, Tornow RP, Horn FK, Laemmer R, Roessler CW, Juenemann AG, Kruse FE, Mardin CY. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal measured by spectral domain OCT. J Glaucoma 2010; 19 (7): 475-82.
7. Byrne SF, Green RL. Ultrasound of the Eye and Orbit. Second Edition. St Louis: Mosby, 2002; p. 419-23.
8. Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Chabi A, Randeau MJ, Shung KK, Cannata J, Lincoff H. High-Resolution ultrasonic imaging of the posterior segment. Ophthalmology 2004; 111(7): 1344-51.

9. Dar M, Tiwari DK, Patil DB, Parikh PV. B-scan ultrasonography of ocular abnormalities: A review of 182 dogs. IJVR 2014; 15(2-47): 122-6.
10. Friberg TR, Gupta A, Yu J, Huang L, Suner I, Puliafito CA, Schwartz SD. Ultrawide angle fluorescein angiographic imaging: a comparison to conventional digital acquisition systems. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2008; 39(4): 304-11.
11. Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography for ultrahigh resolution in vivo imaging. Nature biotechnology 2003; 21(11): 1361-7.
12. Gelatt KN. Essentials of Veterinary Ophthalmology. Third Edition. Iowa: Wiley Blackwell, 2014; pp. 3-378.
13. Gelatt KN, Gilger BJ, Kern TJ. Veterinary Ophthalmology. Fifth Edition. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell, 2013; pp. 39-1311.
14. Haddock LJ, Kim DY, Mukai S. Simple, inexpensive technique for high-quality smartphone fundus photography in human and animal eyes. J Ophthalmol 2013; (3): 1-5.
15. Hewick SA, Fairhead AJ, Chaly JC, Atta HR. A comparison of 10 MHz and 20 MHz ultrasound probes in imaging the eye and orbit. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88(4): 551-5.
16. Kanemaki N, Inaniwa M, Terakado K, Kawarai S, Ichikawa Y. Fundus photography with a smartphone in indirect ophthalmoscopy in dogs and cats. Vet Ophthalmol 2017; 20(3): 280-4.
17. Kerimoğlu H. Günümüzde fundus floresein anjiografinin yeri. Ret Vit Özel Sayı 2015; 23: 15-19.
18. Khanamiri HN. Nakatsuka A. El-Annan J. Smartphone fundus photography. JOVE 2017; 125: 1-5.
19. Kumar D, Rai S, Chandrapuria VP, Umeel, Tekam S. Electroretinogram as a diagnostic tool in veterinary practice. JEZS 2018; 6(4): 146-8.
20. Lee J, Bosen RB. Learning to read retinal OCT. Ophthalmology Management 2015; 19: 4446-8. Maggs DJ, Miller PE, Ofri R. Slatter’s Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology. Fourth Edition. Missouri: Saunder Elsevier, 2008; pp. 1-315.
21. Martin CL. Anamnesis and the ophthalmic examination. Martin CL eds, In: Ophthalmic Disease in Veterinary Medicine. London: Manson Publishing Ltd., 2005; pp. 11-38.
22. Mason DR, Lamb CR, McLellan GJ. Ultrasonographic findings in 50 dogs with retrobulbar disease. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37(6): 557-62.
23. Mentzer AE, Eifler DM, Montiani-Ferreira F, Tuntivanich N, Forcier JQ, Petersen-Jones SM. Influence of recording electrode type and reference electrode position on the canine electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 2005; (111): 9-106.
24. Murphy CJ, Howland HC. The optics of comparative ophthalmoscopy. Vision Res 1987; 27(4): 599-607. Nedev V, Simeonova G. The normal electroretinogram in adult healthy Bulgarian hound dogs. Revue Méd Vét 2017; 168(4-6): 102-7.
25. Nedev VS, Simeonova GP. Normal clinical electroretinography parameters of healthy pharaoh hounddogs. AAVS 2018; 6(2): 81-87.
26. Ollivier FJ, Plummer CE, Barrie KP. Ophthalmic examination and diagnostics. Part 1: The eye examination and diagnostic procedures. Gelatt KN eds, In: Veterinary Ophthalmology, Fourth Edition. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing, 2007; pp. 438-83.
27. Pennick D, Anjou MA. Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography. First Edition. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 2008; p. 49-90.
28. Ramos de Carvalho EJ, Verbraak FD, Aalders MC, van Noorden CJ. Recent advances in ophthalmic molecular imaging. Surv Ophthalmol 2014; 59(4): 393-413.
29. Seeliger MW, Beck SC, Pereyra-Munoz N, Dangel S, Tsai JY, Luhmann UF, van de Pavert SA, Wijnholds J, Samardzija M, Wenzel A, Zrenner E, Narfström K, Fahl E, Tanimoto N, Acar N, Tonagel F. In vivo confocal imaging of the retina in animal models using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Vision Res 2005; 45: 3512–19.
30. Sharp PF, Manivannan A, Xu H, Forrester JV. The scanning laser ophthalmoscope-- a review of its role in bioscience and medicine. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49: 1085–96.
31. Smith K. Clinical examination and diseases of the fundus in dogs. In Practice 2014; 36: 315-33.
32. Sönmez A, Arı S, Ardagil A, Candemir B, Dolar A, Mesci C, Erbil HH. Retina arter dal tıkanıklığında optik koherens tomografi bulguları. Ret-Vit 2008; 16: 63-7.
33. Sussadee M, Phavaphutanon J, Kornkaewrat K, Thayananuphat A. Normal clinical electroretinography parameters for poodle, Labrador retriever, Thai ridgeback, and Thai Bangkaew. J Vet Sci 2015; 16(1): 67-74.
34. Tekin S, Yaşar T. Optik sinir başının stereofotometrik ve scanning laser oftalmoskopik karşılaştırılması. J Clin Anal Med 2015; 6(4): 438-42.
35. Theelen T, Hoyng CB, Klevering BJ. Near-infrared subretinal imaging in choroidal neovascularization. Holtz FG, Spaide RF, eds. In: Medical Retina: Focus on Retinal Imaging. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010; pp. 77-91.
36. Ting DS, Cheung GC, Lim LS, Yeo IY. Comparison of swept source optical coherence tomography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 43(9): 815-9.
37. Turner A. Funduscopic examination: What to look for. World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, June, 2-5, 2010; Victoria-Australia.
38. Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Berry CC, Smith AR, Dirkes KA, Coleman AL, Piltz-Seymour JR, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA, Trick G, Brandt JD, Gordon MO, Kass MA. Racial differences in optic disc topography. Baseline results from the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 22-8.