Abstract
Evcil hayvan beslemek kimileri için hayatlarında oluşacak ekstra bir yük anlamı
taşımaktayken kimileri içinse tarif edilemeyecek kadar güzel bir eylem anlamı taşıyabilir. Evcil
hayvan besleyenlerin, hayvanlarına aile ferdi muamelesi gösterdikleri, hastalıkları veya kayıpları
halinde derin üzüntü yaşadıkları da hem çevremizden hem de bilimsel çalışmalardan edinilen
bilgilerdir. Bu kadar değer verilen savunmasız bir varlığı (aile ferdi) çalışmaya giderken evde
bırakmak şüphesiz ki sahipleniciler için endişe vericidir. Ancak işletmeler için de evcil hayvanlarla
birlikte çalışmak endişe verici gibi gözüküyor olabilir. Oysaki özellikle altın yakalı çalışanları olan bir
takım yabancı menşeili işletmelerin “evcil hayvanlarla çalışma” yöntemini uyguladıkları ve bu
uygulama ile iş stresini azalttıkları, işletmeye aidiyeti arttırdıkları, işletme içi iletişimin ve etkileşimin
olumlu yönde etkilendiği araştırmalarca desteklenmektedir. Bu işletme içi olumlu yansımalar insan
kaynakları yönetimi için uygulamaya geçme kararı açısından cazip gelebilir. Uygulamanın ülkemizde
vücut bulmamış olması, Türkçe literatürde dahi yalnızca hukuki açıdan ele alınmış olması bu alanda
çalışma yapılmasının başat sebebi olarak görülebilir
Keywords
References
- Barker, R., Knisely, J., Barker, S., Cobb, R. ve Schubert, C. (2012). Preliminary investigation of employee's dog presence on stress and organizational perceptions, International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 5(1), 15-30.
- Çetin, E., (2017). Tüketim toplumunda evcil hayvanların sahiplenilmesi: sosyolojik bir analiz, Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20/2, 89-107.
- Foreman, A., Glenn, M., Meade, J. ve Wirth, O. (2017). Dogs in the workplace: a review of the benefits and potential challenges, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1-21.
- Hall, S., Wright, H., McCune, H., Zulch, H. ve Mills, D. (2017). Perceptions of dogs in the workplace: the pros and the cons, Anthrozoos A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 30(2), 291-305.
- Karasu, S. ve Alkar, Ö. Y. (2020). Evcil hayvanını kaybeden bireylerin yaşadıkları yas süreci ile ilgili bir nitel araştırma, Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 91 (2), 86-97.
- Kaya, H. ve Bektaş, M. (2019). Çalışan bireylerin evcil hayvanlara bağlanma nedenlerine ilişkin nitel bir çalışma, Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, IX (2), 401-417.
- Kizziar, James H., Jr.; Dodds, Amber K. (2014). Notes on: making room for Fido at work: animals in the workplace as reasonable accommodations, Labor Law Journal, 65(4). Nellums, Y. C. (2017). Policies for pets in the workplace, LandrumHR, May, 20- 24.
- Wilkin, C. , Fairlie, P. ve Ezzedeen, S. (2016). Who let the dogs in? A look at petfriendly workplaces, International Journal Of Workplace Health Management, 9(1), 96-109.
- Yeşilkayalı, E. ve Ofluoğlu, A. (2018). Aile değerlendirmelerinde bir alt sistem olarak evcil hayvan: genel bir çerçeve, Turkish Studies Social Sciences,
- https://fortune.com/2016/03/08/here-are-the-12-most-pet-friendly-companies/ https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/evcil-hayvani-dogum-yapana-3-gun-dogumizni-40861893 13(26), 1203-1219.
Abstract
Feeding pets can mean an extra burden in their lives for some, while it can be an
undescribable action for others. It is also the information obtained from our environment and
scientific studies that pet feeders treat their animals as family members and experience deep sadness
in case of illness or loss. Leaving such a vulnerable asset (family member) at home on the way to
work is undoubtedly alarming for owners. However, it may seem alarming for businesses to work
with pets. However, it is supported by researches that a number of foreign firms with gold collar
employees apply the method of “working with pets”, and with this practice, they reduce work stress,
increase their belonging to the business, and affect the communication and interaction in the business
positively. These in-house positive reflections may be attractive for the decision to be implemented
for human resource management. The fact that the application did not take place in our country and
that it was only dealt with legally in Turkish literature can be seen as the main reason for working in
this field.
Keywords
References
- Barker, R., Knisely, J., Barker, S., Cobb, R. ve Schubert, C. (2012). Preliminary investigation of employee's dog presence on stress and organizational perceptions, International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 5(1), 15-30.
- Çetin, E., (2017). Tüketim toplumunda evcil hayvanların sahiplenilmesi: sosyolojik bir analiz, Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20/2, 89-107.
- Foreman, A., Glenn, M., Meade, J. ve Wirth, O. (2017). Dogs in the workplace: a review of the benefits and potential challenges, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1-21.
- Hall, S., Wright, H., McCune, H., Zulch, H. ve Mills, D. (2017). Perceptions of dogs in the workplace: the pros and the cons, Anthrozoos A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 30(2), 291-305.
- Karasu, S. ve Alkar, Ö. Y. (2020). Evcil hayvanını kaybeden bireylerin yaşadıkları yas süreci ile ilgili bir nitel araştırma, Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 91 (2), 86-97.
- Kaya, H. ve Bektaş, M. (2019). Çalışan bireylerin evcil hayvanlara bağlanma nedenlerine ilişkin nitel bir çalışma, Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, IX (2), 401-417.
- Kizziar, James H., Jr.; Dodds, Amber K. (2014). Notes on: making room for Fido at work: animals in the workplace as reasonable accommodations, Labor Law Journal, 65(4). Nellums, Y. C. (2017). Policies for pets in the workplace, LandrumHR, May, 20- 24.
- Wilkin, C. , Fairlie, P. ve Ezzedeen, S. (2016). Who let the dogs in? A look at petfriendly workplaces, International Journal Of Workplace Health Management, 9(1), 96-109.
- Yeşilkayalı, E. ve Ofluoğlu, A. (2018). Aile değerlendirmelerinde bir alt sistem olarak evcil hayvan: genel bir çerçeve, Turkish Studies Social Sciences,
- https://fortune.com/2016/03/08/here-are-the-12-most-pet-friendly-companies/ https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/evcil-hayvani-dogum-yapana-3-gun-dogumizni-40861893 13(26), 1203-1219.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 25, 2020 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2020 Issue: 1 - 19th International Business Congress Special Issue |
Cited By
CHILDREN'S RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC SPACES FOR REINFORCING DEMOCRACY: EVALUATIONS ON THE CASE OF TURKIYE
Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.15182/diclesosbed.1496172
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.