Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İKTİSATTA ÇEVRECİ DÖNÜŞÜM: EKOLOJİK MAKRO İKTİSAT

Year 2018, Issue: 51, 127 - 149, 04.07.2018

Recep Ulucak

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.402928
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Çevre ve doğal kaynaklar sorunu iktisat literatüründe
uzun bir geçmişe sahip olsa da artan sanayileşme ve kentleşmeye paralel olarak son
elli yıldır daha çok dikkat çeken bir konu haline gelmiştir ve iktisatta
çevreci bir dönüşüm süreci başlamıştır. Bu doğrultuda geleneksel iktisat
anlayışına bağlı olarak çevre ekonomisi ve doğal kaynaklar ekonomisi gibi alt
disiplinler oluşturulmuştur. 1980’li yıllarda ise çevre ve doğal kaynakları
daha geniş bir perspektifte öncelikli odak noktası haline getiren ekolojik
iktisat akımı doğmuştur. Bu çerçevede alternatif büyüme modellerinin oluşturulması
ve ekolojik kısıtların IS-LM analizine dahil edilmesi gibi önemli gayretler
ekolojik makro iktisat yaklaşımının temellerini zenginleştirmiştir. Bu çalışma,
literatürde giderek artan önemine binaen, ekolojik iktisat yaklaşımı ve bu
yaklaşımın temel odak noktalarını ana akım iktisat ile karşılaştırmakta ve
ekolojik makro iktisadi modellemeler ve bunların çıkarımlarını ele almaktadır. 

Keywords

ekolojik iktisat ekolojik makroiktisat çevre ekonomisi Doğal Kaynak Ekonomisi

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. ve Hemous, D. (2012) "The Environment and Directed Technical Change" The American Economic Review, 102(1): 131–166.
  • Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D. ve Kerr, W. (2016) "Transition to Clean Technology" Journal of Political Economy, 124(1): 52–104.
  • Ackerman, F., Stanton, E. A. ve Bueno, R. (2010) "Fat Tails, Exponents, Extreme Uncertainty: Simulating Catastrophe in DICE" Ecological Economics, 69(8): 1657–1665.
  • Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R. ve Van Reenen, J. (2016) "Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry" Journal of Political Economy, 124(1): 1–51.
  • Aghion, P. ve Howit, P. (1998) Endogenous Growth Theory, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., … Pimentel, D.
  • (1995) "Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment" Science, 268: 13–15.
  • Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2000) "The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Energy Prices and Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence from Asian Developing Countries" Energy Economics, 22(6): 615–625.
  • Barbier, E. B. (1999) "Endogenous Growth and Natural Resource Scarcity" Environmental and Resource Economics, 14(1): 51–74.
  • Bartelmus, P. (2008). Quantitative Eco-Nomics: How Sustainable Are Our Economies?, Springer, Netherlands.
  • Bergaentzlé, C., Clastres, C. ve Khalfallah, H. (2014) "Demand-side Management and European Environmental and Energy Goals: An Optimal Complementary Approach" Energy Policy, 67: 858–869.
  • Brock, W. A. ve Taylor, M. S. (2010) "The Green Solow model" Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2): 127–153.
  • Ceddia, M. G. ve Zepharovich, E. (2017) "Jevons Paradox and The Loss of Natural Habitat in the Argentinean Chaco: The Impact of the Indigenous Communities’ Land Titling and the Forest Law in The Province of Salta" Land Use Policy, 69: 608–617.
  • Cole, Matthew A. (1999) “Limits to Growth, Sustainable Development and Environmental Kuznets Curves: An Examination of the Environmental Impact of Economic Development” Sustainable Development, 7: 87-97.
  • Common, M. ve Stagl, S. (2005) Ecological Economics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Costanza, R. (1989) "What is Ecological Economics?" Ecological Economics, 1(1), 1–7.
  • Costanza, R. ve Daly, H. E. (1987) "Toward an Ecological Economics" Ecological Modelling, 38(1–2): 1–7.
  • Costanza, R., Daly, H. E. ve Bartholomew, J. A. (1991) "Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics" R. Costanza (Ed.) Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability (s. 525), New York, Columbia University Press.
  • Czech, B. (2009) Ecological Economics. Center for the Advancement of Steady State Economy, http://steadystate.org/wp-content/uploads/Czech_ Ecological_Economics.pdf (6.3.2015).
  • Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M. ve Galanis, G. (2017) "A Stock-Flow-Fund Ecological Macroeconomic Model" Ecological Economics, 131: 191–207.
  • Daly, H. E. (1991) "Elements of Environmental of Macroeconomics" R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, New York, Columbia University Press.
  • Daly, H. E. (1997a) "Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz" Ecological Economics, 22(3): 261–266.
  • Daly, H. E. (1997b) "Reply to Solow/Stiglitz" Ecological Economics, 22(3): 271–273.
  • Daly, H. E. ve Farley J. (2004) Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications, Island Press, Washington.
  • Daly, H. E. ve Farley, J. C. (2011) Ecological economics : Principles and Applications. Washington D.C, Island Press.
  • Dhont, R. (2010) "A Steady-State Economy (Herman Daly)" - REBEL WP2: http://www.responsiblebusiness.eu/display/rebwp2/A+steady-state+economy+%28Herman+Daly%29 (12.02.2018)
  • Dinda, S. (2004) "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey" Ecological Economics, 49(4): 431–455.
  • Fontana, G. ve Sawyer, M. (2013) "Post-Keynesian and Kaleckian Thoughts on Ecological Macroeconomics" European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 10(2): 256–267.
  • Fontana, G. ve Sawyer, M. (2016) "Towards post-Keynesian Ecological Macroeconomics". Ecological Economics, 121: 186–195.
  • Galeotti, M., Lanza, A. ve Pauli, F. (2006) "Reassessing the Environmental Kuznets Eurve for CO2 Emissions: A Robustness Exercise" Ecological Economics, 57(1): 152–163.
  • Gradus, R. ve Smulders, S. (1993) "The Trade-off Between Environmental Care and Long-Term Growth? Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models" Journal of Economics, 58(1): 25–51.
  • Grimaud, A. (1999) "Pollution Permits and Sustainable Growth in a Schumpeterian Model" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38(3): 249–266.
  • Grossman, G. M. ve Krueger, A. B. (1991) "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement" National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 3914: 1–57.
  • Grossman, G. M. ve Krueger, A. B. (1995) "Economic Growth and the Environment" The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353–377.
  • Gunderson, R. ve Yun, S.-J. (2017) "South Korean Green Growth And The Jevons Paradox: An Assessment with Democratic and Degrowth Policy Recommendations" Journal of Cleaner Production, 144: 239–247.
  • Hardt, L. ve O’Neill, D. W. (2017) "Ecological Macroeconomic Models: Assessing Current Developments" Ecological Economics, 134: 198–211.
  • Harris, M. J. (2000) “Basic Principles of Sustainable Development, Global Development and Environment Institute” Working Paper 010-04, https://notendur.hi.is/bdavids/UAU101/Readings/Harris_2000_Sustainable_development.pdf (01.03.215).
  • Holm, S.-O. ve Englund, G. (2009) "Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect: Evidence from USA and six European countries 1960–2002" Ecological Economics, 68(3): 879–887.
  • Hussen, A. M. (2004) Principles of Environmental Economics. Second Edition, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Illge, L. ve Schwarze, R. (2006) “A Matter of Opinion: How Ecological and Neoclassical Environmental Economists Think About Sustaianbility and Economics”. German Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Paper, 619. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/18512/1/dp619.pdf (20.12.2017).
  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of The Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ (20.12.2017).
  • IPCC (2014), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ (20.12.2017).
  • Jackson, T., Drake, B., Victor, P., Kratena, K. ve Sommer, M. (2014). Foundations for an Ecological Macroeconomics: Literature Review and Model Development (No. 65). http://www.foreurope.eu/fileadmin/documents/pdf/Workingpapers/%0AWWWforEurope_WPS_no065_MS38.pdf (08.01.2018).
  • Jackson, T. ve Victor, P. A. (2015) "Does Credit Create A “Growth Imperative? A Quasi-Stationary Economy With Interest-Bearing Debt" Ecological Economics, 120: 32–48.
  • Jackson, T. ve Victor, P. A. (2016) "Does slow Growth Lead to Rising Inequality? Some Theoretical Reflections and Numerical Simulations" Ecological Economics, 121: 206–219.
  • Kula, E. (1998) History of Environmental Economic Thought. Routledge, London; New York.
  • Lawn, P. A. (2003). "On Heyes’ IS-LM-EE Proposal to Establish an Environmental Macroeconomics" Environment and Development Economics, 8(1): 31–56.
  • Morales, C. A. L. (2007) "Environmental Macroeconomics: From the IS LM EE Model to a Social Welfare Approach" International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 3(3/4): 301.
  • Moshiri, S. ve Aliyev, K. (2017) "Rebound effect Of Efficiency Improvement in Passenger Cars on Gasoline Consumption in Canada" Ecological Economics, 131: 330–341.
  • Müller-Fürstenberger, G. ve Wagner, M. (2007) "Exploring The Environmental Kuznets Hypothesis: Theoretical And Econometric Problems" Ecological Economics, 62(3): 648–660.
  • Nordhaus W. D. (2007a). The Challenge of Global Warming: Economic Models and Environmental Policy. Yale: Yale University.
  • Nordhaus W. D. (2007b). “To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slowing Global Warming”. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1 (1): 26-45.
  • O’Neill, D. W. (2012) "Measuring Progress in the Degrowth Transition to a Steady State Economy" Ecological Economics, 84: 221–231.
  • O’Neill, D. W. (2015) "What Should Be Held Steady in a Steady-State Economy?: Interpreting Daly’s Definition at the National Level" Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(4): 552–563.
  • Polimeni, J. M. ve Polimeni, R. I. (2006) "Jevons’ Paradox and the Myth of Technological Liberation" Ecological Complexity, 3(4): 344–353.
  • Reyes, R. C. (2011) "The Green Solow Model with Natural Resources Constraint: A Theoretical Note" DLSU Business and Economics Review, 21(1): 111–116.
  • Rezai, A. ve Stagl, S. (2016) "Ecological Macroeconomics: Introduction and Review. Ecological Economics, 121: 181–185.
  • Rezai, A., Taylor, L. ve Mechler, R. (2013) "Ecological Macroeconomics: An Application to Climate Change" Ecological Economics, 85: 69–76.
  • Røpke, I. (2004) "The early History of Modern Ecological Economics" Ecological Economics, 50(3): 293–314.
  • Røpke, I. (2005) "Trends in the Development of Ecological Economics from the Late 1980s to the Early 2000s" Ecological Economics, 55(2): 262–290.
  • Røpke, I. (2013) "Ecological macroeconomics: implications for the roles of consumer-citizens" M. J. Cohen vd. (Eds.) Innovations in Sustainable Consumption: New Economics, Socio-Technical Transitions and Social Practices (ss. 48–64). Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Schlauch, M. ve Palmisano, G. (2013) The Transition from the Neoclassical Growth Model to Ecology (MPRA Working Paper No. 45867), https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45867/ (15.12.2017).
  • Solow, R. M. (1956)."A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth" The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65–94.
  • Song, J., Guo, Y., Wu, P. ve Sun, Sh. (2018) "The Agricultural Water Rebound Effect in China" Ecological Economics, 146: 497–506.
  • Springmann, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Robinson, S., Garnett, T., Godfray, H. C. J., Gollin, D., … Scarborough, P. (2016) "Global and Regional Health Effects of Future Food Production Under Climate Change: A Modelling Study" The Lancet, 387(10031): 1937–1946.
  • Stagl, S. (2014) "Ecological Macroeconomics: Reflections on Labour Markets" European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 11(2): 171–181. Stern, D. (1997) “Van Den Berg: Ecological Economics” The Economic Journal, 107(445): 1905-1907.
  • Stern, D. I. (2004) "Environmental Kuznets Curve" Encyclopedia of Energy (ss. 517–525). http://www.sterndavidi.com/Publications/EKC.pdf (17.12.2017).
  • Stern, D. I. (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years (CCEP Working Paper No. 1514). Crawford. https://ccep.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/publication/ccep_crawford_anu_edu_au/2016-01/ccep1514_0.pdf (17.12.2017).
  • Stern, D. I., Common, M. S. ve Barbier, E. B. (1996) "Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Sustainable Development" World Development, 24(7): 1151–1160.
  • Stiglitz, J. (1974) "Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths" The Review of Economic Studies, 41: 123.
  • Stokey, N. L. (1998) "Are There Limits to Growth?" International Economic Review, 39(1): 1.
  • Taylor, L., Rezai, A. ve Foley, D. K. (2016) "An integrated approach to climate change, income distribution, employment, and economic growth" Ecological Economics, 121: 196–205.
  • Tomanbay, M. (2008) Dünyada Su ve Küresel Isınma Sorunu, Phoenix Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Ulucak, R. ve Erdem, E. (2017) "Ekonomik Büyüme Modellerinde Çevre: Ekolojik Ayak İzini Esas Alan Bir Uygulama" Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(4): 115–147.
  • Wagner, M. (2008) "The carbon Kuznets curve: A cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics?" Resource and Energy Economics, 30(3): 388–408.
  • Van Den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2001) "Ecological Economics: Themes, Approaches, and Differences with Environmental Economics" Regional Environmental Change, 2(1): 13-23.
  • Zhang, J. ve Lin Lawell, C. (2017) "The Macroeconomic Rebound Effect in China". Energy Economics, 67: 202–212.

THE EVOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL VIEWPOINT IN ECONOMICS: ECOLOGICAL MACROECONOMICS

Year 2018, Issue: 51, 127 - 149, 04.07.2018

Recep Ulucak

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.402928
Cited By: 1

Abstract

The evolution of environmental thinking has become
apparent in economics in parallel with the increase in industrialization and
urbanization, although environment and natural resources matters have a long
history in its literature. To this end, environmental economics and natural
resources economics have started to become widespread fields as subdisciplines
of economics. On the other hand, ecological economics that primarily focuses on
resources and environment in a broad perspective has emerged in 1980s. In this
framework, the important efforts, such as alternative growth models and
inclusion of ecological constraints into IS-LM analyses, have strenghtened the
underpinnings of ecological economics. Thus, considering gradually increasing
importance of environmental issues in economics, this study addresses
ecological economics approach by comparing with main stream economics from
various aspects, as well as ecological macroeconomic modellings and
implications.

Keywords

Ecological Economics Ecological Macroeconomics Environmental Economics Natural Resource Economics

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. ve Hemous, D. (2012) "The Environment and Directed Technical Change" The American Economic Review, 102(1): 131–166.
  • Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D. ve Kerr, W. (2016) "Transition to Clean Technology" Journal of Political Economy, 124(1): 52–104.
  • Ackerman, F., Stanton, E. A. ve Bueno, R. (2010) "Fat Tails, Exponents, Extreme Uncertainty: Simulating Catastrophe in DICE" Ecological Economics, 69(8): 1657–1665.
  • Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R. ve Van Reenen, J. (2016) "Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry" Journal of Political Economy, 124(1): 1–51.
  • Aghion, P. ve Howit, P. (1998) Endogenous Growth Theory, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., … Pimentel, D.
  • (1995) "Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment" Science, 268: 13–15.
  • Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2000) "The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Energy Prices and Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence from Asian Developing Countries" Energy Economics, 22(6): 615–625.
  • Barbier, E. B. (1999) "Endogenous Growth and Natural Resource Scarcity" Environmental and Resource Economics, 14(1): 51–74.
  • Bartelmus, P. (2008). Quantitative Eco-Nomics: How Sustainable Are Our Economies?, Springer, Netherlands.
  • Bergaentzlé, C., Clastres, C. ve Khalfallah, H. (2014) "Demand-side Management and European Environmental and Energy Goals: An Optimal Complementary Approach" Energy Policy, 67: 858–869.
  • Brock, W. A. ve Taylor, M. S. (2010) "The Green Solow model" Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2): 127–153.
  • Ceddia, M. G. ve Zepharovich, E. (2017) "Jevons Paradox and The Loss of Natural Habitat in the Argentinean Chaco: The Impact of the Indigenous Communities’ Land Titling and the Forest Law in The Province of Salta" Land Use Policy, 69: 608–617.
  • Cole, Matthew A. (1999) “Limits to Growth, Sustainable Development and Environmental Kuznets Curves: An Examination of the Environmental Impact of Economic Development” Sustainable Development, 7: 87-97.
  • Common, M. ve Stagl, S. (2005) Ecological Economics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Costanza, R. (1989) "What is Ecological Economics?" Ecological Economics, 1(1), 1–7.
  • Costanza, R. ve Daly, H. E. (1987) "Toward an Ecological Economics" Ecological Modelling, 38(1–2): 1–7.
  • Costanza, R., Daly, H. E. ve Bartholomew, J. A. (1991) "Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics" R. Costanza (Ed.) Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability (s. 525), New York, Columbia University Press.
  • Czech, B. (2009) Ecological Economics. Center for the Advancement of Steady State Economy, http://steadystate.org/wp-content/uploads/Czech_ Ecological_Economics.pdf (6.3.2015).
  • Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M. ve Galanis, G. (2017) "A Stock-Flow-Fund Ecological Macroeconomic Model" Ecological Economics, 131: 191–207.
  • Daly, H. E. (1991) "Elements of Environmental of Macroeconomics" R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, New York, Columbia University Press.
  • Daly, H. E. (1997a) "Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz" Ecological Economics, 22(3): 261–266.
  • Daly, H. E. (1997b) "Reply to Solow/Stiglitz" Ecological Economics, 22(3): 271–273.
  • Daly, H. E. ve Farley J. (2004) Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications, Island Press, Washington.
  • Daly, H. E. ve Farley, J. C. (2011) Ecological economics : Principles and Applications. Washington D.C, Island Press.
  • Dhont, R. (2010) "A Steady-State Economy (Herman Daly)" - REBEL WP2: http://www.responsiblebusiness.eu/display/rebwp2/A+steady-state+economy+%28Herman+Daly%29 (12.02.2018)
  • Dinda, S. (2004) "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey" Ecological Economics, 49(4): 431–455.
  • Fontana, G. ve Sawyer, M. (2013) "Post-Keynesian and Kaleckian Thoughts on Ecological Macroeconomics" European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 10(2): 256–267.
  • Fontana, G. ve Sawyer, M. (2016) "Towards post-Keynesian Ecological Macroeconomics". Ecological Economics, 121: 186–195.
  • Galeotti, M., Lanza, A. ve Pauli, F. (2006) "Reassessing the Environmental Kuznets Eurve for CO2 Emissions: A Robustness Exercise" Ecological Economics, 57(1): 152–163.
  • Gradus, R. ve Smulders, S. (1993) "The Trade-off Between Environmental Care and Long-Term Growth? Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models" Journal of Economics, 58(1): 25–51.
  • Grimaud, A. (1999) "Pollution Permits and Sustainable Growth in a Schumpeterian Model" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38(3): 249–266.
  • Grossman, G. M. ve Krueger, A. B. (1991) "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement" National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 3914: 1–57.
  • Grossman, G. M. ve Krueger, A. B. (1995) "Economic Growth and the Environment" The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353–377.
  • Gunderson, R. ve Yun, S.-J. (2017) "South Korean Green Growth And The Jevons Paradox: An Assessment with Democratic and Degrowth Policy Recommendations" Journal of Cleaner Production, 144: 239–247.
  • Hardt, L. ve O’Neill, D. W. (2017) "Ecological Macroeconomic Models: Assessing Current Developments" Ecological Economics, 134: 198–211.
  • Harris, M. J. (2000) “Basic Principles of Sustainable Development, Global Development and Environment Institute” Working Paper 010-04, https://notendur.hi.is/bdavids/UAU101/Readings/Harris_2000_Sustainable_development.pdf (01.03.215).
  • Holm, S.-O. ve Englund, G. (2009) "Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect: Evidence from USA and six European countries 1960–2002" Ecological Economics, 68(3): 879–887.
  • Hussen, A. M. (2004) Principles of Environmental Economics. Second Edition, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Illge, L. ve Schwarze, R. (2006) “A Matter of Opinion: How Ecological and Neoclassical Environmental Economists Think About Sustaianbility and Economics”. German Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Paper, 619. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/18512/1/dp619.pdf (20.12.2017).
  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of The Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ (20.12.2017).
  • IPCC (2014), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ (20.12.2017).
  • Jackson, T., Drake, B., Victor, P., Kratena, K. ve Sommer, M. (2014). Foundations for an Ecological Macroeconomics: Literature Review and Model Development (No. 65). http://www.foreurope.eu/fileadmin/documents/pdf/Workingpapers/%0AWWWforEurope_WPS_no065_MS38.pdf (08.01.2018).
  • Jackson, T. ve Victor, P. A. (2015) "Does Credit Create A “Growth Imperative? A Quasi-Stationary Economy With Interest-Bearing Debt" Ecological Economics, 120: 32–48.
  • Jackson, T. ve Victor, P. A. (2016) "Does slow Growth Lead to Rising Inequality? Some Theoretical Reflections and Numerical Simulations" Ecological Economics, 121: 206–219.
  • Kula, E. (1998) History of Environmental Economic Thought. Routledge, London; New York.
  • Lawn, P. A. (2003). "On Heyes’ IS-LM-EE Proposal to Establish an Environmental Macroeconomics" Environment and Development Economics, 8(1): 31–56.
  • Morales, C. A. L. (2007) "Environmental Macroeconomics: From the IS LM EE Model to a Social Welfare Approach" International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 3(3/4): 301.
  • Moshiri, S. ve Aliyev, K. (2017) "Rebound effect Of Efficiency Improvement in Passenger Cars on Gasoline Consumption in Canada" Ecological Economics, 131: 330–341.
  • Müller-Fürstenberger, G. ve Wagner, M. (2007) "Exploring The Environmental Kuznets Hypothesis: Theoretical And Econometric Problems" Ecological Economics, 62(3): 648–660.
  • Nordhaus W. D. (2007a). The Challenge of Global Warming: Economic Models and Environmental Policy. Yale: Yale University.
  • Nordhaus W. D. (2007b). “To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slowing Global Warming”. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1 (1): 26-45.
  • O’Neill, D. W. (2012) "Measuring Progress in the Degrowth Transition to a Steady State Economy" Ecological Economics, 84: 221–231.
  • O’Neill, D. W. (2015) "What Should Be Held Steady in a Steady-State Economy?: Interpreting Daly’s Definition at the National Level" Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(4): 552–563.
  • Polimeni, J. M. ve Polimeni, R. I. (2006) "Jevons’ Paradox and the Myth of Technological Liberation" Ecological Complexity, 3(4): 344–353.
  • Reyes, R. C. (2011) "The Green Solow Model with Natural Resources Constraint: A Theoretical Note" DLSU Business and Economics Review, 21(1): 111–116.
  • Rezai, A. ve Stagl, S. (2016) "Ecological Macroeconomics: Introduction and Review. Ecological Economics, 121: 181–185.
  • Rezai, A., Taylor, L. ve Mechler, R. (2013) "Ecological Macroeconomics: An Application to Climate Change" Ecological Economics, 85: 69–76.
  • Røpke, I. (2004) "The early History of Modern Ecological Economics" Ecological Economics, 50(3): 293–314.
  • Røpke, I. (2005) "Trends in the Development of Ecological Economics from the Late 1980s to the Early 2000s" Ecological Economics, 55(2): 262–290.
  • Røpke, I. (2013) "Ecological macroeconomics: implications for the roles of consumer-citizens" M. J. Cohen vd. (Eds.) Innovations in Sustainable Consumption: New Economics, Socio-Technical Transitions and Social Practices (ss. 48–64). Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Schlauch, M. ve Palmisano, G. (2013) The Transition from the Neoclassical Growth Model to Ecology (MPRA Working Paper No. 45867), https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45867/ (15.12.2017).
  • Solow, R. M. (1956)."A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth" The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65–94.
  • Song, J., Guo, Y., Wu, P. ve Sun, Sh. (2018) "The Agricultural Water Rebound Effect in China" Ecological Economics, 146: 497–506.
  • Springmann, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Robinson, S., Garnett, T., Godfray, H. C. J., Gollin, D., … Scarborough, P. (2016) "Global and Regional Health Effects of Future Food Production Under Climate Change: A Modelling Study" The Lancet, 387(10031): 1937–1946.
  • Stagl, S. (2014) "Ecological Macroeconomics: Reflections on Labour Markets" European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 11(2): 171–181. Stern, D. (1997) “Van Den Berg: Ecological Economics” The Economic Journal, 107(445): 1905-1907.
  • Stern, D. I. (2004) "Environmental Kuznets Curve" Encyclopedia of Energy (ss. 517–525). http://www.sterndavidi.com/Publications/EKC.pdf (17.12.2017).
  • Stern, D. I. (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years (CCEP Working Paper No. 1514). Crawford. https://ccep.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/publication/ccep_crawford_anu_edu_au/2016-01/ccep1514_0.pdf (17.12.2017).
  • Stern, D. I., Common, M. S. ve Barbier, E. B. (1996) "Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Sustainable Development" World Development, 24(7): 1151–1160.
  • Stiglitz, J. (1974) "Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths" The Review of Economic Studies, 41: 123.
  • Stokey, N. L. (1998) "Are There Limits to Growth?" International Economic Review, 39(1): 1.
  • Taylor, L., Rezai, A. ve Foley, D. K. (2016) "An integrated approach to climate change, income distribution, employment, and economic growth" Ecological Economics, 121: 196–205.
  • Tomanbay, M. (2008) Dünyada Su ve Küresel Isınma Sorunu, Phoenix Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Ulucak, R. ve Erdem, E. (2017) "Ekonomik Büyüme Modellerinde Çevre: Ekolojik Ayak İzini Esas Alan Bir Uygulama" Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(4): 115–147.
  • Wagner, M. (2008) "The carbon Kuznets curve: A cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics?" Resource and Energy Economics, 30(3): 388–408.
  • Van Den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2001) "Ecological Economics: Themes, Approaches, and Differences with Environmental Economics" Regional Environmental Change, 2(1): 13-23.
  • Zhang, J. ve Lin Lawell, C. (2017) "The Macroeconomic Rebound Effect in China". Energy Economics, 67: 202–212.
There are 77 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Recep Ulucak

Publication Date July 4, 2018
Acceptance Date July 4, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Issue: 51

Cite

APA Ulucak, R. (2018). İKTİSATTA ÇEVRECİ DÖNÜŞÜM: EKOLOJİK MAKRO İKTİSAT. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(51), 127-149. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.402928

Cited By

The Effort To Reduce Negative Externality In Post Covid-19 Period In Turkish Economy: Example Of Transportation Sector
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
İ̇lkay GÜLER
https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.755475

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.