BİR TELEKOM OPERATÖRÜNÜN İLLER BAZINDA ETKİNLİĞİNİN ŞEBEKE KALİTESİ AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: DUYARLILIK ANALİZİ TABANLI VZA UYGULAMASI
Abstract
Telekom operatörleri için; ülkeler, bölgeler, iller ve
operatörler arası kıyaslamaların yapılması ve bunun sonucunda yapılacak iyileştirmelere
yönelik gerekli önlemlerin alınması, operatörün etkinliği açısından oldukça
önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, Veri Zarflama Analizi yöntemiyle Türkiye’de faaliyet
gösteren özel bir telekom operatörü için 81 ilin şebeke kalitesi değişkenleri
bakımından etkinlik düzeyleri ile girdi/çıktı değişimleri analiz edilmiş ve duyarlılık
analizi yapılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda; 27 il etkin olarak bulunmuş
ve şebeke kalitesi değişkenleri arasında en önemli girdi, saha sayısı olarak belirlenmiştir. Operatörün en etkin ve en az
etkin olduğu bölgeler Marmara Bölgesi ve Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi olarak tespit
edilmiştir. Ayrıca nüfus ve coğrafi şartlar gibi unsurların etkinlik seviyesi
üzerinde etkisi olduğu görülmüştür.
References
- Referans1: DEBNATH, Ravi and Roma M. SHANKAR; (2008), “Benchmarking Telecommunication Service in India: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(5), pp. 584-598.
- Referans2: PENTZAROPOULOS, George C. and Dimitris I. GIOKAS; (2002), “Comparing the Operational Efficiency of the Main European Telecommunications Organizations: A Quantitative Analysis”, Telecommunications Policy, 26(11), pp. 595-606.
- Referans3: NIGAM, Vineeta; Tripta THAKUR; V.K. SETHI and R.P. SINGH; (2012), “Benchmarking of Indian Mobile Telecom Operators Using DEA with Sensitivity Analysis”. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(2), pp. 219-238.
EVALUATING EFFICIENCIES OF THE PROVINCES FOR A TELECOM OPERATOR ACCORDING TO NETWORK QUALITY: DEA APPLICATION BASED SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Abstract
For telecom operators, making
a benchmark between countries, regions/provinces and operators and taking
precautions for necessary improvements have importance regarding to operator’s
efficiency. In this study, efficiency levels, input/output changes of 81
provinces were analyzed for a Turkish private mobile operator in Turkey in
terms of network quality variables, and sensitivity analysis was made with Data
Envelopment Analysis. According to the
analysis, 27 provinces were found efficiency. Number of site was determined the most important input amaong
network quality variables. Marmara and
Doğu Anadolu Region were identified
the most efficiency and the less efficiency regions for the operatör, respectively.
In addition, factors such as population and geographical conditions have an
effect on the level of efficiency.
References
- Referans1: DEBNATH, Ravi and Roma M. SHANKAR; (2008), “Benchmarking Telecommunication Service in India: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(5), pp. 584-598.
- Referans2: PENTZAROPOULOS, George C. and Dimitris I. GIOKAS; (2002), “Comparing the Operational Efficiency of the Main European Telecommunications Organizations: A Quantitative Analysis”, Telecommunications Policy, 26(11), pp. 595-606.
- Referans3: NIGAM, Vineeta; Tripta THAKUR; V.K. SETHI and R.P. SINGH; (2012), “Benchmarking of Indian Mobile Telecom Operators Using DEA with Sensitivity Analysis”. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(2), pp. 219-238.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 4, 2018 |
| Acceptance Date | July 4, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Issue: 51 |
Cite
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.