Abstract
Bu
çalışmanın amacı idari kolluk düşüncesinde son dönemde yaşanan değişime,
ekonomik kolluk kavramının ortaya çıkışına, piyasaların geleneksel idari kolluk
uygulamalarının yetki alanı dışına çıkışına ve kolluk faaliyetinin kamu hizmeti
yönüne açıklık getirmektir.
Çalışma
Türkiye’deki kolluk makam ve teşkilatlarına yetki veren mevzuat ile yerli ve
yabancı literatür taraması yapılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kolluk kavramını
hukuki yönünden çok yönetsel yönüyle ele alması nedeniyle önemlidir. Çalışmayı özgün
kılan bir diğer yönü ise idari kolluk faaliyetlerini, Türk kamu yönetimi
literatüründe alışılagelmediği üzere, bir kamu hizmeti biçimi olarak ele
almasıdır.
Araştırmanın
sonucunda Batı’da kolluk uygulamalarının birer kamu hizmeti olarak kabul
edildiği, ayrı bir yerde konumlandırılmadıkları, Türkiye’de ise kolluğun,
muhtemelen vesayetçi anlayışın yarattığı etkiyle, kamu hizmetlerinden ayrı ve
yukarı bir noktada konumlandırıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Gerek Batı’da ve
gerekse Düzenleyici ve Denetleyici Kurumların (DDK) ekonomik kolluk birimi
olarak kabul edildikleri tespit edilmiştir.
Keywords
References
- AKINCI, Müslüm; (2001), Ekonomik Kamu Düzeni ve Rekabet Kurumu, Rekabet Dergisi, Sayı: 5, ss. 2-16.
- ALTIN, Aytuğ; (2013), Kamu Hizmeti Anlayışında Değişim ANEMON, Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1, Sayı: 2, ss. 101-118.
- ATAY, Ethem; (2006), Bağımsız İdari Otoriteler ve Türkiye Uygulaması, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi c. X, s.1,2, ss. 259-293.
- CARVAJALAND, Ana and ELLIOTT, Jennifer; (2009), The Challenge of Enforcement in Securities Markets: Mission Impossible?, IMF Working Paper, WP/09/168.
- CASSIM, Rashad and STEUART, Ian; (2005), Public Services and the GATS ICTSD, Policy Paper on Trade in Services and Sustainable. Part III, School of Economic and Business Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Third DRAFT.
- ÇAL, Sedat; (2017), Kamu Hizmeti Kavramı Üzerine Kimi Düşünceler, http://www.idare.gen.tr/cal-kh-dusunceler.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 27.03.2017
- DENHARDT, Robert B. and DENHARDT, Janet V.; (2000), The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering, Public Administration Review, 60/6, pp. 549-559.
- DUGUIT, Leon; (1954), Kamu Hukuku Dersleri, (Çev. Süheyp Derbil), Ankara: AÜHF Yayını.
- DURAN, Lûtfi; (1982), İdare Hukuku Ders Notları, İstanbul: Fakülteler Matbaası.
- FATF; (2015), Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach, Effective Supervision and Enforcement by AML/CFT Supervisors of the Financial Sector and Law Enforcement, Financial Action Task Force.
- GİRİTLİ, İsmet; BİLGEN, Pertev; AKGÜNER Tayfun; (2001), İdare Hukuku, İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
- GÖZÜBÜYÜK, Şeref; (2006), Türkiye’nin Yönetim Yapısı, Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi.
- GÖZLER, Kemal; (2010), İdare Hukukuna Giriş, Bursa: Ekin Basın Yayın Dağıtım.
- GROUT, Paul A. and STEVENS, Margaret; (2003), Financing and Managing Public Services: An Assessment, CMPO Working Paper Series No. 03/076.
- GÜNDAY, Metin ve YILDIRIM, Turan; (2009), İdare Hukuku, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
- KARAHANOĞULLARI, Onur; (2003), Kamu Hizmeti, Ankara Turhan Kitabevi.
- KRAJEWSKI, Markus; (2001), Public Services and the Scope of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), Geneva.
- LIGHT, Jennifer S.; (2001), The Effects of Privatization on Public Services: A Historical Evaluation Approach, Evaluation Findings That Surprise, New Directions For Evaluation, no. 90, pp. 25-41.
- ONAR, Sıddık, Sami; (1996), İdare Hukukunun Umumi Esasları, Cilt:1, 3. Baskı, İstanbul.
- ORER, Gürsel; (2015), Ekonomik Kamu Düzeni ve Devletin Ekonomiye Müdahalesi, Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi, Sayı 6, ss. 363-394.
- ÖZKAN, Ahmet Fatih; (2009), Ekonomik Kamu Düzeni ve Ekonomik Kolluk Faaliyeti, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Yıl 67, Sayı 4, ss. 75-95.
- SEVER, D. Çiğdem; (2015), Türkiye’de Düzenleyici Kurumların Yapısı, İşlevi ve Dönüşümü, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 64 (1), ss. 195-236.
- TAN, Turgut; (2000), Bağımsız İdari Otoriteler, Perşembe Konferansları-4, Rekabet Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara, ss. 3-32.
- TİRYAKİ, Tercan ve GÜRSOY, Türker; (2004), Ekonomik Suç Kavramı ve Sigortacılık Suçlarının Bu Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi, Sayıştay Dergisi, Sayı: 55, ss. 53-70.
- WILSON, Jeremy M.; WEISS Alexander; CHERMAK, Steven; (2014), Contracting for Law-Enforcement Services: Perspectives from Past Research and Current Practice, Program on Police Consolidation and Shared Services, Michigan State University.
- Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası
- 668 Sayılı Olağanüstü Hal Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamesi
- 2559 Sayılı Polis Vazife Salahiyeti Kanunu
- 2692 Sayılı Sahil Güvenlik Komutanlığı Kanunu
- 2803 Sayılı Jandarma Teşkilat Görev ve Yetkileri Kanunu
- 3152 Sayılı İçişleri Bakanlığı Teşkilat ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun
- 5188 Sayılı Özel Güvenlik Hizmetlerine Dair Kanun
- 5326 Sayılı Kabahatler Kanunu
- 5442 Sayılı İl İdaresi Kanunu
- 5952 Sayılı Kamu Düzeni ve Güvenliği Müsteşarlığının Teşkilat ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun
Transition from Law Enforcement Power Approach into Law Enforcement Service Approach in Administrative Law Enforcement Activities
Abstract
Current study aims to declare the recent alteration in administrative law enforcement, the emerge of economic law enforcement concept, getting the markets out of the jurisdiction of conventional administrative law enforcement authorities, and public service aspects of law enforcement practices.
This study was composed by means of examining the legislations in Turkey that empower the law enforcement authorities and local and foreign literature. This paper is distinguished by embracing the law enforcement concept with its administrative aspect rather than juridical one. Another distinctiveness of this paper is to deal with the administrative law enforcement activities as a sort of public services, which is unfamiliar in Turkish public administration literature.
According to the findings, law enforcement activities are approved as public services and they are not positioned on a different category in the West, but in Turkey, probably as a result of administrative law, law enforcement units are deployed on an upright position.
References
- AKINCI, Müslüm; (2001), Ekonomik Kamu Düzeni ve Rekabet Kurumu, Rekabet Dergisi, Sayı: 5, ss. 2-16.
- ALTIN, Aytuğ; (2013), Kamu Hizmeti Anlayışında Değişim ANEMON, Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1, Sayı: 2, ss. 101-118.
- ATAY, Ethem; (2006), Bağımsız İdari Otoriteler ve Türkiye Uygulaması, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi c. X, s.1,2, ss. 259-293.
- CARVAJALAND, Ana and ELLIOTT, Jennifer; (2009), The Challenge of Enforcement in Securities Markets: Mission Impossible?, IMF Working Paper, WP/09/168.
- CASSIM, Rashad and STEUART, Ian; (2005), Public Services and the GATS ICTSD, Policy Paper on Trade in Services and Sustainable. Part III, School of Economic and Business Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Third DRAFT.
- ÇAL, Sedat; (2017), Kamu Hizmeti Kavramı Üzerine Kimi Düşünceler, http://www.idare.gen.tr/cal-kh-dusunceler.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 27.03.2017
- DENHARDT, Robert B. and DENHARDT, Janet V.; (2000), The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering, Public Administration Review, 60/6, pp. 549-559.
- DUGUIT, Leon; (1954), Kamu Hukuku Dersleri, (Çev. Süheyp Derbil), Ankara: AÜHF Yayını.
- DURAN, Lûtfi; (1982), İdare Hukuku Ders Notları, İstanbul: Fakülteler Matbaası.
- FATF; (2015), Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach, Effective Supervision and Enforcement by AML/CFT Supervisors of the Financial Sector and Law Enforcement, Financial Action Task Force.
- GİRİTLİ, İsmet; BİLGEN, Pertev; AKGÜNER Tayfun; (2001), İdare Hukuku, İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
- GÖZÜBÜYÜK, Şeref; (2006), Türkiye’nin Yönetim Yapısı, Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi.
- GÖZLER, Kemal; (2010), İdare Hukukuna Giriş, Bursa: Ekin Basın Yayın Dağıtım.
- GROUT, Paul A. and STEVENS, Margaret; (2003), Financing and Managing Public Services: An Assessment, CMPO Working Paper Series No. 03/076.
- GÜNDAY, Metin ve YILDIRIM, Turan; (2009), İdare Hukuku, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
- KARAHANOĞULLARI, Onur; (2003), Kamu Hizmeti, Ankara Turhan Kitabevi.
- KRAJEWSKI, Markus; (2001), Public Services and the Scope of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), Geneva.
- LIGHT, Jennifer S.; (2001), The Effects of Privatization on Public Services: A Historical Evaluation Approach, Evaluation Findings That Surprise, New Directions For Evaluation, no. 90, pp. 25-41.
- ONAR, Sıddık, Sami; (1996), İdare Hukukunun Umumi Esasları, Cilt:1, 3. Baskı, İstanbul.
- ORER, Gürsel; (2015), Ekonomik Kamu Düzeni ve Devletin Ekonomiye Müdahalesi, Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi, Sayı 6, ss. 363-394.
- ÖZKAN, Ahmet Fatih; (2009), Ekonomik Kamu Düzeni ve Ekonomik Kolluk Faaliyeti, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Yıl 67, Sayı 4, ss. 75-95.
- SEVER, D. Çiğdem; (2015), Türkiye’de Düzenleyici Kurumların Yapısı, İşlevi ve Dönüşümü, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 64 (1), ss. 195-236.
- TAN, Turgut; (2000), Bağımsız İdari Otoriteler, Perşembe Konferansları-4, Rekabet Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara, ss. 3-32.
- TİRYAKİ, Tercan ve GÜRSOY, Türker; (2004), Ekonomik Suç Kavramı ve Sigortacılık Suçlarının Bu Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi, Sayıştay Dergisi, Sayı: 55, ss. 53-70.
- WILSON, Jeremy M.; WEISS Alexander; CHERMAK, Steven; (2014), Contracting for Law-Enforcement Services: Perspectives from Past Research and Current Practice, Program on Police Consolidation and Shared Services, Michigan State University.
- Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası
- 668 Sayılı Olağanüstü Hal Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamesi
- 2559 Sayılı Polis Vazife Salahiyeti Kanunu
- 2692 Sayılı Sahil Güvenlik Komutanlığı Kanunu
- 2803 Sayılı Jandarma Teşkilat Görev ve Yetkileri Kanunu
- 3152 Sayılı İçişleri Bakanlığı Teşkilat ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun
- 5188 Sayılı Özel Güvenlik Hizmetlerine Dair Kanun
- 5326 Sayılı Kabahatler Kanunu
- 5442 Sayılı İl İdaresi Kanunu
- 5952 Sayılı Kamu Düzeni ve Güvenliği Müsteşarlığının Teşkilat ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun
Details
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 28, 2018 |
| Acceptance Date | July 26, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Issue: 52 |
Cited By
İdarenin Kolluk Yetkilerini Genişleten Bir Sebep Olarak Doğal Afet
Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.56701/shd.1354931
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.