Abstract
This paper examines social network analysis of reform projects that one each important as an actor in the process of public policy in Turkey over the period 1620-1991. The purpose of the study is to reveal relationships between actors each other and the structure of relations. Theoretical framework of this study to investigate who are the actors and what are relationships between the actors contained in the process of creating public policy in Turkey. It is a quantitative study. Secondary data are used. Reports have been examined. Screening method was used from data collection methods, documents have been reviewed through history. This method was used in parallel with network analysis technique. According to results of the study, determinations and suggestions of solution are up to date during the period between 1620-1991. Events of Turkey's political history have always been important in terms of the process of public policy. Reform projects seem as if "Save the Government". This situation has resulted in duplication of the same solutions.
Keywords
References
- AKIN, Cengiz; (2000), “Kamu Yönetiminde Yeniden Düzenleme Çalışmaları ve Denetim Sistemimiz “, Türk İdare Dergisi, 427, ss.77-108.
- AYKAÇ, Burhan; (1999), “Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetiminin Küçültülmesi, Yerel Yönetimler ve Yerel Demokrasinin Amaçları”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Dergisi,1, ss.1-12.
- AYKAÇ, Burhan; Şenol DURGUN ve Hüseyin YAYMAN; (2003), Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimi, Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
- AYKAÇ, Burhan; Hüseyin YAYMAN ve Mehmet Akif ÖZER; (2003),”Türkiye’de İdari Reform Hareketlerinin Eleştirel Bir Tahlili”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Dergisi, 2, ss. 153-179.
- ÇOKER, Ziya; (1996), Yönetim ve Siyaset, İstanbul: Kazancı Matbaacılık.
- DEMİR YAŞAMIŞ, Firuz; (2001), “Osmanlı Devlet Yönetiminin Başlangıcı Yılları, Türk İdare Dergisi, 432, ss.1-32.
- ERYILMAZ, Bilal; (2011),Kamu Yönetimi, Ankara: Okutman Yayıncılık.
- GÜRSAKAL, Necmi ; (2009),Sosyal Ağ Analizi, Bursa: Dora Yayıncılık.
- HEPER, Metin; (1985),The State Tradition in Turkey, Walkington: Eothen Press.
- KARADAĞ, Metin; (2000), “Devlet Personel Başkanlığı: Bir Örgüt Geliştirme Örnek Olayı”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 1, ss.133-152.
- ÖZTAŞ, Nail ve Muhittin ACAR; (2004),” Ağbağ Analizine Giriş: Kavramlar ve Yöntemler” iç. Muhittin ACAR ve Hüseyin ÖZGÜR (Ed.), Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi II: Konular Kuramlar ve Kavramlar, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi, ss. 289-320.
- ÖZTAŞ, Nail; (2007),” Sosyal Sermayenin Ağbağ Kuram(lar)ı, Dayanışmacı ve Aracı Sosyal Sermaye”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 3, ss.79-98.SÜRGİT, Kenan; (1972), Türkiye’de İdari Reform, Ankara: TODAİE Yayını.
- SEZER, Yasin ve Naci KARGIN; (2002),”Kamu Yönetiminde Modernleşmesinde Şeffaflaşma Sorunu” ,Türk İdare Dergisi, 436,ss.209-225.TUTUM, Cahit; (1994), Kamu Yönetiminde Yeniden Yapılanma, Ankara: Tesav Yayınları.
- TUTUM, Cahit; (1995), “Kamu Yönetiminde Yeniden Yapılanma”, Yeni Türkiye Dergisi, 4,ss.133-145.
- TORTOP, Nuri; (1993), Yönetim Bilimi, Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
- YAYMAN, Hüseyin; (2005),”Türkiye’nin İdari Reform Politiği”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.YILMAZ, Osman; (2001), Kamu Yönetimi Reformu: Genel Eğilimler ve Ülke Deneyimleri, Ankara: DPT Yayınları.
Abstract
References
- AKIN, Cengiz; (2000), “Kamu Yönetiminde Yeniden Düzenleme Çalışmaları ve Denetim Sistemimiz “, Türk İdare Dergisi, 427, ss.77-108.
- AYKAÇ, Burhan; (1999), “Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetiminin Küçültülmesi, Yerel Yönetimler ve Yerel Demokrasinin Amaçları”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Dergisi,1, ss.1-12.
- AYKAÇ, Burhan; Şenol DURGUN ve Hüseyin YAYMAN; (2003), Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimi, Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
- AYKAÇ, Burhan; Hüseyin YAYMAN ve Mehmet Akif ÖZER; (2003),”Türkiye’de İdari Reform Hareketlerinin Eleştirel Bir Tahlili”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Dergisi, 2, ss. 153-179.
- ÇOKER, Ziya; (1996), Yönetim ve Siyaset, İstanbul: Kazancı Matbaacılık.
- DEMİR YAŞAMIŞ, Firuz; (2001), “Osmanlı Devlet Yönetiminin Başlangıcı Yılları, Türk İdare Dergisi, 432, ss.1-32.
- ERYILMAZ, Bilal; (2011),Kamu Yönetimi, Ankara: Okutman Yayıncılık.
- GÜRSAKAL, Necmi ; (2009),Sosyal Ağ Analizi, Bursa: Dora Yayıncılık.
- HEPER, Metin; (1985),The State Tradition in Turkey, Walkington: Eothen Press.
- KARADAĞ, Metin; (2000), “Devlet Personel Başkanlığı: Bir Örgüt Geliştirme Örnek Olayı”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 1, ss.133-152.
- ÖZTAŞ, Nail ve Muhittin ACAR; (2004),” Ağbağ Analizine Giriş: Kavramlar ve Yöntemler” iç. Muhittin ACAR ve Hüseyin ÖZGÜR (Ed.), Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi II: Konular Kuramlar ve Kavramlar, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi, ss. 289-320.
- ÖZTAŞ, Nail; (2007),” Sosyal Sermayenin Ağbağ Kuram(lar)ı, Dayanışmacı ve Aracı Sosyal Sermaye”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 3, ss.79-98.SÜRGİT, Kenan; (1972), Türkiye’de İdari Reform, Ankara: TODAİE Yayını.
- SEZER, Yasin ve Naci KARGIN; (2002),”Kamu Yönetiminde Modernleşmesinde Şeffaflaşma Sorunu” ,Türk İdare Dergisi, 436,ss.209-225.TUTUM, Cahit; (1994), Kamu Yönetiminde Yeniden Yapılanma, Ankara: Tesav Yayınları.
- TUTUM, Cahit; (1995), “Kamu Yönetiminde Yeniden Yapılanma”, Yeni Türkiye Dergisi, 4,ss.133-145.
- TORTOP, Nuri; (1993), Yönetim Bilimi, Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
- YAYMAN, Hüseyin; (2005),”Türkiye’nin İdari Reform Politiği”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.YILMAZ, Osman; (2001), Kamu Yönetimi Reformu: Genel Eğilimler ve Ülke Deneyimleri, Ankara: DPT Yayınları.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 28, 2018 |
| Acceptance Date | October 8, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Issue: 52 |
Cited By
Public Policy Discipline in Turkish Literature (2015-2020): Trends, Techniques, Preferences
Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.38155/ksbd.1125956
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.