Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A Comparative Analysis of E-waste Policies in the Context of Sustainable Development and Industrial Ecology

Year 2018, Issue: 52, 381 - 408, 28.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.429214

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the e-waste policies in Turkey and the rest of the world, to identify the problems during the realization of these policies and to develop policy proposals. In the study, we tried to clarify the conceptual framework of sustainable development and industrial ecology to emphasize the importance of e-waste policies in the community life. In addition, we have provided information on various policies and the results of these policies in the world through the related literature. As a result, it is emphasized that the decision makers take an active role in the policies to coordinate the economic units, and take on a new significance about economic, social, environmental and health dimensions of the e-waste policies.

References

  • ALLENBY, Braden R.; (1992), “Industrial Ecology: The Materials Scientist in an Environmentally Constrained World”, MRS Bulletin, 17, pp. 46-51 https://doi.org/10.1557/S0883769400040859 , Erişim Tarihi: 23.5.2017
  • AYRES, Robert U.; (1989), “Industrial Metabolism”, in Jesse H. Ausubel and Hedy E. Sladovich (Ed.), Technology and Environment, Washington DC: National Academy Press, pp. 23-49.
  • BALDÉ, Cornelis P., FORTI, Vanessa, GRAY, Vanessa, KUEHR, Ruediger and STEGMANN, Paul; (2017), The Global E-Waste Monitor-2017, Bonn: United Nations University (UNU), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and International Solid Waste Association (ISWA).
  • BALDÉ, Cornelis P., WANG, Feng, KUEHR, Ruediger and HUISMAN, Jaco; (2015), The Global E-Waste Monitor-2014, Bonn: United Nations University.
  • BECIC, Emira and SVARC, Jadranka; (2009), “Sustainable Development: What Are the Measurement Challenges?”, The 3rd OECD World Forum 'Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, Busan.
  • BODEEN, Christopher; (2007), “In 'e-Waste' Heartland, A Toxic China”, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/world/asia/18iht-waste.1.8374259.html Erişim Tarihi: 07.11.2017
  • BÜYÜKGÜNGÖR, Hanife; (2006), “Çevre Kirliliği ve Çevre Yönetimi”, Toprak İşveren Dergisi, 72, ss. 1-16.
  • CAPRA, Fritjof ve MATTEI, Ugo; (2017), Hukukun Ekolojisi: Doğa ve Toplumla Uyumlu Bir Hukuk Sistemine Doğru, Çev.: Ebru KILIÇ. İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • CHANCEREL, Perrine and ROTTER, Susanne; (2009), “Recycling-Oriented Characterization of Small Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment”, Waste Management, 29, pp. 2336–2352.
  • CHUNG, Sung-Woo and MURAKAMI-SUZUKI, Rie; (2008), “A Comparative Study on E-Waste Recycling Systems in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan from the EPR Perspective: İmplications for Developing Countries”, in Michikazu Kojima (Ed.), Promoting 3Rs in Developing Countries: Lessons from the Japanese Experience, Chiba: IDE-JETRO.
  • CLIFT, Roland and DRUCKMAN, Angela; (2016), Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology, Springer International Publishing.
  • Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı; (2015), “Atık Elektrikli ve Elektronik Eşyaların Yönetimi”, Ankara.
  • ÇİFTLİK, Selçuk, HANDIRI, İsmail, BEYHAN, Mehmet, AKÇİL, Ata, ILGAR, Murat ve GÖNÜLLÜ, M. Talha; (2011), “Evaluation of Management, Economy and the Potential of Metal Recovery of Electrical and Electronic Wastes (E-Waste)”, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sigma 3, pp. 261-267.
  • DAVIS, James C.; (2016), Taş Devrinden Bugüne Tarihimiz: İnsanın Hikâyesi, Çev.: Barış Bıçakçı. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • DURSUN, Oktay; (2009), “E-Atık 2: Türkiye’de Durum”, Elektrik Mühendisleri Odası Ankara Şubesi Haber Bülteni, 12-13.
  • EHRENFELD, John and GERTLER, Nicholas; (1997), “Industrial Ecology in Practice - The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, I(1), pp. 67-79.
  • EKİNS, Paul, SİMON, Sandrine, DEUTSCH, Lisa, FOLKE, Carl and GROOT, Rudolf De (2003), “A Framework for the Practical Application of the Concepts of Critical Natural Capital and Strong Sustainability”, Ecological Economics, 44(2–3), pp. 165-185.
  • European Union; (2002), Directive 2002/95/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, Official Journal of the European Union L 37.
  • European Union; (2011), Directive 2011/65/Eu of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, Official Journal of the European Union L 174.
  • European Union, (2012), Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), Official Journal of the European Union L 197. Volume 55.
  • FRASE, Peter; (2017), Dört Gelecek: Kapitalizmden Sonra Hayat, Çev.: Akın Emre PİLGİR. İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • FREDHOLM, Susan; (2008), “Evaluating Electronic Waste Recycling Systems: The Influence Ofphysical Architecture on System Performance”, Master Thesis, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • FROSH, Robert A.; (1992), “Industrial Ecology: A Philosophical Introduction”, National Academy of Sciences, 89, pp. 800–803.
  • GARNER, Andy and KEOLEIAN, Gregory A.; (1995), Industrial Ecology: An Introduction, National Pollution Prevention Centre for Higher Education, Michigan: University of Michigan.
  • GENG, Yong and DOBERSTEIN, Brent; (2008), “Developing the Circular Economy in China: Challenges and Opportunities for Achieving'leapfrog Development”, The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 15, pp. 231–239.
  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature Resources (IUCN); (1980), “World Conservation Strategy”, https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/wcs-004.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 17.11.2017
  • KAHRAMAN, Ahmet Cihat; (2014), “Avrupa Birliği Uyum Sürecinde Türkiye’de E-Atık Yönetimi ve Uygulamaya Yönelik Stratejik Analizler”, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • KERK, Geurt Van De and MANUEL, Arthur; (2008), “A Comprehensive Index for a Sustainable Society: The SSI the Sustainable Society Index”, Ecological Economics, 66, pp. 4–6.
  • KETTNER, Claudiaa, RADLBERGER, Philipp, SCHLEICHER Stefan and THENIUS, Gregor; (2007), Potentials for Extending National Income Accounts by Integrating Sustainable Development Indicators, Graz: Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change.
  • LAYBOURN, Peter; (2011), “Industrial Symbiosis: Iskenderun by Area”. Launching Event of Industrial Symbiosis Project in Iskenderun, Ankara: British Embassy.LUNDGREN, Karin; (2012), The Global Impact of E-Waste: Addressing the Challenge, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • MUNIER, Nolberto; (2005), Introduction to Sustainability: Road to a Better Future, Dordrecht: Springer.
  • MURRAY, James; (2012), “EU Revamps E-Waste Rules with Demanding New Recovery Targets.” The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/aug/14/eu-waste, Erişim Tarihi: 07.11.2017
  • NIUTANEN, Ville; (2005), The Potential of Material and Energy Flow Roundput in Regional Waste Management, Joensuu: Unıversity of Joensuu Publications in Social Sciences: 72.
  • NNOROM, Innocent Chidi and OSIBANJO, Oladele; (2008), “Overview of Electronic Waste (E-Waste) Management Practices and Legislations, and Their Poor Applications in the Developing Countries”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, pp. 843–858.
  • OECD; (2011), Extended Producer Responsibility: a Guidance Manual for Governments. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • ÖKTEM, Begüm; (2016), “Atık Yönetiminde Entegre Uygulama”, Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2/1), ss. 135-147.
  • PEZZEY, John; (1992), “Sustainability: an Interdisciplinary Guide”, Environmental Values, 1, 4, pp. 321–362.
  • PRADHAN, Prajal, COSTA, Luis, RYBSKI, Diego, LUCHT, Wolfgang and KROPP, Jürgen P.; (2017), “A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions”, Earth’s Future, 5, pp. 1169–1179.
  • Resmi Gazete; (22.05.2012), Atık Elektrikli ve Elektronik Eşyaların (AEEE) Kontrolü Yönetmeliği.
  • RAJPUT, Jaypalsing E.; (2013), “E-Waste-Concept, Problems and Solution Policies in India”, International Journal of Management and Business Research, 3(1), pp.31-36.
  • ROSSEM, Chris Van, TOJO, Naoko, LINDHQVIST, Thomas; (2006), Lost in Transposition?, Amsterdam: Greenpeace International, Friends of the Earth and the European Environmental Bureau (EEB).
  • SAVAGE, Matthew, OGILVIE, Steve, SLEZAK, Joszef, ARTIM, Eniko and LINDBLOM Josefina; (2006), in Luis Delgado (Ed.), Implementation of Waste Electric and Electronic Equipment Directive in EU 25, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • SAYMAN, Rifat Ünal and AKPULAT, Onur; (2016), Atık Elektrikli ve Elektronik Eşyaların Kontrolü Yönetmeliği Belediye Uygulama Rehberi, Ankara: Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi (REC) Türkiye Yayını.
  • SHARPE, Samantha and AGARWAL, Renu; (2014), “Strengthening Industrial Ecologys Links with Business Studies: Insights and Potential Contributions from the Innovation and Business Models Literature”, Resources, 3(2), pp. 362–382.
  • SINHA-KHETRIWAL, Deepali, KRAEUCHI, Philipp and WIDMER, Rolf; (2009), “Producer Responsibility for E-Waste Management: Key Issues for Consideration-Learning from the Swiss Experience”, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 153–165.
  • STRANGE, Tracey and BAYLEY, Anne; (2008), Sustainable Development: Linking Economy, Society and Environment, Paris: OECD Publications.
  • TANSKANEN, Pia; (2013), “Management and Recycling of Electronic Waste”, Acta Materialia, 61, pp. 1001-1011.
  • TERADA, Christine; (2012), “Recycling Electronic Wastes in Nigeria: Putting Environmental and Human Rights at Risk”, Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 10(3), pp. 154-172.
  • TÜRK, Murat ve BEKİŞ, Tuba; (2011), “İşletmelerde Rekabetçi Üstünlük Elde Etmede Önleyici (Proaktif) Çevre Yönetimi Yaklaşımı”, Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15(1), ss. 65–84.
  • ULUTAŞ, Ferda; (2011), Endüstriyel Ekoloji, Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Sürdürülebilir Üretim ve Tüketim. Ankara: Yayınlar- VI.
  • WANG, Feng and HUISMAN, Jaco; (2010), Formalisation of E-Waste Collection and Recycling in China, Bonn: United Nations University, Institute for Sustainability and Peace.
  • WANG, Feng; (2014), E-Waste: Collect More, Treat Better, China: Master of Science in Chemistry Geboren te Daye.
  • WIDMER, Rolf, OSWALD-KRAPF, Heidi, SINHA-KHETRIWAL, Deepali, SCHNELLMANN, Max and BÖNI, Heinz; (2005), “Global Perspectives on E-Waste”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), pp. 436-458.
  • World Comission on Environment and Development (WCED); (1987), Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Endüstriyel Ekoloji Kapsamında E-atık Politikaları İçin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

Year 2018, Issue: 52, 381 - 408, 28.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.429214

Abstract

Bu çalışma, dünyada ve Türkiye’de uygulanan e-atık politikalarının incelenmesi, sorunların tespit edilmesi ve politika önerileri geliştirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, e-atık politikalarının toplum yaşamındaki önemini vurgulamak için sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve endüstriyel ekolojinin kavramsal çerçevesi netleştirmeye çalışılmıştır. Buna ek olarak, ilgili literatürden hareketle dünyadaki çeşitli politikalar ve bunların sonuçları hakkında bilgiler verilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, karar vericilerin ekonomik birimlerin koordine edilmesi için politikalarda aktif bir rol benimsemeleri ve e-atık politikalarının ekonomik, sosyal, çevresel ve sağlık boyutlarında yeni bir önem kazanmasının gerekliliği vurgulanmaktadır.

References

  • ALLENBY, Braden R.; (1992), “Industrial Ecology: The Materials Scientist in an Environmentally Constrained World”, MRS Bulletin, 17, pp. 46-51 https://doi.org/10.1557/S0883769400040859 , Erişim Tarihi: 23.5.2017
  • AYRES, Robert U.; (1989), “Industrial Metabolism”, in Jesse H. Ausubel and Hedy E. Sladovich (Ed.), Technology and Environment, Washington DC: National Academy Press, pp. 23-49.
  • BALDÉ, Cornelis P., FORTI, Vanessa, GRAY, Vanessa, KUEHR, Ruediger and STEGMANN, Paul; (2017), The Global E-Waste Monitor-2017, Bonn: United Nations University (UNU), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and International Solid Waste Association (ISWA).
  • BALDÉ, Cornelis P., WANG, Feng, KUEHR, Ruediger and HUISMAN, Jaco; (2015), The Global E-Waste Monitor-2014, Bonn: United Nations University.
  • BECIC, Emira and SVARC, Jadranka; (2009), “Sustainable Development: What Are the Measurement Challenges?”, The 3rd OECD World Forum 'Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, Busan.
  • BODEEN, Christopher; (2007), “In 'e-Waste' Heartland, A Toxic China”, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/world/asia/18iht-waste.1.8374259.html Erişim Tarihi: 07.11.2017
  • BÜYÜKGÜNGÖR, Hanife; (2006), “Çevre Kirliliği ve Çevre Yönetimi”, Toprak İşveren Dergisi, 72, ss. 1-16.
  • CAPRA, Fritjof ve MATTEI, Ugo; (2017), Hukukun Ekolojisi: Doğa ve Toplumla Uyumlu Bir Hukuk Sistemine Doğru, Çev.: Ebru KILIÇ. İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • CHANCEREL, Perrine and ROTTER, Susanne; (2009), “Recycling-Oriented Characterization of Small Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment”, Waste Management, 29, pp. 2336–2352.
  • CHUNG, Sung-Woo and MURAKAMI-SUZUKI, Rie; (2008), “A Comparative Study on E-Waste Recycling Systems in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan from the EPR Perspective: İmplications for Developing Countries”, in Michikazu Kojima (Ed.), Promoting 3Rs in Developing Countries: Lessons from the Japanese Experience, Chiba: IDE-JETRO.
  • CLIFT, Roland and DRUCKMAN, Angela; (2016), Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology, Springer International Publishing.
  • Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı; (2015), “Atık Elektrikli ve Elektronik Eşyaların Yönetimi”, Ankara.
  • ÇİFTLİK, Selçuk, HANDIRI, İsmail, BEYHAN, Mehmet, AKÇİL, Ata, ILGAR, Murat ve GÖNÜLLÜ, M. Talha; (2011), “Evaluation of Management, Economy and the Potential of Metal Recovery of Electrical and Electronic Wastes (E-Waste)”, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sigma 3, pp. 261-267.
  • DAVIS, James C.; (2016), Taş Devrinden Bugüne Tarihimiz: İnsanın Hikâyesi, Çev.: Barış Bıçakçı. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • DURSUN, Oktay; (2009), “E-Atık 2: Türkiye’de Durum”, Elektrik Mühendisleri Odası Ankara Şubesi Haber Bülteni, 12-13.
  • EHRENFELD, John and GERTLER, Nicholas; (1997), “Industrial Ecology in Practice - The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, I(1), pp. 67-79.
  • EKİNS, Paul, SİMON, Sandrine, DEUTSCH, Lisa, FOLKE, Carl and GROOT, Rudolf De (2003), “A Framework for the Practical Application of the Concepts of Critical Natural Capital and Strong Sustainability”, Ecological Economics, 44(2–3), pp. 165-185.
  • European Union; (2002), Directive 2002/95/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, Official Journal of the European Union L 37.
  • European Union; (2011), Directive 2011/65/Eu of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, Official Journal of the European Union L 174.
  • European Union, (2012), Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), Official Journal of the European Union L 197. Volume 55.
  • FRASE, Peter; (2017), Dört Gelecek: Kapitalizmden Sonra Hayat, Çev.: Akın Emre PİLGİR. İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • FREDHOLM, Susan; (2008), “Evaluating Electronic Waste Recycling Systems: The Influence Ofphysical Architecture on System Performance”, Master Thesis, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • FROSH, Robert A.; (1992), “Industrial Ecology: A Philosophical Introduction”, National Academy of Sciences, 89, pp. 800–803.
  • GARNER, Andy and KEOLEIAN, Gregory A.; (1995), Industrial Ecology: An Introduction, National Pollution Prevention Centre for Higher Education, Michigan: University of Michigan.
  • GENG, Yong and DOBERSTEIN, Brent; (2008), “Developing the Circular Economy in China: Challenges and Opportunities for Achieving'leapfrog Development”, The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 15, pp. 231–239.
  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature Resources (IUCN); (1980), “World Conservation Strategy”, https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/wcs-004.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 17.11.2017
  • KAHRAMAN, Ahmet Cihat; (2014), “Avrupa Birliği Uyum Sürecinde Türkiye’de E-Atık Yönetimi ve Uygulamaya Yönelik Stratejik Analizler”, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • KERK, Geurt Van De and MANUEL, Arthur; (2008), “A Comprehensive Index for a Sustainable Society: The SSI the Sustainable Society Index”, Ecological Economics, 66, pp. 4–6.
  • KETTNER, Claudiaa, RADLBERGER, Philipp, SCHLEICHER Stefan and THENIUS, Gregor; (2007), Potentials for Extending National Income Accounts by Integrating Sustainable Development Indicators, Graz: Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change.
  • LAYBOURN, Peter; (2011), “Industrial Symbiosis: Iskenderun by Area”. Launching Event of Industrial Symbiosis Project in Iskenderun, Ankara: British Embassy.LUNDGREN, Karin; (2012), The Global Impact of E-Waste: Addressing the Challenge, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • MUNIER, Nolberto; (2005), Introduction to Sustainability: Road to a Better Future, Dordrecht: Springer.
  • MURRAY, James; (2012), “EU Revamps E-Waste Rules with Demanding New Recovery Targets.” The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/aug/14/eu-waste, Erişim Tarihi: 07.11.2017
  • NIUTANEN, Ville; (2005), The Potential of Material and Energy Flow Roundput in Regional Waste Management, Joensuu: Unıversity of Joensuu Publications in Social Sciences: 72.
  • NNOROM, Innocent Chidi and OSIBANJO, Oladele; (2008), “Overview of Electronic Waste (E-Waste) Management Practices and Legislations, and Their Poor Applications in the Developing Countries”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, pp. 843–858.
  • OECD; (2011), Extended Producer Responsibility: a Guidance Manual for Governments. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • ÖKTEM, Begüm; (2016), “Atık Yönetiminde Entegre Uygulama”, Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2/1), ss. 135-147.
  • PEZZEY, John; (1992), “Sustainability: an Interdisciplinary Guide”, Environmental Values, 1, 4, pp. 321–362.
  • PRADHAN, Prajal, COSTA, Luis, RYBSKI, Diego, LUCHT, Wolfgang and KROPP, Jürgen P.; (2017), “A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions”, Earth’s Future, 5, pp. 1169–1179.
  • Resmi Gazete; (22.05.2012), Atık Elektrikli ve Elektronik Eşyaların (AEEE) Kontrolü Yönetmeliği.
  • RAJPUT, Jaypalsing E.; (2013), “E-Waste-Concept, Problems and Solution Policies in India”, International Journal of Management and Business Research, 3(1), pp.31-36.
  • ROSSEM, Chris Van, TOJO, Naoko, LINDHQVIST, Thomas; (2006), Lost in Transposition?, Amsterdam: Greenpeace International, Friends of the Earth and the European Environmental Bureau (EEB).
  • SAVAGE, Matthew, OGILVIE, Steve, SLEZAK, Joszef, ARTIM, Eniko and LINDBLOM Josefina; (2006), in Luis Delgado (Ed.), Implementation of Waste Electric and Electronic Equipment Directive in EU 25, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • SAYMAN, Rifat Ünal and AKPULAT, Onur; (2016), Atık Elektrikli ve Elektronik Eşyaların Kontrolü Yönetmeliği Belediye Uygulama Rehberi, Ankara: Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi (REC) Türkiye Yayını.
  • SHARPE, Samantha and AGARWAL, Renu; (2014), “Strengthening Industrial Ecologys Links with Business Studies: Insights and Potential Contributions from the Innovation and Business Models Literature”, Resources, 3(2), pp. 362–382.
  • SINHA-KHETRIWAL, Deepali, KRAEUCHI, Philipp and WIDMER, Rolf; (2009), “Producer Responsibility for E-Waste Management: Key Issues for Consideration-Learning from the Swiss Experience”, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 153–165.
  • STRANGE, Tracey and BAYLEY, Anne; (2008), Sustainable Development: Linking Economy, Society and Environment, Paris: OECD Publications.
  • TANSKANEN, Pia; (2013), “Management and Recycling of Electronic Waste”, Acta Materialia, 61, pp. 1001-1011.
  • TERADA, Christine; (2012), “Recycling Electronic Wastes in Nigeria: Putting Environmental and Human Rights at Risk”, Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 10(3), pp. 154-172.
  • TÜRK, Murat ve BEKİŞ, Tuba; (2011), “İşletmelerde Rekabetçi Üstünlük Elde Etmede Önleyici (Proaktif) Çevre Yönetimi Yaklaşımı”, Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15(1), ss. 65–84.
  • ULUTAŞ, Ferda; (2011), Endüstriyel Ekoloji, Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Sürdürülebilir Üretim ve Tüketim. Ankara: Yayınlar- VI.
  • WANG, Feng and HUISMAN, Jaco; (2010), Formalisation of E-Waste Collection and Recycling in China, Bonn: United Nations University, Institute for Sustainability and Peace.
  • WANG, Feng; (2014), E-Waste: Collect More, Treat Better, China: Master of Science in Chemistry Geboren te Daye.
  • WIDMER, Rolf, OSWALD-KRAPF, Heidi, SINHA-KHETRIWAL, Deepali, SCHNELLMANN, Max and BÖNI, Heinz; (2005), “Global Perspectives on E-Waste”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), pp. 436-458.
  • World Comission on Environment and Development (WCED); (1987), Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
There are 54 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Ümit Başülmez This is me 0000-0003-4053-9636

Oytun Meçik 0000-0002-7409-6266

Publication Date December 28, 2018
Acceptance Date October 22, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Issue: 52

Cite

APA Başülmez, Ü., & Meçik, O. (2018). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Endüstriyel Ekoloji Kapsamında E-atık Politikaları İçin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(52), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.429214

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.