Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

KAMU BÜYÜKLÜĞÜ ve EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ : TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ (1970-1999)

Year 2002, Issue: 19, 151 - 172, 31.12.2002

Abstract

Devletin ekonomideki rolünün ne olması gerektiği son yıllarda üzerinde
önemle durulan konulardan biridir. Çalışmada kamu büyüklüğü ve büyüme arasındaki
ilişki araştırılmıştır. Temel kamu harcamaları büyümeyi pozitif yönde etkilerken,
temel fonksiyonların ötesinde kamu harcamalarının artması büyüme üzerindeki
pozitif etkinin azalmasına yol açabilir. Türkiye’de kamu büyüklüğünün büyüme
üzerindeki etkisi iki sektörlü üretim fonksiyonu çerçevesinde araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada,
1971-1999 döneminde Türkiye’de kamu büyüklüğünün kuvvetli olmamakla
birlikte büyümeyi olumsuz yönde etkilediği, ancak kamu harcamalarındaki artışın
büyümeyi olumlu yönde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.

References

  • BARRO, R. J. and J. W. LEE. (1994), “Losers and Winners in Economic Growth” Proceedings of The World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1993, World Bank, pp.267-297.
  • CAO, Y. and Michael Z.F.LI “The Long Run Causality Between Government Size and Economic Growth- A Comparative Study of Four Asian Tigers Over The Period of Industrialization and Post-Industrialization”; <http://www.ntu.edu.sg/nbs/ae/WP-Series/wp2001-03.pdf>, ErişimTarihi: 23.04.2002.
  • ÇEŞTEPE, H. ve M. BİLEN. (2001), “Devletin Ekonomideki Rolü: Finansal Kriz Sonrası Doğu Asya’da Performans Analizi” İşletme Finans Dergisi, Haziran, ss.54-71.
  • DEVERAJAN, S., V. SWAROOP and H. ZOU. (1996), “The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth” Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, pp.313-344.
  • Dünya Bankası (1997), Dünya Kalkınma Raporu 1997(Özet), Haziran. Global Investing News: Economic Growth and Government Size, <http://www.cberhaven.com/globalinvesting/growthgovtsize.html>, Erişim Tarihi: 21.09.2001.
  • GUSEH, J. S. (1997), “Government Size and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Political-Economy Framework” Journal of Macroeconomics, Winter, Vol.19, No.1, pp.175-192.
  • GWARTNEY, J., HOLCOMBE, R. and R. LAWSON. (1998a), “The Scope of Government and the Wealth of Nations” Cato Journal, Vol.18, No.2, Fall, <www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj18n2/cj18n2-1.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi: 22.10.2001.
  • HEİTGER, B. (2001), “The Scope of Government and Its Impact on Economic Growth in OECD Countries”, Kiel Working Paper No.1034, April, <http://www.uni-kiel.de/ifw/pub/kap/2001/kap1034.pdf >, Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2001.
  • GWARTNEY, J., HOLCOMBE, R. and R. LAWSON. (1998b), “The Size and Functions of Government and Economic Growth”, Joint Economic CommitteeStudy,April, <http://www.house.gov/jec/growth/function/function.htm>, Erişim Tarihi: 20.09.2001.
  • IMF (2001), Sweeden Selected Issues-The Role of Government, IMF Country Report No.01/169, September, <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=15383.0>, Erişim Tarihi:20.10.2001.
  • IMF (2002), International Finance Statistics CD-ROM. KELLY, T. (1997), “Public Expenditures and Growth” The Journal of Development Studies, Vol.34, No.1, October, pp. 60-84.
  • KRUEGER, A. O. (1990), “ Government Failures in Development” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume4, Number 3, Summer, pp.9-23.
  • LANDAU, D. “Government and Economic Growth in the Less Developed Countries: An Empirical Study for 1960-1980” Economic Development and Cultural Change 35, pp.35-75.
  • LIN, S. (1994), “Government Spending and Economic Growth” Applied Economics, , 26, pp.83-94.
  • LOPÇU, K. ve Ö. OĞUZ. (2001), “Public and Private Investment and Growth: A Panel Approach” ODTÜ İktisat Kongresi Tebliği.
  • NBER, “How Government Spending Slows Growth”, 2001, <http://www.nber.org/digest/jan00/w7207.html>, Erişim Tarihi: 20.09.2001.
  • RAM, R. (1986), “ Government Size and Economic Growth: A New Framework and Some Evidence from Cross Section and Time Series Data, American Economic Review, Vol.76, No.1, March, pp.191-203.
  • REINERT, E. S. (1999), “The Role of the State in Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Studies, 26, 4/5, pp.268-326.
  • TANZI, V. and L. SCHUKNECHT. (1996), “Reforming Government in Industrial Countries”, Finance and Economic Development, September, s.2-5.
  • TERZİ, H. (1998), “Kamu Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Kalkınma İlişkisi Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir İnceleme” İşletme Finans Dergisi, Ocak, ss.67-78.
  • ULUTÜRK, S .(2001), “Kamu Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi” Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (1), ss.131-139.
  • World Bank, World Development Report 2000/2001, <http://econ.worldbank.org/wdr>, Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2002. World Bank (2001), World Development Indicators CD-ROM.
  • YAMAK, N. ve Y. KÜÇÜKKALE. (1997), “Türkiye’de Kamu Harcamaları Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi” İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Yıl 12, Sayı 131,Şubat, ss.5-14.
  • YAVAS, A. (1998), “Does too Much Government Investment Retard Economic Development of a Country” Journal of Economic Studies, Vol.25, No.4, pp.296-308.
  • YÜLEK, M. (1997), “İçsel Büyüme Teorileri, Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler ve Kamu Politikaları Üzerine” Hazine Dergisi, Nisan, Sayı 6, ss.1-15.
Year 2002, Issue: 19, 151 - 172, 31.12.2002

Abstract

References

  • BARRO, R. J. and J. W. LEE. (1994), “Losers and Winners in Economic Growth” Proceedings of The World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1993, World Bank, pp.267-297.
  • CAO, Y. and Michael Z.F.LI “The Long Run Causality Between Government Size and Economic Growth- A Comparative Study of Four Asian Tigers Over The Period of Industrialization and Post-Industrialization”; <http://www.ntu.edu.sg/nbs/ae/WP-Series/wp2001-03.pdf>, ErişimTarihi: 23.04.2002.
  • ÇEŞTEPE, H. ve M. BİLEN. (2001), “Devletin Ekonomideki Rolü: Finansal Kriz Sonrası Doğu Asya’da Performans Analizi” İşletme Finans Dergisi, Haziran, ss.54-71.
  • DEVERAJAN, S., V. SWAROOP and H. ZOU. (1996), “The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth” Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, pp.313-344.
  • Dünya Bankası (1997), Dünya Kalkınma Raporu 1997(Özet), Haziran. Global Investing News: Economic Growth and Government Size, <http://www.cberhaven.com/globalinvesting/growthgovtsize.html>, Erişim Tarihi: 21.09.2001.
  • GUSEH, J. S. (1997), “Government Size and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Political-Economy Framework” Journal of Macroeconomics, Winter, Vol.19, No.1, pp.175-192.
  • GWARTNEY, J., HOLCOMBE, R. and R. LAWSON. (1998a), “The Scope of Government and the Wealth of Nations” Cato Journal, Vol.18, No.2, Fall, <www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj18n2/cj18n2-1.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi: 22.10.2001.
  • HEİTGER, B. (2001), “The Scope of Government and Its Impact on Economic Growth in OECD Countries”, Kiel Working Paper No.1034, April, <http://www.uni-kiel.de/ifw/pub/kap/2001/kap1034.pdf >, Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2001.
  • GWARTNEY, J., HOLCOMBE, R. and R. LAWSON. (1998b), “The Size and Functions of Government and Economic Growth”, Joint Economic CommitteeStudy,April, <http://www.house.gov/jec/growth/function/function.htm>, Erişim Tarihi: 20.09.2001.
  • IMF (2001), Sweeden Selected Issues-The Role of Government, IMF Country Report No.01/169, September, <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=15383.0>, Erişim Tarihi:20.10.2001.
  • IMF (2002), International Finance Statistics CD-ROM. KELLY, T. (1997), “Public Expenditures and Growth” The Journal of Development Studies, Vol.34, No.1, October, pp. 60-84.
  • KRUEGER, A. O. (1990), “ Government Failures in Development” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume4, Number 3, Summer, pp.9-23.
  • LANDAU, D. “Government and Economic Growth in the Less Developed Countries: An Empirical Study for 1960-1980” Economic Development and Cultural Change 35, pp.35-75.
  • LIN, S. (1994), “Government Spending and Economic Growth” Applied Economics, , 26, pp.83-94.
  • LOPÇU, K. ve Ö. OĞUZ. (2001), “Public and Private Investment and Growth: A Panel Approach” ODTÜ İktisat Kongresi Tebliği.
  • NBER, “How Government Spending Slows Growth”, 2001, <http://www.nber.org/digest/jan00/w7207.html>, Erişim Tarihi: 20.09.2001.
  • RAM, R. (1986), “ Government Size and Economic Growth: A New Framework and Some Evidence from Cross Section and Time Series Data, American Economic Review, Vol.76, No.1, March, pp.191-203.
  • REINERT, E. S. (1999), “The Role of the State in Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Studies, 26, 4/5, pp.268-326.
  • TANZI, V. and L. SCHUKNECHT. (1996), “Reforming Government in Industrial Countries”, Finance and Economic Development, September, s.2-5.
  • TERZİ, H. (1998), “Kamu Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Kalkınma İlişkisi Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir İnceleme” İşletme Finans Dergisi, Ocak, ss.67-78.
  • ULUTÜRK, S .(2001), “Kamu Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi” Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (1), ss.131-139.
  • World Bank, World Development Report 2000/2001, <http://econ.worldbank.org/wdr>, Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2002. World Bank (2001), World Development Indicators CD-ROM.
  • YAMAK, N. ve Y. KÜÇÜKKALE. (1997), “Türkiye’de Kamu Harcamaları Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi” İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Yıl 12, Sayı 131,Şubat, ss.5-14.
  • YAVAS, A. (1998), “Does too Much Government Investment Retard Economic Development of a Country” Journal of Economic Studies, Vol.25, No.4, pp.296-308.
  • YÜLEK, M. (1997), “İçsel Büyüme Teorileri, Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler ve Kamu Politikaları Üzerine” Hazine Dergisi, Nisan, Sayı 6, ss.1-15.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Nısfet Uzay This is me

Publication Date December 31, 2002
Published in Issue Year 2002 Issue: 19

Cite

APA Uzay, N. (2002). KAMU BÜYÜKLÜĞÜ ve EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ : TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ (1970-1999). Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(19), 151-172.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.