Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Selection of Logistic Center Location Integrated AHP-VIKOR Approach: A Case Study of Kayseri Province

Year 2018, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 1 - 9, 30.12.2018

Abstract

The problem of logistics center location selection has emerged as a special version of the problem of facility layout in the logistics and supply chain design. An effective logistics center structure is a key factor in increasing the efficiency of urban freight transport, a significant profit and investment tool. The location of these centers is a complex structure which must be decided by considering many factors. In this article, an integrated approach is proposed by combining Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje (VIKOR) methods for the Logistics Center planned to be built in Kayseri. According to proposed approach; First of all, benchmark weights were determined by AHP method. Then, VIKOR method was used to determine the most suitable place among the alternatives. 

References

  • [1] Taniguchi, E. 2014.Concepts of City Logistics for Sustainable and Liveable Cities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 151, 310-317.
  • [2] Tseng, Y. 2004. The role of Transportation in Logistics. University of South Australia, School of Natural and Built Environments Transport Systems Centre, Master Thesis
  • [3] Nathanail, E., Adamos, G., Gogas, M. 2017. A novel approach for assessing sustainable city logistics. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 1036–1045.
  • [4] Anand, N., Ouak, H., Duin R., Tavasszy, L. 2012.City Logistics Modeling Efforts: Trends and Gaps - A Review. Procedia,Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39: 101-115.
  • [5] Witkowski, J., Kiba, M. 2014. The Role of Local Governments in the Development of City Logistics. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125: 373-385
  • [6] Kauf, S. 2016. City logistics A Strategic Element of Sustainable Urban Development. Transportation Research Procedia, 16: 158-164.
  • [7] Wu, J., Haasis, H.D. 2013.Converting knowledge into sustainability performance of freight villages. Logistic Research, 6(2-3): 63-88.
  • [8] Higgins, C., Ferguson, M. 2011. An exploration of the Freight village concept and its applicability to Ontario. McMaster Institute of Transportation and Logistics, 22-93.
  • [9] Ballis, A., Mavrotas, G. 2007. Freight village design using the multicriteria method PROMETHEE. Operational Research, 213-231.
  • [10] Taniguchi, E., Thompson, R.G., Yamada, T. 2014. Recent Trends and Innovations in Modeling City Logistics.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125: 4-14.
  • [11] Taniguchi, E., Noritake, M., Yamada, T., Izumitani. 1997. Optimizing the size and location of logistics terminals. IFAC Proceedings, 30(8): 741-746.
  • [12] Alberto, P. 2000. The Logistics of industrial location decisions: An application of the AHP methodology. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 3(3): 273-289.
  • [13] Li, Q., Yan, C. 2007. An interactive integrated MCDM based on FANN and application in the selection of Logistic Center Location. Management science and engineering conference, Harbin, China.
  • [14] Ghoseiri, K., Lessan, J. 2008. Location selection for logistics centers using a two-step fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE method. Proceedings of 9th Asia Pasific Industrial Engineering Management systems Conference, Indonesia, 434-440.
  • [15] Kayikci, Y. 2010. A conceptual model for intermodal freight logistics centre location decisions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(3): 6297-6311.[16] Erkayman, B., Gundoğar, E., Akkaya, G., Ipek, M. 2011. A fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for Logistic center location selection. Journal of Business Case Studies, 7(3): 49-54.
  • [17] Hong, L., Xiaohua, Z. 2011. Study on location selection of multi-objective emergency logistics center based on AHP. Procedia Engineering, 15: 2128-2132.
  • [18] Li, Y., Liu, X.,Chen, Y. 2011. Selection of logistics center location axiomatic fuzzy set and TOPSIS methodology in logistics management. Expert systems with applications, 38(6): 7901-7908.
  • [19] Catalano, M., Migliore, M. 2014.A Stackelberg-game approach to support the design of logistics terminals. Journal of Transport Geography, 41: 63-73.
  • [20] Uysal, F., Gülmez, M. 2014.Türkiye’de Akdeniz Bölgesi’nde Lojistik merkez yeri seçimi için bulanık serim teori ve matris yaklaşımı uygulaması. DergiPark, Verimlilik Dergisi, 1: 89-104.
  • [21] Zak, J., Weglinski, S. 2014. The selection of the logistics center location based on MCDM/A methodology. Transportation Research Procedia, 3: 555-564.
  • [22] Rao, C., Goh, M., Zhao, Y., Zheng, J. 2015. Location selection of city logistics centers under sustainability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36: 29-44.
  • [23] Hamzaçebi,C., İmamoğlu, G., Alçı, A. 2016.Selection of Logistics Center location with MOORA method for Black Sea Region of Turkey. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 3(15): 74-82.
  • [24] Pham, T.Y., Ma, H.M., Yeo, G.T. 2017. Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to Locate Logistics Centers in Vietnam: The Logisticians’ Perspective. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4): 211-219.
  • [25] Kaya, B., Uludag, N. 2017. An artificial neural network approach for the logistic center location selection.Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 4(2): 107-115.
  • [26] Saaty, T. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1): 83-98.
  • [27] Triantophyliou, E., Mann, S. 1995. Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2(1), 35-44.
  • [28] Bhusnan, N., Rai, K. 2004. Strategic decision making applying the analytic hierarchy process. Hardcover, 172p.
  • [29] Mardani, A., Edmundas, K.Z., Govindan, K., Senin, A., Jusoh, A. 2016. VIKOR Technique: A systematic review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and applications. Sustainability, 8(1), 37. [30] Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H. 2007. Extenden VIKOR method in comparison outranking methods. Europen Journal of Operatioanl Research, 175(2), 514-529.

AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği

Year 2018, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 1 - 9, 30.12.2018

Abstract

Lojistik
merkez yer seçimi problemi, tesis yerleşimi probleminin özel bir versiyonu
olarak lojistik ve tedarik zinciri tasarımında zorunlu olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.
Etkin bir lojistik merkez yapısı kentsel yük taşımacılığının verimliliğini
artırmada kilit bir faktör, önemli bir kar ve yatırım aracıdır. Bu merkezlerin
nereye konumlandırılacağı birçok faktörün dikkate alınarak karar verilmesi
gereken karmaşık bir yapıdır. Bu makale kapsamında Kayseri ilinde yapılması
planlanan Lojistik Merkez için Analitik Hiyerarşik Süreç (AHP) ve
VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje (VIKOR) yöntemlerini
birleştirerek bütünleşik bir yaklaşım önerilmiştir.
Önerilen yaklaşıma göre;
öncelikle kriter ağırlıkları AHP yöntemiyle belirlenmiş daha sonra VIKOR
yöntemi kullanılarak alternatifler arasında bir sıralama belirlenerek en uygun
yer seçimi yapılmıştır. 

References

  • [1] Taniguchi, E. 2014.Concepts of City Logistics for Sustainable and Liveable Cities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 151, 310-317.
  • [2] Tseng, Y. 2004. The role of Transportation in Logistics. University of South Australia, School of Natural and Built Environments Transport Systems Centre, Master Thesis
  • [3] Nathanail, E., Adamos, G., Gogas, M. 2017. A novel approach for assessing sustainable city logistics. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 1036–1045.
  • [4] Anand, N., Ouak, H., Duin R., Tavasszy, L. 2012.City Logistics Modeling Efforts: Trends and Gaps - A Review. Procedia,Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39: 101-115.
  • [5] Witkowski, J., Kiba, M. 2014. The Role of Local Governments in the Development of City Logistics. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125: 373-385
  • [6] Kauf, S. 2016. City logistics A Strategic Element of Sustainable Urban Development. Transportation Research Procedia, 16: 158-164.
  • [7] Wu, J., Haasis, H.D. 2013.Converting knowledge into sustainability performance of freight villages. Logistic Research, 6(2-3): 63-88.
  • [8] Higgins, C., Ferguson, M. 2011. An exploration of the Freight village concept and its applicability to Ontario. McMaster Institute of Transportation and Logistics, 22-93.
  • [9] Ballis, A., Mavrotas, G. 2007. Freight village design using the multicriteria method PROMETHEE. Operational Research, 213-231.
  • [10] Taniguchi, E., Thompson, R.G., Yamada, T. 2014. Recent Trends and Innovations in Modeling City Logistics.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125: 4-14.
  • [11] Taniguchi, E., Noritake, M., Yamada, T., Izumitani. 1997. Optimizing the size and location of logistics terminals. IFAC Proceedings, 30(8): 741-746.
  • [12] Alberto, P. 2000. The Logistics of industrial location decisions: An application of the AHP methodology. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 3(3): 273-289.
  • [13] Li, Q., Yan, C. 2007. An interactive integrated MCDM based on FANN and application in the selection of Logistic Center Location. Management science and engineering conference, Harbin, China.
  • [14] Ghoseiri, K., Lessan, J. 2008. Location selection for logistics centers using a two-step fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE method. Proceedings of 9th Asia Pasific Industrial Engineering Management systems Conference, Indonesia, 434-440.
  • [15] Kayikci, Y. 2010. A conceptual model for intermodal freight logistics centre location decisions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(3): 6297-6311.[16] Erkayman, B., Gundoğar, E., Akkaya, G., Ipek, M. 2011. A fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for Logistic center location selection. Journal of Business Case Studies, 7(3): 49-54.
  • [17] Hong, L., Xiaohua, Z. 2011. Study on location selection of multi-objective emergency logistics center based on AHP. Procedia Engineering, 15: 2128-2132.
  • [18] Li, Y., Liu, X.,Chen, Y. 2011. Selection of logistics center location axiomatic fuzzy set and TOPSIS methodology in logistics management. Expert systems with applications, 38(6): 7901-7908.
  • [19] Catalano, M., Migliore, M. 2014.A Stackelberg-game approach to support the design of logistics terminals. Journal of Transport Geography, 41: 63-73.
  • [20] Uysal, F., Gülmez, M. 2014.Türkiye’de Akdeniz Bölgesi’nde Lojistik merkez yeri seçimi için bulanık serim teori ve matris yaklaşımı uygulaması. DergiPark, Verimlilik Dergisi, 1: 89-104.
  • [21] Zak, J., Weglinski, S. 2014. The selection of the logistics center location based on MCDM/A methodology. Transportation Research Procedia, 3: 555-564.
  • [22] Rao, C., Goh, M., Zhao, Y., Zheng, J. 2015. Location selection of city logistics centers under sustainability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36: 29-44.
  • [23] Hamzaçebi,C., İmamoğlu, G., Alçı, A. 2016.Selection of Logistics Center location with MOORA method for Black Sea Region of Turkey. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 3(15): 74-82.
  • [24] Pham, T.Y., Ma, H.M., Yeo, G.T. 2017. Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to Locate Logistics Centers in Vietnam: The Logisticians’ Perspective. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4): 211-219.
  • [25] Kaya, B., Uludag, N. 2017. An artificial neural network approach for the logistic center location selection.Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 4(2): 107-115.
  • [26] Saaty, T. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1): 83-98.
  • [27] Triantophyliou, E., Mann, S. 1995. Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2(1), 35-44.
  • [28] Bhusnan, N., Rai, K. 2004. Strategic decision making applying the analytic hierarchy process. Hardcover, 172p.
  • [29] Mardani, A., Edmundas, K.Z., Govindan, K., Senin, A., Jusoh, A. 2016. VIKOR Technique: A systematic review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and applications. Sustainability, 8(1), 37. [30] Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H. 2007. Extenden VIKOR method in comparison outranking methods. Europen Journal of Operatioanl Research, 175(2), 514-529.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Article
Authors

Fulya Zaralı

Harun Reşit Yazgan

Yılmaz Delice

Publication Date December 30, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 34 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Zaralı, F., Yazgan, H. R., & Delice, Y. (2018). AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 34(3), 1-9.
AMA Zaralı F, Yazgan HR, Delice Y. AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. December 2018;34(3):1-9.
Chicago Zaralı, Fulya, Harun Reşit Yazgan, and Yılmaz Delice. “AHP Ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri Ili örneği”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 34, no. 3 (December 2018): 1-9.
EndNote Zaralı F, Yazgan HR, Delice Y (December 1, 2018) AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 34 3 1–9.
IEEE F. Zaralı, H. R. Yazgan, and Y. Delice, “AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2018.
ISNAD Zaralı, Fulya et al. “AHP Ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri Ili örneği”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 34/3 (December 2018), 1-9.
JAMA Zaralı F, Yazgan HR, Delice Y. AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;34:1–9.
MLA Zaralı, Fulya et al. “AHP Ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri Ili örneği”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 3, 2018, pp. 1-9.
Vancouver Zaralı F, Yazgan HR, Delice Y. AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;34(3):1-9.

✯ Etik kurul izni gerektiren, tüm bilim dallarında yapılan araştırmalar için etik kurul onayı alınmış olmalı, bu onay makalede belirtilmeli ve belgelendirilmelidir.
✯ Etik kurul izni gerektiren araştırmalarda, izinle ilgili bilgilere (kurul adı, tarih ve sayı no) yöntem bölümünde, ayrıca makalenin ilk/son sayfalarından birinde; olgu sunumlarında, bilgilendirilmiş gönüllü olur/onam formunun imzalatıldığına dair bilgiye makalede yer verilmelidir.
✯ Dergi web sayfasında, makalelerde Araştırma ve Yayın Etiğine uyulduğuna dair ifadeye yer verilmelidir.
✯ Dergi web sayfasında, hakem, yazar ve editör için ayrı başlıklar altında etik kurallarla ilgili bilgi verilmelidir.
✯ Dergide ve/veya web sayfasında, ulusal ve uluslararası standartlara atıf yaparak, dergide ve/veya web sayfasında etik ilkeler ayrı başlık altında belirtilmelidir. Örneğin; dergilere gönderilen bilimsel yazılarda, ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) tavsiyeleri ile COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)’un Editör ve Yazarlar için Uluslararası Standartları dikkate alınmalıdır.
✯ Kullanılan fikir ve sanat eserleri için telif hakları düzenlemelerine riayet edilmesi gerekmektedir.