BibTex RIS Cite

“TAKIM KARİYER MODELİ” İLE PROJE TAKIMLARINDA KARİYER GELİŞTİRME

Year 2005, Issue: 25, 1 - 18, 01.02.2005

Dr. Adnan Akın

Abstract

Projeyi gerçekleştirmek için biraraya gelerek takım oluşturan bireylerden her biri, kariyerlerini geliştirmek için bir dizi çaba içine girmektedirler. Bu amaca yönelik olarak geliştirilmiş yeni bir kariyer geliştirme yöntemi olan takım kariyer modeli, hem takım genelinin hem de üyelerin bir proje çalışması sürecinde mesleki yönden gelişmesini hedeflemektedir. Böylece, hem birey hem de takım boyutlu olmak üzere iki düzeyde kariyer hedeflerine varılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu makalede, takım kariyer modeli ile; genel olarak proje takımının, özel olarak ise üyelerin kariyer geliştirilmesi süreci ele alınmaktadır

Keywords

Anahtar Kavramlar: Kariyer geliştirme takım kariyer modeli

References

  • APPLEBAUM E. and R. BATT (1994), The New American Worklace: Transforming, Work In The U.S, ILR Pres, New York.
  • ATAOL, A. (1989 ), Kariyer Yönetimi, İzmir.
  • BACDAYAN, P. (2001), “Quality Improvement Teams That Stall Due to PoorProject Selection: An Exploration of Contributing Factors”, Total Quality Management, 12(5), pp. 578-586.
  • BARUCH, Y. and M. PEIPERL (1997), “Back to Square Zero: Post-Corporate Career”, Organizational Dynamics, 25(4), pp. 7-15.
  • BEER, S. (1995), Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrty, John- Wiley, Sons, Chichster.
  • BHASIN, R. (2000), Project Management, Pulp and Paper, San Francisco.
  • BIRD, A. (1994), “Careers as Repositories of Knowledge: A New Perspective on Boundaryless Careers”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, pp.331- 343.
  • BOWERS J. C., S. TANNENBAUM, E. SALAS, and C. VOLPE. “Defining Competencies and Establishing Team Training Requırement”, in R. Gumo., E. Salas (Ed.), Team Effectivenesss, and Decision-Making, In Organizations, San Fransisco, Jossey-Bass Publ., 1995, pp:259-265..
  • BUCHOLZ S. and T. ROTH (1997), Creating High–Performance Team, John Wiley-Sons Inc. New York.
  • CAN, H. (1997), Yönetim ve Organizasyon, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • CARSON, K., D. PAULA and P.CARSON (1997), “Career Entrencment: A Quiet March Toward Occupational Death”, The Academy of Management, 11(1), p.68-78.
  • CIANNI, M. and D. WNUCK (1997), “Individual Growth and Team Enhancement: Moving Toward A New Model of Career Develepment”, The Academy of Management, 11(1), pp. 98-110.
  • DESSLER, G.(1997), Human Resources Management, Prentice Hall, New York.
  • DRUCKER, P. F. (1992), Yeni Gerçekler (Çev. Birtane Karanakçı), T.İ.B Kültür Yay., İstanbul.
  • ERDOĞMUŞ, N. (2002), “Yeni Kariyer Yaklaşımları ve Kariyer Değerlerindeki Değişim”, I. Ulusal Bilgi Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, 10-11 Mayıs, Kocaeli, 520s.
  • EUGENE, F. (1999), “Today’s Mercurial Career Path”, Management Review, 83(11), pp. 11-18.
  • GIBSON, J.C, J. IVANCEWICH and DONNELY, J.H. (1985), Organizational Behavior Structure Process, Business Publ, Texas.
  • GOODMAN, S., P. LEWIS and P.M. FANDTH (1997), Management, West- Publ., New York.
  • GUTTERIDGE T. G. and R. G. HUTCHESON (1984), The Handbook of Human Resource Development, Career Development. In L. Nadler, (Ed.), John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 30, pp. 1-22.
  • HAMILTON, W.L. and J.R. BELL (1990), Organization Development, Prentice- Hall, New Jersey.
  • HELLRİEGEL, D., J. SLOCUM and R. WOODMAN (1998), Organizational Behavior, West Publ., Newyork.
  • HALL, DOUGLAS and JONATHAN E. MOSS (1998), “The New Protean Career Contract: Helping Organizations and Employees Adapt”, Organizational Dynamics, 26(3), pp. 41-59.
  • HALL, DOUGLAS T. and P. H. MIRVIS (1996), The New Protean Career, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • HOEGL, M. and P.LUIGI (2000), “Team Member Proximity and Teamwor in Innovative Project”, İnternet adresi: http://www.sciencedirect.com /science_ob=ArticleURL&_aset.Pdf, Erişim Tarihi:21.02.2004.
  • HOLLAND, J.L. (1985), Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Personality and Work Environment, Prentice-Hall, New York.
  • HOLLENBECK, N. and G. WRIGHT (1997), Human Resource Management, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
  • İNCELER, H. (1996), “Proje Yönetiminde Liderlik ve Takım Çalışması”, Byte, ss.3-9.
  • INKERI, R. and M. VARTIAINEN (2005), “Charateristics of Knowledge Sharing Communities in Project Organizations”, International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), pp. 367-379.
  • KILINÇ, T. ve AKKAVUK, E. (2001), “Takım Performansının Ölçümüne Metodolojik Bir Yaklaşım”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, ss.103-120.
  • KOÇEL, T. (2001), İşletme Yöneticiliği, 8. Basım, Beta Yay., İstanbul.
  • KUTLU, M. (2002), “Toplam Performans Yönetimi”, Anahtar, Şubat, Ankara.
  • LEE, D. R. and P. J SWENEY (2001), “An Assessment of Influence Tactic Used
  • by Project Managers”, Engineering Management Journal,13(2), pp.13- 23.
  • MANNIX, E. and KAREN A. J. (2003), “Let’s Norm and Storm, But Not Right Now: Integratıng Models Group Development and Performance”, Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 6, pp. 26-38.
  • MINER S. and D. F. ROBINSON (1994), “Organizational and Population Level Learning as Engines for Career Transitions”, Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 15, pp. 352-364.
  • MUKHOPADHYAY, T., S. RAJIV and K. SRIVASAN (1997), “Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Qality”, Management Science, 13(12), pp.1637-1656.
  • ÖZDEN, M. C. (2004), Firmalarda Kariyer Planlama, İnternet Adresi: http://www. mcozden.com/ikf_sc5_fkp.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2004.
  • PEIPERL, M. and Y. BARUCH (1997), “Back to Square Zero. The Post-Corporate Career”, American Management Assocation, pp.7-22.
  • PETERS, T. (1997), The Circle of Innovation, Knoft, New York.
  • ROBBINS, S. (1997), Managing Today, Prentice Hall, New York.
  • ROBERTS, L. E. (2003), Working Together, Project Management Journal, 34(3), pp. 49-57.
  • SALAS, E. and GUZZO, R.A. (1995), Team Effectiveness and Decision-Making in Organizations, Jossey-Bass Publ, San Fransisco.
  • SENSE, A. J. (2003), Learning Generators: Project Teams Re-conceptualized, Project Management Journal, 34(3), pp. 3-15.
  • SCHULER, R. (1995), Managing Human Resources, West Publ., St.Paul.
  • SENGE, P. and F. KOFMAN, (1993), “The Heart of Learning Organization”, Organizatinal Dynamics, Fall, pp. 276-289.
  • SUSMAN, I.G. and M. R. JUDITH (1999), Test of A Model Organizational Contributors to Product Development Team Affectiveness, İnternetAdresi: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science_ob=ArticleURL&_aset.pdf, Erişim Tarihi:15.10.2003.
  • TAMBE, M., A. JAFAR, Y. AL-ONAİZAN, A. ERDEM, K.GALA., C. M. STACY and M. ION (1999), Building Agent Teams Using An Explicit Teamwork Model and Learning, Artificial Intelligence, 110(2), pp.215- 239.
  • TRANFIELD, D., S. STUART, F. MORRIS, W. SARAH and P. IVOR (2000), “Strategies for Managing The Teamworking Agenda: Developing a Methodology for Team Based Organisation”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science_ob=ArticleURL&_aset.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 21.05.2003.
  • UZUN,T. (2000), “İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi'nde Etkin Bir Yöntem: Kariyer Planlaması”, /arc_view.php?ex=149&hit =ny Erişim Tarihi: 13.03.2005.
  • WALKER, J. (1992), Human Resource Strategy, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
  • ZIGON, J. (1999) How To Measure Team Performance, Media, Philadelphia.

Year 2005, Issue: 25, 1 - 18, 01.02.2005

Dr. Adnan Akın

Abstract

References

  • APPLEBAUM E. and R. BATT (1994), The New American Worklace: Transforming, Work In The U.S, ILR Pres, New York.
  • ATAOL, A. (1989 ), Kariyer Yönetimi, İzmir.
  • BACDAYAN, P. (2001), “Quality Improvement Teams That Stall Due to PoorProject Selection: An Exploration of Contributing Factors”, Total Quality Management, 12(5), pp. 578-586.
  • BARUCH, Y. and M. PEIPERL (1997), “Back to Square Zero: Post-Corporate Career”, Organizational Dynamics, 25(4), pp. 7-15.
  • BEER, S. (1995), Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrty, John- Wiley, Sons, Chichster.
  • BHASIN, R. (2000), Project Management, Pulp and Paper, San Francisco.
  • BIRD, A. (1994), “Careers as Repositories of Knowledge: A New Perspective on Boundaryless Careers”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, pp.331- 343.
  • BOWERS J. C., S. TANNENBAUM, E. SALAS, and C. VOLPE. “Defining Competencies and Establishing Team Training Requırement”, in R. Gumo., E. Salas (Ed.), Team Effectivenesss, and Decision-Making, In Organizations, San Fransisco, Jossey-Bass Publ., 1995, pp:259-265..
  • BUCHOLZ S. and T. ROTH (1997), Creating High–Performance Team, John Wiley-Sons Inc. New York.
  • CAN, H. (1997), Yönetim ve Organizasyon, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • CARSON, K., D. PAULA and P.CARSON (1997), “Career Entrencment: A Quiet March Toward Occupational Death”, The Academy of Management, 11(1), p.68-78.
  • CIANNI, M. and D. WNUCK (1997), “Individual Growth and Team Enhancement: Moving Toward A New Model of Career Develepment”, The Academy of Management, 11(1), pp. 98-110.
  • DESSLER, G.(1997), Human Resources Management, Prentice Hall, New York.
  • DRUCKER, P. F. (1992), Yeni Gerçekler (Çev. Birtane Karanakçı), T.İ.B Kültür Yay., İstanbul.
  • ERDOĞMUŞ, N. (2002), “Yeni Kariyer Yaklaşımları ve Kariyer Değerlerindeki Değişim”, I. Ulusal Bilgi Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, 10-11 Mayıs, Kocaeli, 520s.
  • EUGENE, F. (1999), “Today’s Mercurial Career Path”, Management Review, 83(11), pp. 11-18.
  • GIBSON, J.C, J. IVANCEWICH and DONNELY, J.H. (1985), Organizational Behavior Structure Process, Business Publ, Texas.
  • GOODMAN, S., P. LEWIS and P.M. FANDTH (1997), Management, West- Publ., New York.
  • GUTTERIDGE T. G. and R. G. HUTCHESON (1984), The Handbook of Human Resource Development, Career Development. In L. Nadler, (Ed.), John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 30, pp. 1-22.
  • HAMILTON, W.L. and J.R. BELL (1990), Organization Development, Prentice- Hall, New Jersey.
  • HELLRİEGEL, D., J. SLOCUM and R. WOODMAN (1998), Organizational Behavior, West Publ., Newyork.
  • HALL, DOUGLAS and JONATHAN E. MOSS (1998), “The New Protean Career Contract: Helping Organizations and Employees Adapt”, Organizational Dynamics, 26(3), pp. 41-59.
  • HALL, DOUGLAS T. and P. H. MIRVIS (1996), The New Protean Career, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • HOEGL, M. and P.LUIGI (2000), “Team Member Proximity and Teamwor in Innovative Project”, İnternet adresi: http://www.sciencedirect.com /science_ob=ArticleURL&_aset.Pdf, Erişim Tarihi:21.02.2004.
  • HOLLAND, J.L. (1985), Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Personality and Work Environment, Prentice-Hall, New York.
  • HOLLENBECK, N. and G. WRIGHT (1997), Human Resource Management, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
  • İNCELER, H. (1996), “Proje Yönetiminde Liderlik ve Takım Çalışması”, Byte, ss.3-9.
  • INKERI, R. and M. VARTIAINEN (2005), “Charateristics of Knowledge Sharing Communities in Project Organizations”, International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), pp. 367-379.
  • KILINÇ, T. ve AKKAVUK, E. (2001), “Takım Performansının Ölçümüne Metodolojik Bir Yaklaşım”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, ss.103-120.
  • KOÇEL, T. (2001), İşletme Yöneticiliği, 8. Basım, Beta Yay., İstanbul.
  • KUTLU, M. (2002), “Toplam Performans Yönetimi”, Anahtar, Şubat, Ankara.
  • LEE, D. R. and P. J SWENEY (2001), “An Assessment of Influence Tactic Used
  • by Project Managers”, Engineering Management Journal,13(2), pp.13- 23.
  • MANNIX, E. and KAREN A. J. (2003), “Let’s Norm and Storm, But Not Right Now: Integratıng Models Group Development and Performance”, Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 6, pp. 26-38.
  • MINER S. and D. F. ROBINSON (1994), “Organizational and Population Level Learning as Engines for Career Transitions”, Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 15, pp. 352-364.
  • MUKHOPADHYAY, T., S. RAJIV and K. SRIVASAN (1997), “Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Qality”, Management Science, 13(12), pp.1637-1656.
  • ÖZDEN, M. C. (2004), Firmalarda Kariyer Planlama, İnternet Adresi: http://www. mcozden.com/ikf_sc5_fkp.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2004.
  • PEIPERL, M. and Y. BARUCH (1997), “Back to Square Zero. The Post-Corporate Career”, American Management Assocation, pp.7-22.
  • PETERS, T. (1997), The Circle of Innovation, Knoft, New York.
  • ROBBINS, S. (1997), Managing Today, Prentice Hall, New York.
  • ROBERTS, L. E. (2003), Working Together, Project Management Journal, 34(3), pp. 49-57.
  • SALAS, E. and GUZZO, R.A. (1995), Team Effectiveness and Decision-Making in Organizations, Jossey-Bass Publ, San Fransisco.
  • SENSE, A. J. (2003), Learning Generators: Project Teams Re-conceptualized, Project Management Journal, 34(3), pp. 3-15.
  • SCHULER, R. (1995), Managing Human Resources, West Publ., St.Paul.
  • SENGE, P. and F. KOFMAN, (1993), “The Heart of Learning Organization”, Organizatinal Dynamics, Fall, pp. 276-289.
  • SUSMAN, I.G. and M. R. JUDITH (1999), Test of A Model Organizational Contributors to Product Development Team Affectiveness, İnternetAdresi: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science_ob=ArticleURL&_aset.pdf, Erişim Tarihi:15.10.2003.
  • TAMBE, M., A. JAFAR, Y. AL-ONAİZAN, A. ERDEM, K.GALA., C. M. STACY and M. ION (1999), Building Agent Teams Using An Explicit Teamwork Model and Learning, Artificial Intelligence, 110(2), pp.215- 239.
  • TRANFIELD, D., S. STUART, F. MORRIS, W. SARAH and P. IVOR (2000), “Strategies for Managing The Teamworking Agenda: Developing a Methodology for Team Based Organisation”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science_ob=ArticleURL&_aset.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 21.05.2003.
  • UZUN,T. (2000), “İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi'nde Etkin Bir Yöntem: Kariyer Planlaması”, /arc_view.php?ex=149&hit =ny Erişim Tarihi: 13.03.2005.
  • WALKER, J. (1992), Human Resource Strategy, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
  • ZIGON, J. (1999) How To Measure Team Performance, Media, Philadelphia.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Dr. Adnan Akın This is me

Publication Date February 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005 Issue: 25

Cite

APA Akın, D. . A. (2005). “TAKIM KARİYER MODELİ” İLE PROJE TAKIMLARINDA KARİYER GELİŞTİRME. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(25), 1-18.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.