Abstract
As the first major global challenge faced by the AK Party, which came to
power with an important majority in November 2002 elections, the March 1 Permit
has opened the gate to a period of change of the balances regarding both the
internal dynamics in Turkey and the US-Turkey relations. In this context, in
terms of both internal and external dynamics of Turkey, Iraq invasion showed
that the beginning of a very difficult process will be a long-term process. This
troubled period’s first explosion point in the whole process yet, was the case
of March 1, 2003. In this regard, it will be useful to discuss domestic and
foreign policy implications for Turkey and the future ground of the probable
vulnerabilities on the relations with the US. This will create a horizon both for
the current breaks and regional and global oriented policy making processes, as
well.
Keywords
References
- “A Friendship on Hold”. The Economist. 29.03.2003
- Athanassopoulou, E. 2001. “American-Turkish Relations since the End of the Cold War”. Middle East Policy. Vol. 8. No. 3
- Ayman, G. 2008. “Bir Güvenlik Sorunsalı Olarak Türk-Amerikan İlişkilerinde Irak Açmazı”. Irak Açmazı: Türkiye Açısından Temel Parametreler (ed.) Boğaziçi Üniversitesi-TÜSİAD Dış Politika Forumu
- Bacik, G. and Aras, B. 2004. “Turkey’s Inescapable Dilemma: America or Europe?”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. Vol. 3. No. 1
- Bölükbaşı, D. 2008. 1 Mart Vakası: Irak Tezkeresi ve Sonrası. Doğan Kitap
- Brzezinski, Z. 1997. The Grand Chessboard. New York: Basic Books
- Bush, George W. The White House. Washington. 24.02.2003
- Cagaptay, S. 2004. “Where Goes the US-Turkish Relationship?”. Middle East Quarterly
- Cornell, E. 2001. Turkey in the 21st Century: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats Curzone Press
- Dejevsky, M. “Türkiye’den Demokrasi Dersi”. The Independent (Radikal 05.03.2003)
- Edelman, E. “Stratejik Ortaklığı Yeniden İnşa Etmemiz Gerek”. Anadolu Ajansı 13.06.2003
- Gregg, Heather S. “Divided They Conquer: The Success of Armenian Ethnic Lobbies in the US”. paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association. 28.08.2002
- Günlübol, M. 1999. Olaylarla Türk Dış Politikası 1919-1995. Siyasal Kitabevi
- Huntington, Samuel P. 1997. “The Erosion of National Interests”. Foreign Affairs
- İşyar, Ömer G. 2005. “An Analysis of Turkish-American Relations from 1945 to 2004”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. Vol. 4. No. 3
- Krugman, P. “Threats, Promises and Lies”. New York Times. 25.02.2003
- Larabee, F. Steven and Lesser, Ian O. 2003. “Turkish Foreign Policy in an Age of Uncertainty”. Rand Corp.
- Makovsky, A. 2000. “US Policy towards Turkey”. in Abramowitz (ed.) Turkey’s Transformation and American Policy
- Mardini, N. “Turkey’s New Crises”. El Sefir. 25.02.2003
- Mourinson, A. 2006. “The Strategic Depth Doctrine of Turkish Foreign Policy”. Middle Eastern Studies. Vol. 42. No. 6 Prager, R. 2003. “Turkish-American Relations: Historical Context and Current Issues” Robins, P. 2007. “The Opium Crisis and the Iraq War: Historical Paralells in Turkey-US Relations”. Mediterranean Politics. Vol. 12. No. 1
- Sözen, A. “A Paradigmatic Shift: New Principles of Turkish Foreign Policy Making”. paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association. 26-29 March 2008
- Türkmen, F. 2009. “Turkish-American Relations: A Challenging Transition”. Turkish Studies. Vol. 10. No. 1
- “US-Turkish Relations and the Challenges Ahead”. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on Europe. Committee on Foreign Affairs. 15.03.2007. Washington DC.
- Yetkin, M. “Washington’la Sinir Harbi”. Radikal. 22.02.2003
Abstract
AK Parti’nin tek başına iktidara geldiği Kasım 2002
seçimlerinin hemen ardından küresel çapta karşılaştığı ilk büyük meydan okuma
olan 1 Mart Tezkeresi, gerek Türkiye’deki iç dinamikler, gerekse Türkiye-ABD ilişkisinin
mahiyeti açısından çoğu dengeyi değiştirebilecek bir döneme kapı açmıştır. Bu
bağlamda, Irak işgali, Türkiye’nin hem iç hem dış dinamikleri açısından,
sonuçları uzun vadeli olacak hayli zor bir sürecin başladığını göstermiştir. Bu
sıkıntılı dönemin, henüz sürecin tam içerisindeki ilk patlama noktası ise, 1
Mart 2003 yılındaki tezkere olmuştur. Bu bakımdan 1 Mart Tezkeresi sürecinin bir
bütün olarak analizini yaparken, Türkiye açısından iç ve dış politika
yansımalarını tartışmak ve buradan ABD ile ilişkilerde gelecekteki olası kırılganlıkların
oluştuğu zemini analiz etmek yerinde ve faydalı olacaktır. Zira bu, hem bugün
yaşanan kopuşlara dair hem de bölgesel ve küresel oryantasyonlu politika yapım
süreçlerine dair bizlere bir ufuk sağlayacaktır.
Keywords
References
- “A Friendship on Hold”. The Economist. 29.03.2003
- Athanassopoulou, E. 2001. “American-Turkish Relations since the End of the Cold War”. Middle East Policy. Vol. 8. No. 3
- Ayman, G. 2008. “Bir Güvenlik Sorunsalı Olarak Türk-Amerikan İlişkilerinde Irak Açmazı”. Irak Açmazı: Türkiye Açısından Temel Parametreler (ed.) Boğaziçi Üniversitesi-TÜSİAD Dış Politika Forumu
- Bacik, G. and Aras, B. 2004. “Turkey’s Inescapable Dilemma: America or Europe?”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. Vol. 3. No. 1
- Bölükbaşı, D. 2008. 1 Mart Vakası: Irak Tezkeresi ve Sonrası. Doğan Kitap
- Brzezinski, Z. 1997. The Grand Chessboard. New York: Basic Books
- Bush, George W. The White House. Washington. 24.02.2003
- Cagaptay, S. 2004. “Where Goes the US-Turkish Relationship?”. Middle East Quarterly
- Cornell, E. 2001. Turkey in the 21st Century: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats Curzone Press
- Dejevsky, M. “Türkiye’den Demokrasi Dersi”. The Independent (Radikal 05.03.2003)
- Edelman, E. “Stratejik Ortaklığı Yeniden İnşa Etmemiz Gerek”. Anadolu Ajansı 13.06.2003
- Gregg, Heather S. “Divided They Conquer: The Success of Armenian Ethnic Lobbies in the US”. paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association. 28.08.2002
- Günlübol, M. 1999. Olaylarla Türk Dış Politikası 1919-1995. Siyasal Kitabevi
- Huntington, Samuel P. 1997. “The Erosion of National Interests”. Foreign Affairs
- İşyar, Ömer G. 2005. “An Analysis of Turkish-American Relations from 1945 to 2004”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. Vol. 4. No. 3
- Krugman, P. “Threats, Promises and Lies”. New York Times. 25.02.2003
- Larabee, F. Steven and Lesser, Ian O. 2003. “Turkish Foreign Policy in an Age of Uncertainty”. Rand Corp.
- Makovsky, A. 2000. “US Policy towards Turkey”. in Abramowitz (ed.) Turkey’s Transformation and American Policy
- Mardini, N. “Turkey’s New Crises”. El Sefir. 25.02.2003
- Mourinson, A. 2006. “The Strategic Depth Doctrine of Turkish Foreign Policy”. Middle Eastern Studies. Vol. 42. No. 6 Prager, R. 2003. “Turkish-American Relations: Historical Context and Current Issues” Robins, P. 2007. “The Opium Crisis and the Iraq War: Historical Paralells in Turkey-US Relations”. Mediterranean Politics. Vol. 12. No. 1
- Sözen, A. “A Paradigmatic Shift: New Principles of Turkish Foreign Policy Making”. paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association. 26-29 March 2008
- Türkmen, F. 2009. “Turkish-American Relations: A Challenging Transition”. Turkish Studies. Vol. 10. No. 1
- “US-Turkish Relations and the Challenges Ahead”. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on Europe. Committee on Foreign Affairs. 15.03.2007. Washington DC.
- Yetkin, M. “Washington’la Sinir Harbi”. Radikal. 22.02.2003
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 4, 2018 |
| Acceptance Date | March 6, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Issue: 51 |
Cited By
A Government Devoid of Strong Leadership: A Neoclassical Realist Explanation of Turkey’s Iraq War Decision in 2003
All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace
Samet YILMAZ
https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.960684
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.