Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Elasticity of substitution between labor, capital and energy in turkey: Translog production function approach

Year 2019, Issue: 54, 114 - 137, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.488045

Abstract

In addition to the
traditional production factors, one of the most needed production input in the
production process is energy. In particular, it is rather high the use of
traditional or primary energy sources in the production process. The aim of
this study is to predict the translog production function including energy
consumption for Turkey. For the analysis, it was utilized GDP, labor, capital,
natural gas, oil and coal data for 1982-2014 period. The prediction was made by
the Ridge Regression method. Findings show that the elasticity of substitution
between inputs is distributed at 1 level. Elasticities of output followed a positive
course throughout the period covered.

References

  • AKTAŞ, Cengiz ve Veysel YILMAZ; (2008), “Türkiye’de Petrol Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15, ss. 45-55.
  • BROCKWAY, Paul, E.; Harry SAUNDERS; Matthew K. HEUN; Timothy J. FOXON; Julia K. STEINBERGER; John R. BARRETT and Steve SORRELL; (2017), “Energy Rebound as a Potential Threat to a Low-Carbon Future: Findings from a New Exergy-Based National-Level Rebound Approach”. Energies, 10(1), ss. 1-24.
  • CASSELS, John, M.; (1951), “On the Law of Variable Proportions”, İnternet Adresi: http://cas2.umkc.edu/ECON/economics/faculty/Lee/courses/502/reading/tp3.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 09.11.2018.
  • ÇERMİKLİ, A. Hakan ve İbrahim TOKATLIOĞLU; (2015), “Yüksek ve Orta Gelirli Ülkelerde Teknolojik Gelişmenin Enerji Yoğunluğu Üzerindeki Etkisi”, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(32), ss. 1-22.
  • CHRISTENSEN, Laurits, R.; Jorgenson W. DALE and Lau J. LAWRENCE; (1973), “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 55(1), pp. 28-45.
  • FANG, Yiping; (2011), “Economic Welfare Impacts from Renewable Energy Consumption: The China Experience”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), pp. 5120-5128.
  • FERGUSON, Carl, E.; (1971), The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • FRISCH, Ragnar: (1965), The Theory of Production, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
  • HEPEKTAN, Erdem ve Yasin SERTKAYA; (2016), “Türkiye’de Elektrik Tüketimi, Kişi Başına GSYİH, CO2 Emisyonu ve Petrol Tüketimi İlişkisi”, Yalova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(12), ss. 163-182.
  • HOCH, Irving; (1955), “Report of the Montreal Meeting, September 10-13, 1954”, Econometrica, 23(3), pp. 324-337.
  • HOERL, Arthur E. and Robert W. KENNARD; (1970), “Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems”, Technometrics, 12(1), pp. 55-67.
  • KOESLER, Simon and Michael SCHYMURA; (2012), “Substitution Elasticities in a CES Production Framework An Empirical Analysis on the Basis of Non-Linear Least Squares Estimation”, Centre for European Economic Research, 12-007, Internet Adress: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2014655, Date of Access: 25.11.2018.
  • LIN, Boqiang and Izhar AHMAD; (2016a), “Technical Change, Inter-Factor and Inter-Fuel Substitution Possibilities in Pakistan: A Trans-log Production Function Approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, pp. 537-549.
  • LIN, Boqiang and Izhar AHMAD; (2016b), “Energy Substitution Effect on Transport Sector of Pakistan Based on Trans-Log Production Function”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, pp. 1182-1193.
  • LIN, Boqiang and Philip ATSAGLI; (2017), “Inter-Fuel Substitution Possibilities in South Africa: A Translog Production Function Approach”, Energy, 121, pp. 822-831.
  • LIN, Boqiang; Philip ATSAGLI and Kingsley E. DOGAH; (2016), “Ghanaian Energy Economy: Inter-Production Factors and Energy Substitution”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, pp. 1260-1269.
  • LIN, Boqiang and Chunping XIE; (2014), “Energy Substitution Effect on Transport Industry of China-Based on Trans-log Production Function”, Energy, 67, pp. 213-222.
  • MARSCHAK, Jacop and William H. ANDREWS; (1944), “Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production”, Econometrica, 12(3/4), pp. 143-205.
  • MUNDLAK, Yair; (1961), “Empirical Production Function Free of Management Bias”, Journal of Farm Economics, 43(1), pp. 44-56.
  • ÖZATA, Erkan; (2010), “Türkiye’de Enerji Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkilerin Ekonometrik İncelemesi”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26, ss. 104-114.
  • PINDYCK, Robert S.; (1979), “Interfuel Substitution and the Industrial Demand for Energy: An International Comparison”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), pp. 169-179.
  • POLLAK, Robert A.; Robin C. SICKLES and Terence, J. WALES; (1984), “The CES-Translog: Specification and Estimation of a New Cost Function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(4), pp. 602-607.
  • SARI, Ramazan and Uğur SOYTAŞ; (2007), “The Growth of Income and Energy Consumption in Six Developing Countries”, Energy Policy, 35(2), pp. 889-898.
  • SHEN, Keting and John WHALLEY; (2013), “Capital-Labor-Energy Substitution in Nested CES Production Functions for China”, National Bureau of Economic Research w19104, Internet Adress: https://www.nber.org/papers/w19104, Date of Access: 25.11.2018.
  • SMYTH, Russell; Paresh Kumar NARAYAN and Hong Liang SHI; (2011), “Substitution Between Energy and Classical Factor Inputs in the Chinese Steel Sector”, Applied Energy, 88(1), pp. 361-367.
  • SONGUR, Mehmet; (2017), “Türkiye’de Beşeri Sermaye ve Fiziksel Sermaye Arasındaki İkame Olanakları: Translog Üretim Fonksiyonu Yaklaşımı”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 7(2), ss. 201-224.
  • SONGUR, Mehmet; (2018), “Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Faktörler Arası İkame Esneklik Katsayısı: Cobb-Douglas, CES ve VES Üretim Fonksiyonu Tahmini”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • SONGUR, Mehmet; Yusuf MURATOĞLU ve Devran ŞANLI; (2018), “Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyüme ile Enerji Tüketimi Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Frekans Alanı Yaklaşımı”, in Ayşe CEBECİ; Erika TORRES and H. Gülçin BEKEN (Ed.), Current Debates in Economics Volume 18, London: IJOPEC Publication Limited, ss. 207-222.
  • SOYTAŞ, Uğur and Ramazan SARI; (2007), “The Relationship Between Energy and Production: Evidence from Turkish Manufacturing Industry”, Energy Economics, 29(6), pp. 1151-1165.
  • WERF, Van der E.; (2008), “Production Functions for Climate Policy Modeling: An Empirical Analysis”, Energy Economics, 30(6), pp. 2964-2979.
  • WESSEH, Presley K. Jr.; Boqiang LIN and Michael Owusu APPIAH; (2013), “Delving into Liberia's Energy Economy: Technical Change, Inter-Factor and Inter-Fuel Substitution”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, pp. 122-130.
  • YAPRAKLI, Sevda ve Z. Çağlar YURTTANÇIKMAZ; (2012), “Elektrik Tüketimi ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensellik: Türkiye Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, CÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), ss. 195-215.
  • ZELLNER, Arnold, Jan KMENTA and Jacques DREZE; (1966), “Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models”, Econometrica, 34(4), pp. 784-795.

Türkiye’de emek, sermaye ve enerji arasındaki ikame esnekliği: Translog üretim fonksiyonu yaklaşımı

Year 2019, Issue: 54, 114 - 137, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.488045

Abstract

Geleneksel üretim
faktörlerinin yanı sıra üretim sürecinde en fazla ihtiyaç duyulan üretim
girdilerinden birisi de enerjidir. Özellikle geleneksel ya da birincil enerji
kaynaklarının üretim süreçlerinde kullanımı oldukça yoğundur. Bu çalışmanın
amacı, enerji tüketimini içeren Translog Üretim Fonksiyonu’nu Türkiye için
tahmin etmektir. Çalışmada 1982-2014 dönemine ait GSYH, emek, sermaye,
doğalgaz, petrol ve kömür verilerinden yararlanılmıştır. Söz konusu tahmin
Ridge Regresyon yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular,
girdiler arası ikame esnekliklerinin 1 düzeyinde dağıldığını göstermektedir.
Çıktı esneklikleri ise, ele alınan dönem boyunca pozitif seyir izlemiştir.  

References

  • AKTAŞ, Cengiz ve Veysel YILMAZ; (2008), “Türkiye’de Petrol Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15, ss. 45-55.
  • BROCKWAY, Paul, E.; Harry SAUNDERS; Matthew K. HEUN; Timothy J. FOXON; Julia K. STEINBERGER; John R. BARRETT and Steve SORRELL; (2017), “Energy Rebound as a Potential Threat to a Low-Carbon Future: Findings from a New Exergy-Based National-Level Rebound Approach”. Energies, 10(1), ss. 1-24.
  • CASSELS, John, M.; (1951), “On the Law of Variable Proportions”, İnternet Adresi: http://cas2.umkc.edu/ECON/economics/faculty/Lee/courses/502/reading/tp3.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 09.11.2018.
  • ÇERMİKLİ, A. Hakan ve İbrahim TOKATLIOĞLU; (2015), “Yüksek ve Orta Gelirli Ülkelerde Teknolojik Gelişmenin Enerji Yoğunluğu Üzerindeki Etkisi”, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(32), ss. 1-22.
  • CHRISTENSEN, Laurits, R.; Jorgenson W. DALE and Lau J. LAWRENCE; (1973), “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 55(1), pp. 28-45.
  • FANG, Yiping; (2011), “Economic Welfare Impacts from Renewable Energy Consumption: The China Experience”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), pp. 5120-5128.
  • FERGUSON, Carl, E.; (1971), The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • FRISCH, Ragnar: (1965), The Theory of Production, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
  • HEPEKTAN, Erdem ve Yasin SERTKAYA; (2016), “Türkiye’de Elektrik Tüketimi, Kişi Başına GSYİH, CO2 Emisyonu ve Petrol Tüketimi İlişkisi”, Yalova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(12), ss. 163-182.
  • HOCH, Irving; (1955), “Report of the Montreal Meeting, September 10-13, 1954”, Econometrica, 23(3), pp. 324-337.
  • HOERL, Arthur E. and Robert W. KENNARD; (1970), “Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems”, Technometrics, 12(1), pp. 55-67.
  • KOESLER, Simon and Michael SCHYMURA; (2012), “Substitution Elasticities in a CES Production Framework An Empirical Analysis on the Basis of Non-Linear Least Squares Estimation”, Centre for European Economic Research, 12-007, Internet Adress: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2014655, Date of Access: 25.11.2018.
  • LIN, Boqiang and Izhar AHMAD; (2016a), “Technical Change, Inter-Factor and Inter-Fuel Substitution Possibilities in Pakistan: A Trans-log Production Function Approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, pp. 537-549.
  • LIN, Boqiang and Izhar AHMAD; (2016b), “Energy Substitution Effect on Transport Sector of Pakistan Based on Trans-Log Production Function”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, pp. 1182-1193.
  • LIN, Boqiang and Philip ATSAGLI; (2017), “Inter-Fuel Substitution Possibilities in South Africa: A Translog Production Function Approach”, Energy, 121, pp. 822-831.
  • LIN, Boqiang; Philip ATSAGLI and Kingsley E. DOGAH; (2016), “Ghanaian Energy Economy: Inter-Production Factors and Energy Substitution”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, pp. 1260-1269.
  • LIN, Boqiang and Chunping XIE; (2014), “Energy Substitution Effect on Transport Industry of China-Based on Trans-log Production Function”, Energy, 67, pp. 213-222.
  • MARSCHAK, Jacop and William H. ANDREWS; (1944), “Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production”, Econometrica, 12(3/4), pp. 143-205.
  • MUNDLAK, Yair; (1961), “Empirical Production Function Free of Management Bias”, Journal of Farm Economics, 43(1), pp. 44-56.
  • ÖZATA, Erkan; (2010), “Türkiye’de Enerji Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkilerin Ekonometrik İncelemesi”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26, ss. 104-114.
  • PINDYCK, Robert S.; (1979), “Interfuel Substitution and the Industrial Demand for Energy: An International Comparison”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), pp. 169-179.
  • POLLAK, Robert A.; Robin C. SICKLES and Terence, J. WALES; (1984), “The CES-Translog: Specification and Estimation of a New Cost Function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(4), pp. 602-607.
  • SARI, Ramazan and Uğur SOYTAŞ; (2007), “The Growth of Income and Energy Consumption in Six Developing Countries”, Energy Policy, 35(2), pp. 889-898.
  • SHEN, Keting and John WHALLEY; (2013), “Capital-Labor-Energy Substitution in Nested CES Production Functions for China”, National Bureau of Economic Research w19104, Internet Adress: https://www.nber.org/papers/w19104, Date of Access: 25.11.2018.
  • SMYTH, Russell; Paresh Kumar NARAYAN and Hong Liang SHI; (2011), “Substitution Between Energy and Classical Factor Inputs in the Chinese Steel Sector”, Applied Energy, 88(1), pp. 361-367.
  • SONGUR, Mehmet; (2017), “Türkiye’de Beşeri Sermaye ve Fiziksel Sermaye Arasındaki İkame Olanakları: Translog Üretim Fonksiyonu Yaklaşımı”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 7(2), ss. 201-224.
  • SONGUR, Mehmet; (2018), “Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Faktörler Arası İkame Esneklik Katsayısı: Cobb-Douglas, CES ve VES Üretim Fonksiyonu Tahmini”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • SONGUR, Mehmet; Yusuf MURATOĞLU ve Devran ŞANLI; (2018), “Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyüme ile Enerji Tüketimi Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Frekans Alanı Yaklaşımı”, in Ayşe CEBECİ; Erika TORRES and H. Gülçin BEKEN (Ed.), Current Debates in Economics Volume 18, London: IJOPEC Publication Limited, ss. 207-222.
  • SOYTAŞ, Uğur and Ramazan SARI; (2007), “The Relationship Between Energy and Production: Evidence from Turkish Manufacturing Industry”, Energy Economics, 29(6), pp. 1151-1165.
  • WERF, Van der E.; (2008), “Production Functions for Climate Policy Modeling: An Empirical Analysis”, Energy Economics, 30(6), pp. 2964-2979.
  • WESSEH, Presley K. Jr.; Boqiang LIN and Michael Owusu APPIAH; (2013), “Delving into Liberia's Energy Economy: Technical Change, Inter-Factor and Inter-Fuel Substitution”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, pp. 122-130.
  • YAPRAKLI, Sevda ve Z. Çağlar YURTTANÇIKMAZ; (2012), “Elektrik Tüketimi ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensellik: Türkiye Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, CÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), ss. 195-215.
  • ZELLNER, Arnold, Jan KMENTA and Jacques DREZE; (1966), “Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models”, Econometrica, 34(4), pp. 784-795.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mehmet Songur 0000-0003-4763-9314

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Acceptance Date May 11, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Issue: 54

Cite

APA Songur, M. (2019). Türkiye’de emek, sermaye ve enerji arasındaki ikame esnekliği: Translog üretim fonksiyonu yaklaşımı. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(54), 114-137. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.488045

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.